[03:27] <poolie> istr there was a patch from the o'rally to make mp pages automatically reload when the diff was ready
[03:28] <poolie> is that still waiting on infrastructure to allow the notification, or something like that?
[03:32] <wgrant> poolie: Right, it's waiting on txlongpoll being made to comply with the new microservice guidelines.
[03:32] <wgrant> poolie: Red Squad expects to do this once they complete their current feature rotation.
[03:32] <poolie> cool
[09:19] <odony> Hello everyone! Is there a help contact now?
[09:20] <odony> We have someone subscribed to several of our project notifications, and that person is on vacation with a very dumb auto-responder that keeps sending the same auto-reply to every notification it receives...
[09:21] <odony> as a result, we have useless spam comments in bugs, merge proposals, etc..
[09:22] <odony> I suppose there is no way we can delete these comments, but perhaps we could unsubscribe that person temporarily from our project notifications? Can someone help with this?
[09:22] <odony> Thanks!
[09:27] <jml> gmb, adeuring or henninge might be able to help.
[09:28] <adeuring> odony: can you tell me the name of the project, mailing list and the of the user with this annoying autoresponder?
[09:29] <henninge> adeuring, odony: I think it would be best to put that informatio in a question.
[09:29] <henninge> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchapd
[09:29] <adeuring> s/apd/pad/
[09:32] <henninge> thanks
[09:32] <odony> adeuring: sure, here's an example of a bug with that auto-response: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-client/+bug/823788
[09:32] <adeuring> tanks
[09:33] <odony> adeuring: the user is https://launchpad.net/~ovailly
[09:33] <odony> adeuring: and he has many notifications on the various OpenERP projects: "openobject-addons", "openobject-server", etc.
[09:34] <odony> adeuring: I've also seen the same kind of auto-response on our mailing-lists, e.g on the "openerp-community" mailing-list: https://lists.launchpad.net/openerp-community/msg00457.html
[09:35] <odony> jml: thanks for your reply, btw :)
[09:36] <odony> adeuring, henninge: if that help I can write an initial question on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[09:36] <odony> s/help/helps/
[09:36] <adeuring> odony: yes, please. I can clean up the spammed bugs, but we need to ask a launchpad admin to unsubscribe the guy from the mailing lists and from bugs. So, could you name the affected mailing lists in the question?
[09:36] <adeuring> then the admin knows where to look
[09:37] <odony> adeuring: sure, I'll mention that
[09:41] <ams_cs> jelmer: ping
[09:41] <jelmer> ams_cs: hi
[09:41] <ams_cs> jelmer: did you do the gcc 4.6 import?
[09:45] <jelmer> ams_cs: yep, Now on revision 108030 (svn revno: 177641).
[09:46] <jelmer> ams_cs: I had to restart the push to Launchpad though, that's still in progress
[09:46] <jelmer> ams_cs: In other news, the upstream bug is fixed now so manual imports should soon no longer be an issue
[09:49] <ams_cs> jelmer: thanks very much
[09:50] <ams_cs> jelmer: I don't see anything on lp just yet .... I'll keepo refreshing
[09:50] <jelmer> ams_cs: It's still pushing, as I had to restart the push from my local machine.
[09:51] <jelmer> ams_cs: I'll ping you when it's done, that should be in the next hour.
[09:54] <odony> adeuring: after looking further, I don't think this user is on the openerp-community mailing-list (he's not a group member), so I think the reply on the mailing-list came indirectly because he replied to a merge proposal notification for a MP that is assigned to that list
[09:55] <odony> adeuring: so the auto-responses come only through his various notification subscriptions
[09:55] <adeuring> odony: ok. so we need to unsubscribed him from all notofications. I'll ask an admin to do that
[10:01] <odony> adeuring: thanks, and I posted the corresponding question: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/167643
[10:01] <odony> adeuring: I suppose you can take that as a basis and turn it into a FAQ
[10:01] <adeuring> odony: too late :) already everything done. sorry for the mess...
[10:02] <odony> odony: okay, it will be there for further reference, thanks a lot :)
[10:03] <odony> s/odony/adeuring/ d'oh
[10:03] <adeuring> ;)
[10:07] <jelmer> what's up with the debian bug importer? I'm getting *a lot* of email about debian bug watches this morning
[10:15] <wgrant> jelmer: Debian moved the archived bugs, so syncing of them was broken until yesterday.
[10:15] <wgrant> I guess it had been broken for a while.
[10:19] <jelmer> ams_cs: Updated
[10:20] <jelmer> wgrant: ah, thanks
[10:20] <ams_cs> jelmer: I see it now, thanks :)
[10:22] <hrw> hi
[10:22] <hrw> bug 824431 - can i get opinion?
[10:22] <jelmer> hi hrw
[10:24] <hrw> blueprints anyway looks like unwanted child ;(
[10:24] <hrw> not even advanced search
[10:24] <wgrant> They are.
[10:25] <wgrant> They have not had an assigned Launchpad engineer since 2007.
[10:26] <hrw> auch
[12:54] <haj> hey... I was wondering, is it possible (without too much hassle) to run launchpad on my own server to host a closed project?
[12:55] <haj> also, does the license allow it to be used like that?
[13:18] <poolie1> haj, it's allowed and it's possible but it may be some hassle to set it up
[13:27] <nigelb> "some" is probably a "slight" understatement :)
[14:12] <hrw> there were rumours that someone managed to setup it
[14:14] <nigelb> I have a local setup.
[14:15] <nigelb> But running it for practical usage means changing all the icons.
[14:15] <nigelb> Because that's owned my Canonical.
[14:43] <bdmurray> The bug watch in bug 691194 was oddly set to Fix Released when the debian bug is archived.
[15:42] <Laney> Do packages have to be in the primary archive for PPU rights to be added?
[16:10] <jml> https://launchpad.net/~jml/+archive/demo/+packages says that the amd64 build of my package was successful, however I don't see it in my PPA.
[16:12] <bigjools> jml: looks there to me
[16:13] <jml> bigjools: for me too... now. I guess 8-10 mins is a usual publishing delay?
[16:13] <bigjools> jml: not unheard of, depends on current load
[16:13] <jml> bigjools: ta.
[16:14]  * jml is making a screencast that involves uploading to and then installing from a PPA
[16:14] <jml> I think heavy editing will be required.
[16:18] <bigjools> jml: didn't mrevell do one of those?
[16:19] <jml> bigjools: undoubtedly a similar one, the kicker here is that the starting point is me running "$ pkgme ppa:jml/demo" in an unpackaged app.
[16:19] <bigjools> ah!
[16:19] <bigjools> I keep meaning to use that
[16:20] <jml> man, I hope openshot is up to this
[16:20] <jml> bigjools: it's pretty neat.
[16:20] <jml> bigjools: and getting better.
[16:21] <bigjools> sweet
[16:21] <bigjools> I have a python app I want to package
[16:22] <jml> cool.
[16:23] <jml> I don't, actually.
[16:23] <jml> I had to write a hello world app to do this demo
[16:23] <jml> (it's for packaging binary apps)
[16:35] <Quintasan> jelmer: ping
[16:35] <jelmer> Quintasan: hi
[16:35] <Quintasan> jelmer: I was wondering if source format 3.0 would be available in recipes at any point
[16:36] <Quintasan> as in 3.0 (quilt)
[16:36] <jelmer> Quintasan: they sort of are at the moment
[16:36] <Quintasan> (quilt) too?
[16:36]  * Quintasan wonders why bzr dailydeb couldnt handle that
[16:36] <jelmer> Quintasan: yes, although that currently means it converts the package to "3.0 (native)" before starting the actual build
[16:37] <jelmer> Quintasan: deploying a new version of bzr-builder that adds some support for non-native packages is on my todo list
[16:38] <Quintasan> jelmer: So, I can use Debian's packaging branch (3.0 (quilt)) in Recipes and it will work?
[16:38] <jelmer> Quintasan: yes, it should - for some values of work
[17:07] <Quintasan> jelmer: Could you tell me what's wrong with https://code.launchpad.net/~quintasan/sm-ssc/main ?
[17:10] <jelmer> Quintasan: timeout from the server
[17:11] <jelmer> Quintasan: unfortunately, hg imports aren't yet as reliable as git or svn imports
[17:13] <Quintasan> Mhm
[17:13] <Quintasan> I see
[17:29] <EvilPhoenix> question regarding PPAs.  Is it possible to allow someone who is not myself to edit/add to a PPA that is owned by my LP account and not a team?
[17:33] <tsimpson> EvilPhoenix: I guess, if you gave them a shared GPG key, maybe
[17:33] <EvilPhoenix> ewww shared keys :P
[17:33] <tsimpson> yep, this is why teams exist :)
[17:36] <TheEvilPhoenix> mhm
[19:15] <figure002> hello. it seems that LP Translations ignored fuzzy entries. Each time a text is changed, it's translations are marked as fuzzy by gettext, and then the outdated translation is removed by LP. What is the proper way to deal with fuzzy entries?
[19:18] <figure002> (this means that translations are lost every time the original English text is changed)