| cSquall | exit | 02:20 |
|---|---|---|
| skaet | jibel, thanks for publishing those images. | 02:23 |
| hggdh | potential blocker for server: bug 813266 | 02:28 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 813266 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu) "eucalyptus fails to start instances (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813266 | 02:28 |
| hggdh | skaet: ^ | 02:29 |
| skaet | hggdh, thanks for flagging, we'll need to make sure it gets infront of Daviey as soon as he wakes up. | 02:30 |
| skaet | heh, have seen you've flagged it in ubuntu-server already. excellent. | 02:32 |
| hggdh | :-) | 02:43 |
| hggdh | skaet: I will wake up early -- say, around 0400, to get with Daviey | 02:48 |
| skaet | thanks hggdh | 02:52 |
| skaet | I'm going to call it a night now too and try for early (although not as early as you ;) ) | 02:53 |
| jibel | mvo, Hey | 07:47 |
| jibel | mvo, could you change lucid to 10.04.3 in meta-release files, please ? | 07:48 |
| mvo | jibel: sure, thanks. doing that now | 07:48 |
| jibel | anyone can help with ltsp tests on 10.04.3 alternate and Ubuntu Desktop Runonce tests ? | 15:18 |
| jibel | Daviey, anyone can do iscsi testing in your team ? | 15:19 |
| Daviey | jibel: potentially.. | 15:30 |
| Daviey | What needs doing? | 15:30 |
| jibel | Daviey, iSCSI Authenticated and Unauthenticated on i386 and amd64 for 10.04.3 | 15:32 |
| jibel | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6039/456 | 15:32 |
| jibel | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6039/453 | 15:32 |
| jibel | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6040/455 | 15:33 |
| jibel | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6040/454 | 15:33 |
| jibel | I'll check what were the results for 10.04.2 | 15:33 |
| Daviey | jibel: Can anyone on QA help with the tests aswell? | 15:40 |
| jibel | hggdh, ? | 15:40 |
| jibel | I can do server upgrade | 15:42 |
| hggdh | heh. I am there, on the i386 LVM+cpryto | 15:42 |
| hggdh | jibel, Daviey ^ | 15:42 |
| jibel | Daviey, so hggdh can finish encrypted (and raid1 ?) , I can do upgrade, no network and rescue, and there's someone missing to do iSCSI, and we'll be done with server (module the kernel bug of course) | 15:45 |
| jibel | module->modulo | 15:45 |
| hggdh | jibel: I can do raid1, but on KVM only | 15:45 |
| jibel | patrickmw, can you help with ltsp on alternate for 10.04.3 ? | 15:45 |
| patrickmw | jibel: sure can | 15:46 |
| jibel | patrickmw, Cool, many thanks! | 15:46 |
| jibel | hggdh, the only issue was the disk not recovering automatically after a disconnect/reconnect | 15:47 |
| jibel | what's left then ? | 15:47 |
| jibel | oh, all the Run once Desktop tests as I said above. | 15:48 |
| hggdh | jibel: will get to it after the i386 test | 15:48 |
| Daviey | jibel: so what do we need to do? | 15:50 |
| patrickmw | jibel, syncing | 15:50 |
| hggdh | Daviey: is it worth the time to run the UEC i386 now? | 15:54 |
| Daviey | hggdh: no, it's almost guranteed to fail | 15:55 |
| Daviey | better to wait for the new kernel. | 15:55 |
| Daviey | hggdh: The boxes you were using, i hijacked to verify apw's custom kernel. | 15:55 |
| Daviey | you can steal them back if needed. | 15:56 |
| hggdh | Daviey: no right now, no need | 15:56 |
| hggdh | hum. This is not good. I started the Raid1 test on two already-existing KVM disks. I had used these disks before for Raid1 tests, so they did have the setup | 16:23 |
| hggdh | I cannot delete and recreate the Raid/partitions | 16:23 |
| hggdh | Daviey: ^ | 16:23 |
| jibel | even with the manual partitioner ? | 16:24 |
| hggdh | yes. I then deleted and recreated the partitions themselves (and swapped the position of root and swap). Cannot recreate/delete the Raid1 defs | 16:25 |
| hggdh | saved the part table, got an error stating I must reboot. Rebooted into d-i, got back to partman, raid device 1 is gone, there is only raid device 0 | 16:26 |
| hggdh | and I cannot delete it | 16:26 |
| Daviey | that sounds familair. | 16:27 |
| hggdh | yes, I dimly remember something like that | 16:27 |
| hggdh | cannot find the bug, opening a new one | 16:38 |
| hggdh | later. I succeeded in deleting it | 16:45 |
| hggdh | huh. Is postfix now installed by default? | 16:54 |
| Daviey | shouldn't be, but a common dep of other stuff | 16:57 |
| jibel | Daviey, Is it known that an LVM encrypted system can't be upgraded from Hardy to Lucid ? | 16:58 |
| Daviey | jibel: I don't remember hearing of that.. is that using LUKS? | 16:58 |
| pedro_ | QA Meeting at #ubuntu-meeting in ~2 mins! | 16:59 |
| jibel | Daviey, yes. The behavior is weird, I had to enter the password maybe 6 or 7 times before it was accepted. | 16:59 |
| Daviey | jibel: clumsy fingers? :) | 17:00 |
| jibel | Daviey, I don't think so, with such a secured password | 17:01 |
| Daviey | heh | 17:01 |
| * Daviey looks at bug #544812 | 17:02 | |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 544812 in cryptsetup (Ubuntu) "LUKS encrypted partition does not mount during boot (affects: 6) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/544812 | 17:02 |
| jibel | Daviey, false alarm, it looks more like no more battery in my wireless keyboard :) | 17:09 |
| Daviey | :P | 17:10 |
| patrickmw | jibel, I had forgotten that I formated my laptop I used for iso testing. I'm getting it all back in order so I can run the ltsp tests | 17:44 |
| patrickmw | well, rather never set it all up again :) | 17:44 |
| hggdh | jibel, Daviey: wasn't there a bug for rebooting on Raid1 in degraded=no? | 18:02 |
| hggdh | jibel: done, raid1 tested on both amd64 and i386 server | 18:41 |
| jibel | hggdh, thanks, upgrade is ok, excepted that it doesn't tell to the user his keyboard is out of battery. | 19:35 |
| jibel | patrickmw, ok | 19:35 |
| hggdh | jibel: oooohh, serious bug | 19:35 |
| jibel | So I was blaming the server team because the encrypted authentication failed 80% of the time. | 19:36 |
| jibel | :-D | 19:36 |
| hggdh | LOL | 19:40 |
| hggdh | OTOH, if someone must be blamed, why not the server team? | 19:40 |
| patrickmw | jibel, favor? can you try booting lucid-alternate-amd64 and try to run a basic install? let me know if you get an error right after selecting Install Ubuntu | 19:43 |
| jibel | patrickmw, uhoh, I tried so many time, what is broken ? | 19:44 |
| jibel | patrickmw, no error here, I have the 'Choose language' screen. What do you get ? | 19:47 |
| patrickmw | I am running a vm, it claims I am not running 64bit (which I am) | 19:48 |
| patrickmw | jibel^ | 19:49 |
| hggdh | KVM or VirtualBox? | 19:49 |
| patrickmw | vbox :( I can certainly try with kvm. i find testing ltsp easier with vbox (nice internal network feature) | 19:50 |
| hggdh | maybe the underlying VM def is set to i386 | 19:50 |
| hggdh | are you reusing a VM? | 19:50 |
| patrickmw | no | 19:51 |
| hggdh | oh | 19:51 |
| hggdh | do you have the KVM modules loaded? | 19:51 |
| jibel | patrickmw, what is the output of 'arch' on the host ? | 19:51 |
| hggdh | and 'lsmod | grep kvm' | 19:51 |
| hggdh | patrickmw: ^ | 20:00 |
| patrickmw | hggdh, sorry I see you guys. just trying in kvm | 20:00 |
| hggdh | patrickmw: if you have KVM loaded, there will be a conflict with VBox for AMD64 | 20:01 |
| patrickmw | hddgh, I removed vbox | 20:01 |
| patrickmw | no conflicts :) | 20:01 |
| hggdh | patrickmw: oh, OK, this will solve the issue ;-) what I do when I want VBox 64 is 'sudo rmmod kvm-intel;sudo rmmod kvm' | 20:02 |
| patrickmw | nice | 20:02 |
| patrickmw | hggdh, jibel: HA! I'm running Oneiric on the netbook that pete sent us. I was wondering if I needed to update thinking there might be a chance that would fix it. Installed lots of updates...now no video display. but I can get into VT | 20:20 |
| hggdh | LOL | 20:23 |
| hggdh | welcome to the bleeding edge | 20:23 |
| hggdh | you would have to find out what failed -- perhaps you can 'sudo stop lightdm; sudo start lightdm' and this will work | 20:24 |
| hggdh | otherwise you have to dig into the /var/log/Xorg.0.log to find out what happened | 20:25 |
| hggdh | BRB | 20:25 |
| jibel | patrickmw, you get the login box or it doesn't even reach that point ? | 20:26 |
| patrickmw | jibel, no login box. blank screen | 20:27 |
| patrickmw | jibel, i'm going to finish ltsp on another box, then troubleshoot later | 20:28 |
| jibel | patrickmw, nothing I seen on recent reports. That is worth filing a bug. | 20:31 |
| patrickmw | jibel, ack | 20:31 |
| patrickmw | jibel, just to verify. were you referring to the first or second language screen? | 20:37 |
| patrickmw | jibel, I have several other amd64 images running. only lucid alternate is giving me a hard time | 20:38 |
| patrickmw | very odd | 20:40 |
| jibel | patrickmw, I was referring to the second. | 21:03 |
| jibel | patrickmw, could you check that in the settings of the VM | 21:04 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| jibel | patrickmw, in 'General/Basic' Version is set to 'Ubuntu 64bit' (that will enable VTx automatically ) | 21:05 |
| patrickmw | jibel, checked. it is | 21:05 |
| jibel | patrickmw, and in 'System/Acceleration' 'Enable VT-x' is enabled | 21:05 |
| jibel | patrickmw, also check that VTx is enabled in the BIOS (or whatever the manufacturer of your machine called it) | 21:06 |
| jibel | also as hggdh said, be sure to unload any other virtualization module that may conflict with VBox | 21:07 |
| patrickmw | jibel: i have a install running right now | 21:09 |
| Claudinux | hi all | 21:29 |
| Claudinux | I would like like to say if when i get an error like this i have to consider the test failed or not | 21:30 |
| Claudinux | bug 645818 | 21:30 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Fedora) (and 5 other projects) "Unknown keyword in configuration file: gfxboot (affects: 99) (dups: 7) (heat: 365)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645818 | 21:30 |
| Claudinux | in this bug the problem is with usb-creator, not with the iso image... | 21:30 |
| charlie-tca | then the iso image did not fail | 21:31 |
| charlie-tca | It may not pass, though, you might not be able to do that test because the usb-creator fails | 21:31 |
| Claudinux | charlie-tca, the iso image fail if i use usb-creator, but if i use another usb creator it works | 21:31 |
| charlie-tca | The fail in in usb creator creating a valid image, is it not? | 21:32 |
| Claudinux | yes, it is | 21:32 |
| charlie-tca | as stated in comment #2 of the bug report, it is not the image failing | 21:33 |
| charlie-tca | it is usb creator itself failing to create a valid image, thus the test can not be done when trying to create the usb drive | 21:33 |
| Claudinux | ok charlie-tca , but if I write the same image on a CD it works | 21:35 |
| charlie-tca | That still doesn' t mean it failed with the usb image that is invalid | 21:35 |
| charlie-tca | The failure is still usb-creator, not the image itself. | 21:36 |
| Claudinux | so, on the iso tracker, the test is to be marked s passed or failed? | 21:37 |
| Claudinux | this is what i'm looking for... | 21:37 |
| Claudinux | *as | 21:38 |
| charlie-tca | The test is a pass if it passed using the cd | 21:38 |
| charlie-tca | Which test is it? | 21:38 |
| Claudinux | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6049/4 | 21:39 |
| charlie-tca | so, are you creating the image on usb in 10.04.3? | 21:40 |
| charlie-tca | According to the bug report, you can not create the usb image in 10.04 and expect it to work, therefore, you will need to create in another release | 21:41 |
| charlie-tca | If you create it in 10.04 and it won't work, but a cd does work, it passes | 21:42 |
| Claudinux | otherwise, if the image won't work on usb or cd the is to be marked as "Failed" | 21:46 |
| Claudinux | ? | 21:46 |
| Claudinux | *test | 21:46 |
| charlie-tca | right | 21:47 |
| Claudinux | ok, thanks charlie-tca | 21:47 |
| charlie-tca | you are welcome. Thanks for helping with testing. | 21:47 |
| Claudinux | :-) | 21:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!