[06:38] <dpm> good morning all
[06:39] <yurchor> good morning
[06:54] <dpm> hey yurchor :)
[06:56] <yurchor> hey dpm! What is Ubuntu policy about using Git branches with no upstream translation?
[06:57] <dpm> yurchor, I'm not sure I understand what you mean with git branches with no upstream translation. Could you give me an example?
[06:57] <yurchor> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/base/networkmanagement/repository
[06:58] <yurchor> libknetwork translation template is extracted not from master but from "nm09" branch
[07:00] <yurchor> *libknetworkmanager
[07:00] <yurchor> https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/plasma-widget-networkmanagement/+pots/libknetworkmanager
[07:01] <yurchor> Upstream uses "master" for translation: http://l10n.kde.org/stats/gui/trunk-kde4/po/libknetworkmanager.po/
[07:06] <dpm> yurchor, so just to make sure I understand: you're saying that in Ubuntu we're using the template from the 'nm09' branch, while at upstream the translation focus is 'master'?
[07:06] <yurchor> Yes, exactly.
[07:13] <dpm> yurchor, ok, gotcha. Again, just to understand it: so do you see any particular issue in that? (it's common that in Ubuntu we ship older versions than upstream)
[07:15] <yurchor> Calligra developers banned Mageia for using developer branch (Alpha 1) in the release. Is the usage of devs branch in the release discussed with KNetworkManager developers?
[07:22] <dpm> yurchor, I think it must have been, but in any case, if that is the actual question, the translation part is secondary: if I understand it correctly, what you're asking is if the usage of that branch in Ubuntu has been blessed by the upstream developers. I cannot answer that, as I don't know, but I'd recommend asking on #kubuntu-devel (perhaps you can ping apachelogger), where some Kubuntu and KDE devs hang out
[07:22] <dpm> they should be able to tell you in detail
[07:22] <yurchor> Ok, thanks.
[07:22] <dpm> no worries :)
[07:22] <dpm> brb
[12:27] <head_victim> Any experienced enGB translators around?