[02:53] ± === yofel_ is now known as yofel [09:41] Hell - o :P === hannesw_ is now known as hannesw [16:51] can things still get synced today ? [16:51] as FF is today right ? [16:51] dupondje: 2100 now [16:52] uh ? [16:53] dupondje: Feature freeze is 2100 UTC [16:53] oh ok :D [16:53] can you sync clang for me ? :) [16:57] it will fix some ftbfs currently, so guess we'd like it :D [17:02] dupondje: can you file a request please, I"m about to step out [17:03] k [17:07] dupondje: is it a new upstream version? we can still sync new revision from Debian after FF as long as it doesn't violate the FF [17:07] Its a new version in debian yea [18:16] Hi, I have asked here about a new version of eclipse (3.7) and I was told to see whether the version in debian experimental would install properly [18:17] However, I am unsure, how I should proceed. [18:19] I have read something about packaging earlier, and I remember something about using the "dsc" file should I use that now as well, or start with the debian.tar.gz?[eclipse_3.7~exp-2.dsc] [18:23] pulling the dsc with dget will fetch all that is needed [18:23] dget -ux url-to-dsc [18:23] but its probably a bit late to get it into oneiric [18:23] feature freeze in 3 hours [18:25] yeah I know [18:25] But if it works flawlessly (which I do not expect) I could always ask for an exception [18:26] And if it doesn't work flawlessly, it is good to know, right :) [18:28] Or maybe later for backports or something [18:33] Wait, feature freeze wasn't expected to take place today? Or at 23:59:59 today? [18:33] 2100 UTC [18:41] jtalor, that means...? [18:41] jtaylor, [18:42] UTC = GMT [18:42] so that is in 2:18 [18:42] coordinated universal time [18:54] I will try to build Eclipse 3.7 in pbuilder. And will post results here [19:33] Hey guys, could someone help me out with mentioning dependencies in debain/control ? The problem is I've a bunch of dependencies on GIR files. [19:33] to be more precise how to do something like this gir1.2-package-* [19:35] Actually, i had mentioned gir1.2-indicate-0.5 as dependency which was just bumped to 1.6 and now I have to manually update the control file. Is there a "wildcard" way of doing this? [19:36] for build dependencies no [19:36] runtime dependencies usually via substitution variables, but that requires that there is a tool to create them [19:36] I'm unfamiliar if that exists for gir [19:37] It is runtime dependency. So I have to manually edit control each time then. Bummer, got like bunch of gir deps. [19:38] dh_girrepository? [19:38] just googled that: http://www.makelinux.net/man/1/D/dh_girepository [19:39] jtaylor, thanks mate! will check it out. [20:19] hey ajmitch , I just happened to see you uploaded django-configglue! a million thanks! [20:19] pindonga: no problem, sorry I cut it close :) [20:19] on the contrary [20:19] what a great guy! [20:19] Laney: :P [20:19] I'm grateful you took all the work [20:21] was this an rdep of something cool? [20:21] Laney: django-configglue wasn't, configglue itself is used by U1 [20:21] aha [20:22] so that depends on your opinion of ubuntu one :) [20:23] my fingers hurt [20:23] jfyi [20:23] been too busy working? [20:23] if only [20:23] just climbing [20:24] got mocked by a teenage girl for being pants at one climb [20:24] hah [20:26] * Elbrus is not good enough in English to understand the expression "for being pants" [20:27] * Elbrus also climbs (but only outdoor) [20:27] = bad [20:27] aha [20:27] you need to understand British English :) === micahg_ is now known as micahg === apachelogger is now known as dslogger [20:30] Laney, django-configglue is cool by itself ;-) (don't heed to the developer :p) [20:31] right, but nothing in oneiric depends on it yet :) [20:31] heh, I believe you :-) [20:31] ajmitch, yeah [21:04] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clang/+bug/824800 => could somebody ack? Package builds fine [21:04] Ubuntu bug 824800 in clang (Ubuntu) "Sync clang 2.9-8 (universe) from debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] === ScottK changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Natty Released! - Natty SRUs can be uploaded | Oneiric: Feature Freeze - Open for bug fixing | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://bit.ly/fz6AyQ | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/ | Congrats to new core-dev: SpamapS [21:07] dupondje: I think that's more bugfix than feature personally [21:08] dupondje: ignore me :), that's still a feature... [21:08] we need it to fix ftbfs of some packages :) [21:09] And another question, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/817579 . When do we choose libreadline-gplv2-dev, when libreadline-dev? [21:09] Ubuntu bug 817579 in apcalc (Ubuntu) "Fix FTBFS on oneiric" [Undecided,Incomplete] [21:09] dupondje: well, that should be easy enough for an FFe [21:10] dupondje: it depends on the licensing, anything that's not compatible with the new readline6 license, needs to use libreadline-gplv2-dev [21:11] readline6 is indeed gplv3 [21:11] but don't ask me whats the difference ... :) [21:12] dupondje: I think this is why doko wanted the transition handled in Debian :) [21:12] yea he reported a bug 2 years ago in debian ... [21:12] Error: Launchpad bug 2 could not be found [21:13] no response [21:13] guess somebody should nmu it ... [21:13] I thought apcalc was just uploaded in debian [21:13] oh, maybe not, that was another thing w/readline [21:13] http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/apcalc.html guess not :D [21:21] package builds with libreadline-dev & libreadline-gplv2-dev ... but no idea what one is the one to choose for this license === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [21:44] dupondje: you'll notice that one depends on libreadline 5 and one on 6. If you don't have a good reason to need gplv2, stick to -dev === yofel_ is now known as yofel