[08:52] <CIA-37> debian-installer: cjwatson * r1502 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 20101020ubuntu50
[10:26] <CIA-37> ubiquity: evand * r4788 pygi/ubiquity/plugins/ubi-partman.py: Proper location for KEY_PRESS.
[14:25] <mterry> ev, yay, another team!  Do we get funny hats?
[14:26] <ev> yeah, sorry about that
[14:26] <ev> but I figured ubuntu-installer or ubuntu-core-dev would be a bad fit if we ever wanted to pull someone from gnome into this mess
[14:26] <ev> you can have your choice of funny hats
[14:26] <mterry> ev, then there's nothing to be sorry about  :)
[14:27] <ev> I'll be wearing a giant pink sombrero
[14:27] <mterry> ev, if GNOME were to use it, it would have to be on their infrastructure.  Should we make that overture?  I'm not sure where this would fit in with their own efforts to lib-ize the map.  I don't think there's been movement on their end
[14:28] <ev> ughh, that's so silly
[14:30] <ev> I could care less about GNOME3 and don't see a massive benefit in relinquishing control to them.
[14:31] <ev> but if you'd really like it to go there, by all means, make a case :)
[14:37] <mterry> eh, more eyes on code is always better
[14:47] <ev> perhaps, but that assumes everyone wants to take the code in the same direction
[17:25] <bdmurray> is bug 811642 as simple as removing the _ in ubiquity.template?
[17:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 811642 in ubiquity ""_Install Now" text shown" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/811642
[19:04] <persia> Isn't that the translation hint?  I may be completely mistaken, but I'd probably look at the .po files.