[06:08] <JordiGH> jordi@Iris:~/coding/vcs$ bzr branch lp:pytave
[06:08] <JordiGH> bzr: ERROR: Invalid http response for https://xmlrpc.edge.launchpad.net/bazaar/: Bad status line received
[06:08] <JordiGH> wat do
[06:20] <RAOF> I'm getting an OOPS when trying to release the bzr SRU to natty-updates with sru-release: OOPS-2035AV33.  I'd guess it's because there are a lot of bugs hanging off that release.
[06:54] <lifeless> RAOF: 3.6 seconds of python time
[06:54] <lifeless> 5.5 seconds of other time
[06:54] <StevenK> 5.5 in SQL + other?
[06:55] <lifeless> 5.5. in statements (which can be sql, mail, memcache ...)
[06:55] <lifeless> 843 statements
[06:55] <lifeless> 90 different person bulk_load calls.
[06:55] <lifeless> 77 bugsubscription lookups
[06:56] <lifeless> 60 team email detail lookups
[06:56] <lifeless> so yeah, I think 'has lots of bugs' is a good summary
[06:56] <lifeless> RAOF: file a bug ?
[07:00] <RAOF> lifeless: Saying what?  “copying packages with lots of associated bugs can cause timeout oops”?
[07:00] <lifeless> RAOF: yes. And include the OOPS code.
[07:01] <lifeless> we have a bug about other aspects of copy efficiency, I don't htink the bug count is one yet.
[07:06] <RAOF> Have bug #817358 with my compliments.
[07:07] <lifeless> thanks
[07:10] <janimo> I am looking at the API reference https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/1.0.html . Is there a way of telling which of the top-level collections return a JSON text (ex: projects) and which an object reference (ex: project_groups). Is the distinction documented elsewhere, as it is not apparent to me on this page?
[07:13] <lifeless> they should be the same.
[07:14] <wgrant> The URL of the WADL project_groups collection is /projectgroups
[07:15] <wgrant>  /project_groups is a 404.
[07:15] <wgrant> Ah, the URL on that page is bad.
[07:16] <janimo> wgrant, of the top level collections only about 5 seem to return JSON. Do all others have broken link on the page? Ex distributions
[07:17] <wgrant> distributions is /distros
[07:17] <wgrant> The URLs are based on the original webapp URLs.
[07:17] <wgrant> The real URLs are, that is.
[07:17] <janimo> wgrant, thanks. So probably many links are broken in the doc
[07:17] <wgrant> The WADL names used on that page are automatically derived from the class names.
[07:17] <wgrant> And I suspect the documentation generator assumes the URL is derived from that.
[07:18] <wgrant> But it's rare that you want to use a top-level collection.
[07:18] <janimo> wgrant, just trying to get a feel for the api from the browser
[08:25] <Guest92651> hello, are some launchpad dev or master here ?
[08:25] <Guest92651> Do you know where submit a suggestion about lauchpad web interface ... ?
[08:28] <Guest92651> Please tell where ask for adding groups to ubuntu launchpad questions
[08:29] <Guest92651> Ubuntu need questions can aggregate group for questions not related to a specific software....
[08:42] <tmm1> is there a global setting to tell bazaar to use pack format 1 instead of 2a
[10:28] <EyesIsMine> How do I delete a branch? I made a mistake and forgot to include the last letter of the git repository I want to import
[10:28] <EyesIsMine> oh, nvm, found it
[10:30] <EyesIsMine> Wait the hell -> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/76149376/otherthing6-tpt-master.log
[10:33] <EyesIsMine> Nope, can't import that repository no matter what I try.
[11:54] <dholbach> hiya
[11:54] <dholbach> can somebody help me with a problem I'm seeing with launchpadlib?
[11:55] <dholbach> a script that used to work for a while suddenly broke
[11:55] <dholbach> http://paste.ubuntu.com/653737/ is the output I'm seeing
[11:55] <dholbach> trying to get proposal.target_branch.sourcepackage.distroseries breaks for some reason
[11:56] <dholbach> it used to work until yesterday it seems
[11:57] <wgrant> dholbach: Looks like you have a corrupt launchpadlib cache.
[11:57] <wgrant> dholbach: Do you have a ~/.cache/launchpadlib?
[11:57] <dholbach> aha
[11:57] <dholbach> let me see
[11:57] <wgrant> Or ~/.launchpadlib/cache?
[11:59] <dholbach> wgrant, let me try again
[11:59] <dholbach> wgrant, you saved the day again
[12:00] <wgrant> Did you just blow away the cache?
[12:00] <dholbach> (at least that's what it looks like now)
[12:00] <dholbach> let me get back to you when I got the champagne out the fridge
[12:00] <dholbach> wgrant, yes
[12:00] <wgrant> Heh.
[12:00] <wgrant> Great.
[12:00] <wgrant> Not sure why that happens... it's happened to me twice.
[12:01] <dholbach> wgrant, cranberry seems to be acting up a little in the last time - it might not even be launchpad's fault this time
[12:01] <dholbach> ... this time :-P
[12:01] <wgrant> Heh.
[12:01] <wgrant> We'll see :)
[12:06] <dholbach> wgrant, confirmed, you ARE the hero of the day
[12:07] <wgrant> Excellent. Let's blame cranberry :)
[12:08] <dholbach> yes, let's :)
[12:12] <jimis> hello, any updates on fixing lp:gcc?
[12:36] <ephan> Is there a way to remove a bug?
[12:36] <ephan> that I submitted
[12:36] <GTRsdk> Hi, when uploading a large orig source to my PPA, it doesn't finish, and hangs at the last kilobyte
[12:37] <ephan> "We don't remove bugs. If there are several bugs about the same issue, you can mark all of them as duplicates of the one you care about and subscribe only to the bug you care about." Oh it seems we can't thanks
[12:55] <GTRsdk> does launchpad verify the package at the last kilobyte during an upload to a PPA?
[12:57] <gary_poster> GTRsdk, I strongly suspect that we don't verify until it's all uploaded, yes.  Do you need an experts confirmation?
[12:57] <GTRsdk> gary_poster, the orig source upload hangs at the last kilobyte
[12:57] <GTRsdk> that is the problem I have
[12:58] <gary_poster> ah I see
[12:58] <gary_poster> no, I don't think that woud be a cause but could be wrong.  GTRsdk, what's the package?
[12:58] <dholbach> GTRsdk, I suspect that it's something that dput does
[12:59] <GTRsdk> I am trying to upload thunderbird 6
[13:02] <gary_poster> GTRsdk, no idea.  I'll see if I can rustle up an idea or a person to help you.
[13:03] <GTRsdk> dholbach, so would it complete if I let the upload go for many hours or should I try something else?
[13:04] <dholbach> GTRsdk, I remember that after the upload was done it would usually sit there for a while, but always complete in the end - I don't know if it's doing some checksum checks, and a quick look into the dput code I still don't have an idea
[13:04] <dholbach> but I'm no dput expert :)
[13:04] <dholbach> my experience is that dput always completed :)
[13:05] <GTRsdk> the orig source code is larger for thunderbird than for other packages I have uploaded, so tht could be the case
[13:07] <bigjools> GTRsdk: this is a known issue
[13:07] <bigjools> it's something to do with routers screwing up the FTP NAT
[13:08] <bigjools> you can work around it by using SFTP
[13:14] <GTRsdk> bigjools, how do I change to sftp?
[13:16] <sidnei> uhm. i seem to remember that it was possible to build-depend on a package in the same ppa for a package recipe. is that not true?
[13:17] <GTRsdk> bigjools, nevermind. I think I found it. Thanks for the information.
[13:17] <bigjools> GTRsdk: http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/sftp-uploads
[13:17] <sidnei> oh, maybe the dependency wasn't published yet when the build started
[13:18] <GTRsdk> bigjools, thanks
[13:25] <GTRsdk> now I get errors about the file containing parsing errors on line 4
[13:37] <GTRsdk> bigjools, how is line 4 supposed to look like?
[13:38] <bigjools> GTRsdk: what file?
[13:39] <GTRsdk> ~/.dput.cf
[13:39] <bigjools> paste it somewhere so I can see
[13:42] <GTRsdk> thanks. I forgot the = sign.
[13:42] <GTRsdk> is the /ubuntu part required?
[13:44] <bigjools> you need ~<personname>[/ppa_name]/<distroname>[/distroseriesname]
[15:22] <GTRsdk> bigjools, the upload is still hanging. is there anything I can do?
[15:22] <GTRsdk> I just noticed something... it is saying via ftp, should it say via sftp?
[15:36] <bigjools> GTRsdk: yes, method=sftp
[15:36] <bigjools> are you still using the ppa: dput style?
[15:47] <GTRsdk> bigjools, yes
[15:48] <bigjools> GTRsdk: you need "dput dput-config-name changesfile"
[15:49] <GTRsdk> bigjools, "No host dput-config-name found in config"
[15:49] <bigjools> not literally.......
[15:49] <bigjools> what did you call your dput config section?
[15:50] <GTRsdk> the file name?
[15:51] <bigjools> the bit inbetween [ and ] in the .dput.cf
[15:51] <bigjools> use that
[15:53] <GTRsdk> bigjools, I need a SSH key to use sftp?
[15:53] <bigjools> GTRsdk: yes
[15:53] <GTRsdk> okay. I don't have one yet, so I'll have to make one
[16:02] <GTRsdk> bigjools, I think it will work. Thanks for the help
[16:02] <bigjools> GTRsdk: glad to help, good luck
[19:35] <cbcunc> bac: ping
[19:42] <bac> hi cbcunc
[19:42] <cbcunc> bac: is somebody going to let us in at ccc tonight?