| === robbiew-afk is now known as robbiew | ||
| === skrewler_ is now known as skrewler | ||
| davinci11 | TeTeT : Hi TeTeT, when i try to attach /dev/vdc again, it doesnt appear in /dev, what wrong ? | 08:46 |
|---|---|---|
| TeTeT | davinci11: does it appear with fdisk -l? | 08:47 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: and what command do you use to attach? | 08:47 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: no | 08:47 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT $ euca-attach-volume $vol -i <INSTANCEID> -d /dev/sdb | 08:48 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: there comes something to my mind - if the device is now called /dev/vdb, the complete ebs based instance stuff might not work, as the loader emi expects sdb | 08:49 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: attach command looks good to me, you sure it's not on the instance? does euca-describe-volumes say it is attached? | 08:49 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: in hybridfox show attached | 08:51 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: VOLUMEvol-596C061F 1cluster1in-use2011-08-03T07:37:09.288Z | 08:56 |
| davinci11 | ATTACHMENTvol-596C061Fi-3565075E/dev/vdc2011-08-03T08:41:28.731Z | 08:56 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: so looks good, what's on the instance to see? | 09:01 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: or is this the final instance with ebs attached? Then I fear it will not work due to sdb vs vdc :( | 09:06 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: step6 echo “1,,L,*” | sudo sfdisk /dev/vdc | 09:06 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: ah, you're still preparing the volume? | 09:07 |
| davinci11 | output: /dev/vdc: No such file or directory | 09:07 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: fdisk -l | 09:07 |
| davinci11 | fdisk -l | 09:07 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT : Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Disk identifier: 0x000c9641 | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | /dev/sda1 * 1 32 248832 83 Linux | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | /dev/sda2 32 19458 156039169 5 Extended | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | /dev/sda5 32 19458 156039168 8e Linux LVM | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Disk /dev/dm-0: 157.7 GB, 157659693056 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19167 cylinders | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Disk identifier: 0x00000000 | 09:08 |
| davinci11 | Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | Disk /dev/dm-1: 2122 MB, 2122317824 bytes | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 258 cylinders | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | Disk identifier: 0x00000000 | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | /dev/dm-1p1 * 2 258 2064352+ 83 Linux | 09:09 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: oerks, what about paste bin? | 09:09 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: also this is not from an instance, it's from your client system | 09:09 |
| davinci11 | paste bin ? | 09:09 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: no offense, but for getting anywhere with UEC you need to learn some basics first, I fear. Maybe visit a class on Linux/Unix shell and command line usage | 09:10 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: pastebin.ubuntu.com, you can copy'n'paste large volumes of text there | 09:10 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: so you don't spam the channel like above | 09:10 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: so the output ok? but yesterday when i attached /dev/vdc. it show when fdisk -l | 09:15 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: output is from your client system, not the instance. you need to ssh to the instance and check there | 09:16 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: but the same output from local machine (cc) when fdsik -l | 09:16 |
| davinci11 | exit | 09:17 |
| davinci11 | sorry wrong typing | 09:17 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: no idea what you're referring too right now | 09:17 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: same output from CC / using ssh from remote pc still get the same output | 09:21 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: no idea, I'm beat then | 09:21 |
| davinci11 | TeTeT: Lol, i missed 1 step SSH :P can get in there and now can see /dev/vdi this time | 09:32 |
| TeTeT | davinci11: still you have the vdx vs sdx problem for the loader emi - no idea how to fix that | 09:33 |
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| smoser | jamespage, ping | 12:14 |
| jamespage | hey smoser | 12:14 |
| smoser | have you, or can you, start full test of images ? | 12:14 |
| jamespage | I have not but I can | 12:15 |
| smoser | jamespage, Daviey, any one else, know of a reason that we should not test 20110802.2 ? | 12:16 |
| smoser | hearing none, jamespage go ahead. | 12:18 |
| jamespage | smoser: ack - I'll run a small cross region test first | 12:19 |
| jamespage | and then kickoff the big one | 12:19 |
| smoser | k | 12:19 |
| Daviey | smoser: that is our candidate. | 13:17 |
| jamespage | Daviey: good job - I just tested it! | 13:22 |
| jamespage | looks 99.95% good to me | 13:22 |
| Daviey | 5% is the "it doesn't boot"? | 13:27 |
| Daviey | jamespage: | 13:27 |
| jamespage | nope | 13:27 |
| jamespage | one test failed on the cloud-config tests - failed to mount ephemeral0 | 13:28 |
| jamespage | but failed consistently for all instances of this test | 13:28 |
| Daviey | jamespage: do you test cluster compute? | 13:28 |
| jamespage | ah-ha - no | 13:28 |
| jamespage | smoser normally runs that sep. | 13:28 |
| Daviey | expecting https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791850 to still be valid | 13:28 |
| uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 791850 in linux "oneiric cluster compute instances do not boot" [High,Triaged] | 13:28 |
| smoser | jamespage, oh yeah, we're still seeing bug 784937 | 13:34 |
| uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 784937 in linux "/mnt not mounted, swap not used, disk is xvde" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784937 | 13:34 |
| smoser | i recently fixed a t1.micro issue where the entry was written to /mnt | 13:35 |
| jamespage | disk is definately xdve still | 13:37 |
| jamespage | http://paste.ubuntu.com/657935/ | 13:37 |
| smoser | jamespage, right. | 13:39 |
| jamespage | that was it tho | 13:40 |
| jamespage | all other tests passed | 13:40 |
| Daviey | So three failures? | 13:48 |
| * Daviey needs to prepare the release notes. | 13:48 | |
| gtaylor | erichammond: Have you ever compared the performance of the Alestic Ubuntu AMIs to Amazon's Fedora-based golden child? | 14:40 |
| === daker is now known as daker_ | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| erichammond | gtaylor: To be clear, the recent Ubuntu AMIs listed at the top of http://alestic.com are published by Canonical, not by me. | 18:35 |
| erichammond | gtaylor: Comparing performance for real world applications is difficult and I have not done it. | 18:35 |
| gtaylor | erichammond: Ah,I was wrongly assuming that Canonical was using Alestic AMIs. | 18:37 |
| gtaylor | erichammond: Well, another side question. Have you had any luck getting an EC2 instance running on 2.6.39+ with the newly merged built-in Xen support? | 18:38 |
| erichammond | I did publish Ubuntu AMIs for two years, and apparently did a ridiculously good job branding them :) | 18:38 |
| gtaylor | erichammond: Yeah, your Google page ranks are still sky high | 18:39 |
| gtaylor | and a lot of people still reference Alestic AMIs | 18:39 |
| erichammond | For a while, I kept getting people who meet me say "Eric Hammond is a really familiar name." I pointed out that they saw it every time they logged in to one of the Ubuntu instances on EC2 (back then). | 18:39 |
| erichammond | I expect Google to continue liking me as I still publish unique and relevant content to the subject matter being searched. | 18:40 |
| gtaylor | Yeah, your blog posts are interesting to see for perspective | 18:41 |
| erichammond | gtaylor: I don't know what you're talking about with the Xen question, but I've been using stock Ubuntu AMIs from Canonical. | 18:41 |
| gtaylor | erichammond: We're in a weird dead period right now. 2.6.39 no longer requires external modules for domU support (which was one of the reasons why there are specific EC2 kernels being distributed). If I understand correctly, the next releases of many distros that use 2.6.39+ can ship a much more generic kernel that can be dist-upgraded like bare metal or more tolerant VM hosts. | 18:43 |
| gtaylor | But almost all AMIs I see run 2.6.35 or so with the kernel either pinned or pointed at an EC2-specific package name. | 18:44 |
| gtaylor | IIRC, canonical uses linux-virtual or something. | 18:44 |
| erichammond | gtaylor: I see. I let other folks worry about that kind of thing now and I just focus at a higher level :) You could ask smoser and the gang over on #ubuntu-cloud | 18:45 |
| erichammond | It's almost noon, so I should head off to work... | 18:45 |
| gtaylor | erichammond: OK, thanks | 18:45 |
| erichammond | oh, we're on #ubuntu-cloud :-) | 18:45 |
| gtaylor | teehee | 18:46 |
| gtaylor | smoser: ^^ | 18:46 |
| erichammond | (Usually when somebody addresses me directly it's over on ##aws) | 18:46 |
| gtaylor | ahh | 18:46 |
| erichammond | later | 18:47 |
| smoser | gtaylor, all ubuntu amis should "just work" for upgrades | 18:48 |
| smoser | in 10.04, we used the '-ec2' kernel flavour. | 18:48 |
| smoser | in 10.10 and beyond, we use '-virtual' | 18:48 |
| smoser | but, mostly '-server' would have "just worked" also. | 18:48 |
| gtaylor | smoser: Is it safe to dist-upgrade to new distro releases on EC2? I assumed it would be for Ubuntu, at least. | 18:49 |
| smoser | dist-upgrade meaning 'apt-get dist-upgrade' ? right? | 18:50 |
| smoser | (versus 'do-release-upgrade', which brings you from 10.04 to 10.10) | 18:51 |
| gtaylor | well, maybe I do mean do-release-upgrade | 18:51 |
| smoser | it should work. | 18:51 |
| gtaylor | smoser: Well that's good to know, thanks | 18:52 |
| smoser | both should work. | 18:53 |
| smoser | gtaylor, if you're using instance-store, you have reason to be more worried. :) | 18:53 |
| smoser | but ebs can be recoverred more easily | 18:53 |
| gtaylor | smoser: Nope, we're using EBS | 18:53 |
| gtaylor | smoser: though, I have reasons to worry about EBS, too :) | 18:53 |
| gtaylor | (ala, the great outage) | 18:53 |
| smoser | this is true. | 18:54 |
| smoser | gtaylor, so yes, i' would suggest doing a do-release-upgrade from within a screen session | 18:54 |
| gtaylor | yeah, that sounds like a good idea | 18:54 |
| smoser | jamespage, you have link to test results ? | 18:56 |
| smoser | did you run the big test? | 18:56 |
| gtaylor | smoser: Do you have any DB servers deployed on EC2? | 18:57 |
| smoser | i do not. | 18:57 |
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| smoser | jamespage, ping please. | 19:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!