[06:55]  * smb yawns
[07:36] <apw> kees, that is something your scripting is doing.  your team does something which changes it to released over and over
[07:37] <apw> smb, moin
[07:37] <smb> apw, moin moin
[07:39] <apw> kees, then generally i change it back on th next autotriage run
[09:05] <Daviey> apw: What is the current status with the lucid kernel?
[09:06] <apw> lucid kernel is built in the PPA
[09:07]  * smb wonders whether Daviey is personally affected
[09:08] <apw> Daviey, https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1825665/+listing-archive-extra
[09:08] <apw> if you fancy doing a last test with the final binaries before they are copied out, it might make skeat happy
[09:11] <Daviey> apw: That is all i hope to achieve in life.
[09:12] <Daviey> apw: thanks
[12:01] <mvo> hi,  I see odd upgrade issues in my kvm based automatic upgrade testing. after the upgrade to 3.0.0-5-generic in oneirc it won't find its root fs anymore. http://people.canonical.com/~mvo/tmp/Screenshot%20at%202011-07-21%2013:58:22.png <- screenshot of the kvm instance. the uuid displayed looks odd, all 00000 for the available paritions. with 2.6.28-8-generic (same image) it books just fine. any ideas where I should dig further?
[12:02] <mvo> blkid /dev/sda1 on the system gives me the right uuid
[12:11] <apw> mvo, but normally UUID mappings are done in initramfs so we'd not expect the kernel to be doing anything with them would we ?
[12:12] <apw> mvo, and that error looks like the kernel erroring the mount ... not initramfs dropping to busybox
[12:12] <apw> have you lost your initramfs for the new kerenl
[12:14] <mvo> apw: thanks! I should have thought about this, let me investigate whats up with the initramfs
[12:15] <mvo> apw: ha! here we go, grub is missing the initrd line, now I just need to figure out why. thanks for your help
[12:24] <apw> mvo, heh good
[14:01] <skaet> apw,  how is the lucid kernel with patch to fix bug 588861 coming along? 
[14:01] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 588861 in linux ""pad block corrupted" error when trying to register an image with 2.6.34 kernel" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588861
[14:05] <apw> skaet, its all built, i 'handed' it to cjwatson and you in #ubuntu-release
[14:06]  * apw wanders out for some air
[14:09] <skaet> apw,  coolio.   Many thanks.  :)
[14:17]  * smb suggests non-air tight windows to apw
[14:24]  * ogasawara back in 20
[14:33] <bjf> brendand_, if you have issues with stable kernels or any kinds of questions about them, it's best to ask them in this public channel
[14:34] <brendand> we've got a system being tested with the proposed maverick kernel which blanks the display after about 2-3 minutes from booting
[14:34] <brendand> we're sure it's not the screensaver
[14:34] <brendand> but this is after doing a full dist-upgrade
[14:34] <brendand> if we just update to the proposed kernel then it seems to work okay
[14:35] <brendand> would it be worth updating both the kernel and xserver-xorg (and perhaps the graphics drivers where applicable)
[14:35] <brendand> ?
[14:36] <bjf> brendand, yes, i think that makes sense, to get to the interaction that is causing the problem
[14:40] <skaet> apw,  have gone ahead and updated kernel tracking bug to indicate it was ready to be published,  and have now moved the kernel to -proposed.
[14:41] <apw_> great
[14:44] <hallyn> so with dkms packages, should dkms be doing anything to check whether the linux-headers package installed matches the kernel, at least, or, preferably whether both are the defaults?
[14:44] <bjf> ogasawara, anytime your ready, ping me
[14:44] <ogasawara> bjf: cool, gimme about 10 more min
[14:45] <bjf> ogasawara, no rush, got plenty to do :-)
[14:45] <tgardner> hallyn, DKMS typically _requiers_ the headers packages to match the kernel ABI
[14:45] <tgardner> requires*
[14:45] <hallyn> tgardner: hm, bc every lucid or maverick 'high' or 'critical' open-vm-dkms bug i just saw has them not matching
[14:46] <tgardner> hallyn, well, we don't maintain DKMS, so I'm not all that familiar with it anymore
[14:46] <hallyn> tgardner: ok, thanks.
[14:46] <tgardner> hallyn, alberto milone has a lot of experience with it
[14:46] <hallyn> if enough of these keep coming, i guess i'll look into it more
[14:51] <ev> I've seen several people, mostly with MacBook Airs in Millbank that cannot reboot.  I've just come across a MacBook Pro that cannot either: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/814118
[14:51] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 814118 in linux "MacBookPro7,1 fails to reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[14:51] <ev> this is all in Natty
[14:51] <ev> if you guys need any more information on those, do let me know.  I sit right by these.
[14:58] <ogasawara> bjf: k, I'm ready whenever
[14:58] <tgardner> bjf, your bot message has a mis-spelling: dianosing. bug #814118
[14:58] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 814118 in linux "MacBookPro7,1 fails to reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/814118
[14:58] <bjf> tgardner, will fix
[15:00] <bjf> ogasawara, will be on my way soon
[15:00] <ogasawara> bjf: ack
[15:00] <smb> ev, I maybe missed it but has that ever worked in 10.04 or not? Anyway, you may try to put reboot=? (with ? alternatively being b, t, k, a, e or p) to the kernel cmndline and try rebooting then.
[15:01] <smb> ev, and of course add any outcome to the bug report
[15:01] <ev> smb: I don't know about 10.04 - I could add a 10.04 kernel to the system and try rebooting from that, if you think it would prove valuable
[15:01] <ev> and I'll give the reboot= ones a go in a bit
[15:01] <ev> just about to jump on a call
[15:02] <smb> ev, Sorry my fault of not reading 11
[15:02] <smb> ev, Whatever I said replace 10.04 with 11.04...
[15:03] <ev> ah, so give old 11.04 kernels a go?
[15:03] <ev> any one in particular?
[15:03] <smb> ev, No I meant debug 11.04
[15:03] <smb> ev, Or tell us whether 11.04 used to work
[15:03] <ev> okay, will do
[15:22] <smb> cking, I was not really sure we had that covered anywhere else, so I added reboot= to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BIOSandUbuntu#Reboot_Methods (which I think you started)
[15:51] <apw> sconklin1, can you check that shank-bot has done the right thing with the lucid update, its in -proposed
[15:52] <sconklin1> shankbot is broken, I'm investigating
[15:52] <apw> sconklin1, ooops :)
[15:52] <sconklin1> I can manually push it, though
[16:31] <skaet> sconklin, bjf, apw - can you join on a call in 10 minutes (info sent by google calendar) to discuss testing appropriate for the lucid kernel in -proposed?
[16:39] <apw> ogasawara, we just uploaded yes? will you be uploading when 3.0 drops as well ?
[16:39] <ogasawara> apw: yes and yes
[16:39] <apw> trying to schedue adding overlayfs
[16:39] <apw> so i guess it makes most sense to shove it in with 3.0
[16:39] <apw> i'll get it applied shortly
[16:39] <ogasawara> apw: ack
[16:40] <ogasawara> apw: assuming 3.0 lands before end of next week, I'll likely just do one more upload next fri before Alpha3
[16:41] <ogasawara> apw: we can squeeze one more in though if you wanted to get overlayfs in and tested
[16:41] <ogasawara> apw: the builds go quicker now since we dropped versatile
[16:46] <apw> ogasawara, i think we are expecting it 'today' as he was g+ing that it would have been out yesterday other than this error
[16:46] <ogasawara> apw: yep, was just reading the LKML post
[16:51] <bjf> sconklin, apw, my input: yes it should be tested, it should be a full testing pass
[17:01] <skaet> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes/ChangeSummary/10.04.3
[17:04] <cjwatson> reassigned bug 801610 to the kernel and marked it Confirmed, but then I remembered in the past that marking kernel bugs Confirmed without doing something else to them caused the kernel team to miss them; is that still true?
[17:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 801610 in linux "Include enic & fnic drivers in ubuntu-installer" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/801610
[17:05] <tgardner> cjwatson, I'll take care of it
[17:05] <brendand_> apw - what's this lucid bug the proposed kernel is meant to fix?
[17:06] <cjwatson> tgardner: thanks
[17:52]  * ppisati -> gym
[17:57] <ogasawara> heh, I like proxying through bjf's mumble
[17:58]  * smb bets that this has a nasty meaning in the uk... :-P
[18:00] <apw> ogasawara, heh thats soundinf pretty dodgy
[18:00] <ogasawara> heh, for once I'm speechless
[18:10] <smb> sconklin, Ok, lbm for lucid got uploaded to the ppa (and I pushed the tree)
[18:11] <sconklin> smb: ack
[18:13] <apw> brendand, the fix in that kernel is for eucalyptus
[18:13] <apw> brendand, something to do with java not starting
[18:16] <brendand> apw - don't have a # by any chance?
[18:16] <apw> bug #588861
[18:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 588861 in linux ""pad block corrupted" error when trying to register an image with 2.6.34 kernel" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588861
[18:17] <apw> brendand, ^^
[18:47] <apw> tgardner, i see 2011-1020 applied to everything but natty/* is that intentional
[19:41]  * jjohansen lunch
[19:54] <tgardner> apw, just took a lunch break. I'll get natty applied shortly
[20:25] <apw> tgardner, ahh thanks