[02:16] <zodiak> hello guys and gals, strange/stupid question time; can I run/play/experiment with ensemble on local hardware ?
[02:33] <robbiew> zodiak: hi, I have to go now...but in short "soon".  We've been working on that ability THIS month...bcsaller and RoAkSoAx are the best to speak to
[02:34] <zodiak> hrm.. good to know .. thanks for the .. oh.. well.. thank you regardless of your presence/non-presence :D
[03:22] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-machines r295 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[03:22] <_mup_> Merged trunk
[03:25] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provision-machines-reexpose r304 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[03:25] <_mup_> Merged upstream
[03:47] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r312 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[03:47] <_mup_> Merged upstream and resolved conflict
[10:20] <adam_g> are default vaules of config options in config.yaml expected to be output via config-get?
[14:44] <_mup_> ensemble/states-with-principals r322 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com
[14:44] <_mup_> resolve conflicts from security-acl merge
[14:44] <_mup_> ensemble/security-acl r305 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com
[14:44] <_mup_> use inline break instead of try/else
[14:45] <_mup_> ensemble/states-with-principals r323 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com
[14:45] <_mup_> resolve conflicts from security-acl merge
[17:18] <_mup_> Bug #822814 was filed: Ambiguous endpoints error could be more informative <Ensemble:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/822814 >
[18:04] <_mup_> ensemble/security-policy-with-topology r324 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com
[18:04] <_mup_> resurrect policy.get_token earlier into branch pipeline, yank policy.client access.
[18:05] <_mup_> ensemble/security-policy-rules-redux r330 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com
[18:05] <_mup_> resolve conflict from security-policy-with-topology merge
[18:34] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r314 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[18:34] <_mup_> Pass machine_id through instead of machine_data bag
[18:40] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r315 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[18:40] <_mup_> Fix dummy and orchestra providers for modified api
[18:50] <jcastro> negronjl: ping
[18:50] <jcastro> negronjl: heya, I hear you have a mongo formula
[18:50] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r316 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[18:50] <_mup_> Fix dummy provider to add machine_id param to start_machine
[18:50] <negronjl> hi jcastro.  Still working out thekinks on it
[18:50] <negronjl> jcastro:  see my formulas here: https://code.launchpad.net/~negronjl
[18:50] <jcastro> hey so check this out: http://nosql2011.wilshireconferences.com/agenda.cfm?confid=64&scheduleDay=PRINT
[18:50] <jcastro> this is in like 2 weeks
[18:51] <jcastro> and we've signed up for the scale out camp on the wednesday night
[18:51] <negronjl> jcastro:  checking ..
[18:52] <negronjl> jcastro:  i see
[18:52] <jcastro> and we're now thinking, showing mongo scaling like a boss would be awesome there.
[18:53] <negronjl> jcastro:  The formulas are here: https://code.launchpad.net/~negronjl  pick them out.  I haven't tested them completely yet but, feel free to do so and provide feedback.
[18:53] <negronjl> jcastro:  I can try and work out the kinks on it
[18:54] <negronjl> jcastro:  Are you planning on doing this live or prerecorded ?
[18:54] <jcastro> negronjl: I am convincing your boss that you should copresent with me
[18:54] <jcastro> this will be live
[18:54] <negronjl> jcastro: live has it's own set of issues ( time, wifi issues, etc. )  I would sugges that you have a backup plan ( recorded session )
[18:55] <jcastro> nod
[18:55] <jcastro> negronjl: m_3 also wants to know how the hadoop is coming along.
[18:56] <negronjl> jcastro, m_3:  making a blog post about hadoop-master/slave and ensemble right now....will let you all know when ready
[18:56] <jcastro> negronjl: oh awesome
[18:57] <m_3> rockin
[19:09] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r317 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[19:09] <_mup_> Fixed remaining tests to support the change to start_machine
[19:18] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r318 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[19:18] <_mup_> Ignore firewall permissions that are ranges greater than 1
[21:14] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r319 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[21:14] <_mup_> Test launch with existing machine security group
[21:15] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r320 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[21:15] <_mup_> Add test to verify scenario that the security group for the env already exists
[21:24] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r321 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[21:24] <_mup_> Doc strings for new tests
[21:51] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r322 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[21:51] <_mup_> Refactored the wrong start_machine in terms of adding machine_id as a param
[22:35] <_mup_> ensemble/expose-provider-ec2 r323 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com
[22:35] <_mup_> Better error message upon EC2Error