[03:59] <Laibsch> ping apw
[03:59] <jk-> Laibsch: he's probably asleep
[04:01] <Laibsch> jk-: thanks.  I figured as much.  He is in an American timezone, isn't he?  That would mean we are at complete opposite timezones.  I thought I'd ping him and stick around.
[04:01] <jk-> Laibsch: nope, GMT.
[04:01] <jk-> so your evening should be fine.
[04:02] <Laibsch> Oh, that's good.  Then I hope to have a chance to catch him later in the evening.
[04:02] <Laibsch> yes, thank you.
[04:02] <jk-> anything we can help you with though?
[04:03] <Laibsch> We had talked about a particular issue I had with an encrypted LVM and incorrect initramfs being created by update-initramfs. After several months I now figured out what the issue was.  I believe something is buggy, but wanted to ask him if he agrees.
[04:03] <jk-> right, ok.
[04:03] <Laibsch> Let me dig up the answer ticket
[04:05] <Laibsch> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+question/154973 The answer to that was that apparently during the upgrade (or manually, don't remember) fstab was changed to mount root via UUID. That seems to fail, addressing via /dev/mapper/$ID works now.
[04:06] <Laibsch> I want to see if that answer ticket should be converted to a bug ticket against the kernel
[04:06] <Laibsch> or update-initramfs
[04:10] <Laibsch> jk-: what do you think?
[04:10] <jk-> well, the kernel doesn't deal with UUIDs, so doesn't sound like a kernel issue.
[04:10] <jk-> I'm curious why referencing by UUID fails though
[04:11] <Laibsch> yes, you are right, not a kernel issue.
[04:13] <Laibsch> yes, me too, I am curious about that.  Figuring out the scripts was difficult enough as it is.  I was more or less walking through the scripts, guessing what happened and playing around.  Educated guessing, more or less. So, I can't really say what's going on.
[04:14] <Laibsch> Some of the if-statement resolved differently in the UUID case, I can say that much.  I inserted a couple of echo statements in the scripts for debug purposes and to see what code actually was and wasn't called.
[13:03] <cjwatson> lool,jcrigby: FYI, I'm disabling the d-i armel/linaro-vexpress build until bug 826021 gets fixed
[13:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 826021 in linux-linaro-vexpress "Please re-enable crypto-modules udeb" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/826021
[14:59]  * ogasawara back in 20
[15:54] <apw> tgardner, did you ever play with the 200line patch cgroup thing?  do you know how to tell if its doing anything?
[15:55] <tgardner> apw, feeling dumb. what cgroup patch ?
[15:55] <ohsix> the lkml post had the token load, make -jwhatever in a terminal while doing other work
[15:57] <tgardner> apw, gonna be in and out for awhile. I'm bisecting a Lucid 2.6.32-34 regression
[16:37] <txomon> hello, I have a big problem with my computer, it crashes easily, and its all about networking. I think this is a kernel problem, as when I kill all the graphic sesions, the computer gets COMPLETELY blocked
[16:38] <txomon> when plug in a network wire (RJ45)
[16:39] <txomon> sforshee, can you help me with this?
[16:40] <apw> txomon, it would be helpful to know which release you are running and which kernel version, plus which network card, and what the ubuntu bug# is
[16:41] <txomon> the last
[16:41] <txomon> I will fill now at the moment the bug
[16:41] <txomon> but I can't fill it as I am using gnome3
[16:41] <apw> so i assume you mean oneiric there
[16:42] <txomon> 2.6.38-10-generic
[16:42] <txomon> where?
[16:43] <apw> ok so not the latest anywhere then
[16:43] <apw> as thats neither teh latest kernel nor the latest series
[16:43] <txomon> im in x64
[16:45] <txomon> there are no more updates if I do "apt-get update"
[16:58] <txomon> apw, do you want me to compile from 0 the last release?
[16:59] <apw> txomon, you probabally could enable -proposed and see if that changes anything
[17:02] <txomon> apw where?
[17:06] <txomon> apw, where?
[17:06] <apw> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
[17:33] <txomon> apw, done, im going to reboot
[17:33] <txomon> apw, Linux javier-PB-ubuntu 2.6.38-10-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 15:07:17 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[17:34] <txomon> there is no more updates of the linux kernel
[17:34] <apw>      linux | 2.6.38-11.48 | natty-proposed | source
[17:34] <apw> according to the archive there is
[17:35] <txomon> so how do I get it?
[17:35] <apw> normally adding -proposed, apt-get update, apt-get dist-upgrade gets everything
[17:36] <txomon> now yes
[17:38] <Sarvatt> ogasawara: thanks a ton for doing ubuntu-p.git this early, made drm-intel-fixes based kernels a million times easier to build :P
[17:39] <apw> Sarvatt, we do normally have it about now, -rc2 of the release after the one we are shoving in
[17:39] <apw> just you don't always know about it :)
[17:39] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: heh, np.  I'm still fixing up build failures at the moment.
[17:39] <apw> (not that ogasawara doesn't deserve thanks of course)
[17:39] <apw> ogasawara, let me know if any of my fss drop off
[17:40] <ogasawara> apw: ack
[17:40]  * apw switches his DNS servers ... say goodbye :/
[17:45] <txomon> apw, done
[17:57] <ricotz> Sarvatt, exactly ;)
[17:58] <ricotz> ogasawara, thanks!, i hope this yama thing is easy to fix
[17:59] <ogasawara> ricotz: yep, about to patch it and push to my repo
[17:59] <ricotz> ogasawara, great
[18:59] <hggdh> sconklin: bug 823912 is ready to keep on
[18:59] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 823912 in linux "linux: 2.6.24-29.93 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/823912
[19:02] <sconklin> hggdh: thanks!
[19:22] <tgardner> sconklin, have you had any howling about a regression in the recently -proposed 2.6.32-34.73 kernel? I'm trying to bisect it, but I've got one of these damn nVidia cards which is giving me a bit a DKMS trouble. I'm suspecting one of the mm patches since the reproducer uses chromium, and I've straced the lockup to an mmap system call.
[19:24] <sconklin> tgardner: let me check my list of regressions I'm tracking. I don't catch them all,but I'll look at the ones I have
[19:26] <sconklin> tgardner: no, I see a 'cordless mouse stops working on return from suspend' and 'lost ethernet networking', no graphics
[19:26] <tgardner> sconklin, ok, I'll keep pursuing this until I figure it out.
[19:28] <sconklin> tgardner: any regressions that I am aware of in a release get tagged regression-release, so you can always try searching for that
[19:28] <tgardner> sconklin, that presumes some skill with LP (and that it won't timeout)
[19:33] <sconklin> tha advanced search page allows searching for tags, but I can't help with the timeout
[19:59]  * jjohansen -> lunch
[19:59] <tgardner> sconklin, I was kidding about the skill :) the timeouts, not so much.
[21:17] <lool> cjwatson: linaro-vexpress > ack; we've had a discussion 10 days ago about revamping the configs and having a sane way to manage them again, so at least I see a path forward on avoiding this kind of issues in the future
[21:27] <njin> Hello guys, i've got a bug during the installation with 3.0.0-8.11 (2.6.32 works fine), can someone look at bug 826948 at the attached photo and tell me wich voice select at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi
[21:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 826948 in linux "system crash during installation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/826948
[21:28] <njin> thanks