=== rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[07:43] <siji> hrw, you there
[07:44] <hrw> yes
[07:44] <siji> hrw, just want to clarify something which u mention ur blog
[07:44] <siji> regd.cross complication of linux for ARM
[07:45] <siji> Am trying to follow ur doc for building the kernel for beagle XM
[07:45] <siji> (assumes it's ur blog)
[07:45] <siji> http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2010/10/19/how-to-cross-compile-arm-kernel-under-ubuntu-10-10/
[07:45] <hrw> its mine
[07:45] <siji> grt..
[07:46] <siji> so for beagle hve to give the parameter linux-omap3 right?
[07:46] <siji> instead of linaro
[07:46] <hrw> would have to check which is now used
[07:48] <siji> " hve tried with omap3 but giving the message "no source package found: linux-omap3"
=== doko__ is now known as doko
[10:08] <ogra_> bug 721531
[10:08] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 721531 in gcc "[armel] gcc computes wrong address for main() at build time" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721531
[10:31] <dmart> ogra_: looks like this is now fixed?
[10:42] <ogra_> dmart, indeed, i just wanted to know the title, people tend to give me bug numbers ;)
=== vila is now known as babune
[10:49] <dmart> ogra_: ah, cunning
=== babune is now known as vila
=== mayday_jay is now known as mayday_jay-away
=== wellark is now known as Wellark
=== micahg_ is now known as micahg
[14:47] <suihkulokki> what is tool that rapes the ubuntu changelogs and adds the: # For older changelog entries, run 'apt-get changelog libc6'
[14:51] <ogra_> suihkulokki, i think thats in pkgbinarymangler or some similar tool
[14:55] <suihkulokki> pkgbinarymangler - strips translations and alters maintainers during build
[14:55] <suihkulokki> Is that going to alter me while I maintain packages :P
[14:57] <doko> makes you a head shorter too
[15:00] <ogra_> bug 820514
[15:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 820514 in ubiquity "oem-config-remove-gtk not found during preinstalled desktop initialization" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/820514
[15:01] <ogra_> bug 819900
[15:01] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 819900 in livecd-rootfs "package pool implementation needs to update apt" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/819900
[15:01] <ogra_> bug 819899
[15:01] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 819899 in livecd-rootfs "package pools need to correctly parse override info to create tasks" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/819899
[15:01] <ogra_> bug 806751
[15:01] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 806751 in debian-installer "Boot partition on SD is too small on omap/omap4" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806751
[15:01] <ogra_> NCommander, why is that one invalid ?
[15:01] <ogra_> bug 820621
[15:01] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 820621 in flash-kernel "netinstall fails to make omap system bootable during install" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/820621
[15:02] <ogra_> bug 709245
[15:02] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 709245 in linux-ti-omap4 "ARM SMP scheduler performance bug" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/709245
[15:05] <suihkulokki> doko: your latest eglibc upload doesn't really add m-a: same back, since debhelper.mk has a snippet to strips m-a fields on amd64
[15:05] <suihkulokki> doko: something like this is needed: http://people.debian.org/~riku/eglibc-multiarch.patch
[15:07] <doko> gahh
[15:09] <doko> slangasek: ^^^ so I assume I should revert this one too ...
[15:09] <slangasek> doko: heh, yes
[15:09] <slangasek> I hadn't yet tracked down the source of the problem, but I did see that the last upload didn't fix it for me...
[15:09] <doko> didn't see it on i386
[15:20] <doko> janimo, yes, I know about the gcc build failure ;p
[16:12] <dmart> plars: are you guys still discussing beagle xM USB issues, or something else?
[16:15] <plars> dmart: err.. see other channel (sorry, responded on the wrong one :)
[16:16] <dmart> plars: no, you were right -- I saked the question on the wrong channel ;)
[16:17] <dmart> s/saked/asked
=== lag` is now known as lag
=== lag is now known as Guest26716
[18:37] <janimo> doko, I don't doubt it, but I thought it is a practice  to file bugs on most ARM FTBFS lately . Even though I forgot to tag it as such :)
[21:44] <Sjekkie> hi
[21:47] <Sjekkie> I was wondering... Since Ubuntu apparently supports OMAP4, would it be possible to install Ubuntu on an Archos Gen9 Tablet once they come out? It's supposed to get an OMAP 4460 CPU, and Archos is usually quite Ubuntu friendly (one of their first tablets ran Ubuntu very well, according to a friend of mine, but that was before the iPad-era afaik)
[21:48] <Sjekkie> My first thought would be that ubuntu might not support the multitouch screen in the tablet
[21:48] <Sjekkie> but the SoC itself should work, right?
[21:52] <plasmasolutions> Hi guys, I'm running ubuntu on my beagleboard and got a problem...when I'm running the PVR demos in the raw version (not the X11 version) I alway get a PVRShell:Unable to create surface...where should I look to find the problem?
[21:52] <plasmasolutions> The X11 version are running well
[21:55] <plasmasolutions> Any ideas?
[21:56] <plasmasolutions> I can provide all information that you'll probably request...got the bb up and running
[21:57] <infinity> Sjekkie: In theory, it should work in some way or other, but I'll reserve any definition of "work" until I see the hardware. :)
[21:58] <Sjekkie> It would be really cool to have a nice Android&Ubuntu dual boot tablet
[21:59] <Sjekkie> Now just wait for the Windows 8 ARM version
[21:59] <Sjekkie> j/k though
[21:59] <Sjekkie> That'll probably flop anyways like WinNT/PowerPC did :P
[22:00] <plasmasolutions> Sjekkie: Maybe you've got an idea for me?
[22:00] <infinity> Depends on how they position Win8, I suppose.
[22:00] <Sjekkie> plasmasolutions: I usually seem smarter than I really am, sorry ;)
[22:01] <plasmasolutions> Sjekkie: :D
[22:01] <Sjekkie> Well there's gonna have to be software
[22:01] <Sjekkie> that's were NT/PPC went wrong
[22:01] <Sjekkie> and WinCE for that matter
[22:02] <Sjekkie> Linux really runs a lot smoother on most non-x86 hardware than most Microsoft products
[22:02] <Sjekkie> 'cept for Xenix on the Apple ][
[22:03] <Sjekkie> But if Windows starts to fail, MS'll just steal&close some linux code like with Kerberos
[22:05] <Sjekkie> which would ruin their product once more, as linux's strongpoint is the open source community to help along in development
[22:06] <Sjekkie> anyhow, I'll just lay low for now, as I've just cought myself nearly spamming this chan :P
[22:09] <plasmasolutions> :) So, back to my problem :)
[23:34] <infinity> Okay, summer and I are no longer on speaking terms.  I think I just overheated my Panda.