[06:38] good morning all [06:39] good morning [06:54] hey yurchor :) [06:56] hey dpm! What is Ubuntu policy about using Git branches with no upstream translation? [06:57] yurchor, I'm not sure I understand what you mean with git branches with no upstream translation. Could you give me an example? [06:57] https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/base/networkmanagement/repository [06:58] libknetwork translation template is extracted not from master but from "nm09" branch [07:00] *libknetworkmanager [07:00] https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/plasma-widget-networkmanagement/+pots/libknetworkmanager [07:01] Upstream uses "master" for translation: http://l10n.kde.org/stats/gui/trunk-kde4/po/libknetworkmanager.po/ [07:06] yurchor, so just to make sure I understand: you're saying that in Ubuntu we're using the template from the 'nm09' branch, while at upstream the translation focus is 'master'? [07:06] Yes, exactly. [07:13] yurchor, ok, gotcha. Again, just to understand it: so do you see any particular issue in that? (it's common that in Ubuntu we ship older versions than upstream) [07:15] Calligra developers banned Mageia for using developer branch (Alpha 1) in the release. Is the usage of devs branch in the release discussed with KNetworkManager developers? [07:22] yurchor, I think it must have been, but in any case, if that is the actual question, the translation part is secondary: if I understand it correctly, what you're asking is if the usage of that branch in Ubuntu has been blessed by the upstream developers. I cannot answer that, as I don't know, but I'd recommend asking on #kubuntu-devel (perhaps you can ping apachelogger), where some Kubuntu and KDE devs hang out [07:22] they should be able to tell you in detail [07:22] Ok, thanks. [07:22] no worries :) [07:22] brb [12:27] Any experienced enGB translators around? === Guest68804 is now known as issyl0