[00:28] In #ubuntu, anth0ny said: ubottu, this is good to know... [00:32] LjL: I lied, looks like there is still a Ginbuntu ban in ot. 39294 [00:32] I didn't even saying! [00:32] PerfieM: You're banned from #ubuntu. Please do not attempt to join it. [00:32] rww: not cool, not at all! [00:32] rww: since when? [00:32] PerfieM: April [00:32] LOLOL [00:33] I was hoping we could but that behind us [00:33] You know, like MATURE people [00:33] ? [00:33] If you acted like "mature people", you wouldn't be banned from #ubuntu :) [00:33] that would require both parties to be mature PerfieM [00:33] bazhang: What makes me think I havent? [00:34] PerfieM, thats neither here nor there, your ban evasion is not a good idea, and against freenode policy [00:34] I forgot I was banned! [00:35] PerfieM, now you know. [00:36] rww, bazhang, I'll be seeing you both in hell [00:36] mature [01:18] Does this channel consist of the ops from #ubuntu-women too? [01:18] PerfieM: why? [01:19] rww: Why nor? [01:19] not... [01:21] rww: is that a yes? [01:21] PerfieM: I'm waiting for an answer to my question. [01:22] rww: Same here [01:22] PerfieM: "This channel is for operator/abuse questions" [01:22] rww: I got banned and I'm wondering why [01:22] CarlFK: because of that, you dont get cookies [01:23] PerfieM: one second === PerfieM is now known as Ooogaboogasoshak === Ooogaboogasoshak is now known as PerfieM [01:24] PerfieM: Your most recent ban in #ubuntu-women was for ban evasion and acting out your usual role as a complete and utter waste of linefeeds. [01:25] ban evasion?! [01:25] I've never been in that channel b4 [01:25] waste of linefeeds? [01:25] PerfieM: Ah, correct. I got it mixed up with the -offtopic output. Just the second part, then. [01:26] rww: name calling is offtopic on freenode, champ [01:27] !appeals [01:27] If you disagree with a decision by an operator, please first pay #ubuntu-ops a visit. If you are still unhappy, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/AppealProcess for the steps you should take. If you feel the need to discuss the channel rules, please contact the ops on IRC or via the email address on the aforementioned page. [01:28] anyways, #ubuntu-women isn't part of the Ubuntu core channels, so that doesn't even really apply :) [01:29] * rww gets the impression he's contradicting himself a lot here, should probably get off IRC in his condition [01:31] I'm going to become on #ubuntu-op [01:31] minus the # [01:31] I find this doubtful. [01:32] A kid can have nightmares, right? [01:32] hehe [01:33] but in all seriousness what is ubuntu-women? [01:33] http://ubuntu-women.org/ [01:33] * PerfieM sighs [01:37] not as cool as I thought [01:43] PerfieM: Is there anything else we can help you with today? [01:43] Oh, is idling not allowed? [01:43] PerfieM: no, it isn't [01:43] lol sorry [01:43] peace [02:27] Happy birthday Myrtti [03:33] blackarchdog seems to be only offtopic [03:36] he's been asked many many times to curtail it. [03:36] tonyyarusso: thanks [03:37] bazhang: he's about to meet the blunt end of a banhammer [03:38] bazhang: and there we go. [03:39] rww, nice [09:17] hi [09:18] just fyi, GoodAd is still the same guy from belgium who is moving from one chan to another insulting people and so on, since a few ... years now. [09:19] thanks Sp4rKy [09:20] yw [09:20] bye [12:16] can i download safari web broser for ubuntu 10.10? [12:16] also wanting imovie for linux [12:18] probably a troll [12:19] he was asking for home delivery of OS disks yesterday as well [12:34] hitme seems to be trolling +1 as well [12:34] watching [12:39] oh, g0t is in #u again? I removed ban yesterday. Let's see if he still has his script enabled [12:39] oh wait, he isn't.. [12:39] he's in #freenode actually [12:39] nope [12:39] not disabled [12:40] oh [12:40] g0t bot at #ubuntu [12:40] in #u too? [12:40] yeah hang on [12:40] ahhh he's in here [12:40] yep [12:41] maybe I should stop removing bans? [12:42] rww would throw a fit [12:42] so DO IT [12:42] haha [12:42] :) [12:44] oCean: nah, it happens, romving bans is a good thing, especially if you are watching for behaviour when/if they come back [12:46] jussi: of course, I understand. Still, for those users it's just silly, since they absolutely have no intention to use the channel for support [12:46] oCean: still, often users once banned for a few days wont bother coming back [12:46] I heard that theory before [12:47] sounds scientific [12:47] should move this to -ot [13:27] os2mac, hi [13:29] os2mac, something you needed help with? === berlinlogger is now known as ulmlogger [17:51] DERBIER> in #u, could be Lars T [17:53] what's his status. I see (recently) removed bans? [17:56] and he's back being the old lars. [19:38] vvcv is now known as _WKLEOMRPORORMMO, also Lars [19:54] wonderful