| RAOF | Is anyone here familiar with the archive side of the kernel SRU process? It looks like the final step of copying from proposed→{updates,security} is just a job for a regular sru-release.py, but I'm not sure of that. And the combination of “unsure” and “copying to -updates” is not one I'm comfortable with ☺. | 00:23 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Laney: Actually, here's probably more relevant :) | 01:10 |
| lifeless | is there anyone in this tz familiar with apt internals ? | 01:12 |
| RAOF | That's a fairly specific skillset; I don't know of anyone. I generally shout at slangasek. | 01:14 |
| RAOF | Laney: Also, how hard would it be to remove the darcs noise? | 01:15 |
| micahg | oh is StevenK around? | 01:29 |
| StevenK | micahg: FSVO. | 01:30 |
| micahg | StevenK: heh, could you remove the libglew1.5-dev binary, it's blocking anything trying to build-dep on libglew-dev? | 01:30 |
| micahg | I can file a bug if you like? | 01:30 |
| StevenK | Yes, can haz bug | 01:30 |
| micahg | StevenK: Bug #819087 | 01:32 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 819087 in glew (Ubuntu) "Please remove the libglew1.5-dev binary" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/819087 | 01:32 |
| micahg | StevenK: It technically needs a core-dev ACK (IANA core-dev) | 01:32 |
| StevenK | "Meh" :-) | 01:33 |
| * ajmitch can ack it if you really need to tick the boxes :) | 01:34 | |
| StevenK | I just wanted a paper-trail -- but then micahg said the magic word 'NBS', which doesn't require one | 01:34 |
| StevenK | micahg: Done | 01:36 |
| micahg | StevenK: thanks :) | 01:36 |
| * micahg goes to clean up the mess he created for others before they find out... | 02:05 | |
| RAOF | Laney: I've rejected the haskell-platform upload from natty-proposed queue that points at bug 711366; I presume that's correct. I'd like to see the darcs changes cleaned out, though. | 02:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 711366 in haskell-platform (Ubuntu) "update to 2011.2" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711366 | 02:11 |
| === ejat- is now known as ejat | ||
| === ejat- is now known as ejat | ||
| === jdong- is now known as jdong | ||
| didrocks | good morning | 05:19 |
| mdke | Laney: that works perfectly. Thanks *so* much | 06:52 |
| fhd | If I've created a merge proposal on Launchpad, do I have to find and add reviewers manually for it to be reviewed? | 07:24 |
| fhd | Or will someone (project owner?) get notified of my proposal automatically? | 07:25 |
| RAOF | fhd: Depends on the project; the owner of the branch will get some notification, but there's no guarantee that goes anywhere. | 07:26 |
| geser | fhd: if it's listed on http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/index.html one of the sponsors should pick it up | 07:26 |
| fhd | RAOF: It's something for Unity (2D) | 07:26 |
| RAOF | That'll get on someone's radar. | 07:26 |
| fhd | I just remember that for Google projects, you always have to add reviewers manually | 07:26 |
| fhd | Or you can wait for months | 07:26 |
| geser | fhd: is this merge proposal for an upstream branch or an ubuntu packaging branch? | 07:27 |
| fhd | geser: Um, the unity branch | 07:28 |
| fhd | geser: This is the issue: https://code.launchpad.net/~fhd/unity-2d/fix-for-bug-795422/+merge/69919 | 07:28 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 69919 in Launchpad itself "Bugs in non-existent product" [Medium,Triaged] | 07:28 |
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| geser | fhd: ok, I don't know how (upstream) projects handle merge proposals, especially unity-2d but I hope someone from the unity-2d team will pick it up | 07:31 |
| fhd | geser: OK, I'll just wait then :) | 07:31 |
| Laney | RAOF: you want me to retain it in the package? | 07:34 |
| RAOF | Laney: After thought I decided that removing it is fine; it's accepted. | 07:35 |
| Laney | awesome, thanks | 07:35 |
| Laney | it disappeared because I have -I..._darcs in my DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS | 07:35 |
| RAOF | You're welcome to review & upload colord to sid in return :) | 07:35 |
| Laney | sure, moving today but I can do that | 07:36 |
| Laney | give me a link to the .dsc :-) | 07:36 |
| RAOF | http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/colord.git | 07:36 |
| Laney | even better, ta! | 07:36 |
| RAOF | Gah! Too much X! I just thought “bzr ci -m” and typed “git ci” | 07:38 |
| Laney | mr commit -m :-) | 07:39 |
| === jamespage1 is now known as jamespage | ||
| Daviey | Are any AA's looking at sync's atm? | 09:22 |
| seb128 | Daviey, not really I think, I did an hour or so of cleaning and syncing previous week but that's about it | 09:23 |
| nigelb | Daviey: I think it was because of Debconf. | 09:25 |
| Daviey | nigelb: yeah, guessed so | 09:31 |
| Daviey | seb128: My oldest sync request was placed 2011-07-20. :/ | 09:32 |
| seb128 | Daviey, yeah, well I spent over an hour and I had to do other things so I didn't get to the bottom of the stack | 09:32 |
| Daviey | seb128: I understand, thanks. | 09:33 |
| geser | Daviey: there was also an accidental auto-sync last week. If you also requested sync of unmodified packages, you might want to check if it perhaps got already synced. | 09:35 |
| Daviey | geser: Already have :) | 09:40 |
| Daviey | One of my syncs was done by accident. \o/ | 09:40 |
| === EyesIsMine is now known as EyesIsServer | ||
| fhd | Ubuntu 11.10 has lightdm instead of gdm - is that just temporary or will it be the new default dm? | 10:38 |
| geser | fhd: lightdm is the new default dm | 10:39 |
| fhd | geser: I see. But the theme probably isn't finished yet, huh? | 10:41 |
| Amaranth | fhd: clearly :) | 10:42 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| tjaalton | pbuilder create fails on oneiric, aborts when it notices /proc is mounted already | 13:22 |
| tjaalton | anyone seen that? | 13:22 |
| infinity | tjaalton: Known mount misfeature. | 13:31 |
| infinity | tjaalton: I need to find some round tuits to look at it, I think. | 13:32 |
| tjaalton | infinity: ok, good | 13:34 |
| infinity | tjaalton: I have a basic idea of what's going wrong, just haven't found the time to dig deeper and fix it yet. | 13:38 |
| tjaalton | infinity: is there a bug # open yet? | 13:38 |
| infinity | tjaalton: There's a Debian bug, no idea if there's a launchpad one, but it seems likely. | 13:39 |
| infinity | tjaalton: I need to fix it in Debian anyway, so it'll make it to UBuntu when I do. | 13:39 |
| geser | tjaalton, infinity: bug #805886 | 13:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 805886 in util-linux (Ubuntu) "/proc does not get umounted after debootstrap" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/805886 | 13:41 |
| tjaalton | infinity: bug 805886 it seems | 13:41 |
| tjaalton | echo :) | 13:41 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| infinity | geser: Thanks. | 13:43 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, seems that a simple patch can make PackageKit optional. Will apply the patch, remove the dependency and suggest the patch upstream. | 14:02 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, thanks | 14:02 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, problem fixed upstream, taking new GIT snapshot ... | 14:17 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, excellent, thanks | 14:17 |
| seb128 | jibel, ^ | 14:17 |
| jibel | tkamppeter, seb128 thanks! | 14:18 |
| seb128 | jibel, we can probably ask skaet to trigger a CD build once the fixed package will be published | 14:20 |
| jibel | didrocks, is the upload of unity/compiz stack ready for a3 ? | 14:21 |
| didrocks | jibel: compiz has been uploaded with some reverts for alpha3 | 14:21 |
| jibel | seb128, what is the ETA ? | 14:21 |
| didrocks | jibel: unity/nux release will be there in 9 minutes normally, so then, time to test/release/package | 14:21 |
| === fhd2 is now known as fhd | ||
| seb128 | jibel, s-c-p? time to get upload, build and published it should be available in 1:28 | 14:22 |
| jibel | thanks. So we could respin with s-c-p and unity. | 14:23 |
| seb128 | jibel, well the publisher run around the hour and take some 45 minutes, so if the upload is built before 5pm which seems likely it should be published around 5:45 pm | 14:23 |
| seb128 | european time | 14:23 |
| stgraber | jibel: I also just pushed the set of packages I needed for edubuntu alpha-3 and fixing LTSP on both edubuntu and ubuntu alternate. | 14:23 |
| seb128 | unity is going to take some 3 hours it needs to go through 2 publisher cycles | 14:23 |
| seb128 | jibel, but yeah, maybe better to wait a few hours and ask for a respin then | 14:23 |
| didrocks | indeed, plan on 3 hours the time to get it and it's plublished | 14:24 |
| jibel | stgraber, ack. | 14:32 |
| jibel | I'll ask for a respin around 1800UTC | 14:32 |
| seb128 | jibel, I will watch unity uploads, build, etc and let you know when it's published | 14:33 |
| jibel | seb128, thanks | 14:33 |
| didrocks | I'll tell you when I have a release and I can upload :) | 14:34 |
| infinity | So, is there a reason the Super+(number) shortcuts in Unity no longer actually launch applications? | 14:41 |
| seb128 | infinity, known bug | 14:41 |
| seb128 | should be fixed with the next update | 14:42 |
| infinity | seb128: Cool, thanks. Was just curious if I'd broken something inadvertently. | 14:42 |
| diwic | infinity, it's intermittently broken in Natty (at least for me) | 14:42 |
| jibel | infinity, bug 813359 | 14:43 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 813359 in compiz (Ubuntu Oneiric) "'Super' shortcuts for the launcher doesn't work anymore" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813359 | 14:43 |
| infinity | diwic: It worked fine for me in natty, broke completely in oneiric. Well, for some value of "fine", I suppose. | 14:43 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, how is the s-c-p upload going? | 14:44 |
| diwic | infinity, for me the super+{s|a|f|t} are always working whereas the 1-9 are sometimes broken. | 14:45 |
| infinity | On the other hand, someone (perhaps accidentally) fixed the misfeature where compiz/unity was trapping ALL super modifiers. | 14:46 |
| infinity | So I can use Super+L for screen lock again. | 14:47 |
| infinity | I wonder if that will get unfixed when Super+# is fixed. :P | 14:47 |
| directhex | i just revoked unity's access to super. don't have time for games. | 14:48 |
| smoser | slangasek, around ? | 14:48 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, nearly ready. | 14:51 |
| * infinity glares at base-files giving him spurious conffile prompts. | 14:51 | |
| tkamppeter | seb128, uploaded. Two bugs will close soon ... | 14:54 |
| === ximion2 is now known as ximion | ||
| === ximion is now known as ximion2 | ||
| === ximion2 is now known as ximion | ||
| tkamppeter | seb128, we talked about a package rename in foomatic-db last Friday. OdyX from Debian did not like it, because it is a very complicated thing to rename packages in Debian. | 15:54 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, so I made him the suggestion to get back into sybc by renaming foomatic-db-xml back to foomatic-db and let the drivers build-depend on foomatic-db but build-conflict with foomatic-db-compressed-ppds. Would the build handle this correctly then, installing foomatic-db and uninstalling foomatic-db-compressed-ppds if it is already installed? | 15:56 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, yes, that would work | 15:57 |
| tkamppeter | tkamppeter, I have also suggested the alternative to let foomatic-db Provide foomatic-db-xml. Would this also work, meaning that the build-depends on foomatic-db-xml then install foomatic-db and uninstall foomatic-db-compressed-ppds if it is already installed? | 15:58 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, ^^ if that alternative also works, then I would not need to modify the driver packages. | 15:59 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, that would work but provides are not versioned | 16:00 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, so if you do that you couldn't have a build-depends on a specific foomatic-db-xml version | 16:01 |
| seb128 | or you would need to build-depends on foomatic-db (>= version), foomatic-db-xml | 16:01 |
| seb128 | which works as well | 16:01 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, so basically your call, or whatever Debian prefers | 16:01 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, so I will do the former, it is easier for versioned dependencies. | 16:02 |
| seb128 | right | 16:02 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, will I need a transitional package named foomatic-db-xml to get correct updates for the few people who have taken my last foomatic-db package? And how long do I have to keep this transitional package? | 16:06 |
| geser | tkamppeter: did you had a transitional package from -db to -db-xml? | 16:08 |
| tkamppeter | geser, yes. | 16:09 |
| geser | tkamppeter: I guess you could drop the transitional package for -db-xml to -db in a couple of weeks (but before release) as till then hopefully all affect alpha users should got it updated | 16:09 |
| tkamppeter | geser, OK, thanks. | 16:10 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, right, do one and drop it in a few weeks | 16:13 |
| tkamppeter | seb128, I am doing this now, thanks. | 16:15 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, thank you | 16:17 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|break | ||
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| ScottK | If there's an archive admin with a moment: Can you do a binary promotion of smoke-dev-tools. It's Universe binary from Main source now needed in Main to build other stuff due to package splits. | 16:31 |
| Quintasan | Anyone has any idea what might be going on with pbuilder? When building anything dpkg-buildpackage uses -j1 even when I call with -j12 | 16:54 |
| mterry | @pilot in | 17:15 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: mterry | ||
| mterry | micahg, ping, I'm on | 17:15 |
| micahg | jtaylor: can you show mterry what you need? | 17:16 |
| jtaylor | mterry: please merge the branch attached to bug 780305 | 17:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 780305 in soya (Ubuntu) "unable to import soya due to undefined symbol" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/780305 | 17:16 |
| mterry | jtaylor, looking | 17:17 |
| jtaylor | it sould also be SRU'd | 17:17 |
| jtaylor | affects oneirc and natty | 17:17 |
| jtaylor | thx | 17:17 |
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| tkamppeter | seb128, all changes concerning foomatic-db are uploaded now. | 17:39 |
| seb128 | tkamppeter, thanks | 17:39 |
| ScottK | seb128: Can you do a binary promotion of smoke-dev-tools. It's Universe binary from Main source now needed in Main to build other stuff due to package splits. | 17:41 |
| ScottK | We're kind of stuck on KDE 4.7.0 stuff on that right now. | 17:41 |
| seb128 | didrocks, ^ | 17:41 |
| didrocks | seb128: sorry, not really the time right now with this unity thing | 17:42 |
| seb128 | ScottK, can do a bit later, the box I'm on now doesn't have my ssh key | 17:42 |
| seb128 | jdstrand, ^ | 17:42 |
| ScottK | OK. | 17:42 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 17:42 |
| seb128 | ScottK, I will do after dinner if nobody else does it | 17:42 |
| ScottK | Great. | 17:42 |
| ScottK | Maybe slangasek can do it? | 17:50 |
| slangasek | lookin' | 17:51 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 17:51 |
| slangasek | ScottK: what needs it in main? Doesn't show up on components-mismatches yet | 17:53 |
| ScottK | slangasek: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smokekde/4:4.7.0-0ubuntu1/+build/2659970 | 17:53 |
| slangasek | strange | 17:54 |
| slangasek | ScottK: promoted, now we just need to figure out why it's not on the component-mismatches list... | 17:57 |
| ScottK | slangasek: Thanks. | 17:57 |
| hallyn | it seems DEB_DH_INSTALLINIT_ARGS is deprecated, but it doesn't tell me what replaces it | 18:01 |
| hallyn | oh, i see. that's cdbs doing all DEB_DH* | 18:02 |
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero | ||
| * negronjl is away: out to lunch | 18:33 | |
| mterry | cyphermox, do you really need libsoup2.4 2.34.4 or can we just sync with Debian's 2.34.3? | 18:47 |
| micahg | mterry: the merge is for 2.35.4 unless it was a typo | 18:48 |
| mterry | micahg, right, sorry. I meant do you really need 2.35.4 or can we just sync with Debian's 2.34.3? | 18:48 |
| cyphermox | bah, no reason to necessarily go with 2.35.4; I guess you can sync | 18:49 |
| micahg | shouldn't that wait until alpha3 though? | 18:50 |
| mterry | micahg, sure, probably. I'm not going to push the button, just sort out this merge and file a sync request | 18:51 |
| micahg | mterry: k, there's one already you can resurrect (from ricotz) | 18:51 |
| micahg | bug 818569 | 18:51 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 818569 in libsoup2.4 (Ubuntu) "Sync libsoup2.4 2.34.3-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/818569 | 18:51 |
| mterry | micahg, thanks! | 18:52 |
| seb128 | mterry, why not updating to the current version? | 18:53 |
| mterry | seb128, because it's a delta, and I don't see a particular feature/bugfix wanted from the new one | 18:53 |
| seb128 | mterry, you could apply that to half of GNOME 3.1 | 18:54 |
| seb128 | but fair enough, your call, we will update when something update its configure requirements | 18:54 |
| mterry | seb128, :) GNOME is a special case. libsoup2.4 has historically been in sync, we only broke it for a security fix | 18:54 |
| mterry | I mean, it was recently in sync, I don't recall its actual history | 18:54 |
| seb128 | mterry, but libsoup is a GNOME component ;-) | 18:55 |
| mterry | seb128, barely :) | 18:55 |
| mterry | seb128, hrm... it does show prominently red in versions.html | 18:56 |
| seb128 | mterry, well as said there is a good stack of components in such cases we updated | 18:56 |
| mterry | you're right seb128, I like to sync too much. I'll go with cyphermox's merge | 18:57 |
| cyphermox | heh, we could merge in debian's changes too, the small ones that aren't yet included | 18:57 |
| seb128 | mterry, i.e gdl, libgnome-keyring,gtksourceview3 | 18:57 |
| mterry | cyphermox, yeah, ricotz requested that in the merge comments | 18:58 |
| seb128 | mterry, trust me I like to sync, it's just that we follow unstable cycle and they don't, we will be back in sync for 3.2 | 18:58 |
| seb128 | mterry, but i've to say versions push me to do those updates, I really dislike red on version :p | 18:59 |
| mterry | seb128, yup. I just didn't realize libsoup2.4 was in versions.html (i.e. among the set ubuntu-desktop cares about). I thought it was a lesser-cared-for-by-us output of GNOME | 18:59 |
| seb128 | mterry, well version is basically 'what is in the default installation' | 18:59 |
| === MacSlow|break is now known as MacSlow | ||
| slangasek | ScottK: so the reason for smoke-dev-tools not showing up as a mismatch is because smokekde wanted to be demoted | 19:12 |
| slangasek | I guess that fixes itself once built and the seeded binaries show up | 19:12 |
| ScottK | OK. Thanks. | 19:12 |
| ScottK | We've got layers of bindings dependencies now that kdebindings is split, so it may take a little bit of time yet to sort out. | 19:13 |
| hallyn | Does anyone see anything telling in bug 818105? Seems to be a general system fault (do i read this right, that it says stdin is 'file or directory not found'?) | 19:29 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 818105 in qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) "package qemu-kvm 0.14.0 noroms-0ubuntu4.4 failed to install/upgrade: erro ao escrever para '<saída standard>': Arquivo ou diretório não encontrado" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/818105 | 19:29 |
| mterry | @pilot out | 19:52 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
| === NCommander changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: soft freeze | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
| lifeless | slangasek: hi; do you have a sec to talk about bug 816606 ? | 20:02 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 816606 in apt (Ubuntu) "apt postinst failure if ubuntu-keyring not installed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/816606 | 20:02 |
| SpamapS | hm, how can I get bzr bd -S to ignore this situation: dpkg-source: warning: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but there is no XSBC-Original-Maintainer field | 20:04 |
| slangasek | lifeless: I do, though if you're looking to me because of RAOF's comments yesterday I fear he's steered you to the wrong person as I'm no expert on apt internals :) | 20:06 |
| lifeless | slangasek: well, I guess I just need someone to agree on a path-to-fix | 20:06 |
| SpamapS | lifeless: isn't it just as likely that the bug lies in debootstrap's dependency resolver which is , by its own man page's admission, quite limited? | 20:06 |
| slangasek | SpamapS: unset DEBEMAIL in the environment for the build; but not for uploads to Ubuntu proper, as that warning shouldn't be ignored | 20:06 |
| SpamapS | slangasek: its been a problem on the upstart package for a long time | 20:07 |
| lifeless | SpamapS: no, its a recommends when as written it must be a predepends | 20:07 |
| SpamapS | slangasek: I believe stemming from the fact that there are two maintainers listed. :-P | 20:07 |
| lifeless | SpamapS: either the dep is wrong, or the code is wrong. | 20:07 |
| lifeless | SpamapS: it affects upgrades as well | 20:07 |
| slangasek | SpamapS: oh, right, that's an illegal maintainer field :) | 20:07 |
| SpamapS | lifeless: indeed.. I think last I looked it was a Depends .. | 20:08 |
| slangasek | SpamapS: mark the maintainer as James, move Scott to Uploaders: ? | 20:08 |
| SpamapS | slangasek: that doesn't fix the gripe.. :-/ | 20:08 |
| slangasek | lifeless: um, certainly not a pre-depends if it's a postinst failure | 20:08 |
| slangasek | SpamapS: why doesn't it? provided that the Maintainer: field lists ubuntu.com, there should be no complaints about XSBC-Original-Maintainer IIRC | 20:08 |
| micahg | well, it should change to a warning vs an error | 20:09 |
| lifeless | slangasek: well, it seems to want it configured vs just unpacked. IMBW. | 20:09 |
| SpamapS | slangasek: bug in the check maybe? | 20:09 |
| slangasek | lifeless: ... which is the definition of Depends | 20:09 |
| lifeless | slangasek: so, thoughts - disable the call, put an || true on the call, or change the relation ? | 20:09 |
| SpamapS | I wonder, was ubuntu-keyring in base packages before and now isn't ? | 20:10 |
| slangasek | lifeless: having a look at the history, one sec | 20:10 |
| lifeless | slangasek: bah, its been too long since I refreshed my predepends definitions :) - sorry. | 20:10 |
| SpamapS | please ignore.. that was a warning, but not what was failing my build | 20:12 |
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| slangasek | lifeless: looks like the Recommends: ubuntu-keyring is entirely inconsistent with Debian (which has Depends: debian-archive-keyring), so I'd say we should promote it to a Depends | 20:20 |
| lifeless | ok | 20:25 |
| lifeless | I'll see about tossing a bzr branch up later today; for now I have to take lynne down for a checkup | 20:26 |
| hallyn | hm, python won't update in oneiric vm | 20:34 |
| hallyn | debconf: DbDriver "config": could not open /var/cache/debconf/config.dat | 20:34 |
| highvoltage | Daev: /win last | 20:34 |
| highvoltage | (eek, sorry) | 20:34 |
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| jtaylor | hi, how can I mark a package as "should-not-be-merged"? argparse introduced a change in an upload which should not make it to ubuntu oneiric | 21:04 |
| micahg | jtaylor: file a sponsorship request to have it blacklisted | 21:05 |
| micahg | jtaylor: how permanent is the need to not sync? there shouldn't be any more auto syncs until P opens | 21:05 |
| jtaylor | depends on when the underlying issue is fixed, should probably be done before P | 21:08 |
| jtaylor | it would need merging currently, but marking somewhere that it should not be done yet would be nice | 21:08 |
| micahg | jtaylor: MoM would be the place for that, but there's not a lot of room to explain why | 21:09 |
| jtaylor | I probably can't add comments there | 21:10 |
| jtaylor | can someone comment, don't merge, would introduce problem in 793695 | 21:10 |
| jtaylor | for package argparse | 21:11 |
| micahg | jtaylor: anyone can add a comment | 21:11 |
| micahg | jtaylor: done anyways | 21:12 |
| micahg | jtaylor: are you sure that's the correct bug #? | 21:13 |
| jtaylor | thx | 21:14 |
| jtaylor | it would probably introduce the same problem as in that bug | 21:14 |
| jtaylor | its the same problem foolscap had, I think you sponsored my fix for that in foolscap | 21:15 |
| jtaylor | argparse 1.2.1 added build-dependency on setuptools + dh_python2 => upgrade failure depending on file ordering in data.tar.gz in binary packages | 21:15 |
| jtaylor | due to egg file -> egg folder | 21:16 |
| micahg | k | 21:16 |
| jtaylor | will python 2.6 still be in oneiric? | 21:21 |
| ScottK | Depends on Debian | 22:47 |
| ScottK | jtaylor: ^^^ | 22:47 |
| ScottK | jtaylor: The plan had been to wait for Debian to make 2.7 default before we dropped 2.6, but now that the Debian release team has dropped the 2.7 transition as a release goal, I doubt that makes sense. | 22:48 |
| jtaylor | is there so much stuff only running with 2.6? | 22:49 |
| broder | ScottK: I thought Debian release team dropped 2.7 as a "release goal", because it was too limited in scope | 22:49 |
| ScottK | Look at Debian 622279 | 22:49 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 622279 in release.debian.org "transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 -> 2.7)" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/622279 | 22:49 |
| broder | maybe i misread the bits e-mail | 22:49 |
| DooMMasteR | hui | 22:50 |
| DooMMasteR | got my ubuntu down to 7,5sec boot time incl. XBMC startup :P | 22:50 |
| micahg | ScottK: wait, for wheezy they're sticking with 2.6? ugh | 22:51 |
| DooMMasteR | on an AMD E-350 | 22:51 |
| ScottK | broder: It doesn't change the fact that it puts it on a "Meh, whenever" schedule since there's no mechanism for NMUs to ease the transition (unless, of course, I decided to just make 2.7 default and who cares what it breaks) | 22:51 |
| broder | ScottK: ah, i see | 22:51 |
| ScottK | micahg: No, they decided switching wasn't a release goal. It doesn't mean the switch can't happen, just that something preventing it isn't RC. | 22:51 |
| ScottK | Now figure the odds of that. | 22:52 |
| micahg | well, it just means that we'll be driving most of the transition as I think regardless we're dropping 2.6 for P | 22:52 |
| ScottK | Yep. | 22:52 |
| slangasek | hmm, my understanding of release goal is "the release team blesses NMUing for this under the same rules as for RC bugs", not quite "this is RC" | 22:54 |
| slangasek | I think we could provide the necessary cover for NMUs without it being a release goal, too | 22:55 |
| slangasek | (though the release team deciding it's not a release goal is certainly not helpful here) | 22:57 |
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!