[00:08] <poolie> +register-merge is timing out?
[00:08] <poolie> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-2029E2
[00:09] <poolie> oh probably bug 793830
[00:12] <lifeless> that
[00:12] <poolie> yes it was
[00:12] <lifeless> or you just pushed a branch with big history and lp contended
[00:12] <poolie> who is allowed to set the status of a mp?
[00:12] <poolie> in https://code.launchpad.net/~paulbrianstewart/ubuntu/oneiric/bzr/814311-typo-52825-manBzr/+merge/68752 I can push to the target but i can't set the status to rejected
[00:12] <lifeless> official reviewers to any state, submitter to less privileged states
[00:12] <poolie> apparently i can delete it but i can't reject it
[00:12] <lifeless> I think I filed a bug about tha tcombination
[00:13] <poolie> so in this case only core devs or something?
[00:18] <lifeless> I'm not sure
[00:45] <idnar> if I mention another bug number in a bug description, is there some way to have that turn into a hyperlink to the relevant bug?
[00:45] <idnar> I could have sworn I did this before, but perhaps my memory is faulty
[00:46] <mwhudson> idnar: "bug NNNNN" is linkified
[00:46] <mwhudson> there are some other syntaxes too, but that's the one i remember
[00:46] <idnar> aha, I just had "#NNNN"
[00:46] <idnar> adding "bug" in front did the trick
[10:58] <jack_lt> how can I see which PPAs are installed, via the command line?
[10:59] <jack_lt> and after a check, how to remove a ppa?
[10:59] <Mkaysi> gksudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list I think
[11:00] <jack_lt> I don't think ppas are added to that file
[11:00] <henninge> jack_lt: there is also the /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory.
[11:00] <henninge> jack_lt: there is usually a file for each ppa
[11:01] <jack_lt> henninge, I see
[11:01] <jack_lt> :/etc/apt/sources.list.d$ ls
[11:01] <jack_lt> mozillateam-thunderbird-stable-lucid.list
[11:01] <jack_lt> and now I want to remove that ppa ..
[11:01] <henninge> jack_lt: remove the file
[11:01] <henninge> then "apt-get update"
[11:02] <jack_lt> henninge, that is the clean and good way?
[11:02] <henninge> jack_lt: I was just wondering about that ...
[11:02] <wgrant> It is.
[11:04] <henninge> jack_lt: it is. There is apt-add-repository but that changes sources.list
[11:05] <jack_lt> ok thx
[11:22] <bigjools> there's a ppa-purge script knocking around
[11:22] <bigjools> downgrades packages as well
[11:45] <Daviey> x edgers
[11:46] <Daviey> Ah, it's been packaged it seems
[15:14] <deryck> adeuring, I'll take IRC now.
[15:15] <adeuring> deryck: ok, thanks
[15:36] <bjsnider> if i delete ppa packages how long is it before the source tarball is also deleted?
[15:45] <dtchen> is there scheduled maintenance currently for upload.ubuntu.com? I'm receiving "Unable to connect to SSH host upload.ubuntu.com; EOF during negotiation" while using sftp.
[15:47] <deryck> dtchen, let me check.
[15:47] <dtchen> deryck: thanks
[15:55] <Ng> dtchen: the logs indicate that you're using a different ssh key to the ones listed in your launchpad user
[15:56] <deryck> bigjools, can you answer bjsnider's question.  I'm afraid I don't know.
[15:56] <bigjools> bjsnider: usually within minutes
[15:58] <dtchen> Ng: thanks. But that seems odd, since I haven't changed keys and was able to use the same key to upload two days ago.
[15:58] <Ng> hmm
[16:00]  * dtchen spots something in ~/.ssh/config and attempts to verify
[16:01] <dtchen> Ng: yep, you're correct, thanks
[16:02] <dtchen> I had a *.launchpad.net but not a corresponding *.ubuntu.com
[16:02] <Ng> :)
[16:54] <jml> ok. this is probably a FAQ, but how long do I have to wait after doing a dput until I see something in the Launchpad web ui, and where would I see it?
[16:58] <jelmer> jml: you'll get an email with a link, and your PPA page will show recent uploads
[16:59] <jml> jelmer: you mean it will show recent successful uploads, right?
[16:59] <jml> jelmer: because I eventually got a 'rejected' email, and never saw anything in the web ui about the upload.
[17:00] <jelmer> jml: yeah, if the package is rejected it will indeed only show up in your inbox
[17:01] <jelmer> (I think, my packages are never rejected :P)
[17:01] <jml> jelmer: thanks.
[17:01] <jml> hah, and you have to bump versions even for rejected uploads.
[17:01] <jml> I think I knew that, actually
[18:11] <doctormo> What command line tools are available to quickly release a tarball to a project?
[18:24] <benji> doctormo: here's a contributed script to upload release tars to LP: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~lazr-developers/launchpadlib/trunk/view/head:/contrib/upload_release_tarball.py
[20:53] <svenskmand> I just uploaded a package to my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~svenskmand/+archive/opendungeons the upload with dput went fine and I got a mail back that the upload was accepted. It also shows up on the webpage but I cannot add it to my local system by using sudo apt-add-repository ppa:svenskmand/opendungeons then I just get the error: "Error: can't find signing_key_fingerprint at https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~svenskmand/+archi
[22:45] <popey> http://loco.ubuntu.com/events/ubuntu-uk/1032/detail/
[22:45] <popey> oops
[22:51]  * popey pokes the world with bug 734520 which makes the loco directory look really very bad indeed.
[22:51] <wgrant> popey: If LP has no image, then why is the LD trying to show one?
[22:52] <wgrant> I see no bad image on the linked page.
[22:52] <popey> be nice if lp had a default headshot image if a user doesnt have one
[22:52] <popey> how does LD know whether a user has one or not?
[22:52] <wgrant> Yes, but that's a wishlist, not a bug.
[22:52] <wgrant> The image URL will be null.
[22:52] <wgrant> It's easy to work around from LD's side.
[22:52] <popey> but LP returns text
[22:52] <popey> for a broken image
[22:53] <popey> Object: <canonical.launchpad.rest.bytestorage.LibraryBackedByteStorage object at 0x12354c50>, name: 'logo'
[22:53] <wgrant> Where are you getting the URL of a broken image?
[22:53] <popey> personally, I'm not.
[22:53] <wgrant> Perhaps there is an image but it's served with the wrong content-type or something?
[22:53] <popey> I'm more a user of LD, and seeing lots of broken links
[22:53] <popey> broken images, sorry
[22:54] <wgrant> I would first be checking what they're doing, because LP doesn't serve garbage as images.
[22:54] <wgrant> It might conceivably be sending the wrong content-type, but browsers cope with that.
[22:54] <popey> https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/~martijn/logo is the image url for example
[22:55] <popey> which returns a piece of text
[22:55] <popey> not an image
[22:55] <wgrant> Not a 200, either.
[22:55] <wgrant> That's an API 404.
[22:55] <popey> ah, interesting
[22:58] <AlanBell> they don't appear in firefox at all, but display as broken in webkit browsers
[22:59] <popey> be much nicer if we displayed a generic headshot of sabdfl
[22:59] <popey> as per http://gizmodo.com/5652184/is-bill-gates-mugshot-photo-the-generic-user-icon-in-outlook-2010
[23:02] <wgrant> Heh
[23:02] <wgrant> Perhaps, but it's not clear how that should work.
[23:03] <wgrant> What if a consumer wants to show one in their own style instead?
[23:03] <wgrant> How do they know if a user has set a custom one or not?
[23:24] <bjsnider> ok, if i delete the packages in a ppa, how long before the orig tarball is also deleted and i can upload a new one with the same name?
[23:24] <wgrant> You can never do that.
[23:25] <bjsnider> that ain't gonna fly
[23:25] <wgrant> To do that would be a lie.
[23:25] <wgrant> It's not the orig tarball if it changes!
[23:26] <bjsnider> it's not anything. i deleted it
[23:26] <bjsnider> can't someone just go in there and destroy it? it's meaningless now
[23:26] <wgrant> No. You have to upload different versions of files with different versions.
[23:27] <wgrant> You can't upload different versions as the same version.
[23:27] <wgrant> That confuses people, apt, and Launchpad.
[23:27] <bjsnider> the builds all failed
[23:28] <wgrant> The source didn't.