 neight <-- no no nono nonono no no no no no no.
[00:31] <h00k> I didn't sound that one out.
[00:31] <h00k> >.<
[00:33] <h00k> does that first part stay consistent? (the web gateway)
[00:33] <elky> yes
[00:33] <elky> that's the hash
[00:34] <h00k> okay, just making sure, I forget that part.
[00:36] <elky> * an8yearoldvagyna is now known as MiraclePenys <-- noted in #freenode
[00:37] <IdleOne> banned from #u
[00:39] <Jordan_U> Is Benkinooby (currently in #ubuntu) the same user as Benk_ (the user who was removed from #ubuntu for giving a mallicious command)? The nick is similar and Benkinooby said "lol" after Benk_'s removal.
[00:42] <IdleOne> Jordan_U: would need to check with staff to see if they are ban evading with that cloak
[00:44] <Jordan_U> IdleOne: There is no ban that I know of, and Benkinooby was in the channel before Benk_ was removed.
[00:44] <Jordan_U> No ban yet at least, I was planning to add a ban forward for the malicious command incident.
[00:45] <IdleOne> might be the same user and hopefully the removal knocked some sense into them
[00:45] <Jordan_U> The "lol" suggests otherwise :(
[00:45] <Jordan_U> I guess there isn't much to do about it at the moment though.
[05:02] <Tm_T> morning
[06:34] <Myrtti> what is KM0201 doing?
[06:34] <bazhang> PM helping jen?
[10:27] <vibhav> Am I unabnned
[10:28] <Tm_T> no, you're not
[10:28] <Tm_T> 1824.42 <+ikonia> vibhav: could you please leave this channel, and come back no sooner than 2 weeks
[10:29] <Tm_T> vibhav: I would kindly ask you to follow the request ikonia made yesterday
[10:35] <vibhav> Why?
[10:35] <vibhav> ikonia abuses his op powers
[10:36] <ikonia> not this again
[10:36] <vibhav> He does
[10:36] <ikonia> vibhav: you are currently ban evading in #ubuntu
[10:36] <ikonia> I've removed you
[10:36] <vibhav> Ok
[10:36] <vibhav> I was not ban evading
[10:37] <ikonia> vibhav: do you know you are banned in #ubuntu yes/no
[10:37] <ikonia> vibhav: I explained in detail the reason you where banned yesterday
[10:37] <vibhav> Yes
[10:37] <ikonia> so why did you join #ubuntu
[10:37] <vibhav> The reason was not approriate
[10:37] <vibhav> Xchat automatically joins #ubuntu
[10:37] <ikonia> vibhav: right, so you are ban evading, I'm informing you I've removed you
[10:37] <vibhav> Mute me
[10:38] <vibhav> so you are ban evading is a wrong sentence
[10:38] <ikonia> no, I've removed you as you are ban evading
[10:38] <ikonia> vibhav: either way, we'll discuss the ban in 2 weeks as I said yesterday
[10:38] <vibhav> Why
[10:38] <vibhav> ikonia make this clear - I read that complete guide and gave it to him
[10:39] <ikonia> for the reasons I explained yesterday which I don't want to re-cover pointlessly again
[10:39] <vibhav> Its not important for me to Use that guide
[10:40] <ikonia> it was important for you to have read it and understood it before giving it to people
[10:40] <ikonia> you'd been warned and banned for this behaviour before, you did it again, you got re-banned, it's that simple
[10:40] <ikonia> I'm not going to discuss it further
[10:40] <vibhav> I understood and read it
[10:40] <vibhav> Why
[10:40] <vibhav> just because you are Losing the argument?
[10:40] <vibhav> There is nothing Simple in it
[10:40] <ikonia> vibhav: 1.) I asked you clearly "have you read this guide"
[10:41] <ikonia> vibhav: you said "no"
[10:41] <ikonia> vibhav: I banned you
[10:41] <ikonia> vibhav: you then said "oh, I have read it"
[10:41] <Tm_T> vibhav: this argumentation has been done before, there is no reason to do it again
[10:41] <ikonia> vibhav: it's clearly obviously you had not read the guide as it was full of dead URLs and missing information
[10:41] <vibhav> YOU ASKED ME , THAT , HAVE YOU USED THIS GUIDE?
[10:41] <ikonia> vibhav: you had clearly not read the guide
[10:41] <vibhav> I had
[10:41] <ikonia> vibhav: typing it caps won't help
[10:41] <vibhav> i KNOW
[10:41] <vibhav> ikonia , You are not fit to be an op
[10:42] <ikonia> then don't do it
[10:42] <ikonia> vibhav: one of my responsabilities it to make sure the users of the channel do not get bad advice
[10:42] <Tm_T> !appeal > vibhav
[10:42] <ikonia> vibhav: you are providing bad advice on a regular basis
[10:42] <ikonia> vibhav: hence why this loop has re-occured
[10:42] <vibhav> That was not bad !
[10:42] <ikonia> vibhav: it was
[10:42] <vibhav> Do you know what is bad advice
[10:42] <ikonia> vibhav: it had incorrect information in it, and when I asked you about it, you had no idea of what it actually did
[10:43] <vibhav> thanks Tm_T
[10:43] <ikonia> vibhav: that means you're pushing advice which you don't know what it does to fix something
[10:43] <Tm_T> vibhav: for the record, I agree ikonia on this
[10:43] <vibhav> Why?
[10:43] <Tm_T> the very same argumentation ikonia has used
[10:43] <Tm_T> and I repeat: this argumentation has been done before, there is no reason to do it again
[10:43] <vibhav> "Mistakes can be made by both sides"
[10:43] <Tm_T> it won't lead to anywhere
[10:44] <vibhav> this was yours
[10:44] <Tm_T> vibhav: yes
[10:44] <Tm_T> vibhav: but there's two options on proceeding on this, being not exclucive on each other
[10:45] <vibhav> ikonia only knows how o critisize others
[10:45] <Tm_T> vibhav: please stop now
[10:45] <vibhav> criticize
[10:45] <vibhav> Why Stop
[10:45] <vibhav> Cant I defend for myself?
[10:45] <ikonia> vibhav: not at all, I often make mistakes and I'm corrected by others,
[10:46] <ikonia> vibhav: I also support other people, that's not critising them,
[10:46] <Tm_T> 1) you wait 2 weeks before re-entering this channel and try discuss matter then. 2) you proceed on the steps described in appeal process
[10:46] <vibhav> No you do not
[10:46] <Tm_T> vibhav: stop, this is not useful, this is not defending yourself, this is only wasting time
[10:46] <vibhav> No this is not
[10:47] <vibhav> Ops think too much of themselves
[10:47] <ikonia> I'll back out at this time and make sure the logs / comments are up to date
[10:47] <Tm_T> vibhav: then proceed on appeal process, no amount of discussion here now will change this
[10:47] <vibhav> Make this clear - I was not giving bad advice , I was offering suggestion
[10:48] <Tm_T> if he returns before two weeks, I will not give him time to try relaunching the conversation
[10:49] <ikonia> I only said two weeks in the hope that he may consider what he does this time
[10:49] <ikonia> keep unbanning him he just carrys on, if it's set a little longer, hey may consider it
[10:49] <Tm_T> indeed
[10:52] <Myrtti> might want to do an ip host ban?
[10:52] <Myrtti> since his client identifies after joining the channels
[10:52] <ikonia> I'm just looking at what happened with the cloak ban
[10:52] <Myrtti> his ident seems stable enough
[10:52] <Myrtti> nothing happened with it
[10:53] <ikonia> I saw him join as cloaked,
[10:53] <Myrtti> it just didn't kick in early enough
[10:53] <Myrtti> I didn't
[10:53] <ikonia> 11:27 -!- vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu
[10:53] <Myrtti> [13:27] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@59.94.134.131] has joined #ubuntu
[10:53] <Myrtti> [13:27] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu
[10:54] <ikonia> ahhh
[10:54] <ikonia> the "has joined" bit is a bit confusing
[10:55] <Myrtti> same thing happened yesterday before the ban
[10:55] <Myrtti> [18:07] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@59.94.136.19] has joined #ubuntu
[10:55] <Myrtti> [18:07] ~~~vibhav [~vibhav___@unaffiliated/vibhav] has joined #ubuntu
[10:58] <Tm_T> "it's not ban evasion, it's autojoin" is explanation I cant take once, but not twice
[10:59] <Tm_T> and if people knows they're banned, and they leave channel rightaway after noticing they have joined a channel they shouldn't, I have no problem
[11:17] <ikonia> that one again
[11:18] <bazhang> yikes
[11:22] <bazhang> termaster is lars torben?
[11:23] <ikonia> I did wonder that
[11:23] <bazhang> yeppers
[11:23] <ikonia> are you certain ?
[11:23] <bazhang> the false PM accusations
[11:23] <ikonia> well, yes
[11:23] <bazhang> szal is honest, he is not
[11:23] <ikonia> and the isp
[11:23] <bazhang> true
[11:24] <bazhang> safe to unban the gateway I set ? the floodbot banned, and the user was klined (ie goodpoot)
[11:24] <ikonia> yup
[11:24] <bazhang> thanks
[11:26] <Termaster> why leave ?
[11:26] <Termaster> why banned ? ikonia
[11:27] <ikonia> Termaster: did I, or did I not warn you to drop the topic 2 times ?
[11:27] <Termaster> yes so i said, HE should stop that
[11:27] <Termaster> and he went on
[11:27] <ikonia> Termaster: he has not mentioned the pm after I aske dyou to stop it
[11:27] <ikonia> you continued
[11:27] <Termaster> no he wrote:
[11:27] <Termaster> "!ubuntu-es"
[11:27] <ikonia> that is nothing to do with a pm
[11:27] <ikonia> that is advising a user to join the channel #ubuntu-es
[11:28] <Termaster> yes but NOBODY speak espagne
[11:28] <Termaster> at that time
[11:28] <Termaster> or spanish or what
[11:28] <ikonia> 12:23 < Zankajo> #ubuntu-es
[11:28] <ikonia> he was trying to join the channel
[11:28] <ikonia> sazl explained how to join #ubuntu-es
[11:28] <Termaster> yes and that do not belong into the channel
[11:28] <ikonia> yes it did
[11:28] <Termaster> but it is a ubuntu channel
[11:28] <ikonia> Termaster: look - enough now
[11:29] <Termaster> and why is he allowed to tell lies ?
[11:29] <ikonia> he's not
[11:29] <Termaster> he said, i pmed him and faked it
[11:29] <ikonia> Termaster: if he did or not is hard to work out, hence why you where asked, and then told to drop the topic as no harm was done
[11:29] <ikonia> you've persisted in trying to pick a fight with him, you're banned
[11:30] <Termaster> i do not like it to tell lies
[11:30] <ikonia> ok, that's great
[11:30] <Termaster> and i think that is in the law punishable
[11:30] <ikonia> but it doesn't change what I've just said
[11:30] <ikonia> I'm not going through this time wasting process with you
[11:30] <Termaster> okay but why have you to ban me ?
[11:30] <Termaster> you can kick me and give me a second chance
[11:30] <bazhang> Termaster, he just told you.
[11:31] <ikonia> Termaster: because I told you 2 times (they where your chances) to drop it, you kept going, you got banned
[11:31] <Termaster> yes the second time were the kickn
[11:31] <Termaster> i think this channel very often bann
[11:31] <ikonia> that has no bearing on your situation
[11:31] <Termaster> okay and how long banned ?
[11:32] <Termaster> he provocated it
[11:32] <ikonia> Termaster: no - YOU did
[11:32] <Termaster> no
[11:32] <Termaster> i behaved good first
[11:32] <ikonia> you caused the problem, so you are banned
[11:32] <ikonia> come back in a weeks time
[11:33] <Termaster> no i saved the long and i will write to ubuntu team
[11:33] <ikonia> ok
[11:33] <Termaster> and to freenode to, i know the server owner
[11:33] <Tm_Tr> there's no excuse for bad behaviour
[11:33] <ikonia> in the mean time you will remain banned for a week at least
[11:33] <ikonia> Termaster: ok, please write your letter, in the mean time please leave this hcannel
[11:34] <ikonia> ok, I am now very confident that was LARS
[11:34] <bazhang> it was, without question
[11:34] <bazhang> now in +1
[11:35] <ikonia> he's gone
[11:35] <bazhang> whoops he quit
[11:35] <bazhang> * [Tabledancer] (~Tabledanc@p579065D7.dip.t-dialin.net): Tabledancer
[11:35] <ikonia> I'm sure he'll be back
[11:35] <ikonia> ahhh bang on time
[11:43] <jussi> Sir ikonia, may I have the pleasure of you reading and replying to my PM? :D
[11:44] <ikonia> you certainly may
[11:44] <ikonia> had I seen it I would have responded quicker
[11:44] <jussi> :)
[11:49] <bazhang> * [thetwo] (~thetwo@p579065D7.dip.t-dialin.net): thetwo
[11:49] <ikonia> ughhh
[11:50] <bazhang> lets let him speak first
[11:50] <bazhang> whoops
[11:50] <ikonia> nah
[11:50] <ikonia> lets not
[11:51] <thetwo> hello, i think, its unfair that i am banned
[11:51] <ikonia> do you
[11:51] <ikonia> why is that
[11:51] <thetwo> first i behaved very very good
[11:51] <ikonia> ok
[11:51] <thetwo> and then is stupid szal must told me:
[11:51] <thetwo> "!offtopic"
[11:51] <ikonia> thetwo: how about this
[11:51] <ikonia> thetwo: you didn't follow the rules
[11:51] <ikonia> thetwo: you got banned
[11:51] <ikonia> thetwo: you where told not to get in for a week
[11:52] <thetwo> no moment i ask why he is not banned
[11:52] <ikonia> thetwo: so I suggest you leave now,
[11:52] <ikonia> thetwo: he didn't break the rules
[11:52] <ikonia> he followed instructions
[11:52] <thetwo> he did a BIG libel
[11:52] <thetwo> he said things, and faked everything
[11:52] <ikonia> no
[11:52] <thetwo> and cant proove it
[11:52] <ikonia> tell you what, I've got a better idea
[11:52] <thetwo> okay i will go
[11:52] <thetwo> and complain
[11:53] <ikonia> I'm going to end this conversation and submit a complaint to your ISP
[11:53] <ikonia> I have the logs stamped and verified by Freenode, so I'll log a complaint too
[11:53] <thetwo> yes and what will do that ?
[11:53] <thetwo> i did not any illegally
[11:53] <ikonia> I'll let your ISP deal with that
[11:53] <thetwo> yes he will lought
[11:53] <ikonia> thetwo: you right your letter, and I'll right mine, lets end it there
[11:54] <ikonia> I will now complain as they should be able to tie him up with Lars and the original complaint I made
[11:54] <bazhang> kubuntu channel people are ignorant?
[11:54] <ikonia> in what way ?
[11:54] <bazhang> dean just entered saying that ^
[11:59] <ikonia> oh
[11:59] <ikonia> I didn't even see dean in #kubuntu
 some odd targeting of szal here
[12:03] <ikonia> just chance I think
[12:09] <bazhang> same exact issue with compiz, one that even the #compiz experts cannot re-create
 can anyone help me to find any contact info of partnership on ubuntu?
[12:27] <ikonia> ?
[12:27] <ikonia> (sorry not been following)
[12:27] <bazhang> just that, nothing else
[14:14] <jpds> bazhang: http://www.canonical.com/about-canonical/partnerships
[14:14] <Pici> jpds: The person said that no one has gotten back to him a week after asking something to the contact info on that page.
[14:15] <jpds> Is he still around?
[14:15] <jpds> Guess not.
[14:15] <Pici> No
[16:35] <IdleOne> ross` in #u might turn into a problem
[16:35]  * IdleOne steps away for a few
[18:23] <Pici> ikonia: encryption libraries are silly
[18:23] <ikonia> oh ?
[18:32] <Pici> handled.
[18:33] <ikonia> so I see
[18:40] <ikonia> can we setup a new rule, people who say "anyone?" get banned for 1 year on sight
[18:44] <topyli> :)
[18:45] <ikonia> you seem receptive to that, so I'll up it to 2 years
[18:55] <charlie-tca> +1
[19:23] <ikonia> it's getting momentum
[21:49] <rww> ikonia: re: dawid: looks like they're on a dynamically-addressed cellphone network. The ban szal mentioned was #41916
[21:50] <ikonia> I saw you delt with it, so went back to sleep
[21:50] <rww> wfm
[21:50] <ikonia> I also see 41928 and 41915
[23:30] <Corey> I turned +r off.
[23:30] <Corey> One user pasteflooding shouldn't cause that.