| tgm4883 | If a MOTU has a minute, can someone review http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/mythbuntu-bare ? It just needs a second ack and I'd like to get this into 11.10 | 01:07 |
|---|---|---|
| === emma is now known as em | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| c_korn | how can I add a parameter to dh_installchangelogs with cdbs? I thought DEB_DH_INSTALLCHANGELOGS whould do the trick | 09:16 |
| jtaylor | DEB_DH_INSTALLCHANGELOGS_ARGS? | 09:19 |
| c_korn | ah, DEB_INSTALL_CHANGELOGS_ALL | 09:19 |
| c_korn | it is mentioned in the doc here: http://build-common.alioth.debian.org/cdbs-doc.html | 09:20 |
| c_korn | don't ask me where this underscore comes from. this is cdbs voodoo | 09:20 |
| directhex | i don't think it's fair to equate cdbs with a legitimate religion like voodoo | 09:27 |
| directhex | i see it as having more in common with your cthulu-worshipping cults | 09:27 |
| akheron | c_korn: I used to grep the cdbs source to find suitable magic variables | 09:41 |
| c_korn | hehe, yeah, this is a good idea ;) | 09:41 |
| francesco_superc | Hi everybody! | 11:25 |
| francesco_superc | Anyone could help me searching one program in repository? | 11:26 |
| francesco_superc | I'm looking for "multisync-tools" | 11:26 |
| francesco_superc | It isn't anymore available? | 11:26 |
| jtaylor | francesco_superc: it was removed because it requres opensync << 0.30: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multisync0.90/+bug/654613 | 11:33 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 654613 in multisync0.90 (Ubuntu) "remove packages needing opensync (<< 0.30) in maverick" [Undecided,Fix released] | 11:33 |
| francesco_superc | jtaylor, thanks. So the deprecated multisync-tool from what does it replace? | 11:39 |
| jtaylor | I don't know of any replacement | 11:48 |
| francesco_superc | jtaylor, thanks a lot the same | 11:50 |
| dupondje | francesco_superc: | 12:26 |
| dupondje | opensync replaced multisync | 12:26 |
| dupondje | We were working on the successor to Multisync called OpenSync. | 12:26 |
| tonymc | hello | 13:08 |
| tonymc | i have a question regarding proper package versioning | 13:08 |
| tonymc | i know it's a question that belongs to #ubuntu-packaging, but there's no one alive there | 13:08 |
| tonymc | anyway, i'm making a PPA, with a brand new program. how do i go about assigning a version? the upstream version is 0.5.1, and it's the first ppa release. should i name is 0.5.1-ppa1 or something else? | 13:09 |
| jtaylor | 0.5.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1 is usually used | 13:13 |
| jtaylor | an official debian version would be 0.5.1-1 so an official ubuntu pacakge should be lower than that -> 0.5.1-0ubuntu1, an ppa package should be lower than that -> 0.5.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1 | 13:14 |
| jtaylor | so the official archive versions replace the non-archive versions | 13:14 |
| jtaylor | if you want the ppa version to replace an archive version use +ppa1 | 13:16 |
| tonymc | what if there's no official version? | 13:17 |
| tonymc | do i have to still specify 0ubuntu1~ppa1? | 13:17 |
| jtaylor | you should, as there might be an official version in the future | 13:18 |
| jtaylor | 0.5.1-0~ppa1 should also work | 13:18 |
| jtaylor | dpkg --compare-versions "0.5.1-0ubuntu1" gt "0.5.1-0~ppa1" && echo "yes" | 13:19 |
| tonymc | thanks for clarification | 13:20 |
| lfaraone | persia: hi, I'll be your AM for this evening^h^h^h^hNM process, how can I be of service? :P | 13:27 |
| tonymc | if i update the package with an upstream version (say, 0.5.2), should i drop the ppa revision back to 1? like 0.5.2-0ubuntu1-ppa1? | 14:05 |
| jtaylor | yes | 14:07 |
| jtaylor | it should indicate which packaging revision of a specific upstream version it is | 14:08 |
| tonymc | aha | 14:08 |
| tonymc | does debian think that 0.5.1a is newer than 0.5.1? or i should just drop the "a" and make a ppa2 instead? | 14:09 |
| jtaylor | use dpkg --compare-versions to figure that out | 14:11 |
| jtaylor | it should be larger | 14:11 |
| tonymc | thanks | 14:13 |
| tonymc | you've been really helpful | 14:13 |
| === EzraR_ is now known as EzraR | ||
| tonymc | another question if you don't mind | 14:31 |
| tonymc | the upstream developer chose to put plugins for his program into /usr/share/, and thus lintian complains about that. what is the proper place to put plugins so that a program could find them? | 14:31 |
| jtaylor | I never packaged something with plugins yet | 14:34 |
| jtaylor | but I think they are usually placed under /usr/lib/package-name/ | 14:34 |
| jtaylor | if they are arch-dependend | 14:34 |
| tumbleweed | and /usr/share/package-name if they aren't. The program might need to be changed to find them in the new location... | 14:35 |
| tonymc | thanks | 14:36 |
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| tgm4883 | If a MOTU has a minute, can someone review http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/mythbuntu-bare ? It just needs a second ack and I'd like to get this into 11.10 | 20:06 |
| stlsaint | would someone mind helping me debugg some of these piuparts results http://paste.debian.net/125307/ | 20:07 |
| stlsaint | ... | 20:09 |
| jtaylor | friggin dpatch why won't it take my patch -.- | 21:04 |
| nigelb | heh | 21:05 |
| * iulian throws quilt at jtaylor. | 21:06 | |
| jtaylor | I'd wish I could use quilt | 21:07 |
| jtaylor | hurray manually editing patches is fun, but it worked | 21:11 |
| jtaylor | debfx: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xawtv/3.95.dfsg.1-8.1ubuntu2 was this forwarded anywhere? | 21:14 |
| jtaylor | patch 103 | 21:14 |
| jtaylor | hm ok 102 says "there is no actual xawtv upstream any more" so probably no forwarding | 21:15 |
| debfx | jtaylor: I've forwarded it to Debian, not sure about upstream | 21:22 |
| debfx | jtaylor: http://git.linuxtv.org/xawtv3.git/shortlog seems active | 21:23 |
| jtaylor | it was unfortunatly not quite complete, see bug 821916 | 21:24 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 821916 in xawtv (Ubuntu) "v4lctl show color return undefined symbol: tan" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/821916 | 21:24 |
| jtaylor | but simple to fix | 21:24 |
| jtaylor | uplaoding a branch shortly, can you sponsor it? | 21:25 |
| debfx | jtaylor: sure | 21:31 |
| jtaylor | debfx: https://code.launchpad.net/~jtaylor/ubuntu/oneiric/xawtv/fix-821916/+merge/70657 | 21:35 |
| jtaylor | an SRU should be probably be made | 21:35 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| debfx | jtaylor: do you want me to open a natty task on the bug? | 21:45 |
| jtaylor | yes please | 21:46 |
| debfx | the package FTBFS on oneiric: http://paste.ubuntu.com/660093/ | 21:46 |
| jtaylor | Oo | 21:48 |
| jtaylor | I built it in a pbuilder | 21:48 |
| jtaylor | maybe its not quite clean | 21:53 |
| debfx | I've built the same package again, now it works fine | 21:54 |
| debfx | not sure what caused it to try call autoconf | 21:54 |
| jtaylor | building in a fresh clean i386 chroot, and it came past that point | 21:55 |
| jtaylor | finished successfully | 21:55 |
| debfx | presumably it was just a local issues with my pbuilder | 22:01 |
| jtaylor | forwared 103 and 102 to the upstream you mentioned | 22:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!