[01:37] daker_, mhall119 removing it because the contact is supposed to be the person to contact.. and the contact may not be the admin [01:47] but, is there a reason why showing admins is bad? [01:54] just because [01:55] admins may not even still be on the tem [01:55] team [02:15] but they still have the ability to manage the LP team and edit details of the LD team [02:15] so I think it's useful to display them === daker_ is now known as daker [08:35] morning [08:36] morning daker [14:06] cjohnston: ping [14:07] nigelb: ping [14:07] mhall119: pong. [14:11] pong [14:12] new summit [14:12] yay [14:13] cjohnston: also new branches and series for summit [14:13] "1.x" is for fixes to the current deployment [14:13] "trunk" will be our primary development focus going forward, it's okay to break things a bit there, since 1.x is our stable branch [14:13] "production" will work like loco-directory's production, when we're ready for a release we merge from 1.x->production, then on cranberry I pull from lp:summit/production [14:14] cjohnston: I just assigned you a bug to fix the logo link [14:14] ok [14:14] to uds.u.c? [14:14] yes [14:14] ya.. [14:14] i was thinking about that [14:14] propose that fix for merging into 1.x [14:15] cause i think that the logo link is in the theme is it not? [14:15] then we'll pull it from 1.x into trunk [14:15] cjohnston: no, it's in a block [14:15] i will look again [14:15] 4 items off of the blueprint are done [14:15] yay [14:16] \o/ [15:05] cjohnston: where are we at with the mothership for uds.u.c? [15:05] mhall119: trying to get access to do it [15:07] i cant get access to edit the header file [15:50] nice.. login.l.net is down [15:57] login.u.c too [15:57] fail! [16:01] !fail [16:01] Factoid 'fail' not found [16:02] !fail-#ubuntu-offtopic [16:02] FATAL Error: Operation succeeded [16:24] Daviey: ping [16:24] uh oh [16:25] oh relax [16:25] its bad if we are calling on daker [16:25] Daviey [16:25] daker on the other hand, means good things are happening [16:25] heh, true [16:25] nothing's broken though, I just have a question for him [16:27] why is render.py so bad? [16:27] because its the wrong way to do things. [16:27] The right way is template filters. [16:27] no.. thats the question for Daviey [16:27] cjohnston: hah, I asked that to the original author. [16:27] mhall119: [16:28] Daviey: hey, did an update to summit.u.c this morning, I added myself to the ADMINS list to get error emails [16:28] ok [16:28] good stuff [16:28] Daviey: my question was 1) do you want to stay on the ADMINS list to get error emails and 2) can I add cjohnston or nigelb to that list? [16:28] mhall119: so did you break the ical? [16:28] Daviey: I fixed it [16:28] lol, he knkows :P [16:29] *knows [16:29] the code was fine, the data was broken ;) [16:29] likely story huh [16:29] mhall119: between both of us, that should be enough. [16:30] ok [16:30] Can we get someone in canonical to "own" summit? please? [16:31] nigelb: good luck with that. [16:31] Daviey: YEah, I've noticed. [16:31] Everyone wants to stay miles away :( [16:31] nigelb: hurry up and get hired and we will [16:31] i got told no thank you very much [16:32] so did I. [16:32] so did I, multiple times [16:32] that's no excuse [16:32] remember "no" just means "try again soon" [16:37] the new sso is live [16:37] i thought Stuart said it was going to force passing username [17:14] mhall119: nigelb : [17:14] 13.14.06 < elmo> the SSO rollout is FUBAR [17:14] 13.14.09 < elmo> we're rolling it back [17:14] \o/ [17:14] lol [17:15] * nigelb blames mhall119 [17:15] * mhall119 blames nigelb [17:16] sounds good [17:16] http://www.zombo.com -> for some inspiration. [17:25] my first bug report on LP bug 813627 [17:25] Launchpad bug 813627 in launchpad "Preview diff lightbox doesn't remove the overlay div (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813627 [17:27] nigelb: D: [17:29] now fix it and join me and nigelb, and leave that mhall119 guy behind [17:29] hiyya jledbetter [17:29] lol [17:31] hi :) [17:32] nigelb: bookmarking that site for future inspiration [17:33] jledbetter: haha [17:44] cjohnston: we need the 960px css patch applied to summit, do you know how? [17:44] yes [17:44] what are we going to do about it looking bad [17:44] with a wide screen view [17:45] i.e. the schedule [17:45] in the short term or the long term? [17:45] long term. [17:45] yes [17:46] want me to talk to the design team about it [17:46] long term the wide-schedule will only be used for the monitors at UDS, we'll make a browser-friendly view to replace it [17:46] ok [17:46] short term [17:46] (this uds) [17:46] cjohnston: can we selectively not apply the 960px css to that template? [17:46] umm.. if so, i dont know how [17:47] you havent taught me test cases [17:47] mhall119: test cases class next wednesday or thursday mid-day? [17:47] please [17:47] use a {% block 960css %}{% endblock %} in the base.html [17:47] then in the schedule template, just use {% block 960css %}{% endblock %} [17:48] are those the only days you've available? [17:48] so we would need two newstyle.css or put the 960css in its own css file [17:48] i dont know this far in advance [17:48] i can do this friday [17:48] I say put the 960 in it's own css file [17:48] we can even include that in the theme [17:48] I can do this friday [17:48] what time [17:49] well [17:49] any time after 11am our time [17:49] if we want to do it right and do it in the classroom, then the classroom is used [17:49] might as well since we have it [17:49] before 5pm if possible [17:49] use the classroom if it's open, otherwise we'll do it in here [17:49] classroom is noon-4 our time [17:49] it'll be basics, since I'm no expert [17:50] can you write test cases for my mp [17:50] yes [17:50] do you want 11 or 4? id rather 11 [17:50] me too [17:50] nigelb: ? [17:50] that'll make it easier for everyone else too I think [17:50] mhall119: how many people do you want to make the schedule depnednet on [17:50] what? [17:51] 11am my time for a class on friday [17:51] go ahead [17:51] are you available [17:51] cjohnston: as many of us as possible, since we all need to start doing it [17:51] yes, unless I go partying :P [17:51] Ronnie1: daker [17:51] your not allwed [17:51] mandatory class [17:51] * nigelb will party at home then [17:51] geez, sleeping *and* drinking, the guy's just totally lost it [17:51] no being drunk during class [17:51] only when writing test cases [17:52] i think we ruined him at uds mhall119 [17:52] we did [17:52] i know i did my fair share of drinking [17:52] *mission accomplished* [17:52] noooo [17:52] lol [17:52] mhall119++ [17:52] he was available more when he wasnt ruined [17:52] true, but his code has improved [17:52] mhall119: have you used vagrant before? [17:52] cjohnston: whats up? [17:52] nigelb: nope [17:53] nigelb: we're just going to be doing basic Django tests [17:53] mhall119: I'm setting it up for an app using Hbase. [17:53] are you available 11am EST this friday for a class [17:53] nigelb: you want to run the class? [17:53] to learn stuff [17:53] mhall119: No, I'd rather listen. I don't have exposure to test writing much. [17:54] Just the little I did for LP. [17:54] nigelb: I've been cowboying some fixes into summit [17:54] :) [17:54] at least stop those mails :) [17:55] nigelb: rev 133-136 https://code.launchpad.net/~summit-hackers/summit/1.x [18:00] mhall119: I would have preferred they went into a branch. [18:00] (and gone through tarmac) [18:03] cjohnston, ? [18:03] Are you available friday at 11am EST for a class on writing tests? [18:03] in GMT it's ? [18:04] umm [18:05] 15 i think [18:05] its currently 1400 est [18:05] so whatever time 3 hours ago was [18:06] ok [18:07] so your good with it? [18:07] anyway i'll be at work, so it's good [18:08] ok.. [18:08] Ronnie1: ? [18:08] cjohnston: nope, not on fridays [18:09] :-/ [18:09] mhall119: ^ [18:09] is it a class about writing unit tests for LD? [18:10] yes [18:12] nigelb: I would prefer that too, but my inbox was exploding [18:12] nigelb: from now on, I will propose branches for merging [18:13] nigelb: will tarmac land branches targetting at 1.x? [18:14] mhall119: no, will have to set it up. [18:14] cjohnston: if we do it in classroom, there will at least be logs [18:14] nigelb: I'm okay with tarmac only landing stuff to trunk [18:14] mhall119: on a call (mozilla webdev). will talk in a bit) [18:14] good luck [18:14] mhall119: Just a team call. Not an interview or anything :) [18:16] ever call is a pseudo-interview [18:17] cjohnston: [summit-hackers] Add more content/direct links on the front page: TODO [18:17] are we still planning on doing that, now that we share the nav with uds.ubuntu.com? [18:22] i want to, but im not incharge [18:23] i want to move everything to the django app [18:23] i guess we can see how well they integrate === daker is now known as daker_ [18:25] mhall119: please https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/ubuntu-community-webthemes/960px/+merge/68587 [18:25] https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/summit/960px/+merge/68589 [18:25] and ill fix LD once you land the theme [18:25] brb.. [18:25] cjohnston: you've tested that this works on summit? [18:26] yes.. i dont have anything to test the scheudle page though [18:26] but i tested other random pages, took it off and put it back on [18:26] ok [18:27] good enough for me, I approved if you can land it [18:35] mhall119: https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/ubuntu-community-webthemes/960px/+merge/68587 [18:37] mhall119: I thought of that. Then decided against it. [18:37] I could always do ~tarmac-webdev/summit/1.1 [18:37] that wway none of us can push to it. [18:37] Only tarmac [18:37] But I'm not comfortable with that. We would always have to do emergency fixes. [18:37] nigelb: to do that, imo, you would need to give us the ability to smack tarmac to make it run NOW [18:38] cjohnston: why? [18:38] why this INSTANT GRATIFICATION need? :) [18:38] the tarmac user is closed from ssh access on my machine. so I won't be able to give anyone access. [18:39] no.. so that when something breaks, we can smack it [18:39] make a page that we can hit and it will fire it off [18:39] that sounds good. I'll get it done this weekend. Just remind me on friday please? [18:41] yay.. instant gratification [18:44] cjohnston: is this Community Week in -classroom? [18:44] yes [18:45] I wasn't going to do a communtiy week session on testing [18:45] you arent [18:45] community week is from noon to 4 [18:45] your doing 11 [18:46] oh, ok [19:05] cjohnston: http://air.mozilla.org/old-air-mozilla/ [19:05] Cross site scripting lesson. [19:06] (its live video) [19:06] lesson 1: don't do it [19:06] lesson 2: DON'T DO IT! [19:12] yeah, its about how to protect your website against it. [19:25] {% csrftoken %} [20:15] Daviey: ping [20:26] Daviey: nvm [20:29] mhall119: pong [20:29] mhall119: nvm [20:29] heh [20:30] nice [20:31] Daviey: we want to break summit some more for you [20:31] we're fixing it! [20:32] they are fighting the evil render.py [20:32] oh dear [20:32] Daviey: mhall119 http://paste.ubuntu.com/648546/ when running ./manage.py lpupdate uds-n [20:32] see breakage [20:32] some things are best left alone :) [20:32] lol [20:32] its no fun that way Daviey [20:33] to me, it looks like there is an issue with the json :) [20:33] i dunno how to fix it [20:33] thats what you are for [20:33] heh [20:35] nigelb: ^^ [20:38] cjohnston: touching render.py is not something that should be done at night. [20:38] I assume this hasn't landed? [20:39] no major changes to render.py have landed [20:48] my error is coming from a brand new pull of lp:summit [20:49] coalwater: now that you have started looking at LD, we need to introduce you to summit [20:50] cjohnston: I found the bug, will work up a fix [20:50] sweet [20:50] cjohnston, what summit [20:50] is it something easy or should i move onto something else mhall119 ? [20:50] a beautiful webapp coalwater [20:50] summit.ubuntu.com [20:51] cjohnston: it's already fixed, you can review it [20:51] sweet [20:51] How are the unit tests looking atm? [20:51] ok [20:51] Daviey: mhall119 , i got to thinking the other day after an email I got about how far summit has come in the last three uds's [20:52] summit seems to see my user name correctly, unlike loco directory :D [20:52] coalwater: do you have the coalwater2 issue in LD? [20:52] yea [20:53] ill ask IS to run an update [20:53] cjohnston: https://code.launchpad.net/~mhall119/summit/fix-lpupdate-meetings/+merge/68604 [20:53] cjohnston: update doesn't run update-openids [20:53] let me logout and back in, maybe that'll change something lol [20:53] mhall119: I know that [20:53] nope [20:53] coalwater: no, it wont [20:54] cjohnston: btw, I spoke with charlieS about django-openid-auth, he's says we should be able to get it on there, waiting for more detail [20:54] thats it mhall119 [20:54] cool [20:54] yup [20:54] no idea on a time frame? [20:54] like you said, thats more important than django [20:54] cjohnston: not ATM, hopefully not long though, I'll keep bugging him [20:55] ya [20:55] mhall119: I was going to say, we could always get a manager on board with us [20:55] if we needed to [20:55] maybe [20:55] for now, review my summit MP please so we can get it out [20:55] im working on it [20:56] test passed [20:56] there is no test for this [20:56] it's a syntax error, not a logic error [20:56] the test file was updated according to my merge [20:56] hmm [20:56] in the mp it isnt [20:56] i dunno [20:56] https://code.launchpad.net/~mhall119/summit/fix-lpupdate-meetings/+merge/68604 ? [20:56] did you merge it into your copy or trunk? [20:57] copy of trunk [20:57] it's targetting 1.x, not trunk [20:57] your trunk probably doesn't have some things in 1.x [20:57] once you approve this, I'll merge 1.x->trunk [20:57] mhall119: can I do a couple other things, like fixing the theme prior to another release? a couple hours or so [20:57] no.. lemme do that [20:57] I'll be at karate with the kids in a couple hours [20:58] tonight? [20:58] yeah [20:58] i have a couple things that i think will be quick fixes [20:58] make them to 1.x, not trunk [20:59] why [20:59] boo [20:59] your making my life hard [20:59] yes I am [20:59] 1.x will eventually be retired [20:59] today? [21:00] until then, it's our stable branch so we can do major refactoring to trunk [21:00] no, not today [21:00] maybe not tomorrow [21:00] but soo [21:00] n [21:00] and for the rest of your life [21:16] so mhall119 we have to manually push to 1.x? [21:32] yes, like the good ol' days [21:33] mhall119: https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/summit/960px/+merge/68609 [21:34] https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/ubuntu-community-webthemes/960px/+merge/68587 [21:35] will look at them when I get home [21:36] boo [21:36] or you can make nigel review them, h e's the PM [21:38] nigelb: [21:57] mhall119: would we be able to add search to summit that searches summit and uds [22:11] cjohnston: maybe, does the search on uds.u.c only search uds.u.c? [23:29] i would assume mhall119 [23:29] mhall119: you back? ready to do reviews? [23:29] we really need to get this migrations stuff fixed mhall119 .. its preventing further development [23:49] cjohnston: I'm back! and ready for dinner! [23:49] cjohnston: migrations on what? [23:49] summit? [23:50] yes [23:50] I can do that to trunk if you'd like [23:50] that'd be great [23:50] and then i can dev in trunk again [23:59] yay.. merges