=== medberry is now known as med_out
[04:32] <dnivra> Laney: highvoltage: are you around?
[04:38] <dnivra> Laney: highvoltage: I've uploaded the initial packaging(for debian). You can view it here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openteacher/. Do review it and let me know if I can make more improvements.
=== StevenK_ is now known as StevenK
[04:40] <dnivra> (^^ In reference to the conversation we had about packaging openteacher: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/682852)
[04:40] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 682852 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] OpenTeacher" [Wishlist,In progress]
[04:40] <dnivra> Anyone else who can pitch in some comments/reviews too. Would appreciate it a lot :).
[07:35] <dholbach> good morning
[07:50] <oier> hi, I was wondering if a motu dev with uploads right could review my package "indicator-bug" at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=9151 I already have one advocate, just need a second one
[07:50] <oier> I would be very grateful
[07:51] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[07:51] <dholbach> hey iulian
=== jibel__ is now known as jibel
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
[09:03] <Quintasan> Good morning.
[10:16] <oier> Hi, I would be very grateful if a motu-dev could review my package "indicator-bug" at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=9151 I already have one advocate so I just need one more
[10:27] <dupondje> is pkg-config needed as build-dep ?
[10:27] <dupondje> or is that always included ?
[10:51] <geser> dupondje: yes, you need to add it to B-D
[12:24] <dupondje> Could somebody give his opinion about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gearmand/+bug/682680
[12:24] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 682680 in gearmand (Ubuntu) "New upstream release, gearmand 0.17" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
[12:24] <dupondje> thx
[12:24] <dupondje> :D
[12:25] <dupondje> added a patch to newest upstream version
[12:28] <geser> dupondje: urgs, can you attach a diff of the debian directory? no one is going to review all those upstream changes, we are only interesting in changes to the packaging
[12:29] <geser> in those cases usually only the diff.gz (or now the .debian.tar.gz) is attached and the sponsor downloads the .orig.tar.gz himself
[12:31] <dupondje> added the file
=== kentb-out is now known as kentb
[12:35] <geser> dupondje: have you tried to contact Monty Taylor to update the package in Debian so it can be synced?
[12:36] <dupondje> not yet
[12:36] <dupondje> there is a non updated bug since begin this year to ask for an upgrade in debian also
[12:39] <geser> dupondje: I see you added some files to debian/docs: does COPYING include the license text or something else?
[12:40] <geser> got the documentation reworked that you don't need to "make docs" anymore? and also no libgearman-docs.doc-base.* files?
[12:40] <dupondje> COPYING does containt license shizzle yes
[12:40] <dupondje> and docs got rewritten completely in 0.20
[12:43] <geser> what license is it? there is no need to ship COPYING in the binary package if it contains one of the common licenses (which are in /usr/share/common-licenses)
[12:43] <dupondje> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gearman-developers/gearmand/trunk/view/head:/COPYING
[12:46] <geser> as I'm not an expert in this field, I guess it's ok to include it in debian/docs
[12:48] <geser> otherwise the diff looks sane
[12:49] <dupondje> thanks for looking
[12:49] <dupondje> gtg now
[12:49] <Laney> find /usr/share/doc -name COPYING doesn't show much
[12:51] <dnivra> Laney: Hello. Could you review the packaging I've done? It can be found at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openteacher/
[12:51] <Laney> dnivra: hello, maybe later if I get some time
[12:51] <dnivra> Laney: sure. No problem :).
[12:51] <dnivra> Shall I drop in the mail to -distribution about this now?
[12:52] <geser> Laney: packages.ubuntu.com lists over 100 hits for COPYING in oneiric
[12:53] <dnivra> highvoltage: Could you review the packaging I've done too if you can? It can be found at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openteacher/
[12:53] <Laney> geser: are a large number of those for tex packages?
[12:53] <dnivra> highvoltage: if you're around that is :)
[12:54] <Laney> geser: anyway, that's low enough to say that it's not common :-)
[12:55] <Laney> dnivra: your build depends aren't complete
[12:57] <dnivra> Laney: Thought I'd already added them. I'll check it out :).
[13:01] <highvoltage> dnivra: thanks, got it
[13:02] <dnivra> highvoltage: it's not completed. I think I've not run dupload yet. must've slipped my mind.
[13:02] <highvoltage> dnivra: ok, np
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
[13:11] <jtaylor> does someone have a working armel chroot?
[13:12] <dnivra> highvoltage: just uploaded it :). I'd indeed missed it out-it failed due to some network connectivity issue earlier.
[13:13] <highvoltage> dnivra: great, I'm at work and have a busy day, I can look at it after lunchtime (around 4 hours from now)
[13:14] <dnivra> highvoltage: no problem :). Could you drop in a mail then? I'd be busy sleeping then. I'll take a look at it tomorrow.
[13:14] <highvoltage> dnivra: sure, pm me your e-mail address
=== med_out is now known as medberry
[13:47] <stlsaint>    /exit
=== jamespage1 is now known as jamespage
=== dnivra_ is now known as dnivra
=== medberry is now known as med_out
=== med_out is now known as medberry
=== paul_ is now known as Elbrus
[17:08] <nhandler> Hmm...I just saw http://blog.launchpad.net/?p=2747 . We might want to make sure we update our documentation. I have a feel we might get some process bugs that non-developers are interested in, they hit 'this affects me too' to show their interest, and the status changes to confirmed (which has a slightly different meaning for these types of bugs)
[17:10] <micahg> maybe we should stop using status for process?
[17:21] <Laney> what else? tags?
[17:21] <Laney> we could just use triaged as non-bug-control can't set that
[17:22] <micahg> Laney: indeed, maybe ACKd becomes triaged
[17:23] <Laney> uh huh
[17:23] <Laney> let's wait and see if this becomes a real problem though
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== kentb is now known as kentb-out
[23:30] <RainCT> Any idea why dpkg-buildpackage may be creating a debian-changes-* patch reverting the changes of all other patches? (3.0 quilt, dh7, compat 8)
[23:31] <RAOF> RainCT: Because you've had those patches applied, then reverted them on your build tree?L
[23:35] <RainCT> Uhm, "mv debian ..; rm -r <src>; tar -xf *orig*; mv debian <src>;" fixed it.
[23:35] <RainCT> But the patches weren't applied
[23:36] <RainCT> ah, "had"
[23:36] <RainCT> RAOF: What's the problem with that?
[23:37] <RAOF> RainCT: If quilt thinks those patches are applied then dpkg-bulidpackage will add a patch to ensure that the final build tree looks like what you've got.
[23:38] <RAOF> So, it's possible you've confused quilt.
[23:38] <RainCT> Ah, I see.
[23:38] <RainCT> It'd rather say, quilt confuses me :P
[23:38] <RainCT> Thanks RAOF
=== medberry is now known as med_out
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel