| poolie | lifeless, i'm going to have a stab at ssh reconnection | 04:36 |
|---|---|---|
| lifeless | poolie: awesome! | 04:37 |
| poolie | will be awesome if i fix it, anyhow | 04:41 |
| lifeless | poolie: its awesome that you're looking at it, really. | 04:43 |
| lifeless | poolie: much appreciated | 04:43 |
| === AuroraBorealis is now known as aurora|afk | ||
| thomi | Hi poolie - quick Q: There was some discussion here last Friday regarding the new config file features, and I'm not sure if that changes the next step for my config patch or not. I got the impression that maybe the PatchMatching idea was being dropped? | 04:59 |
| poolie | i don't actually know what that is | 04:59 |
| thomi | oh - hmm, it seems the devnotes have changed since then anyway :) | 05:01 |
| stylesen | poolie: ping | 06:54 |
| poolie | hi stylesen | 06:55 |
| stylesen | poolie: pm ? | 06:55 |
| === aurora|afk is now known as AuroraBorealis | ||
| === Mkaysi_ is now known as Mkaysi | ||
| gour | i've pulled one branch from LP, converted it to 2a format and now pushing back to my account at LP...is starts speedy, but then it slows down..as a hell...yesterday i had to kill it after 6 hours...it's ~3500revs...any idea what might be wrong? | 09:28 |
| lifeless | you haven't converted the copy on LP | 09:28 |
| lifeless | at a guess | 09:28 |
| gour | i've converted locally | 09:29 |
| lifeless | are you pushing to the same branch on LP ? | 09:29 |
| gour | the original branch is lp:~mdipierro/web2py/devel and i'm pushing to lp:~gour/web2py/devel | 09:30 |
| gour | here is what i see now: 105548kB 28kB/s / Fetching revisions:Inserting stream:Estimate 51443/54666 and after it arrives at 51000 it crawls | 09:31 |
| lifeless | interesting | 09:32 |
| lifeless | uhm | 09:32 |
| gour | 3500revs is not so big, imho | 09:32 |
| lifeless | I suggest filing a question (or asking here in an hour or so - I have to go, and I don't think jam or jelmer or vila are here yet) | 09:32 |
| gour | lifeless: ok. thank you...i'll wait here | 09:33 |
| === gour1 is now known as gour | ||
| gour | jelmer: hello. lifeless told me to ask you, vila or jam about my problem of slow upload to LP...do you mind? | 12:25 |
| jelmer | hi gour | 12:26 |
| jelmer | gour: what's slow exactly? | 12:27 |
| gour | jelmer: push...after some time it starts crawling | 12:27 |
| gour | jelmer: the original branch is lp:~mdipierro/web2py/devel and i'm pushing to lp:~gour/web2py/devel after i converted branch to 2a format | 12:28 |
| gour | today i got 'Write failed: Broken pipehing revisions:Inserting stream:Estimate 51485/54666' and yesterday i killed push after not being complete in 6 hours | 12:28 |
| gour | my adsl is 256k/4M | 12:29 |
| jelmer | gour: how big is the repository? | 12:30 |
| gour | jelmer: ~3500revs...let me size it | 12:30 |
| gour | jelmer: hmm...tar.gz is 1.1G...no wonder, but i see lot of stuff like 'web2py/.bzr/repository/obsolete_packs/...' is it normal? | 12:32 |
| gour | let me check what is the size of original branch in old format | 12:33 |
| jelmer | the obsolete packs can be removed | 12:33 |
| gour | just remove obsolete_packs directory? | 12:34 |
| jelmer | there's no need to remove it, but you should be able to, and please exclude it when looking at the size of the repo | 12:35 |
| gour | i'm pulling orignal repo now | 12:36 |
| gour | obsolete_packs occupy 590M and ../repository/packs is 577M | 12:39 |
| fullermd | Don't remove the _directory_. Removing the files _in_ it should be fine. | 12:55 |
| gour | jelmer: here http://pastebin.com/pQ9LQvVA is du for old format and here http://pastebin.com/bk3xFdG6 for a 2a format which is 2x bigger...is it normal? | 13:00 |
| jelmer | gour: that seems to be purely because of the obsolete packs | 13:01 |
| jelmer | so it's normal, as the obsolete packs can be removed | 13:01 |
| gour | why are they created? | 13:01 |
| fullermd | Because some filesystems are lying liars that lie. | 13:02 |
| fullermd | (and even when they aren't, the hardware picks up the slack by lying on their behalf) | 13:03 |
| gour | heh | 13:03 |
| gour | I rm-ed obsolete packs...now checking repo | 13:04 |
| jelmer | gour: lp:~gour/web2py/devel doesn't appear to exist | 13:05 |
| gour | jelmer: yes, it did not complete | 13:05 |
| gour | so i rm-ed it | 13:05 |
| jelmer | gour: I'm wondering if perhaps it was in an older format, and bzr was trying to convert back from 2a into that format | 13:06 |
| jelmer | while doing the push | 13:06 |
| gour | lp:~gour/web2py/devel is supposed to be the original branch in 2a format | 13:06 |
| gour | jelmer: no, it was not exuisting before | 13:06 |
| gour | however, original web2py is still in old format | 13:07 |
| gour | now 2a branch repo is 591M...let me try to push it | 13:08 |
| jelmer | gour: not having the obsolete packs won't impact performance in any way | 13:11 |
| fullermd | What might LP's stacking stuff do, to pushing a 2a variant of an older format branch? | 13:12 |
| gour | let me see if it will complete now in reasonable time... | 13:16 |
| gour | it arrived at ~4850/51093...and now it is becoming very slow... | 13:27 |
| gour | i cloned original hg repo from google and pushed it to bitbucket...it did the job in ~15mins (14:09,85 total) while pushing to LP is still crawling...it's very frustrating | 14:30 |
| jelmer | gour: ah, the original is an import from hg? | 14:40 |
| jelmer | gour: that might be related | 14:40 |
| gour | jelmer: yes | 14:40 |
| gour | but don't know how it's done | 14:41 |
| jelmer | what was the original again? | 14:41 |
| gour | lp:~mdipierro/web2py/devel | 14:41 |
| gour | i'm resisting to use git (bzr-git is great), but there are more & more projects using hg...and things like this make it cumbersome | 14:42 |
| jelmer | hmm, doesn't appear to've be done with bzr-hg | 14:45 |
| * jelmer tries reproducing the issue | 14:46 | |
| gour | jelmer: original repo is at hg clone https://code.google.com/p/web2py/ | 14:46 |
| gour | jelmer: however, bzr branch is regularly synced | 14:46 |
| jelmer | gour: not using bzr-hg, that doesn't support the pack-0.92 format | 14:47 |
| gour | well, i do not use bzr-hg at all for this repo | 14:48 |
| * gour quit-ed push to LP... | 14:52 | |
| gour | and i wonder how he converts from hg to bzr... | 14:53 |
| jelmer | gour: I'm running the upgrade here now, will try to push in a second | 14:55 |
| gour | jelmer: thanks a lot | 14:56 |
| jam1 | jelmer: I'm pretty surprised about how many web2py branches are on Launchpad, given that there isn't a development focus, so they should all be 500MB or so | 15:03 |
| === jam1 is now known as jam | ||
| jam | anyway, time to pick up my son, catch you guys later | 15:05 |
| jelmer | hdy jzm | 15:05 |
| jelmer | I mean | 15:05 |
| jelmer | Hey jam :) | 15:05 |
| jelmer | jam: Have a nice evening | 15:05 |
| fullermd | Shoot, you missed by the _whole_ alphabet! :p | 15:05 |
| gour | lol | 15:05 |
| * jelmer hits fullermd on the head with the alphabet | 15:06 | |
| * fullermd is consonantly abused like this :( | 15:06 | |
| jelmer | hehe | 15:09 |
| gour | jelmer: i've to go out. bbl in ~2hrs | 15:21 |
| jelmer | gour: k | 15:22 |
| jelmer | gour: push just finished here: bzr push lp:~jelmer/web2py/test 10.66s user 1.19s system 0% cpu 42:35.45 total | 15:52 |
| === abentley is now known as abentley-lunch | ||
| jelmer | gour: it looks like the hg repository has significantly different contents | 16:14 |
| Quintasan | jelmer: I think it was some time ago and maxb even told us about it but I forgot to say thanks for fixing bzr in LP so we have KDE imports working | 16:19 |
| jelmer | Quintasan: np :) | 16:19 |
| * Quintasan is sure forgetful | 16:19 | |
| jelmer | Quintasan: does that mean all recipes are working now? | 16:23 |
| Quintasan | jelmer: If the code inside the branches is working then yes :P | 16:23 |
| jelmer | :) | 16:27 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| jimis | jelmer: I got a notification that a fix is ready regarding the bug about lp:gcc svn import timeout | 16:37 |
| jimis | Is it to not fetch the tags at all? | 16:37 |
| jelmer | jimis: it will fetch the tags but not the revisions those tags are referencing, if those revisions are not part of the ancestry of the branch | 16:38 |
| jelmer | jimis: this is consistent with what it did earlier | 16:38 |
| jimis | jelmer: did you try increasing the timeout value in Twisted? | 16:47 |
| jimis | I haven't worked with Twisted, but here is a relevant thread I found, in case you missed it: | 16:47 |
| jimis | http://osdir.com/ml/python.twisted.web/2006-02/msg00048.html | 16:48 |
| === kedare is now known as kedare_ifr | ||
| === abentley-lunch is now known as abentley | ||
| jelmer | jimis: I'm not sure I follow; how is twisted relevant here? | 17:07 |
| gour | jelmer: what do you mean 'different contents' ? | 17:11 |
| jimis | jelmer: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/73597623/vcs-imports-gcc-trunk.log | 17:12 |
| gour | you have a nice conenction considering it took 42mins only | 17:12 |
| jimis | jelmer: Isn't it the same error, twisted.internet.error.TimeoutError? | 17:13 |
| jimis | gour: which bzr version you have? | 17:21 |
| gour | jimis: 2.3.4 | 17:21 |
| jimis | I've seen major improvements with 2.4, related to how much data is actually downloaded | 17:22 |
| jimis | I wouldn't know if that's relevant to your case however | 17:22 |
| jimis | lp:gcc is a huge branch, and it's *unworkable* with 2.3 | 17:23 |
| gour | jimis: that would be nice improvment..the present sitaution is almost like showstopper | 17:23 |
| jimis | 2.4 is working just fine though, even if it feels a bit sluggish (expected with huge repos like this) | 17:23 |
| jimis | gour: I'm not sure if it will help your case, but it's easy to try the beta | 17:24 |
| gour | jimis: i may try it | 17:24 |
| jimis | just make sure your python is >= 2.6 | 17:25 |
| gour | 2.7.2 here | 17:25 |
| jelmer | gour: there is a different number of revisions in both repositories, and the actual files seem to differ | 17:27 |
| jelmer | gour: I think my bzr version probably matters as well - what are you running? | 17:27 |
| gour | hmm...strange | 17:27 |
| gour | jelmer: 2.3.4 | 17:27 |
| jelmer | gour: So I'm curious how one branch is created from the other | 17:27 |
| gour | me too | 17:27 |
| jelmer | jimis: the error message is the same, but it's got nothing to do with the actual problem | 17:28 |
| jimis | jelmer: ok, I wouldn't know | 17:28 |
| jimis | I saw a timeout, so I thought increasing the socket timeout would mitigate the error... | 17:28 |
| fullermd | Latency may contribute too; you're probably closer to LP than he is. | 17:29 |
| fullermd | Though one would hope that the smarts are smart enough that that's unimportant in such a case... | 17:30 |
| jelmer | I'm running 2.4b5, which I suspect will matter. | 17:30 |
| gour | i see | 17:30 |
| jelmer | gour: the bzr repository includes a bunch of tar files, the hg one does not | 17:33 |
| jimis | Just my opinion here: Guys, try to push 2.4 forward as fast as possible, older versions make bzr look like a fool for big projects... | 17:33 |
| jimis | I had lost several hours waiting on 2.3 to finish until I came to this channel and you told me to try 2.4 beta | 17:34 |
| jelmer | jimis: 2.4.0 will be released in 2 days (: | 17:34 |
| jimis | good :-) | 17:34 |
| jelmer | gour: the hg repo history doesn't start until dec 2009, until well after those tarballs were removed from the bzr repo | 17:34 |
| jelmer | gour: another thing that will help is setting the development focus for web2py on launchpad | 17:35 |
| jelmer | gour: and upgrading the main branch to 2a | 17:35 |
| jelmer | that will mean every push of a new branch to launchpad won't push up any revisions that are in the development focus | 17:35 |
| jelmer | jimis: I agree, although it only matters for the *really* big projects like gcc | 17:36 |
| jimis | jelmer: 2.4-final will be incompatible with python 2.4 after all? | 17:39 |
| jimis | since I'm running it on RHEL I had to fight around this issue too | 17:40 |
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| jimis | it's fine now, I'm just curious | 17:40 |
| indigo | i'm pondering ways to bring the benefits to revision control to people in my company that spend most of their time in excel and email. Is there a really, really simple, graphical interface to bzr that I should consider? | 17:42 |
| jelmer | indigo: qbzr/bzr-explorer/tortoisebzr are the ones to consider I think | 17:56 |
| jelmer | I don't have much experience using a graphical interface exclusively | 17:57 |
| jelmer | jimis: yeah | 17:57 |
| gour | jelmer: i suggested main dev to upgrade to 2a, but wanted to try it ourself first...and those problems are not really auspicious to push migration... | 18:03 |
| gour | is there anything special in usinb bzr in-place? i'd like to try 2.4beta | 18:04 |
| jelmer | gour: using it in place should be fine, except for plugins that might give warnings | 18:08 |
| gour | jelmer: ok, i did 'home' install | 18:08 |
| * gour is pushing with 2.4b5 | 18:14 | |
| jelmer | gour: you probably want to make sure the extensions were built and installed too | 18:14 |
| gour | jelmer: i believe that, based on --version output, it's ok | 18:15 |
| gour | hmm...warning about some extensions | 18:17 |
| gour | but launchpad is 2.4.b5 | 18:18 |
| jelmer | gour: I mean the C extensions | 18:18 |
| gour | jelmer: that was built | 18:19 |
| urbanape | Hey, all. Using Ubuntu 11.04, with Emacs Snapshot GTK, vc-bzr, and have gpg-agent installed. I'm still having trouble signing my commits. I get the following error: http://paste.lisp.org/display/123944 | 20:33 |
| urbanape | I've checked (both via shell-mode and getenv) that my GPG_AGENT_INFO is available to emacs. | 20:33 |
| urbanape | Google is not much my friend in this regard, but I've searched for 'vc-bzr gpg sign commits' and the like | 20:34 |
| jelmer | urbanape: does it work outside of vc-bzr? | 21:37 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| poolie | hi all | 23:52 |
| lifeless | hai | 23:52 |
| urbanape | jelmer: yes, it does, even from within emacs (shell-mode) | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!