=== medberry is now known as med_out [02:06] I'm working on cleaning up the lintian warnings here http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/mythbuntu-bare-1107192257/lintian what is a good way to resolve no-complete-debconf-translation? [02:06] It seems that if nobody translates my software, that I won't ever be able to get rid of this warning === jmarsden_ is now known as jmarsden [06:47] good morning === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === hannesw_ is now known as hannesw [11:50] hello. I'd come a few days ago regarding the packaging of open teacher(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/682852). As said here, I mailed Debian(debian edu to precise) about 5 days ago and nobody have responded to it at all. [11:50] Ubuntu bug 682852 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] OpenTeacher" [Wishlist,In progress] [11:54] should I continue asking debian if they'll upload the package? I do not mind doing so-I've to keep dropping into the IRC channel every now and then. but after no reply for 5 days, I wonder if they'll reply. [11:59] dnivra: can you summarise the discussion to date in a mail to debian-derivatives@lists.debian.org (cc-ed to debian-edu too)? [11:59] I or someone else will try to help you there [12:00] Laney: will do. [12:00] thanks [12:07] Laney: should I mention the Ubuntu bug? and should I mentioned you asked me to email the list? [12:08] dnivra: you can do if you like. I imagine it's something that both debian-edu and edubuntu would benefit from. [12:12] highvoltage: ^^^ maybe you want to do an initial packaging review? :-) [12:48] * highvoltage catches up [12:52] just because I saw you filed the bug [12:54] dnivra: debian-edu is also a small team so it's possible that they could have just missed it [12:55] dnivra: I could do an initial review if you like, I'm not a DD but I'm good at spotting common problems, if the package is in good shape then you could get any debian developer to sponsor it, we have a few hanging out here :) [12:56] I was hoping that posting to -derivatives would make -edu wake up, but failing that anyone else can sponsor indeed [12:58] Laney: highvoltage I just found that open teacher has released a new version and I've a packaging of an older version. so I'll have to do the packaging again. [12:58] should I do the packaging before posting to -derivatives? i still haven't posted yet. [12:59] most of the stuff should carry over (depends on what exactly has changed) — use uupdate to move to the new release [12:59] it might be best to get it as current as you can and then post to mentors [12:59] I guess using the debian-mentors list might be a better idea, having the package ready first... yeah what Laney said :) [12:59] s/post/upload/ [13:00] then you can mail derivatives and edu and get highvoltage to review! [13:00] such fun [13:02] Laney: i'll update to the current ASAP. and about -mentors mailing list, i'd initially posted to them and they asked me to ask debian-edu to sponsor. [13:02] more focused lists make sense, indeed [13:05] and they weren't very enthusiastic of the name [13:05] debian-edu that is [13:08] i'm sure that can be worked around [13:08] -derivatives can help you here [13:10] oh that's great! I'll get the updated packaging into debian mentors asap [15:07] dupondje: hi, I've got a task for you if you choose to accept it :), it would be nice to go through the bugs tagged upgrade-software-version and request syncs/do merges for stuff that's in Debian already before Feature Freeze (Aug 11) [16:27] micahg: I can search that tag on launchpad ? [16:28] dupondje: yep [16:28] will do that next :) [16:29] going trough all the ftbfs now [16:29] and syncing those that have newer version in debian with fix [16:31] dupondje: thanks, BTW, we can fix FTBFS after Feature Freeze (new upstream still needs FFe in most cases, but it's easier to get for a reason like FTBFS fix, disclaimer: IANA release team member) [16:36] somebody around with an armel builder ? :) [16:41] Btw [16:41] what can we do with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mlton/20100608-4 [16:41] ? [16:41] armel build waits for mlton ... === med_out is now known as med === med is now known as medberry [16:43] dupondje: it needs to be bootstrapped by an AA I think [16:44] what's the current stance on FFes for universe? it seemed like we were sort of dropping them when motu-release went away [16:44] (since presumably ubuntu-release has better things to do than review a bunch of unseeded packages) [16:44] broder: tumbleweed and Laney are now on the release team to help with that :) [16:45] ah, cool === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [19:42] Could somebody check https://launchpadlibrarian.net/75520549/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.openmpi_1.4.3-2.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ? [21:00] broder: no, no dropping === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:23] micahg: searching on launchpad for upgrade-software-version seems to give timeout [21:28] ok worked now [21:29] micahg: first example. Package got removed in Ubuntu/Debian. Bug is a upgrade request from 2007. Put as Invalid ? or ? [21:32] dupondje: Sounds reasonable. [21:33] To bad I don't seem to have permissions to set it Invalid ... heh [21:33] maybe with an explanation of why it was removed, if that's still around [21:35] ------------------- Reason ------------------- [21:35] RoDPMT; replaced by plone4 (soon to come); RC buggy [21:35] ---------------------------------------------- [21:35] and its still not there :p [21:36] yeah, there were reasons for removing much of that :) [21:37] it tended to need a version of python that was years out of date [21:37] yep just saw that also indeed [21:37] 2.4 :p [21:37] you found http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564956 ? [21:37] Debian bug 564956 in ftp.debian.org "RM: plone3 -- RoDPMT; replaced by plone4 (soon to come); RC buggy" [Normal,Open] [21:38] y [21:47] Sometimes you would like to be able to upgrade a debian package :p [21:47] dupondje: debian's easy to play with, file a bug where it'll get seen [21:48] oh jeez, that bug is fine [21:48] might want to poke it or mail the debian ftp-team :) [21:48] paultag: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621486 [21:48] Debian bug 621486 in gearmand "gearmand: new upstream version available" [Normal,Open] [21:48] seems like that doesn't work :p [21:49] dupondje: attach a patch with it [21:49] dupondje: then email the maint, and if you really would like it, prepare a NMU [21:50] dupondje: but it looks like security issues are present, so QA might help you fast track that and do a QA upload [21:51] dupondje: if there are CVEs file them important against it and you can go from there. If not, just report the exploit and how to dupe it, and why it's of a high severity :) [21:53] heh ok :) [21:53] i'll get that fixed [21:53] tomorrow ... :D [21:53] nite [21:58] dupondje: night :) === kentb is now known as kentb-out [22:12] why is so much arch dependent :( [22:12] just plugged in my netbook and get 80% cache misses as my main desktop is a different arch :(( [22:12] (while updating) [22:13] does anyone know when debdelta is goind to be usable? [22:13] should be this cycle? [22:15] jtaylor: i haven't heard any motion on it since uds, so i'm guessing probably not at this point [22:16] huh, i'm apparently wrong, actually [22:16] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-o-debdelta === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna [22:29] hey it even works in natty, but not very good ^^ [22:29] each call loads a single delta [23:52] dupondje: yeah, that query is timeout prone ATM, in the example you gave, you can explain that there's a new version in the form of a new library