[00:08] charlie-tca, Xubuntu Desktop 20110803.2 posted [00:08] along with both alternates again ... [00:08] Thanks, skaet [00:10] can the alternate tests be carried forward? the images did not change [00:28] charlie-tca, if the manifests are the same, or close enough, should be fine. [00:28] exact match [00:29] charlie-tca, should be fine then. [00:29] Thanks [00:29] charlie-tca, sorry it was an oversite that the alternates got spun again. [00:30] I figured it had to be. No problem, I just don't have enough hours to run all the tests again [00:30] um, after all this stuff today, Xubuntu live session does *not* auto-login [00:37] superm1, mythbuntu images posted [00:38] mythbuntu 20110804 [00:50] NCommander, I'm going to head to dinner now, when Ubuntu DVD emerges, please announce it here and #u-testing. [00:50] will do [00:50] NCommander, thanks! [00:55] charlie-tca: ugh, do the images still work, or this an actual blocker? [01:01] Finally, kubuntu-armel images downloaded - testing commencing. [01:48] Wow, this is much slower than Natty. [02:12] ScottK: Not going to be able to put a full effort into the Kubuntu arm images unfortunately. I'm getting them to boot no problem, but I won't be able to run through all the apps like I did in Natty. [02:14] So far, the install is doing well, and no major issues (aside from extreme slowness on 8G Class 10 SD). I'll try to run a net install later next week onto a USB drive to do a little more thorough beating. [02:20] ubuntu-dvd is built [02:28] back from dinner and starting installs now [02:28] for Xubuntu [03:03] GrueMaster: Thanks. Anything you can do is appreciated. [03:11] pretty sure I will not be able to do all the install tests tonight on xubuntu [03:11] will have to finish tomorrow [03:12] still trying to get the first one done to see if it is working now [03:27] skaet, jibel, NCommander : Xubuntu desktop images fail [03:27] Configuring target system... stuck [03:28] manifest shows gnome-keyring3.1.1-0ubuntu4 [03:33] I don't think we can publish the alpha3 milestone for Xubuntu [03:39] skaet, jibel, NCommander : please do NOT publish Xubuntu alpha3. The images are broken and will not install [03:39] getting a bug number [03:46] bug 820731 [03:46] Launchpad bug 820731 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Oneiric Ocelot Xubuntu Desktop images fail to install (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/820731 [04:09] skaet: Kubuntu is looking good. We still have more testing to get done, but no show stoppers so far. If you can find a volunteer to do some Wubi testing for us, that'd be great as I don't think we have anyone who can do it. [04:09] I don't think it's essential for Alpha 3, but it'd nice to hit it on at least one image. [04:11] We could stand some amd64+mac help too, but I think I know someone who might be able to do that. [05:44] charlie-tca: k, I'll tell skaet not to publish [05:57] NCommander: Do you know of anyone who can do wubi testing? [06:03] nope [06:06] OK. Thanks. [08:17] charlie-tca, skaet I can't reproduce 820731 and xubuntu 20110803.2 installs and boots fine. [08:17] charlie-tca could you double check the checksums of the images you tested ? [10:18] Ubuntu DVDs 20110804 are on the tracker but http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/dvd/20110804/ is empty [13:17] skaet: rsync is pretty slow here. I'll need another hour and a half to download Edubuntu... [13:22] stgraber: plz send more bandwidth? :) [13:25] I found some old images around, running zsync on them now, hopefully it'll be faster [13:26] download speed wasn't too bad, I was getting a pretty stable 1MB/s on a 10Mb/s internet but I'm downloading DVD images... [14:08] good morning all [14:09] good morning === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [14:21] stgraber, you have the extra time. [14:22] jibel, charlie-tca - what's the latest with the Xubuntu images? [14:22] I can' t get them to work at all, jibel can' t get them to fail [15:05] gah, swig2.0 in universe now has a swig package that superseded the swig1.3 package in main [15:48] stgraber, ev: can you confirm that fixing the xubuntu autologin problem requires another (simple) reupload of casper? [15:51] seems to affect mythbuntu as well === ara_ is now known as ara [16:24] skaet: edubuntu is ready for release [16:25] slangasek: simple upload of casper won't do it [16:25] slangasek: it might fix mythbuntu though [16:25] stgraber: *\o/* very glad to hear it. :) [16:26] ScottK, can you put the updates for Kubuntu in the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneiricOcelot/TechnicalOverview [16:26] ? [16:27] skaet, slangasek: New casper uploaded [16:27] stgraber: what else is needed to fix xubuntu, then, if casper is insufficient? [16:27] this should fix autologin for environments where lightdm.conf already exists as a symlink and where "ubuntu" as a session exists [16:28] slangasek: lightdm currently tries to run the "ubuntu" session, that doesn't exist with xubuntu [16:28] ah [16:28] slangasek: bug 806408 [16:28] Launchpad bug 806408 in xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "After xubuntu upgrade or installation, default session on greeter must be xubuntu (affects: 2) (heat: 24)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806408 [16:29] superm1, how do the mythbuntu images look? are we good to release? [16:29] all that we were waiting on was whatever happened on the casper thing [16:29] we don't get a lot of people to pick up until beta usually though, so i'm fine release noting it if it's not figured out [16:30] superm1, thanks. ok, we'll release then. [16:47] skaet, I've added some desktop items to the technicaloverview, tremulox will still add some software center notes and I think we are good [16:48] seb128, Thank you. :) [16:52] seb128, do you think bug 815077 should be release noted? It has been reported many times. [16:52] Launchpad bug 815077 in indicator-session (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "restart is missing from SessionMenu (affects: 57) (dups: 8) (heat: 288)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/815077 [16:52] jibel, hum, it seems worth adding to the notes yes [16:52] jibel, can you do it? [16:53] seb128, sure, I'll do [16:53] skaet: added bugs to release notes [16:53] jibel, thanks [16:53] charlie-tca, thank you.! [17:01] Daviey, bug 820111 -> release notes ? [17:01] Launchpad bug 820111 in mdadm (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "boot degraded question is asked twice (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/820111 [17:12] skaet: I'll be at my computer in a little over an house. [17:12] ScottK, thanks. [17:14] * Laney lends ScottK a grappling hook [17:14] I think Kubuntu is good on i386, amd64, and armel. [17:15] House / Hour [17:15] Android autocorrect FTL. [17:16] skaet, Ubuntu is good, release notes reviewed and updated. [17:17] jibel, thanks. I've updated the QA tracker to remove the builds we're not shipping with. Could you please review it and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneiricOcelot/ReleaseImageContacts to make sure it matches your understanding as well. [17:17] ? [17:17] k [17:18] stgraber, has anyone done a sanity test on Edubuntu dvd i386, am noticing it isn't marked as tested. [17:19] skaet: I tested LTSP live, the live environment and I just finished an install [17:19] skaet, I'll remove powerpc and amd64+mac from the tracker, ok ? [17:19] rebooting now to do one more test and I'll mark it as good [17:20] jibel, yes. I thought I got them already... guess I switched windows. :P [17:20] :) [17:20] thanks stgraber [17:20] thanks jibe [17:20] jibel even. :) [17:21] jibel, it's late now but xubuntu amd64 on bare metal worked here [17:23] cyphermox, thanks for confirming. [17:23] skaet: done [17:23] stgraber, goodness. Thank you. [17:24] charlie-tca, cyphermox test passed ^ [17:25] why won't they pass for me? [17:25] Do I have two bad computers? [17:26] both images worked here monday [17:26] there has to be something special... where was it failing? [17:29] bug 820731 [17:29] NCommander, slangasek - the images for release are: [17:29] Launchpad bug 820731 in casper (Ubuntu) "Oneiric Ocelot Xubuntu Desktop images fail to install (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/820731 [17:29] lubuntu cd (i386, amd64) [17:29] mythbuntu cd (i386, amd64) [17:29] edubuntu dvd (i386, amd64) [17:29] kubuntu cd (i386, amd64) [17:29] kubuntu alternate (i386, amd64) [17:29] kubuntu dvd (i386, amd64) [17:29] kubuntu arm (omap, omap4) [17:29] netboot (i386, amd64, omap4) [17:29] ubuntu server (i386, amd64) [17:29] ubuntu cloud (cloud32, cloud64) [17:29] ubuntu core (arm) [17:29] ubuntu preinstall (omap3, omap4) [17:29] ubuntu cd (i386, amd64) [17:29] ubuntu alternate (i386, amd64) [17:29] ubuntu dvd (i386, amd64) [17:31] NCommander, slangasek, jibel, stgraber, ScottK, smoser, Daviey, please advise if any of these ^^ don't match your expectations. [17:31] is it ok to upload stuff now? :) [17:31] chrisccoulson, hold off for a couple of hours please. :) [17:32] skaet, ok, no problem [17:32] skaet, above, 'cloud' should probably be better named 'cloud-images' [17:32] or 'cloudimg' [17:32] to differenciate cloud-host from cloud-guest [17:33] skaet: do you know if they're all marked correctly in the tracker such that publish-image-set.py should DTRT? [17:33] skaet: I should have a kubuntu preinstall inthere and ubuntu-server [17:33] smoser: is "cloud-images" anything more than uec/ec2 with a new name? [17:33] slangasek, I hope between me and jibel we've got them all now. But please double check. Lots of last minute churn. [17:35] \/win 40 [17:35] slangasek, in no way shape or form [17:35] cloud-images == nothing more than uec/ec2 with a new name [17:36] right [17:38] marking xubuntu as failed on iso.qa so the publisher script DTRT [17:38] NCommander, ubuntu server preinstall(omap3, omap4) [17:39] skaet, does ubuntu preinstall (omap3, omap4) include server and desktop ? [17:40] skaet: rightsorry, relooked at the list and its all there. eyes are play tricks [17:40] jibel: its a separate desktop and server image [17:40] NCommander, kubuntu preinstall (omap3, omap4) [17:40] NCommander, that is why I ask, it is not clear from the list above. [17:40] jibel, yeah it was an oversite tnot to make it explicit. :) [17:41] well this is fun, 'bzr update' is failing with an error about trying to write to the branch :P [17:41] k [17:48] skaet: tracker shows netinstall images from 20110729 for armel; are those meant to be published or not? [17:49] I'm not sure where these images are anyway, there doesn't seem to be anything on antimony [17:49] slangasek: netinstall images are only rebuilt when D-I is, not daily. [17:49] slangasek, I was just looking at them too.... [17:49] GrueMaster: oh, then these should be named 'netboot' like the existing i386/amd64 ones [17:49] * skaet nods [17:49] no? [17:49] yep [17:50] is the omap3 one ok? [17:50] who has access to fix those names? [17:50] jibel, can you fix the names? [17:50] omap3 (omap) is broken. It leaves the image unbootable. [17:50] GrueMaster, so we're only to publish omap4 one correct? [17:51] I'd ask NCommander. If the fix can be pushed withpout changes to the image (i.e a package fix pulled during install), then we can publish it. [17:52] He knows the exact nature of the breakage. [17:52] NCommander, ^^ netboot omap4 to be released or not? [17:52] omap4 is good. Don't confuse the two. [17:52] netboot omap is the one in question. [17:53] skaet: what gruemaster said [17:53] NCommander: Can you fix the omap boot.scr creation issue w/o changing the netboot image? [17:53] NCommander, Gruemaster thanks. [17:54] Ok, revised list (based on what I'm seeing in QA tracker) now is: [17:54] skaet, done [17:54] edubuntu dvd (i386, amd64) [17:54] kubuntu alternate (i386, amd64) [17:54] kubuntu desktop cd (i386, amd64) [17:54] kubuntu desktop arm (omap3, omap4) [17:54] kubuntu dvd (i386, amd64) [17:54] kubuntu arm (omap3, omap4) [17:54] lubuntu cd (i386, amd64) [17:54] mythbuntu cd (i386, amd64) [17:54] netboot (i386, amd64, omap4) [17:54] ubuntu alternate (i386, amd64) [17:54] ubuntu core (arm) [17:54] ubuntu desktop cd (i386, amd64) [17:54] ubuntu desktop preinstall (omap3, omap4) [17:54] ubuntu dvd (i386, amd64) [17:54] ubuntu server (i386, amd64) [17:54] ubuntu server preinstall (omap3, omap4) [17:54] ubuntu cloud images (cloud32, cloud64) [17:55] NCommander, can you please start the publishing off for the above. [17:55] skaet: the script doesn't work for me I'm getting IOError [17:56] debugging it but until thats done ... [17:56] NCommander: pastebin me a full python backtrace? [17:57] NCommander, ack. Lots for me to do in the interim... ;) [17:57] slangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/658775/ [17:58] NCommander: mmk... no http proxy in the way either? [17:58] none [17:59] NCommander: grab a network trace with wireshark to see what's going on? [18:00] slangasek: I just ran it on another machine and it worked [18:00] alrighty [18:00] so my laptop foobared [18:00] so there are still two images on there that the script doesn't know how to handle yet: Kubuntu Desktop Arm, Ubuntu Core armel [18:01] we might as well get those sorted in the script, so we don't have to do it by hand next time as well... [18:01] yeah [18:02] ugh [18:02] actually, the first one is another case of inconsistent naming on the tracker [18:02] What is the difference between Kubuntu Arm and Kubuntu Desktop Arm? I don't even see a Kubuntu Arm listed. [18:02] was publish-release modified to handle the tgz of ubuntu-core? [18:02] jibel: can Kubuntu Desktop Arm (omap) be renamed to Kubuntu Desktop armel+omap on the tracker, please, and likewise for omap4? [18:03] GrueMaster: no difference; it might be more correct to call this 'Kubuntu Preinstalled'? [18:04] ah, the publisher code actually assumes that any armel images are preinstalled [18:05] and maps 'Desktop' to 'preinstalled-desktop' [18:05] so that's fine [18:05] We also have kubuntu mobile. I would say keep it at Kubuntu Desktop Arm, same as we have for Ubuntu Desktop [18:05] ok [18:05] it still needs fixing to Kubuntu Desktop armel+$subarch [18:05] slangasek, done [18:05] jibel: thanks :) [18:05] now to teach the script about Ubuntu Core [18:06] Ah, that looks good. [18:09] * slangasek whines at the inconsistent directory layout of ubuntu-core [18:10] I don't think publish-release is going to be able to handle this at all [18:10] inconsistent? [18:10] yes [18:10] convention is $project/daily-$imagetype/$date [18:11] ubuntu-core is using $project/$date [18:12] slangasek: it's been like that for ever :D possibly due to there only being Ubuntu on the first release [18:12] So it needs a ./daily/$DATE format. I see. Kind of adds an unneeded layer for now, but for future... [18:13] skaet: did we spin a source image? [18:13] davmor2: no, this is a new image called ubuntu-core which is defying the convention [18:13] "ubuntu-core" != "ubuntu" [18:13] :) [18:14] slangasek: Ah okay [18:14] slangasek: publish-release is probably going to break miserably [18:14] davmor2: Think of ubuntu-core as an SOC independent extremely minimal chroot environment. [18:14] GrueMaster: well, I need to get this fixed up to even be able to run the publishing scripts for it. But first I want to figure out where ubuntu-core images are being *generated*, since it doesn't seem to be part of the public cdimage repo [18:15] ah no, just looking in the wrong place [18:15] found it [18:15] Ask infinity. [18:15] ok [18:15] slangasek: we need a source image rebuild, last rebuild was 20110707 [18:16] slangasek: you won't happen to know the arcanic ruins for that offhand [18:17] ^- skaet [18:17] NCommander: I thought it was always built as part of the alternate CD build [18:17] I thought it was a separate set of ruins. Either way, the image is horribly out of date [18:17] where do you even see it? [18:18] ~/cdimage/www/full/source/current/source/* [18:19] the publish-image-set list has source on there which is why I checked to see if its been rebuilt [18:19] hmm, that's not how it was being built last time I turned the crank [18:19] the crank obviously has been changed :-/ [18:20] and someone didn't save the crank info in the authoritative crontab :) [18:20] ECRACKNOTFOUND [18:20] er [18:20] should be CRANK but it kinda works either way [18:21] there's a bin/cron.source; I'll try running it [18:21] slangasek: k [18:21] Doesn't follow naming conventions either. http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/source/current/source/. Should be http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/source/current/. Also, natty images shouldn't be in the daily dir. [18:21] GrueMaster: source images are rarely used in the internet age [18:22] GrueMaster: we forgot to publish them with natty release and the bug didn't come until 2 months later :-/ [18:22] I know, but if we are building cdimages for them, they should at least conform to standards. [18:22] GrueMaster: agreed [18:23] slangasek: i got a source-20110804.log, looks like that was the right cran [18:23] *crank [18:23] I'll publish everything else why we're waiting [18:25] * skaet nods [18:25] skaet: Those match my expectations. Please save the Kubuntu Desktop images for powerpc and amd64+mac as I have potential testers for them and we may be able to release them late. [18:27] ScottK: how "late"? Do you want us to leave the cronjob disabled for kubuntu desktop for a few days? [18:27] slangasek: Please. The amd64+mac tester is traveling to the desktop summit right now. [18:27] ok [18:28] skaet, NCommander: ^^ so we leave kubuntu desktop disabled in cron after release [18:28] ScottK, I deleted them from the iso tester after your indication we wouldn't be publishing, but I'll see if they can be re-added. (after we put the release out). [18:28] slangasek, ack. :) [18:29] skaet: Thanks. As long as we have the images somewhere, I think the ISO tracker is less important. [18:29] skaet: Looking at tech overview now. [18:29] slangasek: we're ignoring oversize for this cycle, due to transtitions? [18:30] NCommander, yes [18:30] * NCommander is reconfirming [18:32] skaet: what transitions are in progress that we should be leaning on immediately post-release? [18:36] slangasek, probably we should get together with cjwatson and pitti early next week, and do some prioritization/leaning. We knew we would be oversized right now. [18:36] ok [18:36] slangasek, also need to get decision about USB/DVD image made. [18:37] USB/DVD? [18:37] shrink down DVD to 1.5G [18:37] right [18:37] did we ever actually decide *what* we want to cut to get it there? [18:38] I think that was the problem; we had a wide ranging discussion at UDS that identified lots of things that were expendable, but no firm decision on what to keep and what to cut [18:40] slangasek: with the expect of source, we're published [18:41] NCommander: and -core? [18:41] er,expection of core and source:-) [18:42] NCommander, let me know when its started showing up on the mirrors. [18:42] skaet: I haven't ran sync mirrors yet, still waiting for source to build [18:42] slangasek: core going to require significant changes to publish-release to publish [18:43] rather, I need to change the daily build scripts for it, munge the existing tree, and then teach publish-release about it using the existing model [18:44] that works too, although sounds timeconfusingly annoying [18:45] it's the right way around [18:53] skaet: Kubuntu bits in the tech overview. [18:57] ah, infinity co-opted build-livecd-base to do the ubuntu-core building, hum [19:01] skaet, slangasek cloud-images are ready. If i am not around, please ping utlemming and he can push the release button. [19:01] ScottK, just scanned through. Looks good, thanks. [19:01] if *that* fails, then call my cell. [19:01] smoser, you can start pushing the button now. [19:01] rest are going out. [19:01] well then, button being pushed. [19:02] Announce will happen when the mirrors are showing them. [19:02] utlemming, i have the above ^ [19:02] k [19:03] skaet, smoser: I think we're probably ready to pull the lever on cloud, no? [19:03] ah yes, so you said :) [19:03] its being pulled. [19:03] :) [19:03] yay [19:04] \o/ [19:04] source is done, publishing [19:10] publish-image-set taught about Ubuntu core images [19:12] Thanks slangasek! [19:13] slangasek: thecommand itself doesn'twork [19:13] * NCommander kicks his space [19:13] cdimage@antimony:~/cdimage$ ARCHES='armel' for-project ubuntu publish-release daily-preinstalled 20110802 preinstalled-core no alpha-3 [19:13] No daily for oneiric armel on 20110802! [19:14] NCommander: yeah, these ubuntu-core images have been built in a way that defies all the conventions [19:14] great [19:14] do we *have* to release these with alpha3? Can I kick it back to infinity and make him do it over? :P [19:14] it shouldn't really be preinstall [19:14] it should be rootfs [19:15] I think that's a gratuitous name difference [19:15] and ++ slangasek's idea [19:15] slangasek: generally when I think of preinstall, I think of an all in one solution; not some assembly required like I think with core :-P [19:15] skaet: Everything on track for server iso's? [19:16] slangasek: its not the only rootfs ship we've shipped Kubuntu Mobile was a rootfs on N900 and shipped as daily-live [19:16] Daviey, yes, smoser's pushed the button to publish cloud image, we've pushed out server [19:17] Daviey, waiting for them to be picked up, visible, etc. now. [19:17] https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/alpha-3/ [19:17] skaet: I haven't pushed sync-mirrors, nothing should push out until I do [19:17] * skaet makes a note to update a link in the TechOverview. [19:18] skaet / smoser: good cookies. [19:18] skaet: I already did earlier :) [19:18] Thanks Daviey ! :) [19:19] NCommander: kubuntu-mobile-11.04-preinstalled-mobile-armel+omap4.img.gz <-- not a rootfs tarball, at least [19:20] it was a rootfs:-P [19:20] * NCommander scurvies out of sight [19:24] slangasek: stillnot happy publishing core despite the name change [19:25] Did anyone find a reason I can't install the Xubuntu desktop images? [19:26] NCommander: yep, I've constructed a for-project commandline by hand now; am going back to adjust publish-image-set accordingly [19:26] NCommander: so ubuntu-core/releases now exists, so I guess everything's good now? [19:26] the source image is built too [19:26] slangasek: yeah, just need to sanity and cross-check [19:27] charlie-tca: bah, you didn't want Xubuntu A3 published, did you due to the broken image? [19:27] right [19:27] Until we find why it is not installing on hardware [19:27] Oh good [19:27] I had enough forsight to delete it out of the tracker last night which caused it not to publish [19:27] charlie-tca: how is it failing? [19:27] Carry on :-) [19:28] smoser / utlemming: Can one of you two drive getting the updated template/theme for cloud-images.* .. lacking branding! [19:28] it hangs at "Configuring target system" on both 32bit and 64bit computers [19:29] slangasek: bug 820731 [19:29] Launchpad bug 820731 in casper (Ubuntu) "Oneiric Ocelot Xubuntu Desktop images fail to install (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/820731 [19:30] skaet: we have an action item for infinity (or someone) to clean up the publishing of ubuntu-core images; the current publishing is a complete bodge repurposing a script that wasn't meant to be used this way, and the filenames are (IMHO gratuitously) different from any other images we've built before which means they either need to have their names changed or publish-release needs to be extended to know about them [19:30] slangasek, yup agree. [19:30] (would really prefer the former; it's not scalable to have publish-release work with every filename under the sun) [19:30] fortunately, this is why we have alphas so we get these issues shaken out before beta ;) [19:31] slangasek: right, so I'm doing the final cross-check and we still have edubuntu and desktop A2 release folders [19:31] charlie-tca: Isn't gnome-power-manager being deprecated? [19:31] should I bring death to them? [19:31] I don't know. Xubuntu doesn't use it [19:31] slangasek, indeed it is. Will add it to the actions on the weekly agenda so it gets tracked there, but we'd best follow up offline. [19:32] casper should not require gnome-power-manager [19:33] NCommander: yes, those directories should be moved to ~/cdimage/old-images/{releases,edubuntu/releases}/oneiric [19:33] Daviey: casper should be generic, shouldn't it? [19:34] Daviey: s/deprecated/rendered worthless by GNOME upstream design decisions/, ITYM :P [19:34] charlie-tca: ack, sure is a bug - looks like bdmurray identified the location. [19:34] slangasek: :D [19:34] k [19:34] old images cleared out [19:35] How do I get that fixed now? [19:35] with the exception of ubuntu-core old ones [19:36] NCommander: in what sense is ubuntu-core an exception? [19:36] skaet: slangasek bah, edubuntu dvd never made it onto the tracker! its untested AFAIK [19:36] did you mean xubuntu maybe? [19:36] slangasek: it has old those folders ofold builds [19:36] Would seeding gnome-power-manager in Xubuntu cause any problems for A3? [19:37] NCommander: ok - but you weren't actually clearing out old dailies or anything. just making sure :) [19:37] Direct conflict with xfce4-power-manager, yes [19:37] NCommander: I see edubuntu dvd on the tracker just fine [19:37] NCommander, edubuntu DVD has been tested by stgraber, and he's signing off on the images. [19:37] bah [19:37] * NCommander shutsup [19:38] right, I'm idiot [19:38] ignore me [19:38] NCommander, much rather you ask if something seems like an anomoly. :) [19:38] edubuntu definitely was on the tracker, I even left comments for each of the tests ;) [19:39] is everything published to our satisfaction? Time to hit 'sync-mirror' (if you haven't already, NCommander?) [19:40] slangasek: looks good to me, the diff is in/tmp/diff if you want to review [19:40] slangasek: BTW, do you know how to edit the cdimage.u.c./netboot page? Its out of date [19:40] NCommander: edit by hand [19:41] k [19:41] NCommander: pass on reviewing the diff, TL;DR :) [19:41] slangasek: I'llpost the index.html diff,the tree diff is already up [19:44] slangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/658839/ [19:45] Erm, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/daily-preinstalled/ has no files anymore. [19:45]