=== henninge changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: gary_poster | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad === henninge changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [08:11] Hey, who can I bug about a but in bug-watch-updater? :) [08:11] s/but/bug/ [08:12] bug-watch-updater changes a debian bug to "Fix Released" even though when the bug was closed unversioned in Debian - which means that it's either not a bug or invalid. [08:13] Rhonda: Is that a valid assumption now? [08:13] When it was written, there was no version tracking :) [08:16] bug 701186 is similar, but not the same [08:16] Launchpad bug 701186 in Launchpad itself "Bugwatcher reported wrong status for 'wontfix' debian bug" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/701186 [08:28] wgrant: It's valid as long as noone does stupid things. ;) [08:28] That's *not* a valid assumption :( [08:29] heh [08:29] To understand my statement better, I do regularly go through wrongly closed bugreports which hinder getting them archived in Debian, so … "in theory" it's a valid assumption. [08:30] It just made me jump that one of my bugreports got marked as "Fix Released" when I was sure that it was an invalid bugreport in the first place. === gord_ is now known as gord === medberry is now known as med_out === vila is now known as babune === babune is now known as vila [11:06] I would say it's valid when the status of the bug in the Debian BTS is correct [11:07] and if you're going to assume that it's not correct, then obviously you can't rely on any information at all === Mkaysi_ is now known as Mkaysi === henninge is now known as henninge-lunch === bac changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: bac | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad === henninge-lunch is now known as henninge === micahg_ is now known as micahg [14:48] bac: Do I need a LOSA to set the Release Manager for a commercial subscription project? Can't find a link for that on ...project/trunk [14:48] mrjazzcat: what project? [14:49] bac: https://launchpad.net/ness/trunk -- Want to set RM to Albert Stone ~ahs3 [14:49] * bac looks [14:50] mrjazzcat: next to "Release Manager" do you see the little pencil icon? [14:50] bac: no [14:50] bac: perhaps I setup the empty branch wrong. [14:51] mrjazzcat: i can edit and set the RM for you. i'm surprised you cannot. [14:52] bac: I do have peon powers, after all ;-) [14:53] mrjazzcat: but you are in pmteam, no [14:53] bac: Yes, I certainly hope so [14:53] mrjazzcat: :) -- the RM has been set [14:54] bac: Thanks. I'll go double check that I'm in pmteam, but I can't imagine I could do anything without that. [14:54] bac: have a great day [14:54] thanks mrjazzcat [16:10] I asked this the other day but got no reply: Do packages have to be in the Ubuntu primary archive to be able to have PPU uploaders set? [16:45] Laney: PPU? [16:46] per package uploader [16:46] and bac, are you asleep? [16:46] Laney: yes, you can't set an upload permission for a non-existent package [16:46] I mean, is being in a PPA enough? [16:47] I don't know if this is the right terminology, but does that create a SPPH record? Is that what it needs? [16:47] Laney: it has to be in the archive that you want to set the upload permission for [16:47] ok then, thanks [16:48] Laney: I see what you're driving at - this is a known bug I think, it was filed the other day [16:48] not sure how to get around it [16:48] I think I remember hearing that you could upload to a PPA and then add PPU bits [16:48] Laney: that *might* work. [16:48] I've never tested it [16:48] no I'm not asking for any particular fix, just wondering what the situation is [16:49] wgrant: since you know everything, do you know this? :-) [16:52] Laney: I think it will work - LP just needs to know that the package exists [16:53] having checked the code... :) [16:53] :P [16:53] thanks then, now I get to ask the TB to implement this change [16:54] (this is #562451 :P) [17:17] When uploading a kernel ppa to my project page, the process hangs after the kernel.tar.gz was tranferred - can someone help ? [17:18] bac: ping [17:18] hi mpoirier [17:18] bac: the header claims you're hte guy to talk to... [17:18] mpoirier: yep [17:19] what's up? [17:19] bac: cool [17:19] I'm trying to get my kernel ppa to https://launchpad.net/~linaro-landing-team-ste/+archive/st-ericsson-u8500-public/+packages === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-bbl [17:19] bac: the command dput ppa:mathieu.poirier/st-ericsson-u8500-public linux-ux500_2.6.38-1001.5_source.changes [17:19] hangs after the kernel got tranferred. [17:19] bac: ood signature on /home/mpoirier/work/linaro/lag/linux-ux500_2.6.38-1001.5.dsc. [17:19] Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net): [17:19] Uploading linux-ux500_2.6.38-1001.5.dsc: done. [17:19] Uploading linux-ux500_2.6.38-1001.5.tar.gz: 98274k/98275k [17:20] bac: it's stuck there and won't move. [17:20] bac: can you help me ? [17:20] mpoirier: i can try === mrjazzcat is now known as mrjazzcat-afk [17:22] mpoirier: this has failed repeatedly the same way? [17:22] yes, repeatedly. [17:23] I'm thinking that if it was releated to permissions, the dsc file would be rejected... [17:23] mpoirier: let me see if i can find some answers for you. [17:23] bac: very cool. === lag` is now known as lag === lag is now known as Guest26716 === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [18:21] mpoirier: the log files look as if the upload succeeded. are you certain it didn't? [18:22] bac: All I'm certain of is that I don't get a prompt back. [18:22] bac: it hangs there... [18:22] bac: did all the files make it ? [18:27] Is there a tutorial that will tell me the basics of launchpad lib so I can repeat what is done here? http://ftagada.wordpress.com/2011/01/05/ppa-stats-initial-impressions/ [18:27] Something that starts with "run the command 'python'" would probably be good. [18:28] I'm reading https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib [18:28] But it there seems to be a gap between the two, so I run python, load launchpadlib, and type "ppa", and it doesn't work. [18:29] hi darxus [18:30] Hi. [18:30] It should not be so much freaking work just to see if anybody's using my packages :) [18:33] Darxus: actually you're probably very close [18:33] the blog entry you referenced takes some shortcuts [18:33] they show the use of a ppa object but don't show how they got it. 'ppa' isn't a command, in there example it is an object [18:34] you can look you your ppas via the 'ppas' method on a person object [18:34] I suspected something like that. [18:34] Ahh, thanks. [18:34] Darxus: so you could do [18:34] ppa = lp.me.ppas[0] [18:35] where 'lp' is your launchpad object [18:35] Darxus: does that make sense? [18:35] Almost, trying... [18:36] Can I do that without authenticating in launchpadlib? [18:36] i doubt it [18:36] you certainly can't refer to the lp.me object [18:37] Right. [18:37] Darxus: here's a tip: the package ubuntu-dev-tools has a script called 'lp-shell' and it is great for interactively playing with launchpadlib [18:37] Thanks. [18:37] it'll log you in and give you a lp object right off the bat [18:37] Ahh, good, thanks. [18:38] you have to do the authentication dance the first time, of course [18:38] anyway, ping me here if you have more questions. be sure to use my nick though or i might not notice [18:41] Authentication seems to be failing because lynx isn't providing a referer. Don't see anything related in my .lynxrc. [18:42] Ah, system wide default. Ugh. [18:50] Huh, I verified through my own webserver logs that lynx is reporting a referrer, but I'm still getting "Launchpad requires a REFERER header to perform this action. There is no REFERER header present. This can be caused by configuring your browser to block REFERER headers." [18:53] Changed my browser to links and that can't even get past the login prompt. [18:56] >>> ppa [18:56] [18:56] Woo. [18:57] Had to resort to running lp-shell locally, which used chrome instead of text browsers. [19:04] NameError: name 'binary_package_publishing_history' is not defined [19:04] Where do I get that from? === mrjazzcat-afk is now known as mrjazzcat [19:06] And how do I get to a ppa that I don't own, specifically https://launchpad.net/~spamassassin/+archive/spamassassin-daily ? === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [19:17] hi Darxus: [19:18] Darxus: you can get the object for 'spamassassin' and then get their ppas [19:18] Darxus: http://paste.ubuntu.com/664467/ [19:24] * Darxus screams. [19:24] I was trying to do something like that... this example didn't have the quotes, and apparently that matters: " team = launchpad.people[team] [19:24] " from https://help.launchpad.net/API/Examples [19:24] Thanks. [19:25] Darxus: you will get better response from the non-edge servers [19:26] I don't know what an edge or non-edge server is in this context. [19:26] 06:56 < Darxus> [19:27] get rid of the 'edge.' in that url. [19:28] >>> binary_package_publishing_history [19:28] NameError: name 'binary_package_publishing_history' is not defined [19:28] How do I get binary_package_publishing_history to work? [19:28] lifeless: Ah, I'm not doing anything with that url, as far as I'm concerned it's just telling me which ppa I'm looking at. [19:29] Unless I'm more confused than I thought. [19:29] you're using a web api [19:29] that url is the url the data for the python object came from. [19:29] so you're using the web url pointing to the edge servers - servers we are in the process of decomissioning [19:32] lifeless: Are you suggesting I run lp-shell with an argument of "production" or something? [19:33] Darxus: lp-shell should connect to production [19:34] Darxus: 'binary_package_publishing_history' is not an object but a method call [19:35] Darxus: where did you get lp-shell from ? [19:35] lifeless: ubuntu-dev-tools [19:36] lifeless: it is pretty handy [19:37] bac: care to file a bug about it using edge ? [19:37] bac: or, well we should check oneiric doesn't [19:37] Darxus: are you running oneiric ? [19:37] lifeless: well, we need to see what he's using. the one for natty does not [19:40] lifeless: here is the output from the natty version of the package: http://paste.ubuntu.com/664476/ [19:42] ok, thats encouraging [19:42] I *thought* it had been fixed (and that was why I asked where he got it from :P) [19:42] No, I'm running Maverick on the machine where lp-shell is working. [19:43] So, I got hit counts from the latest package versions in the PPA I care about. [19:43] Using https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/139855/comments/42 [19:43] Ubuntu bug 139855 in Launchpad itself "Display stats about PPA usage" [Low,Fix released] [19:45] Cool, looks like removing the "status='Published'," is giving me exactly what I want. [19:50] Thanks for the help. [20:11] Is there somewhere we should be reporting spam comments? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mythtv/+bug/606598/comments/7 [20:11] Ubuntu bug 606598 in mythtv (Ubuntu) "mythshutdown assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/mythshutdown: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0376e3c0 ***" [Medium,Won't fix] [20:23] hi tgm4883 [20:24] tgm4883: i'll take care of it. usually people open a question against the launchpad project === bac changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [21:07] bac, good to know, thanks [22:19] PROBLEM: Can't open attachment on this bug - oops: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/722078 [22:19] Ubuntu bug 722078 in Ubuntu "System won't boot after alternative installation with encrypted LVM" [Undecided,New] === yofel_ is now known as yofel [22:28] Is there way to see all the bugs in a project a person or team is *not* subscribed to?