| Quintasan | Good morning. | 06:39 |
|---|---|---|
| dholbach | good morning | 07:38 |
| philipballew | good evining from CA dholbach | 07:42 |
| dholbach | hi philipballew | 07:45 |
| philipballew | how's wherever you are dholbach ? | 07:46 |
| dholbach | Germany's waking up, I guess :) | 07:47 |
| philipballew | haha, I think you were the man in the packaging how to video i watched 2 weeks ago? | 07:48 |
| philipballew | unless i am mastaken. the 4 part one or something? | 07:48 |
| dholbach | yeah, those are a bit dusty already :) | 07:49 |
| dholbach | but yes, that could well have been me :) | 07:50 |
| philipballew | they looked a little dusty. is there a newer packaging guide? I have some tar's I need to get goin on? i was thinking the debian maintainers guide? | 07:50 |
| ajmitch | morning dholbach | 08:00 |
| dholbach | hey ajmitch | 08:00 |
| dholbach | there's http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/ (which is being worked on right now, but at least the introduction should be there) | 08:01 |
| philipballew | seemes easy enough | 08:02 |
| philipballew | thanks! | 08:04 |
| oier__ | good morning | 08:45 |
| oier__ | is anybody up for reviewing my package indicator-bug? I already have one advocate and I am looking for second one http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=9151 | 08:45 |
| oier__ | hi again, as many of you already know, I'm looking for a second advocate for my package indicator-bug at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=9151 | 11:13 |
| oier__ | I would love your help | 11:13 |
| dnivra | Laney: highvoltage: hey. Did you check out the packaging of openteacher at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openteacher/ ? | 12:50 |
| geser | dnivra: you need at least also python in Build-Depends | 12:52 |
| geser | have you tried to build it in a pbuilder? | 12:52 |
| dnivra | geser: I just started it the build process now. | 12:53 |
| tumbleweed | dnivra: I don't see a setup.py, so you'll need to write one (or use dh_install or dh_python2's undocumented pyinstall feature) | 13:03 |
| dnivra | that's odd. I was sure I added those fields yesterday. but they're nowhere to be seen! I was sure. | 13:03 |
| tumbleweed | also it doesn't look architecture specific | 13:03 |
| tumbleweed | oh, sorry they are documented, just not in the release I was looking at | 13:04 |
| dnivra | what did you mean by architecture specific? | 13:04 |
| dnivra | tumbleweed: ^^ | 13:04 |
| tumbleweed | dnivra: you have "Architecture: any", but it should probably be "all" | 13:05 |
| highvoltage | dnivra: yesterday was a bit crazy, but I haven't forgotten about it | 13:05 |
| dnivra | highvoltage: no problemo. I was just asking that's all :). | 13:05 |
| dnivra | Oh right. Will change it. | 13:06 |
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| === bambee_ is now known as bambee | ||
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === s0ultekkie is now known as soultekkie | ||
| === apachelogger is now known as birthdaylogger | ||
| wibblymat | I have a question about a package I'm trying to update. The Apache Solr and Lucene projects have been merged upstream so you get both in the same source tarball. If I want to update the solr package to the latest version, should I make both lucene2 and solr source packages be replaced? | 23:25 |
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| wibblymat | I guess another good question would be about the pacakge name. Lucene is now on version 3.4, which makes lucene2 a bad name. Why lucene2 in the first place? Is it better to have it as lucene3 or just lucene in the future? | 23:29 |
| cdunlap | Hello. | 23:49 |
| cdunlap | I have a quick 'man' page question | 23:49 |
| cdunlap | I am trying to add options to the mountall man page but I can't get a line break to be recognized | 23:49 |
| cdunlap | I am using gmanedit | 23:50 |
| cdunlap | is there something special you need to do, that I am obviously missing? | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!