[00:26] PerfieM: hi [00:26] rww: just the kid I was looking for [00:26] That doesn't bode well. What can I do you for? [00:27] what's my chances of getting unbanned from those 2 channels? [00:27] Which two? I know of three. [00:28] if you mean the two core channels... #ubuntu I'd need to check the bantracker and I can't do that right now, #ubuntu-offtopic we could probably do [00:30] although I'm going afk for an hour or so and I prefer to supervise people I've just unbanned, so funkyHat or gord might be better to work on that with [00:31] its half one, i'm not here [00:31] oh yeah, huh. [00:31] rww: its okay, you can keep the ban on for now [00:32] I currently don't have access to the bantracker, so I can't really help either [00:33] lol [00:33] useless [00:33] PerfieM: alrighty, drop by in an hour or so if you want me to take a look today, otherwise come back tomorrow. I'm probably going to clean up -ot's banlist tonight anyway, so... [00:34] rww: aiight dog [01:35] * rww grabs soda and the OT banlist [01:38] rww: I'm reasonably certain that any of mine in there can come off. [01:38] so how many decades has it been since Pici had a bot in there? [01:38] at least if they lack comments [01:41] rww: if its a ban/quiet for my bot, feel free to remove it [01:41] already did. curious: what did it do? [01:41] I don't even remember which bot this was. [01:41] I forget. [01:41] lol [01:41] I think it was the first bantracker prototype. [01:41] tonyyarusso: it was named nyx, if that helps [01:42] no idea [01:42] also, for those of you who had doubts, I /do/ leave bans active sometimes. like this incog one O____O [02:16] urlin2u called the ops in #ubuntu () === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang [02:41] @btlogin [02:41] * funkyHat stomps on ubottu [02:46] heh, looks like we missed one of ryaxnb's bans during his last unban. I think that might be the longest undetected case of ban-evasion I've seen yet :P [02:48] it was inadvertant on our part as well, sounds like [02:52] Can we just enforce it anyway? [02:54] man, I say stuff like that and the complaints don't stop for minutes ;( [02:54] Heh [02:55] possibly you need to choose a better time of day to say such stuff [02:59] #ubuntu-offtopic's banlist is a living testament to the ineffectiveness of ban evasion prevention ;( [03:00] which one is blockcold? jungli? [03:00] yes [03:05] !away > joshlegs-awayish [03:47] ya y wont ubuntu start up an a 24 core computer [03:47] that had to cost a pretty penny [03:47] i wonder if all the cores have ever been used at once [03:48] No, b/c he can't boot :P [03:48] I only use 32 bit cores; each core does one bit of processing! [09:22] @btlogin [09:26] linuxuz3r_ called the ops in #ubuntu () [11:55] tis a bit crazy in there. [11:55] indeed [12:25] rww: if you're doing a clean up on -ot all my -ot bans can be removed, if you're scripting it. if not I'll do it myself [12:59] o_____O [13:13] hello pici why banned [13:14] dasdssffa: Because you were just banned when you were using the webchat. [13:14] And yet you changed your IP address to return. [13:14] okay but why [13:14] i often said that i do not want classic [13:14] but everybody tells me classic [13:14] Because you continue to ask the same questions over and over and over and over.. [13:14] Pici: lars knows what he's doing, just remove him from this channel, it's a pointless conversation [13:15] no [13:15] Pici: i do not asked something again [13:15] Pici i asked if i can use 10.10 [13:15] yes, use 10.10 if you want. No one cares which release you use. [13:15] no it cares somebody [13:15] overall i ask they tell me, szupport ends for 10.10 cant help you now [13:16] it was with 9.04 this way, with 9.10 andi t will be with 10.10 [13:16] each non-LTS release is supported for 18 months [13:17] yes so my question was does it rent to use 10.10, but all told me nooooooclassic do not ask again blabalbla [13:19] but i guess, as always, you stick with your openion, me with mine and i will not unbanned [13:19] so iam going tpo leave [13:19] this channel now [13:19] bye [13:19] okay [13:19] dasdssffa: please note that evading bans is against freenode policy, we can't really help you if you're removed from the entire network [13:19] y [13:20] <[THC]AcidRain> man when will i be unban? [13:21] <[THC]AcidRain> this is some bullshit [13:21] <[THC]AcidRain> its been like 2 weeks. hell i learned my lesson [13:21] <[THC]AcidRain> feels like 2 yrs rly [13:22] <[THC]AcidRain> i will never say the word "hax" again in #ubuntu [13:22] <[THC]AcidRain> i dont even know what the charge of my banishment was [13:22] I don't suppose there is any good way to find out for sure, but what is a good proceedure to use when you suspect you are trying to help someone that claims to be using Ubuntu, but you're pretty sure he's not? [13:22] <[THC]AcidRain> i forgot its been so long [13:22] usr13: depends on a lot of things [13:23] usr13: give us a moment and we'll be with you [13:23] Yea, that's what I thought [13:23] [THC]AcidRain, its been around 3 days [13:23] Ok. [13:23] <[THC]AcidRain> bazhang, man those 3 days have been eternity [13:23] [THC]AcidRain, you seem to be not ontopic during your time in #ubuntu [13:23] <[THC]AcidRain> like you think im joking, i sit and look at the #ubuntu channel wishing i could talk. i was tryign to give you the silent treatment to see if you lovedme but its not working [13:23] Ok, well, it's not all that important I guess. [13:24] <[THC]AcidRain> i want to be on topic now :( [13:24] usr13, sure its augh [13:24] <[THC]AcidRain> ill even raise my hand before i speak [13:24] <[THC]AcidRain> lesson learned: if "ubuntu" is not in my statement or question, dont type it [13:25] <[THC]AcidRain> i got you man. unban me =( [13:25] [THC]AcidRain, its not a ban, just a +q [13:25] <[THC]AcidRain> is there not a high counsil or something around here who will determine my official fait [13:25] <[THC]AcidRain> well -q :(:(:(:( [13:25] [THC]AcidRain, I asked you to join here 2 days ago [13:26] <[THC]AcidRain> i was being a jerk then lol cmon man [13:26] <[THC]AcidRain> show some love. ubuntu love [13:26] [THC]AcidRain, please read the guidelines and the code of conduct before we proceed [13:26] [THC]AcidRain: I suggest you take this a bit more seriously if you want to deal with the quiet [13:26] !guidelines | [THC]AcidRain [13:26] [THC]AcidRain: The guidelines for using the Ubuntu channels can be found here: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Guidelines [13:26] <[THC]AcidRain> omg. you are seriously going to make me read that? [13:26] !coc | [THC]AcidRain [13:27] [THC]AcidRain: The Ubuntu Code of Conduct is a community etiquette document to which we ask all Ubuntu users to adhere, and can be found at http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ | For information on how to electronically sign the CoC, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SigningCodeofConduct [13:27] <[THC]AcidRain> man i rly hate reading and you have given me to school type documents to read? :/ [13:27] <[THC]AcidRain> if you gonna make me i will [13:27] <[THC]AcidRain> but i thought me sayin i learned my lesson was enough [13:27] [THC]AcidRain, if its too much trouble, there's really no way to move forward [13:28] <[THC]AcidRain> ok im reading guidelines now >_> [13:28] [THC]AcidRain: ou seemed focused on your technical problem. think about the social problem: channel with many people chatting, a few ops, people that cause problems, people that don't respect the ops [13:29] [THC]AcidRain: if you don't mind my interfering a little, you're here to resolve your issue in #ubuntu. frankly, this attitude is not beneficial for that. laughing at operators who try to help you here is not very encouraging [13:30] <[THC]AcidRain> topyli, well when i said "lol" it more meant "damn i know i messed up. laugh is on me" [13:31] <[THC]AcidRain> i have read the guidelines. i see my faults [13:31] <[THC]AcidRain> i guess my issue fell under "Dont be annoying" [13:34] [THC]AcidRain, and the other link, the code of conduct, please [13:34] <[THC]AcidRain> bazhang, it must just be me. but i swear i cant beat the captcha [13:35] [THC]AcidRain, there is none there [13:35] <[THC]AcidRain> did you not want me to sign the CoC? [13:35] [THC]AcidRain: You don't need to sign it, just read it. [13:35] nope, just read the link [13:36] (The signing requires a gpg key and is outside the scope of this conversation) :) [13:36] <[THC]AcidRain> Pici, oh i see now. i hadnt read that far down yet [13:37] <[THC]AcidRain> bazhang, ok. i have read that as well [13:37] [THC]AcidRain, and you agree to abide by both? next time won't be just a +q [13:38] <[THC]AcidRain> with a chance of possible defense in my statement regarding its association with #ubuntu. i agree [13:38] [THC]AcidRain, not sure what that means [13:39] <[THC]AcidRain> in the future, it may appear that i sore offtopic, but in a few short single line statements, its for a bigger meaning aimed toward helping someone [13:39] <[THC]AcidRain> im like a zombie that feeds off knowledge. i NEED #ubuntu to live [13:39] [THC]AcidRain, thats not what #ubuntu is about. #ubuntu-offtopic is for chit chat [13:39] <[THC]AcidRain> understood [13:40] <[THC]AcidRain> agreed [13:40] [THC]AcidRain, there is not going to be the editorial offtopic commentary then? [13:40] <[THC]AcidRain> correct [13:41] <[THC]AcidRain> i was going to post something like "BOOM IM BACK!" but after reading the CoC and guidelines, i see that would not be appropriate [13:41] <[THC]AcidRain> because of 600+ people did the same thing with a public away message, it would be flood [13:41] <[THC]AcidRain> and annoying [13:42] <[THC]AcidRain> and very unhelpful. rly it would just violate all terms of agreement [13:42] <[THC]AcidRain> i will strive for perfection. and one day hope to me an admin or op like yourself [13:43] <[THC]AcidRain> cmon man. tell me some good news [13:43] [THC]AcidRain, the +q is removed. [13:44] <[THC]AcidRain> ! <3 [14:06] sorry for the disconnects [14:06] my vps provider is looking into something [14:16] @login [14:16] The operation succeeded. [14:16] @btlogin [14:16] .15 [14:16] hey, unban me from #ubuntu i need to enter there. thank you very much. [14:17] physically_fit: you where banned because you persistantly ignored instructions to not ask questions on how to get past country specific content [14:17] i wont do that again. unban me. [14:17] sorry - I dont' believe you at this time [14:18] you ignored multiple warnings, got banned [14:18] i just posted 2 or 3 lines [14:18] then tried to do it in other channels, despite being told not to [14:18] so I'm not going to unban you at this time. [14:18] physically_fit: each time I asked you not to - you waited 15 minutes and did it again [14:18] when are you going to unban me [14:18] I then banned you, you moved to #ubuntu-offtopic and started to do it [14:18] you moved to #ubuntu-fi to do it, despite me telling you not to [14:18] i need a date [14:19] physically_fit: you won't get a date as I'm not convinced by your intentions [14:19] this is the first time that im banned in here [14:19] yes, but the reasons you got banned is what's the problem [14:19] it's not that you didn't know what you where doing [14:19] you made multiple decisions to ignore instructions not to do something [14:19] i forgot about what happened yesterday. i want to enter ubuntu for other reasons [14:20] you forgot - I didn't [14:20] I have no confidence you can follow instructions/behave in the channel at this time. [14:20] come back in a few days [14:20] in the meantime, please read the guidelines, and code of conduct [14:20] 2 days if you want to be specific [14:20] that's 48 hours from now [14:20] !guidelines [14:20] ubottu: guidelines > physically_fit [14:20] The guidelines for using the Ubuntu channels can be found here: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Guidelines [14:20] physically_fit, please see my private message [14:20] !coc [14:20] The Ubuntu Code of Conduct is a community etiquette document to which we ask all Ubuntu users to adhere, and can be found at http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ | For information on how to electronically sign the CoC, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SigningCodeofConduct [14:21] h00k, awwwh :) [14:21] @mark #ubuntu-ops physically_fit review ban in 48 hours from this time stamp - not before [14:21] The operation succeeded. [14:26] bazhang: ftr, lightdm replaces gdm in oneiric. [14:27] Pici, he wanted arch help however, was crossdistrochannelposting [14:27] bazhang: Right, just wanted to make sure that we don't assume that all lightdm questions are arch related in the future :) [14:27] Pici, heh, yeah I know about lightdm being in oneiric [14:41] ikonia: I already cleaned up yesterday (by hand, not scripted). The only bans you have set in there right now are galamar, fujisan, phix, LarsTorben, and I think the other ones I'm seeing in BT are already removed. [14:42] ikonia: the first one I'm not sure what's up with them, the last three I think are rather keepable [14:42] cool, thank you [15:04] anyone here going to LinuxCon/NA? [15:31] Hi [15:33] topyli Hello [15:36] hello usr13 [15:36] sorry we didn't get time to answer your question earlier [15:40] That's ok. There may not be any real answer. And well, not all that important I guess. There's not really any way to force or trick someone into letting us know what OS they REALLY are running, so I suppose it is a moot point [15:41] usr13: can see certain things, such as the output of lsb-release, the output of apt-get update, the running kernel with uname etc, they can all give clues [15:42] but they can lie about output of lsb_release -a [15:42] that is true, which is why I gave you other commands [15:43] Ok, yea, good info. uname could give a clue. But what about apt-get update What about that? What would you look for there? [15:43] the repos they are using [15:45] So... "What is the third to last line in output of apt-get update?" [15:46] Or... something like that? [15:53] no, just pastebin the output of it and have look if it looks sane [16:25] Hi usr13, is there anything this channel can help you with currently? [16:31] usr13: if there's nothing we can do for you, please part the channel [18:51] hi [18:51] why banned [18:53] larstk: I think you know [18:53] we've had many, many conversations and discussions about this [18:53] no i want to do a restart [18:53] completely from beginning [18:53] sorry, not at this time [18:54] ok [18:54] you got many, many changes for a "restart" [18:57] halp! [18:58] oCean: ? [18:58] Jordan_U: sorry, crossposting :) [20:49] Oh, a new bot to get used to. [20:51] where ? [20:52] ikonia: h00k means eir [20:52] ikonia: eir [20:52] h00k: STOP COPYING ME COPYING YOU [20:52] oh [20:52] rww: STOP COPYING ME COPYING YOU [20:52] -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- You are not authorized to perform this operation. [20:52] :( [23:05] <[THC]AcidRain> Richiie, unity is indeed the worse thing to come from the human race [23:05] that didn't last long [23:18] * [KittyGirl] (boohoo@unaffiliated/cmi-dos): troll face [23:18] seems familiar [23:54] [thc]acidrain is PM'ing me to say that since he helped someone, he gets to go offtopic