[08:19] hey there [08:20] ScottL: the git clone cmd is: [08:20] git clone git://kxstudio.git.sf.net/gitroot/kxstudio/kxstudio [08:21] ScottL: note the 'git://', not 'http://' [11:31] thanks falktx, i'll try again tonight then [11:32] k [13:40] holstein: ping me when you are up and about [13:54] Hey scott-work, what was it that you had in mind on Friday? [13:58] hi astraljava , there were two things actually, how was moving? is it all complete? [13:59] astraljava: luke had posted a pastebin of the diffs from when you updated the seeds and i have comments on them [14:00] i can make the changes but i figure you still had the source file on your machine and could make them easy enough [14:01] scott-work: Sure, I can. Let me just find the pastebin entry when I get home (just about to leave the office). [14:02] scott-work: Oh, and moving was alright, though exhausting. Just a few things next weekend, and the finishing cleaning up, then I'm all done. [14:03] astraljava: let me know when you are ready :) [14:04] the second thing was going to push the infomration for the backports to you (finally) [14:04] there are sooo many things going on and i don't seem to be able to finish any of them :( [14:04] which reminds me.... [14:05] persia: i have spent time during last week trying to find out why the linux-meta package didn't build, can either you or abogani help me? [14:05] https://launchpad.net/~slavender/+archive/broken/+build/2643266/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.linux-meta-lowlatency_3.0.0-5.6%7Eppa3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [14:05] persia: also i wanted to remind you that you were going to review the package and get back to me with corrections [14:06] i also still need to get back with bassburner about some pages for the website as well [14:20] dh_gencontrol -s -- -Vkernel-version=Version: 3.0.0-5.6~ppa3 -Vkernel-abi-version=Version: 3.0.0-5.6~ppa3-6~ppa3) oneiric; urgency=low -Vgeneric-depends=generic sh: Syntax error: ")" unexpected [14:21] scott-work: Could you paste somewhere your debian/changelog? [14:21] It seems that an extraneous "(" was added there. [14:21] I meant ")" [14:22] scott-work: FYI 3.0.0-7.8 is alreay available in my PPA and in my git trees. [14:28] abogani: i looked at that in the changelog and didn't see it, but i will look again [14:29] scott-work: Pastebin it, please [14:29] abogani: i will have to do this at home in +6 hours, i'm not at my linux machine sadly [14:29] scott-work: Ok [14:30] abogani: however, i _will_ do it and send it to you, if youare not on IRC i will email it to you tonight [16:00] scott-work: I'm not seeing the pastebin entry address in the backlog. Can you link to it, please? [16:03] scott-work: Oh, you meant the original one that Luke posted back in the day, yeah found that. I thought you had the comments up there somewhere. Sorry. [16:06] From #debian-multimedia @ irc.oftc.net: [15:07] < pabs> ooh, linux-image-rt-amd64 linux-image-3.0.0-1-rt-amd64 entered the archive :D [16:24] astraljava: i haven't done a pastebin yet...actually i'm not sure what form you would prefer [16:25] astraljava: i can list them here, i can send an email to you, i could do a Google+ thingie, whatever you want [16:25] i wonder if the -rt kernel will be brought into the ubuntu repos....i dont' think UKT will want it there but i could be wrong [16:32] scott-work: Any form is fine with me. [16:32] scott-work: Also, have the -rt kernel in universe? Would that be too awful? [16:32] Or is it mandatory to have all kernels in main? [16:33] scott-work: Though, come to think of it, listing them here would ensure they're being logged. [16:33] them being logged* [16:36] we should be putting the -lowlatency into universe [16:36] maybe it was that UKT didn't want the -rt in the main [16:43] I understand that, as that would require support from them, when they were not creating the beast in the first place. [16:43] But universe? Wouldn't it work? [16:44] i think so, i wonder who would be maintainers for it? [16:56] ubuntustudio-developers? [16:57] Maintainer: UbuntuStudio Developers [17:08] for the -rt kernel? really? is someone else committed us to do something? [17:36] Well, if it's just synced from debian, I doubt there's much else to do. [17:38] We still have time until feature freeze, so there's a chance it can be synced. [18:16] my point was more that i wouldn't want someone else to commit me to maintaining something that i wasn't even aware of [18:16] not saying this is the case, but it sounds like it from your description [18:17] i hape that someone at least spoke with someone from the team before committing ubuntustudio-devel to be the maintainers [18:19] scott-work: Sure. I just guess that in ubuntu, there aren't that many individual maintainers, but rather teams. I guess we'd be the only one interested. [18:21] Oh, I suppose that would be MOTU in this case, if it's a direct sync, as is the case with mudita24.