[00:29] <anadon> hey, what's the old grub2 reinstall after windows link?
[00:29] <charlie-tca> !grub
[00:34] <anadon> boot-repair isn't findable--the repository can't be found.  error 404
[01:12] <anadon> hey, I have an UEFI setup by windows and I need to get grub working.  The usual reinstalling isn't working.  Any idea how to get this to work?
[01:18] <anadon> hello?
[01:37] <anadon> hey, I have an UEFI setup by windows and I need to get grub working.  The usual reinstalling isn't working.  Any idea how to get this to work?
[05:15] <head_victim> I've done a apt-get install gnome-shell but at the lightdm prompt everytime I try to log into gnome it gives me "unable to load session "gnome"" error box. Unity works perfectly but I wanted to see what the fuss about gnome shell was.
[07:15] <Joymo> where did alpha 3 go, it looks like it was downloadable but removed ?
[07:16] <Guest20271> does oneiric still ship with gnome classic? and what will happen to it during upgrade?
[08:10] <dupondje> head_victim: you prolly missing some package :P
[08:11] <dupondje> you have gnome-session?
[08:27] <allandee> ok
[08:27] <linuxfreaker> Hi
[08:27] <allandee> hi
[08:27] <linuxfreaker> I am here
[08:27] <IdleOne> allandee linuxfreaker thank you for moving here in the proper channel :)
[08:27] <linuxfreaker> Guys..I need help on Ubuntu 11.10 alpha with gcc
[08:27] <IdleOne> much appreciated
[08:28] <linuxfreaker> I installed gcc through apt-get install gcc and it got installed successfully
[08:28] <allandee> linuxfreaker: so, the PATH environment variable -- it points among other things to /usr/bin for sure?
[08:28] <allandee>  
[08:28] <allandee> and ls -l /usr/bin/gcc says?
[08:28] <linuxfreaker> But when i am running /usr/bin/gcc it threw the error root@km-vmqa-dhcp184:~/vmware-tools-distrib# gcc gcc: fatal error: no input files compilation terminated.
[08:28] <linuxfreaker> root@km-vmqa-dhcp184:~/vmware-tools-distrib# ls -l /usr/bin/gcc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2011-07-20 03:00 /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-4.6
[08:29] <allandee> that                            is expected though, that only means that gcc is in fact in /usr/bin/gcc -- and that you didn't provide any input files
[08:29] <linuxfreaker> means ?
[08:29] <linuxfreaker> okie
[08:29] <allandee> how to you run the script?
[08:30] <allandee> the vmware script?
[08:30] <linuxfreaker> But why re-installing gcc even dint work for /usr/bin/gcc
[08:30] <linuxfreaker> I think we shud first fix this
[08:30] <linuxfreaker> Vmware -tools script comes ater
[08:30] <linuxfreaker> after
[08:30] <allandee>  /usr/bin/gcc is there and working as expected for now
[08:30] <linuxfreaker> Why /usr/bin/gcc threw the error
[08:31] <allandee> because you didn'
[08:31] <allandee> t provide input files ;)
[08:31] <linuxfreaker> ohh..u mean the command needs input files
[08:31] <allandee> how do you run the script?
[08:31] <linuxfreaker> ohk fine
[08:31] <linuxfreaker> Let me tell u about vmware-tools then
[08:31] <linuxfreaker> As you see http://pastebin.com/ChgLZC4M
[08:32] <linuxfreaker> generally vmware-tools on Ubuntu needs compilations
[08:32] <linuxfreaker> and need gcc and kernel-header files
[08:34] <allandee> I have comments to address that, but first:
[08:34] <allandee> the last line in that pastebin is this:
[08:34] <allandee> Enter the path to the kernel header files for the 3.0-3-server kernel? /lib64/modules/3.0-3-server/build/kernel
[08:38] <linuxfreaker> Allandee: Here is the complete Installing VMware Tools.  In which directory do you want to install the binary files? [/usr/bin]  What is the directory that contains the init directories (rc0.d/ to rc6.d/)? [/etc]  What is the directory that contains the init scripts? [/etc/init.d]  In which directory do you want to install the daemon files? [/usr/sbin]  In which directory do you want to install the library files? [/usr/lib/v
[08:38] <linuxfreaker> Sorry
[08:38] <linuxfreaker> Here is the new pastebin : http://pastebin.com/ZAfpagF1
[08:39] <allandee>  checking
[08:40] <linuxfreaker> thnx
[08:40] <allandee> just to make sure "The path "/lib64/modules/3.0-3-server/build/kernel" is not a valid path to the
[08:40] <allandee> 3.0-3-server kernel headers." is the last line you see?
[08:40] <linuxfreaker> yes
[08:41] <linuxfreaker> Do u want more lines?
[08:41] <allandee> no
[08:41] <linuxfreaker> All it says after the step is WARNING: This program cannot compile any modules for the following reason(s)...  - This program could not find a valid path to the gcc binary.  Please ensure that the gcc binary is installed on this sytem.  - This program could not find a valid path to the kernel headers of the running kernel.  Please ensure that the header files for the running kernel are installed on this sytem.
[08:42] <linuxfreaker> That is what it skips and goes ahead
[08:42] <allandee> what does "uname -a" say?
[08:42] <linuxfreaker> 3.0-3-server #4-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 1 09:50:36 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[08:44] <allandee> does "ls -D /lib64" give a sane result?
[08:45] <linuxfreaker> yes
[08:46] <linuxfreaker> http://pastebin.com/myV5eDRE
[08:47] <allandee> http://pastebin.com/myV5eDRE
[08:47] <allandee> ooops
[08:48] <allandee> what do you have in your /lib64/modules?  do you have the stuff for 3.0.3 there?
[08:49] <allandee> (and if not, why would the script try to link to it?)
[08:49] <linuxfreaker> ls 3.0.0-7-generic  3.0.0-7-server  3.0.0-7-virtual  3.0-3-server
[08:50] <linuxfreaker> yes
[08:50] <linuxfreaker> its there
[08:50] <allandee> but no link from 3.0.3 to anything
[08:50] <linuxfreaker> http://pastebin.com/RPqTqCwe
[08:52] <linuxfreaker> no
[08:53] <linuxfreaker> root@km-vmqa-dhcp184:/lib64/modules# ls -la 3.0-3-server total 4208 drwxr-xr-x  4 root root   4096 2011-08-04 04:37 . drwxr-xr-x  6 root root   4096 2011-08-03 07:19 .. lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     35 2011-07-01 09:43 build -> /usr/src/linux-headers-3.0-3-server
[08:54] <allandee> try to apt-get install linux-headers-3.0.3
[08:54] <allandee> but
[08:54] <allandee> they should be there hang on
[08:58] <linuxfreaker> linux-headers-3.0.0-7 is already the newest version
[08:58] <allandee> no, it looks like everything should be there, do you have linux-headers-3.0.3 installed?  (the obvious question last) ;)
[08:59] <linuxfreaker> linux-headers-3.0-3-server is already the newest version.
[08:59] <allandee> apt-cache search linux-headers-3.*
[08:59] <allandee> ?
[08:59] <allandee> any 3.0.3?
[09:01] <linuxfreaker> ?
[09:02] <linuxfreaker> root@km-vmqa-dhcp184:/lib64/modules# apt-cache search linux-headers-3.* linux-headers-3.0.0-7 - Header files related to Linux kernel version 3.0.0 linux-headers-3.0.0-7-generic - Linux kernel headers for version 3.0.0 on x86/x86_64 linux-headers-3.0.0-7-server - Linux kernel headers for version 3.0.0 on x86_64 linux-headers-3.0.0-7-virtual - Linux kernel headers for version 3.0.0 on x86/x86_64 linux-headers-3.0-3-server - Li
[09:02] <linuxfreaker> root@km-vmqa-dhcp184:/lib64/modules# apt-cache search linux-headers-3.* linux-headers-3.0.0-7 - Header files related to Linux kernel version 3.0.0 linux-headers-3.0.0-7-generic - Linux kernel headers for version 3.0.0 on x86/x86_64 linux-headers-3.0.0-7-server - Linux kernel headers for version 3.0.0 on x86_64 linux-headers-3.0.0-7-virtual - Linux kernel headers for version 3.0.0 on x86/x86_64 linux-headers-3.0-3-server - Li
[09:02] <linuxfreaker> Sorry
[09:02] <linuxfreaker> http://pastebin.com/bVGdgFar
[09:03] <allandee> oops, I meant 3.*3
[09:04] <allandee> but:
[09:04] <linuxfreaker> ok let me see
[09:04] <allandee> the script is looking for the kernel header files in /lib64/modules/<version>-server/build/kernel
[09:04] <linuxfreaker> http://pastebin.com/uf9eyype
[09:05] <linuxfreaker> yes
[09:05] <allandee> and that seems unorthodox
[09:05] <linuxfreaker> I did suppiled that but it dint work
[09:05] <linuxfreaker> why?
[09:05] <allandee> and, I thought, maybe a new scheme with 3.0
[09:05] <allandee> right
[09:05] <linuxfreaker> I think Linux 3.0 has something to do here
[09:06] <linuxfreaker> You guys dont wait for Linus Torvald to make it GA either
[09:06] <linuxfreaker> :)
[09:06] <linuxfreaker> Very Quick :)
[09:06] <allandee> hehe
[09:06] <linuxfreaker> But I respect Ubuntu ..thats my fav distro
[09:09] <linuxfreaker> Will be out for another 20 mins for tea
[09:09] <linuxfreaker> thanx allendee for the support
[09:10] <linuxfreaker> wish if someone can try installing gcc on ubuntu alpha2
[09:10] <linuxfreaker> I am installing a fresh copy again to see what is going wrong
[09:11] <allandee> I've run dry short of stupid forcing, like "ln -s /usr/src/linux-headers-3.0.3-64 /lib64/modules/3.0.3/server/build/kernel"
[09:16] <allandee> you can see where the linux-headers package puts the header-files with "dpkg -L <package-name>" after it's installed.  ln -s that directory to /lib64/modules/3.0.3-server/build/kernel -- that's the best I can do, cheesy as frack, but I can't wrap my head around how that script ends on that being the cool location to look for the headerfiles
[09:22] <allandee> I tried making the script inherit the environment variables "CPATH", "C_INCLUDE_PATH" and "CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH", btw, and passing -- -I<path> that weirdly is interpreted, but not passed on to the compiler.
[09:28] <linuxfreaker> i m back
[09:34] <linuxfreaker> linking dint work
[09:39] <allandee> is there a different error, then?
[09:41] <linuxfreaker> I am going to try in fresh ubuntu
[09:41] <allandee> ok
[09:41] <linuxfreaker> apt-get install build-essentail getting fine
[09:41] <linuxfreaker> 2 min to go
[09:42] <allandee> I'm going to go out on a limb and say that you will still have no header files in "/lib64/modules/3.0.3/server/build/kernel" - but maybe that monster script decides to look elsewhere, idk
[09:44] <linuxfreaker> The same erro allen
[09:45] <linuxfreaker> Seems like the vmware script is unable to find the gcc and kernel-header in fresh too
[09:46] <linuxfreaker> But surprisngly it worked in Alpha 1
[09:52] <Machtin> hummm.. i got a xonar dx and can't unmute the s/pdif, any ideas?
[09:53] <Machtin> although! in phonon i can test the speakers and they work. but movies and music (vlc and amarok) won't play
[10:21] <Machtin> solved :D
[10:24] <kavurt> is kubuntu oneiric alpha available?
[11:08] <Ian_Corne> I'm really going crazy with this ctrl+tab hijacking
[11:08] <Ian_Corne> and there's no way i can disable it
[11:08] <Ian_Corne> changed it in the ccsm unity plugin
[11:08] <Ian_Corne> but it's still acts on ctrl+tab
[11:11] <ephan> I have a question about Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric, Daily Builds
[11:11] <ephan> I'd like to know if I can use Wifi Internet if I run a daily build of it live
[11:16] <iceroot> ephan: i would suggest if you have questions like that to not use a daily-build. instead run the stbale-release 11.04
[11:17] <ephan> iceroot, I need to use the daily build in order to build Unity
[11:17] <ephan> And I'm wondering if live, I can use the internet. When I used 11.04 Daily Builds, I could not
[11:18] <iceroot> ephan: try it
[11:18] <Ian_Corne> My 0.02EUR, try it
[11:18] <Ian_Corne> damn iceroot !
[11:18] <iceroot> ephan: depending on the wifi-chip and if it is supported
[11:18] <Ian_Corne> it should work
[11:18] <iceroot> Ian_Corne: just to slow .)
[11:18] <Ian_Corne> *should*
[11:19] <ephan> iceroot, maybe I should repose my question. I tried it, and I could only log in as guest, and to use internet I needed a guest password, which I didn't have because I never set up. Thanks
[11:19] <iceroot> ephan: i think we should start at another point. why do you need to build unity?
[11:20] <ephan> iceroot, I want to try the Bitesize bugs campaign
[11:21] <iceroot> ephan: there should be an info on the live-cd/download-page what are the logins
[11:23] <ephan> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ This is where I downloaded it from, and I could not find any information on logins. Thanks
[11:31] <iceroot> ephan: google says user is "ubuntu" without a password
[12:38] <sdimkov> At what time is alpha 3 coming out today ?
[13:00] <sdimkov> At what time is alpha 3 coming out today ? ?
[13:04] <om26er> sooooooon
[13:06] <vega-> sdimkov: 17:29:37 ... approx.
[13:07] <sdimkov> vega-: I'm not sure if you're just kidding with me :)  What do you mean by that time? And do you refer to GMT time or something else?
[13:08] <Pici> sdimkov: Like all Ubuntu releases there is no set time for it to be released.
[13:08] <sdimkov> Pici: I see, thanks.
[13:22] <vega-> they never learn
[13:32] <anadon> Hey, I'm trying to get my computer to dual boot windows on a gpt disk .  boot-repair isn't working.  Anyone know how I can boot my brick?
[13:35] <BLZbubba> is upstart part of the next ubuntu?  any chance of it going away in an upcoming release?
[13:35] <BLZbubba> i want to use ubuntu server but not until upstart is gone
[13:37] <geser> BLZbubba: yes, and I didn't hear of any plans to replace upstart
[13:37] <geser> the transition cost from upstart to something else (like systemd) is too big for too little benefit
[13:39] <Pici> If it were to go away, I wouldn't expect it until after 12.04
[13:39] <anadon> Hey, I'm trying to get my computer to dual boot windows on a gpt disk .  boot-repair isn't fixing Grub2.  Anyone know how I can boot my brick?
[14:39] <BLZbubba> geser: upstart is bad enough that it would be worth it IMO
[14:45]  * burner really wishes X with nvidia were working instead of this nouveau-not-work-so-good-with-my-dual-monitors driver :|
[14:49] <BLZbubba> burner: i use nouveau with 2 monitors on nvidia and it has been pretty good
[14:49] <BLZbubba> what problems are you having?
[14:49] <burner> they mirror each other
[14:50] <burner> and the second one is supposed to go 1920x1080, but it goes 1680x1050 from the top left
[14:50] <burner> and i want to play heroes of newerth... i assume i need nvidia vs. nouveau for that
[15:06] <gjl> is alpha 3 still on track to be released today?
[15:08] <fashun> I am using alpha 3 downloaded from the daily build
[15:10] <Ian_Corne> burner: yes
[15:13] <BLZbubba> burner: yeah for 3d games nouveau will not be your friend.  what's wrong with the nvidia driver?
[15:13] <BLZbubba> you should be able to just load the package
[15:16] <quzi> come on where's that alpha 3.. How can we find out when it comes out ?
[15:17] <Ian_Corne> keep tryin http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/alpha-3
[15:17] <Ian_Corne> :p
[15:19] <geser> BLZbubba: there was a discussion in May 2011 about systemd, see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-May/thread.html if you are interested
[15:19] <Pici> quzi: Why don't you just grab the daily iso if you're so eager?
[15:20] <quzi> Pici: not the same :P
[15:22] <quzi> geser: are you saying ubuntu will switch from upstart to systemd ?  I thought that ain't happening.. not after all the money spent on upstart
[15:22] <quzi> ?
[15:23] <geser> quzi: no, it won't happen as far as I know but a user started a discussion in May if Ubuntu switches or not
[15:24] <quzi> geser: what's your oppinion on systemd VS upstart ?
[15:27] <geser> quzi: I don't know neither upstart nor systemd good enough to have an opinion about it
[15:27] <burner> BLZbubba: the package being nvidia-current right?  I have it...  I've removed all nouveau.  I aptitude reinstalled it... Then I created an xorg.conf with sudo nvidia-xconfig, but I get no DM when I try.  If I remove xorg.conf, it goes back to nouveau or nv presumably
[15:28] <genii-around> !nomodeset
[15:29] <burner> i'll give that a shot... thanks
[15:30] <genii-around> burner: If you have a line like GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="nouveau.modeset=1" in /etc/default/grub for instance, the nouveau driver loads and the nvidia doesn't even if it's installed
[15:36] <quzi> !next
[16:35] <BLZbubba> burner: you should try the nvidia config utility, and turn on twinview
[16:36] <BLZbubba> iirc it is just nvidia-xconfig --twinview
[16:36] <BLZbubba> nvidia-something
[16:36] <BLZbubba> geser: daily iso?
[16:38] <BLZbubba> quzi: upstart needs better tools, there are situations where it just stops with no messages on what went wrong - e.g. i had an nfs server in /etc/fstab that was down, and ubuntu server wouldn't boot and had no error message anywhere
[16:39] <BLZbubba> i would hate it less if it were more mature in that regard - e.g. if it were easy to make it write everything it does to a log file
[16:39] <BLZbubba> it is almost unusable in container environments e.g. openvz
[16:42] <quzi> BLZbubba: I see what you mean. And seems like systemd is far more actively developed. Or at least a glance at their repos shows a clear difference
[16:43] <quzi> do you think Ubuntu would consider replacing upstart? I mean that's the trend right now :D It's fedora, opensuse and others switching at the moment
[16:43] <maco> given canonical makes upstart, i doubt it
[16:43] <micahg> quzi: that was tabled until after the LTS
[16:44] <maco> also, ChromeOS uses upstart too, not everybody's switching away from upstart...just away from SysV Init
[16:45] <yofel> BLZbubba: nfs mount stopping the boot is actually mountall hanging with a plymouth prompt on what to do
[16:47] <BLZbubba> i understand RHEL 7 will drop upstart at least.  that is a positive step
[16:47] <BLZbubba> yofel: yeah that could be it, except my 10.04 servers don't show any kind of prompt when this happens
[16:48] <BLZbubba> it is a cool concept, once it matures it will be great
[16:48] <BLZbubba> maybe if it had a boot method where it gives you a "yes/no" prompt for every possible service
[16:48] <yofel> hm, shouldn't happen. Try adding 'nobootwait' as mount option. Not documented anywhere I could see, but should help
[16:49] <BLZbubba> yofel: well the problem was that mountall just failed and so it didnt emit the event that the next step needed
[16:49] <BLZbubba> it wasn't waiting for anything, init just stopped initting
[16:50] <yofel> it didn't fail, is simply waited for user action - which never happened
[16:50] <BLZbubba> i'll try hosing my mythbuntu system tonight and see what happens.  it is 11.04
[17:26] <quzi> no alpha 3 yet ?/
[17:47] <h00k> So, I'm seeing my wireless card, broadcom fail.
[17:47] <h00k> I cannot connect to a wpa2 network, where should I report the bug against?
[17:48] <h00k> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/658769/
[17:54] <h00k> Oh, printing moved to over there ->
[17:54]  * h00k points to power button menu
[18:01] <h00k> printing appears to be broken, 'lpd' keeps crashing
[18:01] <h00k> but lpd doesn't appear to exist
[18:19] <antihero> sound has randomly stopped working
[18:19] <antihero> my card shows up under lspci though
[18:34] <jjgalvez__> does anyone know if Oneiric will be friendlier within virtualbox? Natty really does not work very will within Virtualbox
[18:36] <xxx> jjgalvez__: what problems do you experince?
[18:38] <jjgalvez__> none specifically with Oneiric, (I've not tried it yet) but with natty there are several performance issues with it being run within virtualbox, I think they all have to do with compiz because it works a little better with unity-2d. Note the last version of ubuntu worked great in virtualbox even with composting turned on
[18:40] <xxx> oh sorry I didn't understand your question in first place :)  I thought you have problems with Natty  as VB host but you have as a guest. No clues here..
[18:45] <jjgalvez__> actually I've been using it both as a guest and a host :) I run Natty on my desktop and then have VB with another instance of natty in it. I like to keep a vm for playing with stuff, much easier to rebuild broken VM then totally hose my desktop
[18:54] <dermaster> hello
[18:54] <dermaster> can i get help
[19:26] <xxx> hey where's the alpha 3
[19:26] <xxx> ?
[19:26] <xxx> 4 is close to end
[19:26] <xxx> I mean 4th of aug.
[19:27] <IAmNotThatGuy> xxx, alpha 3 is the testing version 3. Beta is the final(stable) release
[19:28] <IAmNotThatGuy> it has some bugs
[19:28] <xxx> IAmNotThatGuy: And how is that relating to my question?  :)
[19:28] <IAmNotThatGuy> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/
[19:28] <antihero> helloo
[19:29] <antihero> anything that would have broken envy24 module or something?
[19:29] <IdleOne> xxx: it doesn't. Alpha3 will be released when it is released, soonish.
[19:29] <IAmNotThatGuy> erm! wait. xxx sorry. I am about to bed. sleepy. sorry for the wrong reply
[19:29]  * IAmNotThatGuy read that where as what :|
[19:29] <xxx> no worries :)
[19:31] <xxx> at least does anybody know where to check if it is released ?
[19:31] <xxx> it was supposed to be out today.
[19:31] <xxx> I'm only checking at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/alpha-3/
[19:32] <xxx> oh
[19:32] <xxx> I just wrote it and they published it :D
[19:32] <xxx> hurrey
[19:32] <antihero> How do I make alsa re-detect my soundcards
[19:32] <Pici> xxx: Its out when the email goes out.
[19:32] <xxx> on which ml ?
[19:33] <Pici> ubuntu-announce or ubuntu-devel-announce, I forget which one
[19:33] <antihero> Hello?
[19:34] <xxx> Pici: I think they're rleasing at as we speak. Checkout http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/alpha-3/           it is clearly different from    http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[19:34] <Pici> I know some issues with the xubuntu iso are still being worked out.  Hopefully that won't result in a re-spin of the other isos though.
[19:40] <IdleOne> Pici: both does list I think
[19:40] <IdleOne> lists*
[19:41] <IdleOne> or I am signed up to both
[19:44] <h00k> This is my wireless after trying to connect to a WPA2 wireless network: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/658769/ Any protips as to where I should report this against
[19:44] <antihero> Help?
[19:50] <antihero> Is anyone actually there?
[19:55] <Pici> antihero: clearly
[19:55] <Pici> antihero: But if we don't know the answer to your question, we aren't all going to say that.
[19:58] <DASDSDADS> hi
[19:59] <antihero> ok
[20:00] <antihero> Hmm, it shows up in /proc/asound/cards, but not aplay-l
[20:00] <antihero> which is really odd. When I do alsa reload, a window from KDE comes up telling me the cards have been removed (?!)
[20:00] <antihero> which would make sense if it had found them in the first place
[20:09] <antihero> http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=11582607bf4309b6537ff0f3f62a8037a8e38792
[20:09] <antihero> this has information on my alsa problem
[20:37] <antihero> Yeah so my system is turning off my soundcards :S
[20:38] <BUGabundo> evening folks of the mighty land of the writing
[20:39] <antihero> Hey BUGabundo
[20:40] <antihero> if you scroll up you can see me whining about broken sound
[20:40] <charlie-tca> Hello, BUGabundo
[20:40] <charlie-tca> no alpha3 for Xubuntu
[20:40] <antihero> BUGabundo: Any idea why my kernel would be disabling my soundcards?
[20:43] <BUGabundo> antihero: no backlog
[20:43] <BUGabundo> feel free to PM me it, if I can help
[20:51] <xxx> I want my Alpha 3! :D  not coming out today ?
[20:52] <BUGabundo> stop whinning
[20:52] <BUGabundo> get a daily
[20:53] <xxx> it's what irc channels are for
[20:53] <BUGabundo> :P
[20:56] <Ian_Corne> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/alpha-3/
[20:58] <xxx> Ian-Corne: I've been checking this every 2 minuts, I guess they changed the title to alpha 3 few minutes ago :)
[20:59] <xxx> somebody said we'll get email on either <ubuntu-announce>  or <ubuntu-devel-announce>  but that haven't happen yet
[21:07] <BUGabundo> this is funky
[21:07] <BUGabundo> $ pkill -9 chromium-browser
[21:07] <BUGabundo> is not killing chromium :S
[21:10] <Ian_Corne> I just changed the 2 to 3
[21:10] <Ian_Corne> in the url
[23:11] <coz_>  hey all
[23:13] <BUGabundo> hey coz_
[23:13] <coz_> BUGabundo,  hey guy ")
[23:31] <poolie> hi
[23:32] <poolie> i just upgraded to oneiric and now the delay from login to having my desktop up has got very long
[23:32] <poolie> something like 45s
[23:32] <poolie> on a machine where it was previously quite fast
[23:32] <poolie> is this a known problem?
[23:36] <alex_mayorga> anyone else with broken virtualbox?