[02:20] exit [02:23] jibel, thanks for publishing those images. [02:28] potential blocker for server: bug 813266 [02:28] Launchpad bug 813266 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu) "eucalyptus fails to start instances (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813266 [02:29] skaet: ^ [02:30] hggdh, thanks for flagging, we'll need to make sure it gets infront of Daviey as soon as he wakes up. [02:32] heh, have seen you've flagged it in ubuntu-server already. excellent. [02:43] :-) [02:48] skaet: I will wake up early -- say, around 0400, to get with Daviey [02:52] thanks hggdh [02:53] I'm going to call it a night now too and try for early (although not as early as you ;) ) [07:47] mvo, Hey [07:48] mvo, could you change lucid to 10.04.3 in meta-release files, please ? [07:48] jibel: sure, thanks. doing that now [15:18] anyone can help with ltsp tests on 10.04.3 alternate and Ubuntu Desktop Runonce tests ? [15:19] Daviey, anyone can do iscsi testing in your team ? [15:30] jibel: potentially.. [15:30] What needs doing? [15:32] Daviey, iSCSI Authenticated and Unauthenticated on i386 and amd64 for 10.04.3 [15:32] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6039/456 [15:32] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6039/453 [15:33] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6040/455 [15:33] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6040/454 [15:33] I'll check what were the results for 10.04.2 [15:40] jibel: Can anyone on QA help with the tests aswell? [15:40] hggdh, ? [15:42] I can do server upgrade [15:42] heh. I am there, on the i386 LVM+cpryto [15:42] jibel, Daviey ^ [15:45] Daviey, so hggdh can finish encrypted (and raid1 ?) , I can do upgrade, no network and rescue, and there's someone missing to do iSCSI, and we'll be done with server (module the kernel bug of course) [15:45] module->modulo [15:45] jibel: I can do raid1, but on KVM only [15:45] patrickmw, can you help with ltsp on alternate for 10.04.3 ? [15:46] jibel: sure can [15:46] patrickmw, Cool, many thanks! [15:47] hggdh, the only issue was the disk not recovering automatically after a disconnect/reconnect [15:47] what's left then ? [15:48] oh, all the Run once Desktop tests as I said above. [15:48] jibel: will get to it after the i386 test [15:50] jibel: so what do we need to do? [15:50] jibel, syncing [15:54] Daviey: is it worth the time to run the UEC i386 now? [15:55] hggdh: no, it's almost guranteed to fail [15:55] better to wait for the new kernel. [15:55] hggdh: The boxes you were using, i hijacked to verify apw's custom kernel. [15:56] you can steal them back if needed. [15:56] Daviey: no right now, no need [16:23] hum. This is not good. I started the Raid1 test on two already-existing KVM disks. I had used these disks before for Raid1 tests, so they did have the setup [16:23] I cannot delete and recreate the Raid/partitions [16:23] Daviey: ^ [16:24] even with the manual partitioner ? [16:25] yes. I then deleted and recreated the partitions themselves (and swapped the position of root and swap). Cannot recreate/delete the Raid1 defs [16:26] saved the part table, got an error stating I must reboot. Rebooted into d-i, got back to partman, raid device 1 is gone, there is only raid device 0 [16:26] and I cannot delete it [16:27] that sounds familair. [16:27] yes, I dimly remember something like that [16:38] cannot find the bug, opening a new one [16:45] later. I succeeded in deleting it [16:54] huh. Is postfix now installed by default? [16:57] shouldn't be, but a common dep of other stuff [16:58] Daviey, Is it known that an LVM encrypted system can't be upgraded from Hardy to Lucid ? [16:58] jibel: I don't remember hearing of that.. is that using LUKS? [16:59] QA Meeting at #ubuntu-meeting in ~2 mins! [16:59] Daviey, yes. The behavior is weird, I had to enter the password maybe 6 or 7 times before it was accepted. [17:00] jibel: clumsy fingers? :) [17:01] Daviey, I don't think so, with such a secured password [17:01] heh [17:02] * Daviey looks at bug #544812 [17:02] Launchpad bug 544812 in cryptsetup (Ubuntu) "LUKS encrypted partition does not mount during boot (affects: 6) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/544812 [17:09] Daviey, false alarm, it looks more like no more battery in my wireless keyboard :) [17:10] :P [17:44] jibel, I had forgotten that I formated my laptop I used for iso testing. I'm getting it all back in order so I can run the ltsp tests [17:44] well, rather never set it all up again :) [18:02] jibel, Daviey: wasn't there a bug for rebooting on Raid1 in degraded=no? [18:41] jibel: done, raid1 tested on both amd64 and i386 server [19:35] hggdh, thanks, upgrade is ok, excepted that it doesn't tell to the user his keyboard is out of battery. [19:35] patrickmw, ok [19:35] jibel: oooohh, serious bug [19:36] So I was blaming the server team because the encrypted authentication failed 80% of the time. [19:36] :-D [19:40] LOL [19:40] OTOH, if someone must be blamed, why not the server team? [19:43] jibel, favor? can you try booting lucid-alternate-amd64 and try to run a basic install? let me know if you get an error right after selecting Install Ubuntu [19:44] patrickmw, uhoh, I tried so many time, what is broken ? [19:47] patrickmw, no error here, I have the 'Choose language' screen. What do you get ? [19:48] I am running a vm, it claims I am not running 64bit (which I am) [19:49] jibel^ [19:49] KVM or VirtualBox? [19:50] vbox :( I can certainly try with kvm. i find testing ltsp easier with vbox (nice internal network feature) [19:50] maybe the underlying VM def is set to i386 [19:50] are you reusing a VM? [19:51] no [19:51] oh [19:51] do you have the KVM modules loaded? [19:51] patrickmw, what is the output of 'arch' on the host ? [19:51] and 'lsmod | grep kvm' [20:00] patrickmw: ^ [20:00] hggdh, sorry I see you guys. just trying in kvm [20:01] patrickmw: if you have KVM loaded, there will be a conflict with VBox for AMD64 [20:01] hddgh, I removed vbox [20:01] no conflicts :) [20:02] patrickmw: oh, OK, this will solve the issue ;-) what I do when I want VBox 64 is 'sudo rmmod kvm-intel;sudo rmmod kvm' [20:02] nice [20:20] hggdh, jibel: HA! I'm running Oneiric on the netbook that pete sent us. I was wondering if I needed to update thinking there might be a chance that would fix it. Installed lots of updates...now no video display. but I can get into VT [20:23] LOL [20:23] welcome to the bleeding edge [20:24] you would have to find out what failed -- perhaps you can 'sudo stop lightdm; sudo start lightdm' and this will work [20:25] otherwise you have to dig into the /var/log/Xorg.0.log to find out what happened [20:25] BRB [20:26] patrickmw, you get the login box or it doesn't even reach that point ? [20:27] jibel, no login box. blank screen [20:28] jibel, i'm going to finish ltsp on another box, then troubleshoot later [20:31] patrickmw, nothing I seen on recent reports. That is worth filing a bug. [20:31] jibel, ack [20:37] jibel, just to verify. were you referring to the first or second language screen? [20:38] jibel, I have several other amd64 images running. only lucid alternate is giving me a hard time [20:40] very odd [21:03] patrickmw, I was referring to the second. [21:04] patrickmw, could you check that in the settings of the VM === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:05] patrickmw, in 'General/Basic' Version is set to 'Ubuntu 64bit' (that will enable VTx automatically ) [21:05] jibel, checked. it is [21:05] patrickmw, and in 'System/Acceleration' 'Enable VT-x' is enabled [21:06] patrickmw, also check that VTx is enabled in the BIOS (or whatever the manufacturer of your machine called it) [21:07] also as hggdh said, be sure to unload any other virtualization module that may conflict with VBox [21:09] jibel: i have a install running right now [21:29] hi all [21:30] I would like like to say if when i get an error like this i have to consider the test failed or not [21:30] bug 645818 [21:30] Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Fedora) (and 5 other projects) "Unknown keyword in configuration file: gfxboot (affects: 99) (dups: 7) (heat: 365)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645818 [21:30] in this bug the problem is with usb-creator, not with the iso image... [21:31] then the iso image did not fail [21:31] It may not pass, though, you might not be able to do that test because the usb-creator fails [21:31] charlie-tca, the iso image fail if i use usb-creator, but if i use another usb creator it works [21:32] The fail in in usb creator creating a valid image, is it not? [21:32] yes, it is [21:33] as stated in comment #2 of the bug report, it is not the image failing [21:33] it is usb creator itself failing to create a valid image, thus the test can not be done when trying to create the usb drive [21:35] ok charlie-tca , but if I write the same image on a CD it works [21:35] That still doesn' t mean it failed with the usb image that is invalid [21:36] The failure is still usb-creator, not the image itself. [21:37] so, on the iso tracker, the test is to be marked s passed or failed? [21:37] this is what i'm looking for... [21:38] *as [21:38] The test is a pass if it passed using the cd [21:38] Which test is it? [21:39] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/6049/4 [21:40] so, are you creating the image on usb in 10.04.3? [21:41] According to the bug report, you can not create the usb image in 10.04 and expect it to work, therefore, you will need to create in another release [21:42] If you create it in 10.04 and it won't work, but a cd does work, it passes [21:46] otherwise, if the image won't work on usb or cd the is to be marked as "Failed" [21:46] ? [21:46] *test [21:47] right [21:47] ok, thanks charlie-tca [21:47] you are welcome. Thanks for helping with testing. [21:48] :-)