| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| poolie | hi riddell | 06:40 |
|---|---|---|
| vila | hey poolie and others ! | 06:51 |
| poolie | hi there | 06:53 |
| poolie | i'm giving udd config options to talk to staging lp to make it easier to debug/test stuff | 06:53 |
| vila | poolie: great ! | 06:53 |
| vila | poolie: don't worry too much about using the stacked-based configs, I intend to upgrade udd when 2.4.x is deployed on jubany anyway | 06:54 |
| poolie | vila, so how about https://code.launchpad.net/~mbp/udd/configure/+merge/71822 | 07:46 |
| poolie | oh also, while i'm here, can you see if you can get into the blog? | 07:46 |
| * vila looking | 07:46 | |
| vila | poolie: this won't work until 2.4x is deployed I think | 07:47 |
| vila | poolie: meh, I'm out-of-date about iconfig | 07:49 |
| vila | gee, I didn't remember introducing a forward-compatible layer there... | 07:50 |
| poolie | ah, are you saying iconfig's present but can't be used? | 07:50 |
| vila | no no no, you're doing fine, my bad | 07:51 |
| poolie | thanks for thinking of it though | 07:53 |
| Riddell | hola | 07:54 |
| poolie | hi thar | 07:55 |
| jam | morning all | 07:56 |
| poolie | hi jam | 07:56 |
| vila | poolie: reviewed | 08:02 |
| vila | poolie: BB:tweak | 08:02 |
| poolie | thankss | 08:13 |
| poolie | i'll roll that out then | 08:31 |
| poolie | actually i might try to actually fix the httperrors first | 08:38 |
| jimis | I did a bzr switch, and an unexpected conflict happened | 08:54 |
| jimis | Can I undo and go back to previous branch to commit? | 08:54 |
| poolie | hi jimis | 08:55 |
| poolie | you can go back but i think that will carry back the conflicts | 08:56 |
| poolie | sorry | 08:56 |
| poolie | there ought to be a way to say 'i wish i never switched (or, merged, or whatever)' but there isn't yet | 08:56 |
| jimis | I was afraid of that :-( | 08:58 |
| jimis | anyway I understand that this workflow is not considered as mainstream for bzr | 08:58 |
| * jelmer waves | 08:58 | |
| poolie | hi jelmer | 08:58 |
| jelmer | g'evening poolie | 08:59 |
| jimis | imho it should ask before switching, saying that a conflict has occured | 08:59 |
| vila | jimis: out of curiosity, what kind of unexpected conflict did you get ? | 08:59 |
| jimis | vila: I had changed a file but forgot to commit | 09:00 |
| jimis | so when I did "bzr switch other-branch" a conflict happened | 09:01 |
| jimis | and now I have to resolve it | 09:01 |
| vila | oh, so you wanted to commit it, not switch to the other branch carrying the change ? | 09:02 |
| jimis | wow, switching back created a double conflict :-o | 09:02 |
| vila | yeah, never a good idea to leave unresolved conflict | 09:02 |
| jimis | vila: no I wanted to switch, but I had forgotten to commit this particular file | 09:02 |
| vila | right, that what I meant, you wanted to commit *before* switching | 09:03 |
| jimis | that's what I should have done, yeah | 09:03 |
| vila | there are cases when you want to switch but still want to carry the change over | 09:03 |
| jimis | but bzr should have reminded me because I forgot | 09:03 |
| jimis | I intend to file a bug when I find some time, about missing functionality when working with checkouts | 09:04 |
| vila | yeah, kind of the --strict option on pull/push and... I forgot the other one send ? | 09:04 |
| jimis | I understand it is not a mainstream workflow, but it is the *only* possibility when working with branches sized as big as lp:gcc | 09:04 |
| jimis | multiple dirs is not an option then | 09:05 |
| Riddell | vila: where is baboun again? | 09:10 |
| jelmer | Riddell, under vila's desk :) | 09:10 |
| * Riddell books a trip on the eurostar to test his branch | 09:10 | |
| jelmer | jam: did you have more comments on my transport-segments branch? | 09:10 |
| vila | Riddell: http://babune.ladeuil.net:24842 | 09:10 |
| vila | jelmer: :) | 09:10 |
| jelmer | Riddell: :) | 09:11 |
| jam | jelmer: no, just the display thing, Riddell had already approved the branch | 09:11 |
| Riddell | vila: hmm, how do I build a branch again? | 09:14 |
| Riddell | oh, helps if I log in | 09:14 |
| vila | yeah, a lot ;) | 09:14 |
| jelmer | jam: thanks :) | 09:15 |
| jam | vila: do you have python-2.4 on babune? | 09:23 |
| Riddell | vila: I scheduled selftest-subset-natty but it says "pending - natty64.local is offline" | 09:25 |
| vila | Riddell: yup, the slave needs to be started, just wait a bit | 09:25 |
| vila | jam: probably, depends on the slave | 09:25 |
| jam | when did FF go to 6.0? | 09:26 |
| vila | jam: why would you care, we don't support anymore ? | 09:26 |
| jam | did they just decide to stop doing minor versions | 09:26 |
| jam | vila: I'm backporting something to bzr-2.1 for Lucide | 09:26 |
| jam | Lucid | 09:26 |
| jam | so we *do* care there | 09:26 |
| vila | then it should be available on the lucid slave | 09:26 |
| vila | jam: note that installing a local lucid chroot will probably be more convenient for you | 09:27 |
| vila | unless you just want a final test run that is | 09:28 |
| maxb | 09:30 | |
| jam | vila: yeah, pretty much | 09:30 |
| jam | I think everything is ok | 09:30 |
| jam | I just want to make sure before I submit it, and it goes boom when we release | 09:30 |
| vila | but.. doesn't python defaults to 2.5 on lucid already ? | 09:32 |
| vila | python | 2.6.5-0ubuntu1 | lucid | all | 09:33 |
| vila | yeah, 2.6 even | 09:33 |
| jam | vila: sure, but we are still backporting to a 2.1 series, which *is* 2.4 compatible | 09:33 |
| vila | I'm not even sure 2.4 is supported on lucid (imbw) | 09:33 |
| jam | even backporting to bzr-2.3 we should be verifying python-2.4 compatibility | 09:34 |
| vila | right, but I'm not sure you can use lucid to test 2.4 you may need to dig deeper | 09:34 |
| jam | I thought you had that set up on babune | 09:34 |
| jam | (since it at least are excuse for why it was ok to upgrade PQM) | 09:34 |
| poolie | ok this time for sure | 09:35 |
| jam | poolie: ? (this time you're gone for sure?) | 09:38 |
| poolie | this time i think i fixed bug 819910 | 09:38 |
| jam | or this time httperror is fixed | 09:38 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 819910 in Ubuntu Distributed Development "many packages fail to import due to HTTPError talking to Launchpad (eg ubuntu:transmission)" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/819910 | 09:38 |
| poolie | it took kind of a silly long time | 09:38 |
| vila | poolie: \o/ | 09:38 |
| poolie | we'll see | 09:38 |
| poolie | i have something a bit more realistic working locally though | 09:38 |
| poolie | which is a good step | 09:38 |
| poolie | not my best day ever | 09:39 |
| poolie | https://code.launchpad.net/~mbp/udd/819910-service-root/+merge/71832 | 09:39 |
| poolie | quick review anyone? | 09:40 |
| jam | poolie: looking | 09:43 |
| vila | not at lot to look at ;) can't you add a test for that, even against a live lp ? | 09:43 |
| jam | poolie: str() is worrying for me, though it may be correct. And it certainly looks like something that Launchpadlib is likely to break | 09:43 |
| jam | since you're poking at private attributes | 09:44 |
| poolie | the object itself is a URI class | 09:44 |
| vila | and yeah, why the str() ? | 09:44 |
| poolie | and it defines a str as apparently the right way to get an actual string | 09:44 |
| jam | poolie: ok, that part works for me. | 09:44 |
| poolie | other launchpad client infrastructure won't accept the URI | 09:44 |
| poolie | as far as using the underscoe | 09:44 |
| poolie | there's no public equivalent | 09:45 |
| poolie | maybe i'll ask in #launchpad | 09:45 |
| jam | poolie: there's no way to ask for a branch's LP URL? | 09:45 |
| jam | or is it that you have to go via a round-trip that you are trying to avoid | 09:45 |
| jam | like lp.branches['~user/project/branch'].url seems like it should work | 09:46 |
| jam | but that is a round trip you might be trying to avoid | 09:46 |
| poolie | does that work? | 09:46 |
| poolie | it would be cleaner | 09:46 |
| poolie | i don't think this will be a performance problem | 09:46 |
| poolie | it's not hit all that much compared to the amount of other work this program does | 09:46 |
| jam | poolie: https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/beta.html#branches | 09:47 |
| jam | I'm thinking | 09:47 |
| vila | yeah, make it work, make it right, make it fast... and it doesn't work yet ;) | 09:47 |
| poolie | that doesn't work; it seems to expect an integer index | 09:48 |
| poolie | but there might bbe something similar | 09:48 |
| jam | poolie: so probably lp.branches.getByUniqueName(short_form).self_link | 09:48 |
| poolie | yep | 09:48 |
| poolie | or no | 09:48 |
| lifeless | jam: I wonder if you could have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~lifeless/python-oops-wsgi/extraction/+merge/71839 | 09:48 |
| lifeless | jam: its a replacement for the oops middleware we use in launchpadloggerhead | 09:49 |
| jam | lifeless: no diff yet, but I'll give it a minute | 09:49 |
| lifeless | yeah, no panic | 09:49 |
| lifeless | bedtime for me, 7am meeting tomorrow ;) | 09:49 |
| jam | lifeless: maybe you have a hint. Trying to get the LP API reference for a branch known by its short name | 09:49 |
| jam | (~user/project/branch) | 09:49 |
| poolie | yep, that's it | 09:49 |
| jam | trying to get something like api/1.0/... | 09:49 |
| poolie | thanks | 09:50 |
| jam | poolie: getByUniqueName is correct? | 09:50 |
| lifeless | jam: you want the devel api, not beta | 09:50 |
| jam | lifeless: this is for the udd package importer | 09:50 |
| lifeless | yes | 09:50 |
| jam | I think we found it, though. | 09:50 |
| lifeless | beta is -deprecated- | 09:50 |
| lifeless | dead dead dead | 09:50 |
| lifeless | for a live service under maintenance, I would definitely be using the devel version of the API | 09:51 |
| poolie | where is he using beta? | 09:51 |
| poolie | oh in the doc api | 09:51 |
| poolie | i don't think that's a problem unless we still have an lplib that defaults to beta | 09:52 |
| jam | poolie, lifeless: sure, it was just what firefox quick-linked for me when typing "apidoc" | 09:52 |
| poolie | oh actually if we're going to call we can just use getByUrls and simplify this a bit more | 09:52 |
| jam | poolie: or getByUrl, just depends what you actually have. | 09:53 |
| lifeless | poolie: its a problem to the extent that there is stuff in 'beta' that no longer exists, and conversely not stuff in beta that now exists. | 09:53 |
| lifeless | best to read the docs for the api being used. | 09:53 |
| poolie | i am looking at the 1.0 docs | 09:53 |
| poolie | i mean i don't think there's a practical problem for the importer | 09:53 |
| lifeless | sure | 09:54 |
| lifeless | I get that; I'm just trying to ensure you don't do what I've seen others do which is try a gone api and be confused when its not there but is on the web page. | 09:54 |
| poolie | oh it is actually gone? | 09:55 |
| lifeless | that particular one isn't. | 09:55 |
| poolie | perhaps the beta api doc pages should be removed | 09:55 |
| lifeless | but, in beta particularly, a great many have been deprecated and are now gone | 09:55 |
| lifeless | and there is a great deal in 1.0 that won't be listed on the beta page | 09:55 |
| lifeless | so you might miss out on just the right api for the job | 09:55 |
| lifeless | anyhow | 09:55 |
| lifeless | jam: that diff is up; I realise I haven't glued the url inclusion in the report in yet, I'll do that as a separate landing I think | 09:56 |
| poolie | so, jam needs to just update his bookmark or browser history | 09:56 |
| lifeless | more or less ;) | 09:57 |
| lifeless | gnight | 09:57 |
| poolie | jelmer: hooray | 10:06 |
| jelmer | poolie: glad that finally seems to be taking shape :) | 10:07 |
| jam | vila: so, do you have a test runner on babune that can run older versions of bzr against python-2.4? | 10:08 |
| vila | jam: not sure, do you know which ubuntu release supported 2.4 in the end ? | 10:10 |
| jam | hardy? | 10:11 |
| vila | hardy is 2.5 by default iirc | 10:11 |
| jam | vila: probably default, but still supported | 10:11 |
| jam | vs you can't even install python-2.4 on Lucid | 10:11 |
| vila | after a quick check, babune always use the default python so there is no existing job to test 2.4 explicitly, but you can probably create one pretty easily | 10:14 |
| vila | the hardy slave has python-2.4 installed | 10:14 |
| poolie | jam, ok, how about https://code.launchpad.net/~mbp/udd/819910-service-root/+merge/71832 then | 10:17 |
| jam | poolie: lp_call is really how you have to spell that? ugh | 10:18 |
| jam | but otherwise, approve | 10:18 |
| jam | poolie: you have a comment "Sripo of the scheme, and hostname" that should go | 10:18 |
| poolie | lp_call is a wrapper that handles retrying the operation etc | 10:19 |
| poolie | it really ought to be in lplib | 10:19 |
| poolie | also, for that matter, it would be nice if you could declare special forms in python for things like this | 10:19 |
| jam | sure | 10:20 |
| poolie | thanks | 10:21 |
| poolie | ok, i'll merge it and try it | 10:22 |
| jam | poolie: care to chat about my patch? | 10:30 |
| poolie | i'm just trying to roll this onto jubany and it seems to be breaking | 10:30 |
| poolie | after that sure | 10:30 |
| jam | sure | 10:31 |
| poolie | this is your get_parent_map patch? | 10:33 |
| jam | yes | 10:35 |
| poolie | jam, ok that _seems_ to be working | 10:55 |
| poolie | bit hard because of bug 827935 | 10:55 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 827935 in Launchpad itself "consistent timeout on user branch listing page" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827935 | 10:55 |
| poolie | jam i might have some dinner now, i'll try to ping you later | 11:00 |
| jam | sure | 11:00 |
| jam | I should have lunch as well | 11:00 |
| jelmer | hmm, it's kindof worrying that PQM is now so slow that we can keep it busy overnight :-/ | 11:11 |
| vila | jelmer: ... and still has a queue of 5 :-( | 11:21 |
| Riddell | so it this my fault or baboun's? http://babune.ladeuil.net:24842/view/debug/job/selftest-subset-natty/12/console | 11:32 |
| jam | Riddell: isn't everything your fault? You're the new guy, after all. | 11:33 |
| Riddell | it might be less my fault if I learnt to spell babune | 11:33 |
| vila | FATAL: Unable to delete script file /tmp/hudson2041655501694922969.sh | 11:34 |
| vila | shudder, long time not seen | 11:34 |
| vila | slave died for mysterious reason, try again, using a smaller subset may help | 11:35 |
| vila | making chroots real nodes and switching the old jobs to these new nodes will also address the issue but I'm not there yet... | 11:36 |
| vila | I've made some progress on upgrading the gentoo slave (which I couldn't do for.. months), currently rebuilding 12/258 packages... | 11:37 |
| vila | maxb: ping | 11:46 |
| vila | jam: are you planning to build th windows installers for 2.4.0 ? | 11:47 |
| jam | vila: at some point, though I was still dragging my feet based on what Jelmer has stated about bzr-svn (critical bug still remaining) | 11:47 |
| vila | huh ? Where ? When ? jelmer ? | 11:48 |
| vila | crap, just found the mail | 11:48 |
| vila | jelmer: is there a bug # for that ? | 11:49 |
| jam | vila: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bugs?search=Search&field.importance=Critical&field.status=New&field.status=Incomplete&field.status=Confirmed&field.status=Triaged&field.status=In+Progress&field.status=Fix+Committed ? | 11:51 |
| jam | 3 critical bugs | 11:51 |
| vila | hmpf | 11:52 |
| vila | madness | 11:52 |
| vila | jelmer: are all these bugs relevant for 2.4.0 or only for prior versions ? | 11:54 |
| vila | jelmer: also, are they regressions and do they affect the majority of users ? | 11:55 |
| jam | vila: I think you scared him away | 11:55 |
| vila | hehe | 11:55 |
| vila | *I* am the one who is scared, I know nothing scares jelmer ;) | 11:56 |
| jelmer | I'm lunchin' :) | 12:01 |
| jelmer | 826946 is the one that's worrying me | 12:02 |
| jelmer | 704716 is fixed so no longer an issue | 12:02 |
| jelmer | 485601 is fixed I think but doesn't have tests yet | 12:02 |
| vila | pfew, good to know (bon appétit by the way) | 12:03 |
| vila | jelmer: should bug #826946 block the 2.4.0 release (or even the 1.1.1 ? bzr-svn release) though ? | 12:05 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 826946 in Bazaar Subversion Plugin "Commit to svn repo completes, but repo is not updated" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/826946 | 12:05 |
| vila | HMPF (no space left on device, gentoo I hate you) | 12:06 |
| jelmer | vila: if it is as serious as it appears to be, it's a serious regression | 12:06 |
| vila | k | 12:06 |
| vila | jelmer: let me know how it goes | 12:06 |
| poolie | jam, are you back? | 12:15 |
| jam | poolie: yep | 12:15 |
| poolie | vila, is enospace connected or something else? | 12:15 |
| poolie | jam do you have an mp up already? | 12:16 |
| jam | poolie: yeah, I posted it while you were dining | 12:16 |
| vila | poolie: I went to /etc/fstab and found the comment I left ages ago when the same problem happened: don't use tmpfs for /var/tmp if more space is needed for emerge | 12:17 |
| jam | poolie: if you want to read through the merge proposal, I think I've captured everything I had to say about it. The only other bit that would-have-been-nice is to have you run some tests from Sydney | 12:21 |
| jam | but they take a while, and I didn't work up a script to automate all of it | 12:21 |
| poolie | i might do that tomorrow | 12:21 |
| poolie | vila, just add more swap | 12:25 |
| vila | poolie: or more memory or just comment out the fstab line which I did. After a reboot, the emerge is going on now | 12:26 |
| poolie | jam, i'm reading it | 12:27 |
| poolie | or tell emerge to use a different tmpfs | 12:27 |
| === Mkaysi_ is now known as Mkaysi_|ZNC | ||
| poolie | what a nice analysis | 12:34 |
| poolie | and what a long commit message :) | 12:34 |
| === Mkaysi_|ZNC is now known as Mkaysi | ||
| poolie | jam, hi | 12:43 |
| jam | hey | 12:43 |
| poolie | so the reasoning and the code make sense to me | 12:43 |
| poolie | i can't see any actual bugs (other than a couple of tweaks) | 12:43 |
| poolie | i'm not super confident that i would catch any bugs that actually were there though, cause it's moderately large | 12:44 |
| jam | yeah | 12:44 |
| poolie | so, perhaps i should just try it out a bit tomorrow | 12:44 |
| jam | I did manually test it against launchpad a fair amount | 12:44 |
| jam | Not that it exhaustively tests all possible edge cases. | 12:44 |
| poolie | i think landing into trunk first makes sense | 12:47 |
| poolie | it's really nice it doesn't need a server change | 12:47 |
| poolie | is there anything in particular we should talk about? | 12:48 |
| jam | poolie: I think I've worked through it. I mostly wanted to do the summary live-on-the-phone, but it has been done | 12:54 |
| poolie | weeee | 12:55 |
| poolie | the flood of mp mail indicates the lpapi connection is unjammed | 12:55 |
| poolie | i wonder if people will feel spammed | 12:56 |
| poolie | i guess it's a good chance to consider how much they are useful | 12:56 |
| jam | poolie: when don't people feel spammed by lp? | 12:56 |
| poolie | i don't know | 12:56 |
| poolie | i certainly do | 12:56 |
| poolie | i'd like to do built-in non-email notifications some time | 12:56 |
| poolie | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/827935/comments/1 might amuse | 12:57 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 827935 in Launchpad itself "consistent timeout on user branch listing page" [Critical,Triaged] | 12:57 |
| poolie | i should sleep | 12:57 |
| jam | poolie: real quick, what time would be reasonable to load the global config to check the value? | 12:59 |
| jam | poolie: OFFSET 313000 seems particularly telling | 13:00 |
| jam | (sort all 500,000 entries, and give me the middle 48) | 13:01 |
| poolie | yeah that offset looks to me like it's either loading them all (i'm not sure if that's what the oops means) or slicing a big collection | 13:03 |
| poolie | i haven't dug into it | 13:03 |
| poolie | how do you mean 'what time'? | 13:03 |
| poolie | as in, where in the code, or how long do i think it would take? | 13:03 |
| jam | poolie: where in the code | 13:03 |
| poolie | perhaps when the remotebranch or similar is constructed, make an instance and hold it? | 13:04 |
| jam | I don't think we want to check the config on every _get_parent_map_rpc call | 13:04 |
| poolie | that should make sure it's read just once | 13:04 |
| jam | this is in RemoteRepository | 13:04 |
| poolie | ok, remoterepository then | 13:04 |
| poolie | vila may have a more evolved idea, but putting it there should mean it's not loaded too many times in normal use, and we can move it later | 13:04 |
| jam | poolie: but you're thinking to cache the GlobalStack object, not just the config value | 13:05 |
| poolie | yes | 13:05 |
| jam | vila: ^^ thoughts? | 13:05 |
| poolie | is even reading out of that expensive? | 13:05 |
| poolie | it may be | 13:05 |
| jam | poolie: I don't think it is expensive as in, will show up in real-user-time branching all of history | 13:05 |
| jam | maybe in shorter term. But for all of bzr it only does 600 or so RPCs | 13:06 |
| jam | because of the preloading behavior | 13:06 |
| vila | jam,poolie: is there a global config on lp ? | 13:06 |
| poolie | ok, good night then | 13:06 |
| jam | vila: a config for all branches on lp? no | 13:07 |
| poolie | jam, if it's nontrivial to change i wouldn't block on it | 13:07 |
| jam | though you could do a locations.conf thing | 13:07 |
| poolie | we can always add it if it's wanted | 13:07 |
| vila | I suspect not (today) | 13:07 |
| poolie | another option would be to go off a debug flag which we know should be cheap | 13:07 |
| poolie | good night all | 13:08 |
| vila | jam: if you're talking about *local* config then the plan is that checking an option will be a bit more than checking an in-memory dict (or thrice) i.e. far lower than reading a file | 13:09 |
| vila | poolie: g'night | 13:09 |
| vila | jam: or doing an rpc call | 13:10 |
| jam | sure, but "plan" and what will "land in 2.4" is pretty different | 13:11 |
| jelmer | g'night poolie | 13:12 |
| vila | jam: well, stop worrying about a bug that has been there since the beginning then | 13:13 |
| vila | jam: *all* options requires reading one or several config files so far | 13:14 |
| jam | vila: which is why I've generally *avoided* having things in config files so far | 13:45 |
| vila | jam: then keep doing so until we get a better config or join the effort to get there ;) | 13:49 |
| * jelmer is generally also not too fond of adding configuration options | 13:55 | |
| jelmer | it's often the easy answer, deferring to the user instead of thinking about what the right thing to do is | 13:56 |
| vila | yup, I know the trap | 13:56 |
| bigjools | as a KDE user, I say moar config! | 13:56 |
| vila | that doesn't mean nothing should be configurable | 13:57 |
| jelmer | bigjools: ((-: | 13:58 |
| vila | jelmer: the other extreme example is OSX (or more generally Apple) where you *can't* configure what you want because *they* know better | 14:00 |
| jelmer | vila: yeah | 14:04 |
| * jelmer takes a quick break | 14:11 | |
| === Mkaysi is now known as Mkaysi|ZNC | ||
| vila | jelmer: back ? | 15:11 |
| jelmer | vila: yep | 15:17 |
| vila | jelmer: you mentioned a fallout about my last patch around BZR_HOME, I can't find the thread anymore :-/ | 15:18 |
| vila | jelmer: but from memory you mentioned bzr-svn tests failing because of it. I was wondering if these tests should be put into core instead | 15:20 |
| jelmer | vila: basically, if BZR_HOME is set then bzrlib.config.config_dir() returns unicode strings | 15:20 |
| vila | yeah, I remembered that | 15:20 |
| jelmer | vila: GMTA. lp:~jelmer/bzr/cachedir was an attempt to do just that :) | 15:20 |
| vila | oooh | 15:23 |
| vila | I don't clearly see the connection though :) | 15:23 |
| vila | or was it just a first step ? | 15:24 |
| jelmer | vila: bzr-svn falls back to storing its cache in ${config_dir()}/cache/svn if it can't find a cache directory | 15:24 |
| vila | ha, that's the connection, pfew, but... where does cache_dir calls config_dir ? | 15:26 |
| jam | jelmer: so it looks like PQM is still chewing through stuff you submitted yesterday. Not a good sign. | 15:31 |
| jam | http://webnumbr.com/bzr-pqm-queue-length.from%282011-08-01%29 | 15:31 |
| jam | I do wish we had some stats on time-to-run-the-test-suite | 15:31 |
| jam | anyway, I'm off for now. Have a good night y'all | 15:32 |
| vila | g'night jam, the issues you mentioned have been briefly discussed here ;) | 15:34 |
| jelmer | jam: g'night | 15:36 |
| jelmer | jam: it does indeed look worrying :_/ | 15:36 |
| jelmer | vila: it doesn't, but the bzr-svn equivalent of it does | 15:36 |
| vila | ....finally :) | 15:37 |
| vila | sooo, no need to search how to avoid return unicode right ? Better spend my time on reviewing your branch instead ? Or are you already addressing jam's review ? | 15:38 |
| vila | jelmer: ^ | 15:43 |
| jelmer | vila: Yeah, I'm addressing jam's concerns at the moment. | 15:45 |
| vila | k | 15:46 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| === Mkaysi|ZNC is now known as Mkaysi | ||
| jelmer | have a good evening | 16:52 |
| wilx | Hi, I am having problems installing/running bzr-fastimport: http://codepad.org/Uz43PkP4 | 17:19 |
| wilx | This is the selfcheck fastimport as suggested by the README.txt output. | 17:19 |
| wilx | I run setup.py build and then I have copied the directory to ~/.bazaar/plugins/fastimport | 17:20 |
| fullermd | That's happening in bzr-git, not fastimport... | 17:25 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| fullermd | Riddell: ping (if'n you're around still) | 17:38 |
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| wilx | fullermd: Oh, so it is not a problem with my installation steps of bzr-fastimport? | 19:00 |
| wilx | Shall I report it as a bug as suggested? | 19:00 |
| maxb | Perhaps, but not on fastimport, because the problem is an version incompatibility between bzr-git and dulwich | 19:18 |
| hexsprite | I _think_ i'm using a checkout, why do I get this? ERROR: Cannot switch a branch, only a checkout. | 19:21 |
| maxb | wilx: Actually the problem is simply: If you install dulwich 0.8.0, you must also install bzr git >= 0.6.2 | 19:22 |
| maxb | hexsprite: Try "bzr info", see if it is as you expect. Pastebin it for more help. | 19:22 |
| lifeless | mgz: hi | 19:22 |
| hexsprite | Maybe that's not even the right command for what I want to do. Which is to switch my working copy to be based on a new repository located in my homedir | 19:22 |
| mgz | hey lifeless | 19:24 |
| hexsprite | eg. i just merged all my changes from my feature checkout in ~/feature into ~/trunk repo. now i want to update ~/feature to be based on ~/trunk | 19:24 |
| lifeless | mgz: I can meet anytime, if now would be more convenient for you | 19:24 |
| lifeless | mgz: I just need 5 minutes to feed cats n stuff (I"ll be right back after that - let me know :P) | 19:25 |
| maxb | hexsprite: Please pastebin the output of "bzr info ~/feature" and "bzr info ~/trunk" - it will help explain the details of your situation | 19:25 |
| hexsprite | bzr info for both: http://pastebin.com/eMF1iiVD -- note ~/main a checkout of trunk and 1079_dojo is where I'm actively working on new features | 19:28 |
| mgz | lifeless: I'm ready when you're back | 19:28 |
| hexsprite | to get 1079_dojo up to date so should i be doing: bzr switch ~/main | 19:30 |
| lifeless | mgz: kk | 19:36 |
| lifeless | mgz: do you have skype ? | 19:36 |
| mgz | I don't have a decent mic to connect to the computer unfortunately | 19:37 |
| lifeless | kk | 19:37 |
| lifeless | ringing in a sec | 19:37 |
| jxself | http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/latest/en/whats-new/whats-new-in-2.4.html | 19:41 |
| jxself | Says 2.4 was released August 8? | 19:41 |
| jxself | http://bazaar.canonical.com/en/ disagrees | 19:41 |
| meme | hi im trying to use bzr to push source code to a launchpad project but i have no idea what im doing i think im doing it right but i get bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "/home/jadon/airscripts/.bzr/branch/": location is a repository. | 19:46 |
| meme | 19:46 | |
| meme | anyone able to help? | 19:47 |
| meme | anyone? | 19:50 |
| jxself | Relax. Be patient, young grasshopper. :) | 19:50 |
| beuno | meme, you're not in a branch, you're in a repostiry | 19:50 |
| meme | so i need to cd deeper tell im in a branch? | 19:51 |
| hexsprite | seems like bzr pull ~/main was what i needed | 19:55 |
| meme | well i did something that happend and now it does other stuff and it seems to work | 19:57 |
| === hexsprite_ is now known as hexsprite | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| Riddell | fullermd: pong | 22:08 |
| fullermd | Ohai. Um. Why was I pinging you? | 22:10 |
| * fullermd scratches his elbow. | 22:10 | |
| fullermd | Oyah. Are you doing much actively on qbzr? I noticed you popping up in the commit logs somewhat lately... | 22:11 |
| wilx | maxb: Thanks, that's probably it. I have only bzr-git 0.6.1 installed. | 22:56 |
| controversial | hi | 22:56 |
| controversial | i've tried svn, git, and hg, and i'm using hg right now. i'm curious about bzr though. how does that compare against hg | 22:57 |
| === krow_ is now known as krow | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!