[11:15] <benji> man, this giant rollback has me down; I hope it's fixed soon
[12:04] <danilos> there is another crisis today, I am trying to get oranges to take on this, because we lemons have already helped with one today :)
[12:09] <gary_poster> heh
[12:09] <gary_poster> what crisis is this one danilo
[12:10] <gary_poster> I was about to go ask abentley about the merge-proposal-jobs failing
[12:10] <danilos> gary_poster, merge-proposal-job is failing, eg. diffs don't get generated
[12:10] <gary_poster> :-)
[12:10] <danilos> gary_poster, henninge is now on it and he'll probably have a chance to talk to abentley today when he shows up
[12:10] <gary_poster> danilo, did you get any attention yet?  I could not find pertinent logs.  OK, fantastic
[12:11] <danilos> gary_poster, wgrant and losas started on it, I am sure oranges will do a good job of resolving it :)
[12:11] <gary_poster> :-) cool danilos.
[12:28] <gary_poster> bac benji danilos call in 2
[12:29] <gary_poster> bac benji danilos please make sure kanban board is up to date
[12:39] <bac> danilos: if you get lp2kanban working again i can host it on my server, if needed
[12:39] <bac> the cronjob, i mean
[12:47] <danilos> bac, sure, thanks
[13:09] <danilos> gary_poster, fwiw, I filed an ec2 expense claim, not sure if you get any emails these days
[13:10] <gary_poster> danilos, I have been, but I think a healthy dose of paranoia is well warranted with canonicaladmin.  Lemme look...
[13:11] <danilos> thanks
[13:13] <gary_poster> danilos, did not receive email (yet?) but I did just approve it
[13:18] <danilos> gary_poster, thanks, so obviously the system is not at it's best yet
[13:18] <gary_poster> heh, no
[13:18] <danilos> (though, "its best" was never very good anyway)
[13:18] <gary_poster> right :-)
[13:18] <gary_poster> danilos, quick review when you get a chance: https://code.launchpad.net/~gary/launchpad/bug772880/+merge/70306
[13:19] <gary_poster> oops diff not there yet
[13:19] <danilos> gary_poster, will it get there?
[13:19] <gary_poster> hm, good question
[13:19] <gary_poster> let me get it for you...
[13:20] <gary_poster> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/657926/ (and added to MP)
[13:20] <danilos> gary_poster, that's ok, I just merge into a devel tree and then revert it later when I am done reviewing
[13:20] <gary_poster> cool
[13:20] <danilos> gary_poster, I assume the new pygments is already in download-cache?
[13:20] <gary_poster> yeah
[13:21] <danilos> gary_poster, also, does it make sense to set the value in json cache to None if pub is None?
[13:22]  * gary_poster blinks
[13:23] <gary_poster> danilos, I don't know what you are talking about
[13:23] <danilos> gary_poster, oh, I guess I don't have a fresh enough devel checkout :)
[13:23] <gary_poster> :-)
[13:24] <danilos> gary_poster, all good (interestingly, one revision I didn't have was very small so I thought it was part of it :)
[13:25] <gary_poster> :-) cool thanks danilos
[13:38] <benji> gary_poster: I'm about to give up on https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/701953; there's just not enough there for me to get a toehold.  Any hints before I look for something else?
[13:38] <_mup_> Bug #701953: ValueError OOPS on codehosting <lp-code> <oops> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/701953 >
[13:38] <gary_poster> benji, do you mean hints on that bug or hints on finding a new bug?
[13:38] <benji> either :)
[13:39] <gary_poster> heh
[13:39] <gary_poster> ok, lemme look at bug...
[13:44] <gary_poster> benji, I like to try and figure out a way to make things a bit better for the next person even when I decide to move on.  The traceback for that bug makes it look like it is entirely within bzr.  Moreover, it has not occurred since Jan 7 or Jan 8, if the OOPS tools are to be trusted in that regard--and I'm not sure I do.
[13:45] <gary_poster> So, here's what I would do. (1) go to devpad and do a manual grep for this traceback on crowberry.  Report back on results in bug.  If it has not occurred since Jan, change status to Won't Fix. (2) Add Bazaar to bug, with a comment saying that you are not sure it is pertinent, but it looks like it, and you'd like their opinion of te traceback.
[13:45] <gary_poster> I might do #2 even if I marked the bug Won't Fix
[13:45] <gary_poster> Then I would be done.
[13:45] <benji> good advice, will do
[13:47]  * danilos -> long, late lunch, will work on lp2kanban afterwords, no OCR anymore :)
[13:48] <bac> gary_poster: got safari to work again
[13:48] <gary_poster> For choosing a bug, I don't have any grand ideas.  timeouts are interesting to tackle, I find, though I've mixed success with actually following through with them.  For one problem, I keep encountering soyuz, and deciding I'm not willing to pay that price right now.
[13:48] <gary_poster> It might be an interesting idea to have a tag or a wiki page which kept track of bugs we all thought were interesting on the yellow squad. The wiki page would be nice because it would let us say who found it interesting, why, and if they are offering or looking for guidance on it.
[13:48] <gary_poster> But anyway,,,I dunno
[13:48] <gary_poster> danilos, enjoy :-)
[13:48] <danilos> thanks :)
[13:48] <gary_poster> bac, what did you have to do?
[13:48] <bac> the scripts i use for modifying /etc/hosts were creating a symbolic link, which worked pre-lion
[13:48] <gary_poster> ah!
[13:48] <bac> so just copying the linked file worked
[13:49] <bac> now i must re-jigger my script.
[13:49] <gary_poster> mine is a symlink to /private/etc/hosts bac
[13:49] <gary_poster> I think OS X does that itself
[13:53] <benji> gary_poster: can you verify that this is the right place for me to be looking for those OOPSes? /srv/launchpad.net-logs/scripts/crowberry/codehosting-oopses
[13:55] <gary_poster> benji, yeah, looks right.  I'll zoom over there for a look myself
[13:56] <benji> these errors are still happening (but under a different OOPS ID because of the varying message)
[13:56] <gary_poster> benji, mild darn, but still good information :-)
[13:56] <benji> I'll add the info I have to the bug.
[13:57] <gary_poster> perfect
[13:57] <gary_poster> bac or benji, could you look into the buildbot failure on devel please?
[13:58]  * gary_poster has call with flacoste in 3
[13:58] <bac> ok
[13:58] <gary_poster> thanks
[14:01] <bac> two branches by wgrant both look suspect
[14:15] <bac> actually wgrant's r 13599 seems to be the fix but wasn't included in the build.  rebuild forced.
[14:21] <gary_poster> danilo, flacoste says land code for 814580 on db-devel
[14:21] <gary_poster> on call
[14:46] <gary_poster> bac, flacoste suggests maybe good idea to talk to lifeless after you have a concrete working proposal for bug 813322, particularly if you have questions or concerns.
[14:46] <_mup_> Bug #813322: timeout marking bugs with many dupes as dupe of another bugs <timeout> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by bac> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/813322 >
[14:50] <danilos> gary_poster, I will, and I am
[14:59] <gary_poster> thx
[15:29] <bac> gary_poster: yes, i'd planned to do that
[15:29] <gary_poster> cool bac
[15:29] <gary_poster> thx
[15:30] <gary_poster> bac, also thanks for looking at buildbot issue.  Please reply to failure email on list
[15:30] <bac> sorry, had to race out to get my car back.  nice to have a vehicle with AC and power steering again
[15:30] <gary_poster> heh, I bet
[15:31] <bac> done
[16:05] <gary_poster> thx
[16:05] <gary_poster> bac, is https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/691352 a dupe of what you are working on?
[16:05] <_mup_> Bug #691352: BugTask:+duplicate / Bug:EntryResource timeout when marking a bug with duplicates as a duplicate of another bug <timeout> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/691352 >
[16:06] <bac> gary_poster: probably.  looking at the OOPS now
[16:07] <gary_poster> cool
[16:14] <bac> yes.
[16:14] <bac> i'll mark that one a duplicate of the one i'm working.  and hope it doesn't time out.  :(
[16:15] <gary_poster> heh :-)
[16:15] <bac> success
[16:15] <gary_poster> great
[16:15]  * gary_poster is decreasing the critical bug count by hook or by crook
[16:37] <gary_poster> lunch
[18:48] <bac> hi gary_poster i've got a zope event question
[18:50] <gary_poster> bac, I've got several answers I've been saving up for just such an occasion
[18:51] <bac> gary_poster: so, i'm attempting to create a special class like lazr...IObjectModifiedEvent mainly so i can have a different handler for the event
[18:51] <bac> er
[18:51] <bac>     <subscriber
[18:51] <bac>         for="lp.bugs.interfaces.bug.IBug                 lp.bugs.interfaces.bug.IDeferredObjectModifiedEvent"
[18:51] <bac>         handler="lp.bugs.subscribers.bug.deferred_notify_bug_modified"/>
[18:51] <bac>     <subscriber
[18:51] <bac>         for="lp.bugs.interfaces.bug.IBug                 lazr.lifecycle.interfaces.IObjectModifiedEvent"
[18:52] <bac>         handler="lp.bugs.subscribers.bug.notify_bug_modified"/>
[18:52] <bac> and i've registered like so
[18:53] <bac> however my new event is a subclass of IObjectModifiedEvent and i find the old handler is being called
[18:53] <gary_poster> yeah
[18:53] <bac> what's my way out?
[18:53] <gary_poster> and there's no "stop processing" or "me first" either
[18:54] <gary_poster> practically, you need to not subclass the original
[18:54] <bac> so i can't use inheritance here at all and need to redo the class from scratch?
[18:54] <gary_poster> oh well
[18:54] <bac> ok, that's what i figured/feared
[18:54] <gary_poster> you can reuse the calss
[18:54] <gary_poster> class
[18:54] <gary_poster> you just cannot reuse the interface
[18:54] <gary_poster> would that help bac?
[18:55] <bac> maybe
[18:55] <gary_poster> ok lemme get details
[18:56] <gary_poster> bac, zope.interface.implementsOnly
[18:56] <gary_poster> instead of implements
[18:56] <bac> sorry i'm being gently chastised by lifeless elsewhere
[18:56] <gary_poster> says "yes I want to use my superclasses, but please ignore their interfaces"
[18:57] <bac> oh sweet
[18:57] <gary_poster> glad that helps
[18:57] <gary_poster> 'cause that's all I've got
[18:57] <bac> well, we'll see if it does
[19:01] <bac> gary_poster: hey that worked!
[19:01] <gary_poster> yay, bac!
[20:17] <benji> gary_poster: keyring 0.6.2 has been released: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/keyring (there was another bug fix on the tip so I included that too, yielding 0.6.2)
[20:17] <gary_poster> benji, cool, thank you!
[20:17] <benji> np
[20:25] <gary_poster> Emailed Carl
[20:34] <gary_poster> night!