| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| * smb yawns | 06:55 | |
| apw | kees, that is something your scripting is doing. your team does something which changes it to released over and over | 07:36 |
|---|---|---|
| apw | smb, moin | 07:37 |
| smb | apw, moin moin | 07:37 |
| apw | kees, then generally i change it back on th next autotriage run | 07:39 |
| === jibel__ is now known as jibel | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| Daviey | apw: What is the current status with the lucid kernel? | 09:05 |
| apw | lucid kernel is built in the PPA | 09:06 |
| * smb wonders whether Daviey is personally affected | 09:07 | |
| apw | Daviey, https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1825665/+listing-archive-extra | 09:08 |
| apw | if you fancy doing a last test with the final binaries before they are copied out, it might make skeat happy | 09:08 |
| Daviey | apw: That is all i hope to achieve in life. | 09:11 |
| Daviey | apw: thanks | 09:12 |
| mvo | hi, I see odd upgrade issues in my kvm based automatic upgrade testing. after the upgrade to 3.0.0-5-generic in oneirc it won't find its root fs anymore. http://people.canonical.com/~mvo/tmp/Screenshot%20at%202011-07-21%2013:58:22.png <- screenshot of the kvm instance. the uuid displayed looks odd, all 00000 for the available paritions. with 2.6.28-8-generic (same image) it books just fine. any ideas where I should dig further? | 12:01 |
| mvo | blkid /dev/sda1 on the system gives me the right uuid | 12:02 |
| apw | mvo, but normally UUID mappings are done in initramfs so we'd not expect the kernel to be doing anything with them would we ? | 12:11 |
| apw | mvo, and that error looks like the kernel erroring the mount ... not initramfs dropping to busybox | 12:12 |
| apw | have you lost your initramfs for the new kerenl | 12:12 |
| mvo | apw: thanks! I should have thought about this, let me investigate whats up with the initramfs | 12:14 |
| mvo | apw: ha! here we go, grub is missing the initrd line, now I just need to figure out why. thanks for your help | 12:15 |
| apw | mvo, heh good | 12:24 |
| === kentb-out is now known as kentb | ||
| skaet | apw, how is the lucid kernel with patch to fix bug 588861 coming along? | 14:01 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 588861 in linux ""pad block corrupted" error when trying to register an image with 2.6.34 kernel" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588861 | 14:01 |
| apw | skaet, its all built, i 'handed' it to cjwatson and you in #ubuntu-release | 14:05 |
| * apw wanders out for some air | 14:06 | |
| skaet | apw, coolio. Many thanks. :) | 14:09 |
| * smb suggests non-air tight windows to apw | 14:17 | |
| * ogasawara back in 20 | 14:24 | |
| bjf | brendand_, if you have issues with stable kernels or any kinds of questions about them, it's best to ask them in this public channel | 14:33 |
| === brendand_ is now known as brendand | ||
| brendand | we've got a system being tested with the proposed maverick kernel which blanks the display after about 2-3 minutes from booting | 14:34 |
| brendand | we're sure it's not the screensaver | 14:34 |
| brendand | but this is after doing a full dist-upgrade | 14:34 |
| brendand | if we just update to the proposed kernel then it seems to work okay | 14:34 |
| brendand | would it be worth updating both the kernel and xserver-xorg (and perhaps the graphics drivers where applicable) | 14:35 |
| brendand | ? | 14:35 |
| bjf | brendand, yes, i think that makes sense, to get to the interaction that is causing the problem | 14:36 |
| skaet | apw, have gone ahead and updated kernel tracking bug to indicate it was ready to be published, and have now moved the kernel to -proposed. | 14:40 |
| apw_ | great | 14:41 |
| hallyn | so with dkms packages, should dkms be doing anything to check whether the linux-headers package installed matches the kernel, at least, or, preferably whether both are the defaults? | 14:44 |
| bjf | ogasawara, anytime your ready, ping me | 14:44 |
| ogasawara | bjf: cool, gimme about 10 more min | 14:44 |
| bjf | ogasawara, no rush, got plenty to do :-) | 14:45 |
| tgardner | hallyn, DKMS typically _requiers_ the headers packages to match the kernel ABI | 14:45 |
| tgardner | requires* | 14:45 |
| hallyn | tgardner: hm, bc every lucid or maverick 'high' or 'critical' open-vm-dkms bug i just saw has them not matching | 14:45 |
| tgardner | hallyn, well, we don't maintain DKMS, so I'm not all that familiar with it anymore | 14:46 |
| hallyn | tgardner: ok, thanks. | 14:46 |
| tgardner | hallyn, alberto milone has a lot of experience with it | 14:46 |
| hallyn | if enough of these keep coming, i guess i'll look into it more | 14:46 |
| ev | I've seen several people, mostly with MacBook Airs in Millbank that cannot reboot. I've just come across a MacBook Pro that cannot either: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/814118 | 14:51 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 814118 in linux "MacBookPro7,1 fails to reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 14:51 |
| ev | this is all in Natty | 14:51 |
| ev | if you guys need any more information on those, do let me know. I sit right by these. | 14:51 |
| ogasawara | bjf: k, I'm ready whenever | 14:58 |
| tgardner | bjf, your bot message has a mis-spelling: dianosing. bug #814118 | 14:58 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 814118 in linux "MacBookPro7,1 fails to reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/814118 | 14:58 |
| bjf | tgardner, will fix | 14:58 |
| bjf | ogasawara, will be on my way soon | 15:00 |
| ogasawara | bjf: ack | 15:00 |
| smb | ev, I maybe missed it but has that ever worked in 10.04 or not? Anyway, you may try to put reboot=? (with ? alternatively being b, t, k, a, e or p) to the kernel cmndline and try rebooting then. | 15:00 |
| smb | ev, and of course add any outcome to the bug report | 15:01 |
| ev | smb: I don't know about 10.04 - I could add a 10.04 kernel to the system and try rebooting from that, if you think it would prove valuable | 15:01 |
| ev | and I'll give the reboot= ones a go in a bit | 15:01 |
| ev | just about to jump on a call | 15:01 |
| smb | ev, Sorry my fault of not reading 11 | 15:02 |
| smb | ev, Whatever I said replace 10.04 with 11.04... | 15:02 |
| ev | ah, so give old 11.04 kernels a go? | 15:03 |
| ev | any one in particular? | 15:03 |
| smb | ev, No I meant debug 11.04 | 15:03 |
| smb | ev, Or tell us whether 11.04 used to work | 15:03 |
| ev | okay, will do | 15:03 |
| smb | cking, I was not really sure we had that covered anywhere else, so I added reboot= to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BIOSandUbuntu#Reboot_Methods (which I think you started) | 15:22 |
| apw | sconklin1, can you check that shank-bot has done the right thing with the lucid update, its in -proposed | 15:51 |
| sconklin1 | shankbot is broken, I'm investigating | 15:52 |
| apw | sconklin1, ooops :) | 15:52 |
| sconklin1 | I can manually push it, though | 15:52 |
| skaet | sconklin, bjf, apw - can you join on a call in 10 minutes (info sent by google calendar) to discuss testing appropriate for the lucid kernel in -proposed? | 16:31 |
| apw | ogasawara, we just uploaded yes? will you be uploading when 3.0 drops as well ? | 16:39 |
| ogasawara | apw: yes and yes | 16:39 |
| apw | trying to schedue adding overlayfs | 16:39 |
| apw | so i guess it makes most sense to shove it in with 3.0 | 16:39 |
| apw | i'll get it applied shortly | 16:39 |
| ogasawara | apw: ack | 16:39 |
| ogasawara | apw: assuming 3.0 lands before end of next week, I'll likely just do one more upload next fri before Alpha3 | 16:40 |
| ogasawara | apw: we can squeeze one more in though if you wanted to get overlayfs in and tested | 16:41 |
| ogasawara | apw: the builds go quicker now since we dropped versatile | 16:41 |
| apw | ogasawara, i think we are expecting it 'today' as he was g+ing that it would have been out yesterday other than this error | 16:46 |
| ogasawara | apw: yep, was just reading the LKML post | 16:46 |
| bjf | sconklin, apw, my input: yes it should be tested, it should be a full testing pass | 16:51 |
| === sconklin1 is now known as sconklin | ||
| === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero | ||
| skaet | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes/ChangeSummary/10.04.3 | 17:01 |
| cjwatson | reassigned bug 801610 to the kernel and marked it Confirmed, but then I remembered in the past that marking kernel bugs Confirmed without doing something else to them caused the kernel team to miss them; is that still true? | 17:04 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 801610 in linux "Include enic & fnic drivers in ubuntu-installer" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/801610 | 17:04 |
| tgardner | cjwatson, I'll take care of it | 17:05 |
| brendand_ | apw - what's this lucid bug the proposed kernel is meant to fix? | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | tgardner: thanks | 17:06 |
| * ppisati -> gym | 17:52 | |
| ogasawara | heh, I like proxying through bjf's mumble | 17:57 |
| * smb bets that this has a nasty meaning in the uk... :-P | 17:58 | |
| apw | ogasawara, heh thats soundinf pretty dodgy | 18:00 |
| ogasawara | heh, for once I'm speechless | 18:00 |
| smb | sconklin, Ok, lbm for lucid got uploaded to the ppa (and I pushed the tree) | 18:10 |
| sconklin | smb: ack | 18:11 |
| apw | brendand, the fix in that kernel is for eucalyptus | 18:13 |
| apw | brendand, something to do with java not starting | 18:13 |
| brendand | apw - don't have a # by any chance? | 18:16 |
| apw | bug #588861 | 18:16 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 588861 in linux ""pad block corrupted" error when trying to register an image with 2.6.34 kernel" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588861 | 18:17 |
| apw | brendand, ^^ | 18:17 |
| apw | tgardner, i see 2011-1020 applied to everything but natty/* is that intentional | 18:47 |
| * jjohansen lunch | 19:41 | |
| tgardner | apw, just took a lunch break. I'll get natty applied shortly | 19:54 |
| apw | tgardner, ahh thanks | 20:25 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === kentb is now known as kentb-out | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
