[15:55] <m_3> Hi, I'm having problems pushing a source package to a ppa (my changes file is http://paste.ubuntu.com/662756/ and the process I used to create the package is http://pastebin.com/cfkb7kJm )
[15:56] <EvilPhoenix> m_3:  define "having problems"
[15:56] <EvilPhoenix> what error(s) do you get
[15:56] <m_3> dput finishes successfully, but no email and nothing showing up in my ppa
[15:56] <EvilPhoenix> give it a few minutes
[15:56] <EvilPhoenix> sometimes the ppa system takes up to a few minutes to process the upload
[15:56] <m_3> ppa URL is https://launchpad.net/~mark-mims/+archive/ppa
[15:56] <EvilPhoenix> wait for the email, you will get it eventually
[15:57] <EvilPhoenix> i dont care what the ppa url is, but i've uploaded to ppas as well
[15:57] <EvilPhoenix> and at times
[15:57] <EvilPhoenix> the upload email has been delayed several minutes
[15:57] <EvilPhoenix> up to an hour on really bad days surrounding release dates of stable versions of ubuntu.
[15:58] <m_3> EvilPhoenix: thanks
[15:58] <EvilPhoenix> if the email doesnt show up in, say, within 2 hours, come back here
[15:58] <EvilPhoenix> by then you should have received the email
[16:00] <bigjools> m_3: your GPG signing key is not registered in LP it seems
[16:00] <EvilPhoenix> oh that
[16:00] <EvilPhoenix> hehe
[16:00] <bigjools> didn't dput tell you that?
[16:00] <EvilPhoenix> afaik dput doesnt tell you that
[16:00] <EvilPhoenix> the ppa system rejected each time though
[16:00] <EvilPhoenix> when i used crap keys that were unregged
[16:01] <bigjools> dput does tell you that, for about 2 months now
[16:01] <EvilPhoenix> m_3:  did you upload a PGP key to the keyserver.ubuntu.com servers?
[16:01] <m_3> I sent about 6 packages over the last day or so
[16:01] <EvilPhoenix> bigjools:  then i must have a borked version :/
[16:01] <EvilPhoenix> m_3:  did you register your PGP key on Launchpad?
[16:01] <m_3> I'm cleaning up my keys now
[16:01] <bigjools> no, the ftp server sends a code back down the session, no special dput needed
[16:02] <m_3> yes, I had an old one that might not've had the email associated correctly
[16:02] <EvilPhoenix> <EvilPhoenix> bigjools:  then i must have a borked version :/  <--- borked = broken
[16:02] <m_3> just added a new one to launchpad
[16:02] <EvilPhoenix> m_3:   to launchpad, or to the ubuntu keyservers?
[16:03] <bigjools> EvilPhoenix: yes I know what borked means. What I am saying is that the error message is sent back down then FTP session
[16:04] <m_3> to lp, I'm uploading it to keyserver.ubuntu.com now
[16:04] <m_3> that key has an additional uid that's not showing up in the LP version, so I might need to upload that again
[16:05] <EvilPhoenix> m_3:  you'd need to upload to keyserver.ubuntu.com then wait a bit
[16:05] <EvilPhoenix> then add it to lp
[16:18] <ahasenack> hi guys, maybe someone here can help with a recipe upload error: https://code.launchpad.net/~landscape/+archive/lds-trunk/+recipebuild/70310
[16:18] <ahasenack> "File convoy_0.2.0~bzr14-0landscape2~bzr7~lucid1.tar.gz already exists in LDS Trunk, but uploaded version has different contents"
[16:18] <ahasenack> first of all, there were no changes in the two branches used to build this, so I don't know why an upload was even triggered
[16:18] <ahasenack> it's set to daily uploads, but only if there are changes according to the help file
[16:19] <ahasenack> secondly, I don't understand the error, as there were no changes in the code, but it says the tarball has different contents. I wonder if it's about the debian/changelog entry that the recipe adds each time
[16:19] <ahasenack> but that shouldn't land in the tarball I think, only in the diff, so I'm probably doing something wrong
[17:06] <m_3> EvilPhoenix, bigjools: success... thanks for the help!
[17:07] <bigjools> np
[17:18] <EvilPhoenix> yep
[17:18] <EvilPhoenix> glad we could help you
[20:13] <ries> gents, I have a small question when I look here : https://launchpad.net/~librecad-dev/+archive/librecad-daily/+packages for what builds was the compilation successfull?
[20:17] <tsimpson> ries: what do you mean exactly?
[20:17] <ries> tsimpson: I think I wound it.. it's build with amd64 and i386...
[20:18] <tsimpson> yeah, just expand the package links
[20:21] <ries> tsimpson: I didn't knew they where buttons... (I am old school...)
[20:21] <tsimpson> welcome to Web 2.0
[20:21] <tsimpson> soon to be replaced with Web 3.0, probably
[20:22] <ries> :) well.. web 3 is symantic changes, right? Web 2 was all about making websites white and text gray and make buttons disappear to get a clean hard to read layout....
[20:24] <ries> tsimpson: anyways, thanks for responding...
[21:42] <Andy80> hi guys
[21:43] <Andy80> I'd like to suggest you how to possibly improve the translation tool in Launchpad, in particular for the "untranslated" strings. Who can I talk to?
[22:24] <lifeless> Andy80: you can join the launchpad users mailing list
[22:24] <lifeless> Andy80: or file a bug