| elky | <an8yearoldvagyna> neight <-- no no nono nonono no no no no no no. | 00:31 |
|---|---|---|
| h00k | I didn't sound that one out. | 00:31 |
| h00k | >.< | 00:31 |
| h00k | does that first part stay consistent? (the web gateway) | 00:33 |
| elky | yes | 00:33 |
| elky | that's the hash | 00:33 |
| h00k | okay, just making sure, I forget that part. | 00:34 |
| elky | * an8yearoldvagyna is now known as MiraclePenys <-- noted in #freenode | 00:36 |
| IdleOne | banned from #u | 00:37 |
| Jordan_U | Is Benkinooby (currently in #ubuntu) the same user as Benk_ (the user who was removed from #ubuntu for giving a mallicious command)? The nick is similar and Benkinooby said "lol" after Benk_'s removal. | 00:39 |
| IdleOne | Jordan_U: would need to check with staff to see if they are ban evading with that cloak | 00:42 |
| Jordan_U | IdleOne: There is no ban that I know of, and Benkinooby was in the channel before Benk_ was removed. | 00:44 |
| Jordan_U | No ban yet at least, I was planning to add a ban forward for the malicious command incident. | 00:44 |
| IdleOne | might be the same user and hopefully the removal knocked some sense into them | 00:45 |
| Jordan_U | The "lol" suggests otherwise :( | 00:45 |
| Jordan_U | I guess there isn't much to do about it at the moment though. | 00:45 |
| === h00k is now known as riotkittie | ||
| === riotkittie is now known as h00k | ||
| === h00k is now known as rww | ||
| === rww is now known as Guest47159 | ||
| === Guest47159 is now known as h00k | ||
| Tm_T | morning | 05:02 |
| === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang | ||
| Myrtti | what is KM0201 doing? | 06:34 |
| bazhang | PM helping jen? | 06:34 |
| vibhav | Am I unabnned | 10:27 |
| Tm_T | no, you're not | 10:28 |
| Tm_T | 1824.42 <+ikonia> vibhav: could you please leave this channel, and come back no sooner than 2 weeks | 10:28 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: I would kindly ask you to follow the request ikonia made yesterday | 10:29 |
| vibhav | Why? | 10:35 |
| vibhav | ikonia abuses his op powers | 10:35 |
| ikonia | not this again | 10:36 |
| vibhav | He does | 10:36 |
| ikonia | vibhav: you are currently ban evading in #ubuntu | 10:36 |
| ikonia | I've removed you | 10:36 |
| vibhav | Ok | 10:36 |
| vibhav | I was not ban evading | 10:36 |
| ikonia | vibhav: do you know you are banned in #ubuntu yes/no | 10:37 |
| ikonia | vibhav: I explained in detail the reason you where banned yesterday | 10:37 |
| vibhav | Yes | 10:37 |
| ikonia | so why did you join #ubuntu | 10:37 |
| vibhav | The reason was not approriate | 10:37 |
| vibhav | Xchat automatically joins #ubuntu | 10:37 |
| ikonia | vibhav: right, so you are ban evading, I'm informing you I've removed you | 10:37 |
| vibhav | Mute me | 10:37 |
| vibhav | so you are ban evading is a wrong sentence | 10:38 |
| ikonia | no, I've removed you as you are ban evading | 10:38 |
| ikonia | vibhav: either way, we'll discuss the ban in 2 weeks as I said yesterday | 10:38 |
| vibhav | Why | 10:38 |
| vibhav | ikonia make this clear - I read that complete guide and gave it to him | 10:38 |
| ikonia | for the reasons I explained yesterday which I don't want to re-cover pointlessly again | 10:39 |
| vibhav | Its not important for me to Use that guide | 10:39 |
| ikonia | it was important for you to have read it and understood it before giving it to people | 10:40 |
| ikonia | you'd been warned and banned for this behaviour before, you did it again, you got re-banned, it's that simple | 10:40 |
| ikonia | I'm not going to discuss it further | 10:40 |
| vibhav | I understood and read it | 10:40 |
| vibhav | Why | 10:40 |
| vibhav | just because you are Losing the argument? | 10:40 |
| vibhav | There is nothing Simple in it | 10:40 |
| ikonia | vibhav: 1.) I asked you clearly "have you read this guide" | 10:40 |
| ikonia | vibhav: you said "no" | 10:41 |
| ikonia | vibhav: I banned you | 10:41 |
| ikonia | vibhav: you then said "oh, I have read it" | 10:41 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: this argumentation has been done before, there is no reason to do it again | 10:41 |
| ikonia | vibhav: it's clearly obviously you had not read the guide as it was full of dead URLs and missing information | 10:41 |
| vibhav | YOU ASKED ME , THAT , HAVE YOU USED THIS GUIDE? | 10:41 |
| ikonia | vibhav: you had clearly not read the guide | 10:41 |
| vibhav | I had | 10:41 |
| ikonia | vibhav: typing it caps won't help | 10:41 |
| vibhav | i KNOW | 10:41 |
| vibhav | ikonia , You are not fit to be an op | 10:41 |
| ikonia | then don't do it | 10:42 |
| ikonia | vibhav: one of my responsabilities it to make sure the users of the channel do not get bad advice | 10:42 |
| Tm_T | !appeal > vibhav | 10:42 |
| ubottu | vibhav, please see my private message | 10:42 |
| ikonia | vibhav: you are providing bad advice on a regular basis | 10:42 |
| ikonia | vibhav: hence why this loop has re-occured | 10:42 |
| vibhav | That was not bad ! | 10:42 |
| ikonia | vibhav: it was | 10:42 |
| vibhav | Do you know what is bad advice | 10:42 |
| ikonia | vibhav: it had incorrect information in it, and when I asked you about it, you had no idea of what it actually did | 10:42 |
| vibhav | thanks Tm_T | 10:43 |
| ikonia | vibhav: that means you're pushing advice which you don't know what it does to fix something | 10:43 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: for the record, I agree ikonia on this | 10:43 |
| vibhav | Why? | 10:43 |
| Tm_T | the very same argumentation ikonia has used | 10:43 |
| Tm_T | and I repeat: this argumentation has been done before, there is no reason to do it again | 10:43 |
| vibhav | "Mistakes can be made by both sides" | 10:43 |
| Tm_T | it won't lead to anywhere | 10:43 |
| vibhav | this was yours | 10:44 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: yes | 10:44 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: but there's two options on proceeding on this, being not exclucive on each other | 10:44 |
| vibhav | ikonia only knows how o critisize others | 10:45 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: please stop now | 10:45 |
| vibhav | criticize | 10:45 |
| vibhav | Why Stop | 10:45 |
| vibhav | Cant I defend for myself? | 10:45 |
| ikonia | vibhav: not at all, I often make mistakes and I'm corrected by others, | 10:45 |
| ikonia | vibhav: I also support other people, that's not critising them, | 10:46 |
| Tm_T | 1) you wait 2 weeks before re-entering this channel and try discuss matter then. 2) you proceed on the steps described in appeal process | 10:46 |
| vibhav | No you do not | 10:46 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: stop, this is not useful, this is not defending yourself, this is only wasting time | 10:46 |
| vibhav | No this is not | 10:46 |
| vibhav | Ops think too much of themselves | 10:47 |
| ikonia | I'll back out at this time and make sure the logs / comments are up to date | 10:47 |
| Tm_T | vibhav: then proceed on appeal process, no amount of discussion here now will change this | 10:47 |
| vibhav | Make this clear - I was not giving bad advice , I was offering suggestion | 10:47 |
| Tm_T | if he returns before two weeks, I will not give him time to try relaunching the conversation | 10:48 |
| ikonia | I only said two weeks in the hope that he may consider what he does this time | 10:49 |
| ikonia | keep unbanning him he just carrys on, if it's set a little longer, hey may consider it | 10:49 |
| Tm_T | indeed | 10:49 |
| Myrtti | might want to do an ip host ban? | 10:52 |
| Myrtti | since his client identifies after joining the channels | 10:52 |
| ikonia | I'm just looking at what happened with the cloak ban | 10:52 |
| Myrtti | his ident seems stable enough | 10:52 |
| Myrtti | nothing happened with it | 10:52 |
| ikonia | I saw him join as cloaked, | 10:53 |
| Myrtti | it just didn't kick in early enough | 10:53 |
| Myrtti | I didn't | 10:53 |
| ikonia | 11:27 -!- vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu | 10:53 |
| Myrtti | [13:27] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@59.94.134.131] has joined #ubuntu | 10:53 |
| Myrtti | [13:27] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu | 10:53 |
| ikonia | ahhh | 10:54 |
| ikonia | the "has joined" bit is a bit confusing | 10:54 |
| Myrtti | same thing happened yesterday before the ban | 10:55 |
| Myrtti | [18:07] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@59.94.136.19] has joined #ubuntu | 10:55 |
| Myrtti | [18:07] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu | 10:55 |
| Tm_T | "it's not ban evasion, it's autojoin" is explanation I cant take once, but not twice | 10:58 |
| Tm_T | and if people knows they're banned, and they leave channel rightaway after noticing they have joined a channel they shouldn't, I have no problem | 10:59 |
| ubottu | szal called the ops in #ubuntu () | 11:17 |
| ikonia | that one again | 11:17 |
| bazhang | yikes | 11:18 |
| bazhang | termaster is lars torben? | 11:22 |
| ikonia | I did wonder that | 11:23 |
| bazhang | yeppers | 11:23 |
| ikonia | are you certain ? | 11:23 |
| bazhang | the false PM accusations | 11:23 |
| ikonia | well, yes | 11:23 |
| bazhang | szal is honest, he is not | 11:23 |
| ikonia | and the isp | 11:23 |
| bazhang | true | 11:23 |
| bazhang | safe to unban the gateway I set ? the floodbot banned, and the user was klined (ie goodpoot) | 11:24 |
| ikonia | yup | 11:24 |
| bazhang | thanks | 11:24 |
| Termaster | why leave ? | 11:26 |
| Termaster | why banned ? ikonia | 11:26 |
| ikonia | Termaster: did I, or did I not warn you to drop the topic 2 times ? | 11:27 |
| Termaster | yes so i said, HE should stop that | 11:27 |
| Termaster | and he went on | 11:27 |
| ikonia | Termaster: he has not mentioned the pm after I aske dyou to stop it | 11:27 |
| ikonia | you continued | 11:27 |
| Termaster | no he wrote: | 11:27 |
| Termaster | "!ubuntu-es" | 11:27 |
| ikonia | that is nothing to do with a pm | 11:27 |
| ikonia | that is advising a user to join the channel #ubuntu-es | 11:27 |
| Termaster | yes but NOBODY speak espagne | 11:28 |
| Termaster | at that time | 11:28 |
| Termaster | or spanish or what | 11:28 |
| ikonia | 12:23 < Zankajo> #ubuntu-es | 11:28 |
| ikonia | he was trying to join the channel | 11:28 |
| ikonia | sazl explained how to join #ubuntu-es | 11:28 |
| Termaster | yes and that do not belong into the channel | 11:28 |
| ikonia | yes it did | 11:28 |
| Termaster | but it is a ubuntu channel | 11:28 |
| ikonia | Termaster: look - enough now | 11:28 |
| Termaster | and why is he allowed to tell lies ? | 11:29 |
| ikonia | he's not | 11:29 |
| Termaster | he said, i pmed him and faked it | 11:29 |
| ikonia | Termaster: if he did or not is hard to work out, hence why you where asked, and then told to drop the topic as no harm was done | 11:29 |
| ikonia | you've persisted in trying to pick a fight with him, you're banned | 11:29 |
| Termaster | i do not like it to tell lies | 11:30 |
| ikonia | ok, that's great | 11:30 |
| Termaster | and i think that is in the law punishable | 11:30 |
| ikonia | but it doesn't change what I've just said | 11:30 |
| ikonia | I'm not going through this time wasting process with you | 11:30 |
| Termaster | okay but why have you to ban me ? | 11:30 |
| Termaster | you can kick me and give me a second chance | 11:30 |
| bazhang | Termaster, he just told you. | 11:30 |
| ikonia | Termaster: because I told you 2 times (they where your chances) to drop it, you kept going, you got banned | 11:31 |
| Termaster | yes the second time were the kickn | 11:31 |
| Termaster | i think this channel very often bann | 11:31 |
| ikonia | that has no bearing on your situation | 11:31 |
| Termaster | okay and how long banned ? | 11:31 |
| Termaster | he provocated it | 11:32 |
| ikonia | Termaster: no - YOU did | 11:32 |
| Termaster | no | 11:32 |
| Termaster | i behaved good first | 11:32 |
| ikonia | you caused the problem, so you are banned | 11:32 |
| ikonia | come back in a weeks time | 11:32 |
| Termaster | no i saved the long and i will write to ubuntu team | 11:33 |
| ikonia | ok | 11:33 |
| Termaster | and to freenode to, i know the server owner | 11:33 |
| Tm_Tr | there's no excuse for bad behaviour | 11:33 |
| ikonia | in the mean time you will remain banned for a week at least | 11:33 |
| ikonia | Termaster: ok, please write your letter, in the mean time please leave this hcannel | 11:33 |
| ikonia | ok, I am now very confident that was LARS | 11:34 |
| bazhang | it was, without question | 11:34 |
| bazhang | now in +1 | 11:34 |
| ikonia | he's gone | 11:35 |
| bazhang | whoops he quit | 11:35 |
| bazhang | * [Tabledancer] (~Tabledanc@p579065D7.dip.t-dialin.net): Tabledancer | 11:35 |
| ikonia | I'm sure he'll be back | 11:35 |
| ikonia | ahhh bang on time | 11:35 |
| jussi | Sir ikonia, may I have the pleasure of you reading and replying to my PM? :D | 11:43 |
| ikonia | you certainly may | 11:44 |
| ikonia | had I seen it I would have responded quicker | 11:44 |
| jussi | :) | 11:44 |
| bazhang | * [thetwo] (~thetwo@p579065D7.dip.t-dialin.net): thetwo | 11:49 |
| ikonia | ughhh | 11:49 |
| bazhang | lets let him speak first | 11:50 |
| bazhang | whoops | 11:50 |
| ikonia | nah | 11:50 |
| ikonia | lets not | 11:50 |
| thetwo | hello, i think, its unfair that i am banned | 11:51 |
| ikonia | do you | 11:51 |
| ikonia | why is that | 11:51 |
| thetwo | first i behaved very very good | 11:51 |
| ikonia | ok | 11:51 |
| thetwo | and then is stupid szal must told me: | 11:51 |
| thetwo | "!offtopic" | 11:51 |
| ikonia | thetwo: how about this | 11:51 |
| ikonia | thetwo: you didn't follow the rules | 11:51 |
| ikonia | thetwo: you got banned | 11:51 |
| ikonia | thetwo: you where told not to get in for a week | 11:51 |
| thetwo | no moment i ask why he is not banned | 11:52 |
| ikonia | thetwo: so I suggest you leave now, | 11:52 |
| ikonia | thetwo: he didn't break the rules | 11:52 |
| ikonia | he followed instructions | 11:52 |
| thetwo | he did a BIG libel | 11:52 |
| thetwo | he said things, and faked everything | 11:52 |
| ikonia | no | 11:52 |
| thetwo | and cant proove it | 11:52 |
| ikonia | tell you what, I've got a better idea | 11:52 |
| thetwo | okay i will go | 11:52 |
| thetwo | and complain | 11:52 |
| ikonia | I'm going to end this conversation and submit a complaint to your ISP | 11:53 |
| ikonia | I have the logs stamped and verified by Freenode, so I'll log a complaint too | 11:53 |
| thetwo | yes and what will do that ? | 11:53 |
| thetwo | i did not any illegally | 11:53 |
| ikonia | I'll let your ISP deal with that | 11:53 |
| thetwo | yes he will lought | 11:53 |
| ikonia | thetwo: you right your letter, and I'll right mine, lets end it there | 11:53 |
| ikonia | I will now complain as they should be able to tie him up with Lars and the original complaint I made | 11:54 |
| bazhang | kubuntu channel people are ignorant? | 11:54 |
| ikonia | in what way ? | 11:54 |
| bazhang | dean just entered saying that ^ | 11:54 |
| ikonia | oh | 11:59 |
| ikonia | I didn't even see dean in #kubuntu | 11:59 |
| bazhang | <Guest72146> some odd targeting of szal here | 12:02 |
| ikonia | just chance I think | 12:03 |
| bazhang | same exact issue with compiz, one that even the #compiz experts cannot re-create | 12:09 |
| bazhang | <saikat> can anyone help me to find any contact info of partnership on ubuntu? | 12:26 |
| ikonia | ? | 12:27 |
| ikonia | (sorry not been following) | 12:27 |
| bazhang | just that, nothing else | 12:27 |
| jpds | bazhang: http://www.canonical.com/about-canonical/partnerships | 14:14 |
| Pici | jpds: The person said that no one has gotten back to him a week after asking something to the contact info on that page. | 14:14 |
| jpds | Is he still around? | 14:15 |
| jpds | Guess not. | 14:15 |
| Pici | No | 14:15 |
| IdleOne | ross` in #u might turn into a problem | 16:35 |
| * IdleOne steps away for a few | 16:35 | |
| === oCean_ is now known as oCean | ||
| === marienz_ is now known as marienz | ||
| Pici | ikonia: encryption libraries are silly | 18:23 |
| ikonia | oh ? | 18:23 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from xindzz`off) | 18:30 |
| Pici | handled. | 18:32 |
| ikonia | so I see | 18:33 |
| ikonia | can we setup a new rule, people who say "anyone?" get banned for 1 year on sight | 18:40 |
| topyli | :) | 18:44 |
| ikonia | you seem receptive to that, so I'll up it to 2 years | 18:45 |
| charlie-tca | +1 | 18:55 |
| ikonia | it's getting momentum | 19:23 |
| === rww is now known as tardis | ||
| === tardis is now known as rww | ||
| rww | ikonia: re: dawid: looks like they're on a dynamically-addressed cellphone network. The ban szal mentioned was #41916 | 21:49 |
| ikonia | I saw you delt with it, so went back to sleep | 21:50 |
| rww | wfm | 21:50 |
| ikonia | I also see 41928 and 41915 | 21:50 |
| ubottu | FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (Testtube1 appears to be flooding, but emergency mode is on) | 22:14 |
| ubottu | FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (ryan__ appears to be flooding, but emergency mode is on) | 22:14 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (flood (16)) | 23:29 |
| ubottu | szal called the ops in #ubuntu () | 23:29 |
| Corey | I turned +r off. | 23:30 |
| Corey | One user pasteflooding shouldn't cause that. | 23:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!