[00:31] neight <-- no no nono nonono no no no no no no. [00:31] I didn't sound that one out. [00:31] >.< [00:33] does that first part stay consistent? (the web gateway) [00:33] yes [00:33] that's the hash [00:34] okay, just making sure, I forget that part. [00:36] * an8yearoldvagyna is now known as MiraclePenys <-- noted in #freenode [00:37] banned from #u [00:39] Is Benkinooby (currently in #ubuntu) the same user as Benk_ (the user who was removed from #ubuntu for giving a mallicious command)? The nick is similar and Benkinooby said "lol" after Benk_'s removal. [00:42] Jordan_U: would need to check with staff to see if they are ban evading with that cloak [00:44] IdleOne: There is no ban that I know of, and Benkinooby was in the channel before Benk_ was removed. [00:44] No ban yet at least, I was planning to add a ban forward for the malicious command incident. [00:45] might be the same user and hopefully the removal knocked some sense into them [00:45] The "lol" suggests otherwise :( [00:45] I guess there isn't much to do about it at the moment though. === h00k is now known as riotkittie === riotkittie is now known as h00k === h00k is now known as rww === rww is now known as Guest47159 === Guest47159 is now known as h00k [05:02] morning === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang [06:34] what is KM0201 doing? [06:34] PM helping jen? [10:27] Am I unabnned [10:28] no, you're not [10:28] 1824.42 <+ikonia> vibhav: could you please leave this channel, and come back no sooner than 2 weeks [10:29] vibhav: I would kindly ask you to follow the request ikonia made yesterday [10:35] Why? [10:35] ikonia abuses his op powers [10:36] not this again [10:36] He does [10:36] vibhav: you are currently ban evading in #ubuntu [10:36] I've removed you [10:36] Ok [10:36] I was not ban evading [10:37] vibhav: do you know you are banned in #ubuntu yes/no [10:37] vibhav: I explained in detail the reason you where banned yesterday [10:37] Yes [10:37] so why did you join #ubuntu [10:37] The reason was not approriate [10:37] Xchat automatically joins #ubuntu [10:37] vibhav: right, so you are ban evading, I'm informing you I've removed you [10:37] Mute me [10:38] so you are ban evading is a wrong sentence [10:38] no, I've removed you as you are ban evading [10:38] vibhav: either way, we'll discuss the ban in 2 weeks as I said yesterday [10:38] Why [10:38] ikonia make this clear - I read that complete guide and gave it to him [10:39] for the reasons I explained yesterday which I don't want to re-cover pointlessly again [10:39] Its not important for me to Use that guide [10:40] it was important for you to have read it and understood it before giving it to people [10:40] you'd been warned and banned for this behaviour before, you did it again, you got re-banned, it's that simple [10:40] I'm not going to discuss it further [10:40] I understood and read it [10:40] Why [10:40] just because you are Losing the argument? [10:40] There is nothing Simple in it [10:40] vibhav: 1.) I asked you clearly "have you read this guide" [10:41] vibhav: you said "no" [10:41] vibhav: I banned you [10:41] vibhav: you then said "oh, I have read it" [10:41] vibhav: this argumentation has been done before, there is no reason to do it again [10:41] vibhav: it's clearly obviously you had not read the guide as it was full of dead URLs and missing information [10:41] YOU ASKED ME , THAT , HAVE YOU USED THIS GUIDE? [10:41] vibhav: you had clearly not read the guide [10:41] I had [10:41] vibhav: typing it caps won't help [10:41] i KNOW [10:41] ikonia , You are not fit to be an op [10:42] then don't do it [10:42] vibhav: one of my responsabilities it to make sure the users of the channel do not get bad advice [10:42] !appeal > vibhav [10:42] vibhav, please see my private message [10:42] vibhav: you are providing bad advice on a regular basis [10:42] vibhav: hence why this loop has re-occured [10:42] That was not bad ! [10:42] vibhav: it was [10:42] Do you know what is bad advice [10:42] vibhav: it had incorrect information in it, and when I asked you about it, you had no idea of what it actually did [10:43] thanks Tm_T [10:43] vibhav: that means you're pushing advice which you don't know what it does to fix something [10:43] vibhav: for the record, I agree ikonia on this [10:43] Why? [10:43] the very same argumentation ikonia has used [10:43] and I repeat: this argumentation has been done before, there is no reason to do it again [10:43] "Mistakes can be made by both sides" [10:43] it won't lead to anywhere [10:44] this was yours [10:44] vibhav: yes [10:44] vibhav: but there's two options on proceeding on this, being not exclucive on each other [10:45] ikonia only knows how o critisize others [10:45] vibhav: please stop now [10:45] criticize [10:45] Why Stop [10:45] Cant I defend for myself? [10:45] vibhav: not at all, I often make mistakes and I'm corrected by others, [10:46] vibhav: I also support other people, that's not critising them, [10:46] 1) you wait 2 weeks before re-entering this channel and try discuss matter then. 2) you proceed on the steps described in appeal process [10:46] No you do not [10:46] vibhav: stop, this is not useful, this is not defending yourself, this is only wasting time [10:46] No this is not [10:47] Ops think too much of themselves [10:47] I'll back out at this time and make sure the logs / comments are up to date [10:47] vibhav: then proceed on appeal process, no amount of discussion here now will change this [10:47] Make this clear - I was not giving bad advice , I was offering suggestion [10:48] if he returns before two weeks, I will not give him time to try relaunching the conversation [10:49] I only said two weeks in the hope that he may consider what he does this time [10:49] keep unbanning him he just carrys on, if it's set a little longer, hey may consider it [10:49] indeed [10:52] might want to do an ip host ban? [10:52] since his client identifies after joining the channels [10:52] I'm just looking at what happened with the cloak ban [10:52] his ident seems stable enough [10:52] nothing happened with it [10:53] I saw him join as cloaked, [10:53] it just didn't kick in early enough [10:53] I didn't [10:53] 11:27 -!- vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu [10:53] [13:27] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@59.94.134.131] has joined #ubuntu [10:53] [13:27] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu [10:54] ahhh [10:54] the "has joined" bit is a bit confusing [10:55] same thing happened yesterday before the ban [10:55] [18:07] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@59.94.136.19] has joined #ubuntu [10:55] [18:07] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu [10:58] "it's not ban evasion, it's autojoin" is explanation I cant take once, but not twice [10:59] and if people knows they're banned, and they leave channel rightaway after noticing they have joined a channel they shouldn't, I have no problem [11:17] szal called the ops in #ubuntu () [11:17] that one again [11:18] yikes [11:22] termaster is lars torben? [11:23] I did wonder that [11:23] yeppers [11:23] are you certain ? [11:23] the false PM accusations [11:23] well, yes [11:23] szal is honest, he is not [11:23] and the isp [11:23] true [11:24] safe to unban the gateway I set ? the floodbot banned, and the user was klined (ie goodpoot) [11:24] yup [11:24] thanks [11:26] why leave ? [11:26] why banned ? ikonia [11:27] Termaster: did I, or did I not warn you to drop the topic 2 times ? [11:27] yes so i said, HE should stop that [11:27] and he went on [11:27] Termaster: he has not mentioned the pm after I aske dyou to stop it [11:27] you continued [11:27] no he wrote: [11:27] "!ubuntu-es" [11:27] that is nothing to do with a pm [11:27] that is advising a user to join the channel #ubuntu-es [11:28] yes but NOBODY speak espagne [11:28] at that time [11:28] or spanish or what [11:28] 12:23 < Zankajo> #ubuntu-es [11:28] he was trying to join the channel [11:28] sazl explained how to join #ubuntu-es [11:28] yes and that do not belong into the channel [11:28] yes it did [11:28] but it is a ubuntu channel [11:28] Termaster: look - enough now [11:29] and why is he allowed to tell lies ? [11:29] he's not [11:29] he said, i pmed him and faked it [11:29] Termaster: if he did or not is hard to work out, hence why you where asked, and then told to drop the topic as no harm was done [11:29] you've persisted in trying to pick a fight with him, you're banned [11:30] i do not like it to tell lies [11:30] ok, that's great [11:30] and i think that is in the law punishable [11:30] but it doesn't change what I've just said [11:30] I'm not going through this time wasting process with you [11:30] okay but why have you to ban me ? [11:30] you can kick me and give me a second chance [11:30] Termaster, he just told you. [11:31] Termaster: because I told you 2 times (they where your chances) to drop it, you kept going, you got banned [11:31] yes the second time were the kickn [11:31] i think this channel very often bann [11:31] that has no bearing on your situation [11:31] okay and how long banned ? [11:32] he provocated it [11:32] Termaster: no - YOU did [11:32] no [11:32] i behaved good first [11:32] you caused the problem, so you are banned [11:32] come back in a weeks time [11:33] no i saved the long and i will write to ubuntu team [11:33] ok [11:33] and to freenode to, i know the server owner [11:33] there's no excuse for bad behaviour [11:33] in the mean time you will remain banned for a week at least [11:33] Termaster: ok, please write your letter, in the mean time please leave this hcannel [11:34] ok, I am now very confident that was LARS [11:34] it was, without question [11:34] now in +1 [11:35] he's gone [11:35] whoops he quit [11:35] * [Tabledancer] (~Tabledanc@p579065D7.dip.t-dialin.net): Tabledancer [11:35] I'm sure he'll be back [11:35] ahhh bang on time [11:43] Sir ikonia, may I have the pleasure of you reading and replying to my PM? :D [11:44] you certainly may [11:44] had I seen it I would have responded quicker [11:44] :) [11:49] * [thetwo] (~thetwo@p579065D7.dip.t-dialin.net): thetwo [11:49] ughhh [11:50] lets let him speak first [11:50] whoops [11:50] nah [11:50] lets not [11:51] hello, i think, its unfair that i am banned [11:51] do you [11:51] why is that [11:51] first i behaved very very good [11:51] ok [11:51] and then is stupid szal must told me: [11:51] "!offtopic" [11:51] thetwo: how about this [11:51] thetwo: you didn't follow the rules [11:51] thetwo: you got banned [11:51] thetwo: you where told not to get in for a week [11:52] no moment i ask why he is not banned [11:52] thetwo: so I suggest you leave now, [11:52] thetwo: he didn't break the rules [11:52] he followed instructions [11:52] he did a BIG libel [11:52] he said things, and faked everything [11:52] no [11:52] and cant proove it [11:52] tell you what, I've got a better idea [11:52] okay i will go [11:52] and complain [11:53] I'm going to end this conversation and submit a complaint to your ISP [11:53] I have the logs stamped and verified by Freenode, so I'll log a complaint too [11:53] yes and what will do that ? [11:53] i did not any illegally [11:53] I'll let your ISP deal with that [11:53] yes he will lought [11:53] thetwo: you right your letter, and I'll right mine, lets end it there [11:54] I will now complain as they should be able to tie him up with Lars and the original complaint I made [11:54] kubuntu channel people are ignorant? [11:54] in what way ? [11:54] dean just entered saying that ^ [11:59] oh [11:59] I didn't even see dean in #kubuntu [12:02] some odd targeting of szal here [12:03] just chance I think [12:09] same exact issue with compiz, one that even the #compiz experts cannot re-create [12:26] can anyone help me to find any contact info of partnership on ubuntu? [12:27] ? [12:27] (sorry not been following) [12:27] just that, nothing else [14:14] bazhang: http://www.canonical.com/about-canonical/partnerships [14:14] jpds: The person said that no one has gotten back to him a week after asking something to the contact info on that page. [14:15] Is he still around? [14:15] Guess not. [14:15] No [16:35] ross` in #u might turn into a problem [16:35] * IdleOne steps away for a few === oCean_ is now known as oCean === marienz_ is now known as marienz [18:23] ikonia: encryption libraries are silly [18:23] oh ? [18:30] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from xindzz`off) [18:32] handled. [18:33] so I see [18:40] can we setup a new rule, people who say "anyone?" get banned for 1 year on sight [18:44] :) [18:45] you seem receptive to that, so I'll up it to 2 years [18:55] +1 [19:23] it's getting momentum === rww is now known as tardis === tardis is now known as rww [21:49] ikonia: re: dawid: looks like they're on a dynamically-addressed cellphone network. The ban szal mentioned was #41916 [21:50] I saw you delt with it, so went back to sleep [21:50] wfm [21:50] I also see 41928 and 41915 [22:14] FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (Testtube1 appears to be flooding, but emergency mode is on) [22:14] FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (ryan__ appears to be flooding, but emergency mode is on) [23:29] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (flood (16)) [23:29] szal called the ops in #ubuntu () [23:30] I turned +r off. [23:30] One user pasteflooding shouldn't cause that.