[06:20] <astraljava> cjwatson: Yay! Thanks!
[08:05] <jamespage> good morning  - please could an archive admin accept the libspring-java binaries packages in the NEW queue for oneiric - ta
[10:08] <Daviey> apw: Confirming that the PPA kernel resolves the issue
[10:39] <apw> skaet, cjwatson, i assume that the PPA kernel should be copied out to -proposed at least, also have we decided on how much QA to apply
[10:41] <cjwatson> jibel: any showstoppers you know of that would prevent releasing non-server images?
[10:41] <jibel> cjwatson, I found a problem with ltsp install
[10:42] <jibel> it tried to download the files from the wrong location on the ltsp server
[10:42] <jibel> but there's an easy workaround
[10:42] <cjwatson> is it a regression from .2?
[10:42] <jibel> cjwatson, other than this, I think we are good.
[10:43] <cjwatson> (is this bug 813837?  not much to go on there, it doesn't e.g. say *which* filename)
[10:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 813837 in ltsp (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "ltsp client not able to load boot file (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813837
[10:43] <jibel> cjwatson, IDK, 10.04.2 tests are marked as passed. I'll try with a10.04.2 image
[10:44] <jibel> yes, this one. I'm adding a comment and the workaround.
[10:44] <cjwatson> I wonder if it's kernel-version-dependent - that's why knowing the filename it's failing to locate would be helpful
[10:45] <cjwatson> apw: I'll look shortly when I have some I/O bandwidth (backups got a bit confused today and overran)
[10:45] <jibel> not kernel dependent.
[10:46] <jibel> the client tries to download the file ltsp/amd64.tmp/pxelinux.0 but the real location is ltsp/amd64/pxelinux.0
[10:46] <apw> cjwatson, as long as the team knows the status i am  happy
[10:47] <jibel> a quick workaround is to create a symlink on the server.
[10:47] <jibel> anyone knows where this path is defined ?
[10:48] <Daviey> cjwatson: Did skaet talk to you last night?
[10:49] <cjwatson> yeah, I got a brain-dump when she was finishing up
[10:49] <Daviey> The plan is/was to still release the current 10.04.3 candidate and release note the kernel issue.
[10:49] <Daviey> (for server)
[10:50] <Daviey> The fixed kernel will bake for 7 days in -proposed?
[10:50] <cjwatson> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes/ChangeSummary/10.04.3 says "if" for that - I thought it was certain?
[10:51] <cjwatson> the alternative would be to do rapid-fire QA on it and waive the waiting period; but it's possible that that's too risky for the kernel, since it affects more than server if some unforeseen thing goes wrong
[10:52] <Daviey> myself and robbie were OK with releasing 10.04.3 with the bug, and release noting it.
[10:52] <cjwatson> ok, clearly your call :)
[10:53] <Daviey> We felt the time (& expense) involved with re-QA'ing the image outweighs the benefit.
[10:53] <Daviey> *ideally* i'd like the kernel in -updates on announcement, but that isn't the end of the world.
[10:54] <Daviey> If this was a non-point release, it would be more serious IMO.
[10:54] <Daviey> The bug already exists in the archive, so it's no differnet from 10.04 + updates.
[10:56] <cjwatson> jibel: hunting ...
[11:00] <jibel> its in /etc/ltsp/dhcp.conf
[11:01] <cjwatson> dhcp.conf -> dhcpd.conf?
[11:01] <cjwatson> I'd guessed that, but was trying to find what was doing the substitution
[11:01] <cjwatson> (phone, though)
[11:02] <jibel> dhcpd.conf sorry
[11:04] <jibel> ltsp didn't change since the release of lucid, this bug must be there from the start.
[11:19] <cjwatson> jibel: except I'm not sure that something else isn't substituting stuff into that file
[13:13] <pitti> cjwatson: do you want lucid-updates stay locked down for now, or is it ok to release proposed packages?
[13:16] <cjwatson> pitti: locked please
[13:16] <cjwatson> I haven't taken a snapshot yet
[13:16] <pitti> cjwatson: ack
[13:16]  * pitti also tells the other SRU-eros
[13:17] <cjwatson> shouldn't be too long
[13:19] <cjwatson> jibel: I didn't get much further tracking that down; the target architecture gets substituted in from debian/ltsp-client-builder.postinst, and this seems to indicate that /opt/ltsp/images/amd64.img.tmp didn't get removed
[13:19] <cjwatson> but I don't know why
[13:19] <cjwatson> jibel: at least wew have a workaround
[13:23] <jibel> cjwatson, I'm stuck at the same place. I tried 10.04.2 which exhibits the same bug, I'll try 10.04.
[13:23] <cjwatson> jibel: is there an oneiric system involved anywhere in this mix?
[13:24] <jibel> and there's nothing interesting the the logs. mksquashfs exit correctly.
[13:24] <jibel> cjwatson, no oneiric system involved
[13:25] <cjwatson> odd
[13:25] <cjwatson> well, if it's not a regression from .2, definitely not a blocker
[13:25] <jibel> agree
[13:26] <cjwatson> starting prepublication now
[13:26] <cjwatson> would appreciate it if nobody else touched antimony :-)
[13:27] <pitti> cjwatson: oh, btw
[13:27] <pitti> cjwatson: there was a www.prev when I looked yesterday
[13:27] <pitti> cjwatson: this might have been a leftover from me from alpha-2, unless you created it yesterday
[13:27] <pitti> so please kill if it isn't your's
[13:30] <cjwatson> already done - publish-image-set.py's commands do that
[13:34] <skaet> good morning cjwatson, pitti - publishing started I see :)
[13:34] <cjwatson> yep, though I may have to interrupt it to go out for a bit
[13:34] <cjwatson> but I'll try to get prepublication done first
[13:35] <skaet> cjwatson, fair enough.
[13:38] <cjwatson> prepublication syncing out now - the 10.04.2 DVD is gone without being replaced by the 10.04.3 one because I got things in slightly the wrong order, but that'll be rectified in a few hours
[13:39] <skaet> cjwatson,  just to confirm,  we're not publishing powerpc images?  (since no tests run on them.)
[13:42] <cjwatson> skaet: correct
[13:42] <skaet> coolio.
[13:42] <skaet> :)
[13:43] <cjwatson> point-release-snapshot running; I'm going out for a bit now, back in perhaps an hour, I basically have to wait for mirrors at this point anyway
[13:48] <skaet> cjwatson,  ok
[13:50] <jibel> cjwatson, 10.04 doesn't have the bug, now trying 10.04.1
[13:53] <cjwatson> pitti: consider lucid-updates unfrozen now
[13:53] <pitti> cjwatson: ah, splendid
[14:06] <apw> cjwatson, did we publish the lucid kernel ?
[14:29] <cjwatson> apw: no, not yet, I was going to do that once I'd finished with image publication
[14:30] <cjwatson> if somebody else wants to deal with copying it, I'd appreciate it actually
[14:42] <skaet> jibel, cjwatson, pitti, brendand - kernel candidate to fix 588861 has now been copied to -proposed.  Tracking bug is bug: 813507
[14:43] <pitti> ah, thanks for the info
[14:46] <brendand> skaet - we're not trying to release 10.04.3 with that version are we?
[14:47]  * brendand thought 10.04.3 was released today
[14:47] <cjwatson> brendand: no
[14:47] <cjwatson> 10.04.3 is locked
[14:47] <skaet> brendand,  we want to get it into -updates as soon as possible.
[14:55] <jibel> cjwatson, I think I found the problem with ltsp
[14:55] <jibel> in ltsp-client-builder.postinst the script exit too early from the while loop to update the debconf progress bar
[14:55] <jibel> so dhcpd.conf is updated before the image is actually ready
[14:55] <jibel> At this stage its name is $(arch).img.tmp
[14:56] <jibel> then ltsp-update-image finishes normally and rename the image, but dhcpd.conf is already updated with the wrong name.
[14:56] <jibel> This bug still exists in oneiric and is not always reproducible
[14:57] <cjwatson> ah
[15:52] <cjwatson> I can't really tell what's going on with mirroring since we forgot to start running the mirror prober more frequently, but it's had a couple of hours now so I think I'll just go ahead with the main publication
[15:55] <apw> skaet, what was the decision on QA for the lucid kernel
[15:56] <skaet> cjwatson,  sounds good.
[15:56] <skaet> apw,  setting up a meeting to discuss what makes sense as a merge of the traditional SRU testing process and standard server testing.
[16:19] <skaet> ScottK,  just confirming we have your signoff to release the Kubuntu 10.04.3 images that have been tested on the iso tracker?
[16:19] <ScottK> Let me look.
[16:21] <ScottK> skaet: I'm good with Kubuntu desktop and alternate on i386 and amd64, yes.
[16:21] <skaet> Thanks, ScottK
[16:41] <cjwatson> skaet: all yours now, I've done everything up to point 3 on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PointReleaseProcess (reload that if you have it loaded already, I've been editing it recently)
[16:42] <cjwatson> I'll be around for a bit longer if you spot anything wrong
[16:44] <skaet> cjwatson,  thanks.
[17:26] <cjwatson> I've re-enabled copy-report
[17:26] <cjwatson> (so that should be automatically copying stuff from -security to -updates again)
[17:27]  * micahg hugs cjwatson 
[18:06] <brendand> skaet - what is the bug this -proposed kernel is meant to fix?
[18:43] <cjwatson> brendand: bug 588861
[18:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 588861 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 6 other projects) ""pad block corrupted" error when trying to register an image with 2.6.34 kernel (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 22)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588861
[18:44] <cjwatson> it seems to be properly referenced in the changelog
[18:45] <skaet> ScottK,  was trying out the links, and http://ubuntu.mirrors.pair.com/releases//kubuntu/lucid/kubuntu-10.04.3-desktop-i386.iso is giving You don't have permission to access /releases//kubuntu/lucid/kubuntu-10.04.3-desktop-i386.iso on this server.  Standard symptom of waiting for mirrors?  or something else?
[18:46] <ScottK> I'm guessing the mirror didn't sync yet.
[18:46] <ScottK> http://ubuntu.mirrors.pair.com/releases//kubuntu/lucid/ still says .2
[18:47] <skaet> also looks like MD5 sums need updating on: http://www.kubuntu.org/getkubuntu/download
[18:48] <skaet> ScottK,  I'll give it another 1/2 hour or so then for the mirrors.   Am seeing the ubuntu images on the mirrors now.
[18:50] <ScottK> If you can give the the correct md5sums, I can update it.
[19:26] <ScottK> skaet: Should be fixed.  I left 10.04.2 for now since some mirrors will still offer those for awhile.
[19:27] <skaet> ScottK,  ok.  I'm seeing them pretty clearly on: http://releases.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/10.04.3/,  so imagine at this point its just a matter of time.
[19:27] <ScottK> Yep.
[19:41] <skaet> 10.04.3 is announced.  :)
[19:45] <skaet> cjwatson,  steps 4,5 done,  6 not needed.  if you're around,  can you deactivate the 10.04.3 milestone?   (I still appear to lack the ability :-/)
[19:46] <cjwatson> skaet: done
[19:46] <skaet> cjwatson,  Thanks!
[19:52] <ScottK> cjwatson: If you have a moment, would you please run the packageset update script again.  I think we've got all the new packages in finally.
[19:52] <skaet> heh,  more automatic out-of-office/on vacation replies to the announce then usual.  Yup,  guess it must be summer vaction time.  :P
[20:48] <slangasek> cjwatson, skaet: congrats on 10.04.3!
[20:49] <skaet> thanks slangasek.  :)
[20:54] <cjwatson> ScottK: done, http://paste.ubuntu.com/649464/ - anything else, drop me a mail with the exceptions that are currently in core/desktop-core and shouldn't be
[20:54] <ScottK> cjwatson: Thanks.
[20:58] <Daviey> skaet: is it too late to ask for a respin of 10.04.3?
[20:59] <skaet> Daviey: yes
[20:59] <skaet> it is too late
[20:59] <Daviey> skaet: Oh good.
[21:02] <skaet> :)