=== awalton is now known as awalton__
[04:31] <sdhasu> !ops
[04:31] <ubot4> Help! Seveas, Hobbsee, gnomefreak, coleSLAW, or dholbach
[04:31] <sdhasu> suck my fucking dick bitch and spit it in my beer
[07:10] <evfool> mvo: still getting the update-manager exceptions with the dbus strings, and have no idea where should I look to fix
[07:11] <mvo> evfool: hmmm, I wonder if it might be locale dependant or something like this, could you temporarely switch to en (if you are using something else)? just for testing?
[07:12] <evfool> mvo: but I've got a stacktrace, 2 lines, defer/__init__.py", line 472, in _inline_callbacks and defer/__init__.py", line 472, in _inline_callbacks
[07:12] <evfool> mvo: LANG=en_US.UTF-8
[07:12] <mvo> oh
[07:12] <mvo> ok, you have the current python-defer from oneiric I suppose?
[07:14] <evfool> yep, 1.0.2-0ubuntu2
[07:14] <evfool> mvo^
[07:14] <mvo> thanks, could you pastebin the full backtrace you get again please?
[07:15] <mvo> thanks for the section fixes too btw
[07:16] <evfool> mvo: http://paste.ubuntu.com/654267/
[07:17] <mvo> evfool: thanks! and you said you get this for a random selection of package, right? and its always "already installed"?
[07:18] <evfool> mvo: no, it's sometimes not installed, sometimes it's nothing to remove as it's not installed
[07:19] <mvo> is gir1.2-launchpad-integration-3.0 installed? and if so, is it upgradable? i.e. what does apt-cache policy gir1.2-launchpad-integration-3.0 show?
[07:21] <evfool> Installed: None, candidate, 0.1.54
[07:21] <mvo> evfool: ok, thanks. so aptdaemon is very clearly wrong about this
[07:22]  * mvo scratches head
[07:23] <evfool> mvo: I have unchecked gir1.2-launchpad-integration, now it's Package [dbus.String(u'libdconf-qt0')] isn't available
[07:24] <mvo> evfool: what does apt-cache policy say for this one ?
[07:24] <evfool> mvo: Installed: none, Candidate : 0.0.0.110722-.....
[07:27] <mvo> evfool: hm, could you kill aptd and run it in a terminal with "aptd --debug -t -r" and try the same again? I wonder if it outputs anything useful, it will spit out a lot of debug messages this way
[07:30] <evfool> mvo: as I said, aptd -r resolves the problem, packages install
[07:30] <evfool> mvo: so I have to find a way to start aptd with --debug by default
[07:32] <mvo> evfool: /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.debian.apt.service has the startup command, iirc it logs to syslog too, so just adding --debug there should work
[07:33] <mvo> evfool: that makes me wonder if its actually something to do with the environment, i.e. when you restart it in your user environment with all PATH/env setup it seems to do ok, but the system env it does not
[07:34] <mvo> evfool: could you check "cat /proc/$(pidof aptd)/environ" if anything looks different from your regular env?
[07:36] <evfool> it's the same in my chroot as in my regular env
[07:36] <evfool> mvo^
[07:38] <evfool> mvo: but after running aptd -r it changes, it gets a lot longer... before it was 1 line long, after it's very long
[07:39] <mvo> evfool: just one line? could you pastebin the original one please too?
[07:43] <evfool> mvo: http://paste.ubuntu.com/654286/
[07:45] <mvo> evfool: is there a "/usr/local/bin/aptd" ?
[07:46] <evfool> mvo: yes
[07:46] <evfool> mvo: probably because I have built and run the latest aptdaemon, I guess
[07:46] <mvo> evfool: ok, which one is that?  it looks like this is part of the problem, aptd -t -d -r will picks this one by default
[07:47] <mvo> evfool: could you please try /usr/sbin/aptd -d -t -r ? and see if that helps or not?
[07:47] <mvo> evfool: or rather, if with that the problem can still be reproduced?
[07:48] <evfool> mvo: no, the problem is solved with this one too
[07:49] <mvo> ok, thanks
[07:50] <evfool> mvo: tried /usr/sbin/aptd -r and /usr/local/bin/aptd -r and both solve the problem, but after killing it, and starting update-manager, I get the same again
[07:54] <mvo> evfool: thanks, could you add --debug to the .service file? maybe that gives us new clues
[07:57] <evfool> mvo: I've added, but nothing's logged to my terminal, as with aptd -r --debug &, so which logfile should I check?
[07:58] <mvo> evfool: does /var/log/syslog show anythng? you probably need to kill aptd once to ensure it gets the new flag
[08:09] <evfool> there's no syslog file
[08:09] <evfool> mvo^
[08:10] <mvo> evfool: ups, sorry /var/log/messages
[08:10] <mvo> or /var/log/debug
[08:11] <mvo> hm, no /var/log/syslog ? odd
[08:11] <evfool> mvo: no /var/log/syslog, no /var/log/messages
[08:14] <bullgard4_> I would like reporting an error in GNOME 2 under Natty: The screen freezes with some artifacts, but I can recover by toggling to a virtual console. What package should I associate my error report to in Launchpad?
[08:14] <evfool> mvo: nvm, I'll try later with a completely new chroot with the latest daily build, we shouldn't waste any more time on this right now
[08:16] <evfool> mvo: just happening in two configs 100% reproducible for me, is too odd... but as no one else can repro it, let's consider the issue an Invalid one for now, I'll get back to it if I can repro it anywhere, anytime or anyone else will complain about this :)
[08:18] <mvo> evfool: right, two setups is suspicous, I really wonder what is going on there
[09:10] <jibel> mvo, good morning
[09:11] <jibel> mvo, have you seen bug 812993 and bug 812862
[09:11] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 812993 in apt (Ubuntu) "aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::compare() -- __strlen_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strlen.S:43 (affects: 13) (dups: 22) (heat: 176)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/812993
[09:11] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 812862 in apt (Ubuntu) "aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::compare() -- __strlen_sse42 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strlen-sse4.S:32 (affects: 10) (dups: 10) (heat: 90)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/812862
[09:11] <jibel> there is an increasing number of these in Oneiric
[09:13] <jibel> from the duplicates it only affects amd64
[09:29] <mvo> jibel: let me look
=== zyga_ is now known as zyga-x11
[11:39] <bullgard4_> I would like reporting an error in GNOME 2 under Natty: The screen freezes with some artifacts, but I can recover by toggling to a virtual console. What package should I associate my error report to in Launchpad?
[11:47] <mvo> jibel: I may have found the issue with the apt crash, will upload a fix today, I'm 100% certain that its the fix as I was not able to reproduce it, but it looks like it
[12:08] <greg-g> bullgard4_: that could be an xorg issue
[12:11] <bullgard4_> greg-g: Yes. So I will direct my error report in Launchpad to the xorg metapacke.
[12:11] <bullgard4_> greg-g: Yes. So I will direct my error report in Launchpad to the xorg metapackage.
[12:26] <xteejx> Hey peeps
[12:27] <xteejx> Anyone able to help me resolve bug 818011? I'm stuck and can't upgrade anything
[12:27] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 818011 in xdiagnose (Ubuntu) "package xdiagnose (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py', which is also in package xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.2 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/818011
[12:27] <jibel> again. I think that was fixed already :/
[12:27] <xteejx> jibel: I only just reported it :S
[12:30] <xteejx> Any way around it? I tried 'sudo apt-get -f install' but it still fails
[12:36] <jibel> xteejx, does it fail if you run 'sudo apt-get install xserver-xorg-video-intel' to upgrade it to 2:2.15.0-3ubuntu2 before upgrading xdiagnose?
[12:37] <xteejx> Yup, same thing..umet deps
[12:37] <xteejx> *unmet deps
[12:37] <xteejx> the -intel depends on xdiagnose
[12:39] <xteejx> jibel: The specific error is "trying to overwrite '/usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py', which is also in package xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.2"....would it make sense to just sudo rm that file?
[12:53] <jibel> xteejx, better stay away of manual deletion. If there's no way to force the upgrade, an alternative could be to remove xdiagnose, it will remove ubuntu-desktop, upgrade xserver-xorg-video-intel and then reinstall ubuntu-desktop
[14:00] <bdmurray> Anybody familiar with Kubuntu about?
[14:02] <yofel> bdmurray: hm?
[14:03] <bdmurray> I'm using digikam and the Geolocation part says "Geolocation using Marble not available" and I'm wondering what package I'm missing.
[14:03] <bdmurray> hint its not marble ;-)
[14:04] <bdmurray> I have marble, -data and -plugins
[14:08] <yofel> bdmurray: can you give me some steps to get to that? I don't usually use GPS stuff
[14:09] <bdmurray> yofel: in digikam in the far right side there is a Geolocation thing with a globe by it
[14:09] <bdmurray> yofel: you might need a geotagged photo
[14:11] <bdmurray> yofel: I'll put one somewhere for you
[14:11] <yofel> thanks, I found it, but the window is simply greyed out here
[14:12] <bdmurray> and for me it says Geolocation using Marble not available although the picture has a Latitude and Longitude in it
[14:13] <bdmurray> http://people.canonical.com/~brian/tmp/20110619-133349_IMG_8370.JPG
[14:13] <yofel> thanks
[14:14] <yofel> ok, works here (which is natty + 4.7 backport) - what are you on?
[14:14] <bdmurray> oneiric
[14:14] <yofel> is kipi-plugins installed?
[14:14] <bdmurray> yes
[14:16] <yofel> libgps19 should be there too as long as marble-plugins is installed...
[14:16] <yofel> I'm waiting for a build to finish, so in ~15mins I can reboot back to oneiric and test there
[14:17] <bdmurray> yofel: yes that is installed too
[15:22] <jibel> pedro_, good afternoon
[15:24] <pedro_> good afternoon jibel
[15:25] <jibel> pedro_,  there are 3 desktop bugs that generate a lot of noise
[15:25] <jibel> seb128 thinks it happens at session closing
[15:25] <jibel> Could you do something with a bug pattern to make them quieter. If it is not a issue of course because the number of duplicates is very high
[15:25] <jibel> bug 804896
[15:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 804896 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:140: dequeue_pending_request: Assertion `req == dpy->xcb->pending_requests' failed. (affects: 164) (dups: 226) (heat: 1713)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/804896
[15:25] <jibel> bug 804221
[15:25] <jibel> bug 804472
[15:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 804221 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertion `!dpy->xcb->reply_data' failed. (affects: 81) (dups: 115) (heat: 964)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/804221
[15:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 804472 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:221: poll_for_event: Assertion `(((long) (event_sequence) - (long) (dpy->request)) <= 0)' failed. (affects: 22) (dups: 23) (heat: 198)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/804472
[15:26] <pedro_> jibel, sure, will look at those
[15:27] <hggdh> and my oneiric is still hosed... no more nvidia, unity-2d fails to start up, etc
[15:27] <pedro_> sigh, launchpad timeouts on the bugs...
[15:27] <jibel> pedro_, Cool, thanks!
[15:28] <jibel> pedro_, use /+text at the end of the url
[15:28] <pedro_> yup
[15:28] <jibel> or the api, the timeout is higher
[15:31] <jibel> hggdh, how does unity-2d fails to start ?
[15:31] <hggdh> jibel: yes
[15:31] <hggdh> and metacity
[15:31] <jibel> hggdh, only console or background ?
[15:32] <hggdh> only console ; background is active on X, but no commands except for some indicators
[15:32] <jibel> hggdh, is lightdm-gtk-greeter installed on your system ?
[15:33] <hggdh> jibel: yes, I confirmed it
[15:33] <hggdh> jibel: 0.9.2-oubuntu4
[15:35] <hggdh> there might a a conflict ftom the other packages in xorg-edgers
[15:35] <jibel> hm, there was a bug where this package was not installed, so there was no greeter and only a text console, but that is not it.
[15:35] <hggdh> no, unfortunately
[15:35] <kamusin> hggdh, I had the same problem.. the easy and quick solution for me was reinstall Oneiric .. sigh
[15:36] <kamusin> by the way, happy sysadmin day to everyone!
[15:36] <hggdh> yeah, I was trying to NOT reinstall. Twice in the same cycle is too much
[15:36] <kamusin> who is sysadmin (of course)
[15:36]  * hggdh reluctantly raises hand
[15:41] <hggdh> jibel: is today's oneiric desktop ISO usable?
[15:41]  * hggdh goes for a reinstall :-(
[15:41] <jibel> hggdh, no build today, but yesterday is ok
[15:42] <hggdh> jibel: thank you
[15:49]  * hggdh goes for a surgical reinstall, keeping /home
[15:50] <hggdh> and saving /etc/ for an easier recovery...
[15:58] <hggdh> jibel: insteresting: running rescue from the CD, I cannot successfully enter the password for my disk
[16:00] <hggdh> I get "rescue: no key available with this passphrase"
[16:01] <kamusin> doh.. having a nice day
[16:10] <hggdh> this is hell :-(
[16:10] <hggdh> OK. making a last backup before formatting the disk
[17:10] <bdmurray> yofel: any news?
[17:11] <yofel> sorry, was busy with the kde 4.7 backports for natty, I'm actually just rebooting
[17:17] <yofel> k, nvidia fixed, back in oneiric
[17:27] <yofel> bdmurray: ok, confirmed that it doesn't work, I'll reply once I know more
[17:29] <bdmurray> yofel: well that sucks
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch
[17:49] <hggdh> jibel: yesterday's alternate is also hosed
[18:05] <jibel> hggdh, yes, yesterday and today, same bug. the fix didn't get uploaded. Tomorrow will be a better day.
[18:18]  * hggdh goes back to natty
[18:52] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: have you seen bug 813240?
[18:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 813240 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Xubuntu installer says "That name already exist on the network" for any choosen name (affects: 1) (heat: 438)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813240
[18:52] <charlie-tca> yes, it's true, too
[18:52] <charlie-tca> I think it happens in both Ubuntu and Xubuntu desktop installer
[18:52] <bdmurray> here I was hoping they were lies all lies
=== Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinh
=== Ursinh is now known as Ursinha
[18:53] <charlie-tca> nope
[18:53] <charlie-tca> If the name you use for the computer has been in use or exists in a /etc/hosts file, it gives that warning
[18:54] <charlie-tca> It doesn't block the name, it just warns that it exists already
[18:55] <charlie-tca> I will even mark it triaged, if you want me to
[18:56] <charlie-tca> I see it every time I run a desktop image installation
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel