kamal | hi Launchpad people... Uploading to my PPA just now yielded: | 01:17 |
---|---|---|
kamal | 550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ['General error', 'General error', 'General error'] : Permission denied. | 01:17 |
kamal | ... but to my surprise it actually did accept the upload. | 01:17 |
lifeless | yes | 01:19 |
kamal | oh and to clarify... the package *was* signed properly, and I upload to PPA's all the time and have never seen such a message. | 01:19 |
lifeless | bug 798957 | 01:19 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 798957 in Launchpad itself "Uploads are seemingly (but not actually) rejected" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 | 01:19 |
kamal | lifeless: that's it all right! thanks. | 01:20 |
lifeless | it will likely be 7-8 hours before we can fix, its scary but cosmetic - sorry. | 01:20 |
kamal | lifeless: np, I can live with that :-) | 01:20 |
=== lifeless changed the topic of #launchpad to: PPA uploads are working, it just looks bad: https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
micahg | lifeless: is that error this that bigjools posted about? https://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-dev/msg07751.html | 01:25 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
lifeless | micahg: no | 01:26 |
micahg | oh, no, it's the GPG one, right | 01:26 |
GTRsdk | hi | 01:40 |
GTRsdk | can someone help me get rid of a second account? | 01:40 |
GTRsdk | I need this one removed: https://launchpad.net/~i-rs | 01:42 |
lifeless | please open a ticket at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 01:46 |
GTRsdk | lifeless, using the account I want deleted? | 01:50 |
lifeless | GTRsdk: either. If you just want to merge them you can use the merge interface | 01:50 |
lifeless | https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/Merging | 01:50 |
GTRsdk | lifeless, I have put the question on the answers page | 01:51 |
GTRsdk | lifeless, should I assign someone? | 01:52 |
lifeless | no | 01:55 |
lifeless | no unless you are their manager ;) | 01:55 |
GTRsdk | lifeless, I'm merging them | 01:58 |
michaelh1 | Hi there. bzr branch lp:gcc-linaro is running terribly slowly today and has for the last ~4 hours. Any ideas? | 02:14 |
lifeless | micahg: canterbury internet being naffed ? | 02:15 |
michaelh1 | lifeless: nah, this is from EC2 in Virginia | 02:17 |
lifeless | hmm | 02:17 |
lifeless | using bzr+ssh | 02:17 |
lifeless | ? | 02:17 |
michaelh1 | It was fine ~9 am, went to kack around 11 am, is still slow | 02:17 |
michaelh1 | Yeah | 02:17 |
micahg | lifeless: hmm? | 02:25 |
lifeless | micahg: ? | 02:25 |
micahg | [21:15] <lifeless> micahg: canterbury internet being naffed ? | 02:25 |
lifeless | micahg: michaelh1 and I live in the same region; as far away as you can get from London | 02:26 |
micahg | lifeless: ah, just looks like tab complete failure :) | 02:26 |
michaelh1 | Yeah, you can have a cup of tea in the time it takes for a SSL handshake... | 02:26 |
lifeless | micahg: ah yes, tab fail. | 02:26 |
lifeless | micahg: + failure to read :> | 02:27 |
lifeless | micahg: sorry | 02:27 |
micahg | lifeless: no problem :) | 02:27 |
michaelh1 | 714kB 0kB/s \ Finding revisions and has been for 15 minutes... | 02:42 |
michaelh1 | (is slowly ticking along though) | 02:42 |
lifeless | possibly overloaded server | 02:42 |
lifeless | no sysadmins for a few hours though | 02:42 |
michaelh1 | Yip. Hopefully when it finishes this part it will be faster... | 02:43 |
michaelh1 | ...1203kB 0kB/s - Finding revisions | 02:59 |
RAOF | "debcheckout libglib2.0-0" errors out with: bzr: ERROR: Invalid http response for https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/glib/ubuntu/.bzr/branch-format: Unable to handle http code 405: expected 200 or 404 for full response.: | 03:16 |
wgrant | RAOF: s/code/bazaar/ | 03:16 |
RAOF | wgrant: Ta. The VCS-Bzr line needs to be updated, obviously. | 03:18 |
michaelh1 | 2301kB 0kB/s \ Finding revision | 03:40 |
* michaelh1 cancels the job until tomorrow... | 03:40 | |
=== michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
=== michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
cemc | I'm trying to upload some package to my PPA from ubuntu 10.04 with dput and I'm getting the following: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/667930/ | 05:24 |
cemc | yesterday I uploaded to another ppa the same way and it didn't complain. I tried that passive_ftp option it suggests but it doesn't work | 05:24 |
=== michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
=== michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
=== jtv is now known as jtv-eat | ||
michaelh1 | Any server admins about? My bzr branch lp:gcc-linaro/4.6 is terribly slow | 06:38 |
lifeless | cemc: thats the bug listed in the topic of the channel | 06:43 |
cemc | lifeless: indeed... sorry about that, didn't notice. thanks | 06:46 |
mrevell | Hello! | 08:07 |
benonsoftware | How do I find out what teams I am waiting to be approved on? | 09:01 |
cgregan | Hello Launchpad Team! I'm having a problem with a restriction in Blueprint subscription. It seems my Canonical Private team is not able to subscribe to a Blueprint. Is there a way to force this? | 09:14 |
lifeless | cgregan: known limitation | 09:23 |
cgregan | lifeless: workaround? | 09:24 |
lifeless | cgregan: if by force you mean 'make the blueprint error if anyone tries to view it', yes. | 09:24 |
lifeless | cgregan: don't use a private team :) - sorry, I know thats not great, but - let me dig up the bug. | 09:24 |
cgregan | lifeless: ok....hmm....problem is my team is a canonical only and we discuss internal company business on our mailing list | 09:24 |
lifeless | cgregan: basically we have very strict limits on the interactions private teams can have with othero objects; we *now* think we have a design where we can loosen this. | 09:25 |
cgregan | lifeless: great.....any ETA? Is there an LP working group I can follow to check in on progress? | 09:25 |
lifeless | its not currently scheduled for any team to work on, though I know most teams would love to do it :) | 09:26 |
lifeless | bug 405277 | 09:26 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 405277 in Launchpad itself "Private teams are not able to join other teams (public or private)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/405277 | 09:26 |
lifeless | cgregan: it may not look like its about the same thing, but its the same root cause. | 09:26 |
cgregan | thanks...I would be happy to put some Pints on the table to expedite! :-) | 09:26 |
lifeless | cgregan: I suggest you file a bug about this particular scenario (so we can make sure we fix it when we do the other work - or possibly fix it earlier) | 09:26 |
cgregan | great...will do | 09:27 |
lifeless | cgregan: are you in platform ? | 09:27 |
nigelb | ok, FYI, I now find it hard to subscribe myself to a bug. Well, at least not very intuitive. | 09:27 |
cgregan | lifeless: OEM Services | 09:27 |
lifeless | cgregan: what I mean to say is, there is an escalation process for getting stuff to queue jump - the stakeholders group | 09:27 |
cgregan | lifeless: ah..yes | 09:28 |
lifeless | cgregan: I think smagoun is the OEM rep to that group; you can raise the bug with him | 09:28 |
cgregan | lifeless: I have a stakeholder :smagoun | 09:28 |
lifeless | cgregan: (after filing it) | 09:28 |
cgregan | cool....I will | 09:28 |
cgregan | thanks for the info | 09:28 |
lifeless | nigelb: patches appreciated! | 09:28 |
lifeless | cgregan: no probs; this is an area we can make lots of improvements to | 09:28 |
nigelb | lifeless: I would, gladly, except its a UX thing which needs discussion more than patching. | 09:29 |
nigelb | I think a mail to launchpad-dev is in order maybe? | 09:29 |
lifeless | nigelb: uhm, kindof., | 09:29 |
lifeless | nigelb: there are bugs around this already; with some analysis. | 09:29 |
nigelb | oh good! | 09:29 |
lifeless | nigelb: I think you'll file mrevell can give some guidance on what the existing user testing found | 09:30 |
nigelb | lifeless: awesome, I'll shall poke when I get off work | 09:30 |
lifeless | yellow didn't get as long a run at the subscriptions as they had hoped, and some bits are more of a compromise situation than they wanted. | 09:30 |
mrevell | nigelb, Please do :) | 09:31 |
nigelb | aha! | 09:31 |
cgregan | lifeless: bugs for LP go here? https://bugs.launchpad.net/~launchpad | 09:35 |
benonsoftware | yeah | 09:35 |
nigelb | without the ~ I think | 09:35 |
lifeless | cgregan: thats the LP engineering team | 09:46 |
lifeless | cgregan: you want bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad | 09:46 |
cgregan | lifeless: sorry....yeah...no ~ | 09:46 |
cgregan | thanks | 09:46 |
michaelh1 | Any server admins about? My bzr branch lp:gcc-linaro/4.6 is terribly slow | 10:19 |
Laney | are the i386 buildds real or just i386 chrootson amd64? | 10:33 |
bigjools | PPA buildds are all virtual | 10:36 |
ajmitch | & the same for the ubuntu archive? i386 kernel & libs? | 10:37 |
dieck | ls | 10:41 |
dieck | sry, wrong terminal :) | 10:41 |
=== michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
bigjools | ubuntu builders are real | 10:44 |
wgrant | Laney: Some have i386 kernels, some have amd64. | 10:48 |
Laney | ok | 10:48 |
=== adeuring changed the topic of #launchpad to: PPA uploads are working, it just looks bad: https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
=== henninge is now known as henninge-lunch | ||
=== Mkaysi_ is now known as Mkaysi_|ZNC | ||
hakermania | Hello. I've made this project over here in launchpad: https://launchpad.net/wallpaper-changer The project is currently waiting for review in REVU for inclusion in 11.10. Do I have to open a PPA or a launchpad project in LP? | 12:37 |
jelmer | hakermania, a Launchpad project isn't necessary for REVU | 12:37 |
hakermania | jelmer, but it's the opposite here | 12:38 |
jelmer | hakermania, how do you mean? | 12:39 |
hakermania | REVU project is necessar in lp because it has to close a lp bug on its initial release. This mean that a lp project has to be created | 12:39 |
=== Mkaysi_|ZNC is now known as Mkaysi | ||
jelmer | hakermania, that bug should be filed against the "ubuntu" project in Launchpad | 12:46 |
hakermania | jelmer, i'm talking about the needs-packaging bug | 12:46 |
jelmer | hakermania, yes, that shouldn't be against the upstream project | 12:47 |
jelmer | hakermania, see the link on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages | 12:47 |
hakermania | jelmer, anyway, I made it against the upstream project and there's no problem (definitely, the reviewers care about bug's existence only). | 12:49 |
hakermania | jelmer, do you think the bug should be against ubuntu? | 12:51 |
jelmer | hakermania, yeah, it should be against ubuntu according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages | 12:54 |
jelmer | it looks like a bug task has already been opened against ubuntu on that bug | 12:54 |
beatpanic | good afternoon! stupid question about python launchpadlib, is it possible to login to launchpad with launchpadlib in an automatic fashion? I mean without browser intervention thanks! | 13:07 |
tumbleweed | beatpanic: browser intervention happens once, when you authorise the script forever (or for a limited time, if you choose) | 13:10 |
beatpanic | tumbleweed, ok, I understand now thanks | 13:11 |
directhex | what type of hardware is rothera ? | 13:16 |
=== henninge-lunch is now known as henninge | ||
=== Mkaysi is now known as Mkaysi|ZNC | ||
* directhex whistles the "everything's broken and i have no idea why" song | 14:49 | |
Laney | it wouldn't be so urgent but for the upgrade bug | 14:50 |
wgrant | directhex, Laney: Huh? | 14:56 |
directhex | <directhex> what type of hardware is rothera ? | 14:56 |
directhex | we've got mono failing to build on i386, but only on ubuntu buildds and some random mailing list person's xen vm. doesn't fail in debian or locally in pbuilder | 14:57 |
wgrant | rothera is not Xen, but that's about all I know. | 14:57 |
wgrant | Someone like lamont might know more. | 14:57 |
lamont | wgrant: rothera is an antartic base. that'd make it circa 2004 tech | 14:59 |
wgrant | I would have guessed 2004/2005, but that's not immensely useful :) | 14:59 |
directhex | can we try a rebuild on a different piece of tin? | 15:00 |
Laney | can you find out what machine built https://launchpadlibrarian.net/77383717/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.mono_2.10.4-2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz too? someone retried it before I Got to see | 15:00 |
lamont | model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz | 15:00 |
lamont | cpuinfo claims 2 | 15:00 |
Laney | lamont: what kernel? | 15:00 |
lamont | 2GB of RAM, 2GB of swap | 15:00 |
Laney | arch, I mean | 15:00 |
lamont | 32bit only | 15:00 |
lamont | 2.6.24-27-server | 15:01 |
wgrant | Laney: That was rothera. | 15:01 |
wgrant | Automatic build of mono_2.10.4-2 on rothera by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 | 15:01 |
Laney | ah yeah, didn't know what to look for | 15:01 |
Laney | ta | 15:01 |
Laney | so it got rothera twice. | 15:01 |
directhex | <directhex> can we try a rebuild on a different piece of tin? | 15:01 |
lamont | how is it dying? | 15:01 |
Laney | assertion failure when building the docs | 15:02 |
Laney | worked in debian | 15:02 |
Laney | and locally, and ppa | 15:02 |
Laney | locally was i386-on-amd64 though | 15:02 |
lamont | I wonder if it just plain runs itself out of disk | 15:02 |
lamont | er, swap | 15:02 |
directhex | we're not ram heavy | 15:02 |
directhex | what does this look like, java? | 15:03 |
lamont | the machine doesn't support 64-bit | 15:03 |
lamont | you said docs | 15:03 |
lamont | and hell, gettext is java these days, at least for part of it. makes me cry a little | 15:03 |
directhex | it builds on arm, don't those arm boxes lack ram? | 15:04 |
lamont | verily | 15:04 |
Laney | but does it build the docs? | 15:04 |
* lamont hip deep in some other stuff | 15:04 | |
directhex | Laney, yessir | 15:05 |
directhex | Laney, we do a full build of everything, so we can run the test suite | 15:05 |
Laney | fair cop | 15:05 |
directhex | so we did a successful build on the arm box "genip" | 15:05 |
achadwick | If I copy a PPA package named with "~maverick1" in my PPA's maverick series to a different one and ask it to be recompiled, will the ~maverick1 be replaced with, say ~natty1 automagically? | 15:07 |
Laney | zirconium built it last time | 15:07 |
* achadwick assumes this is the right place to ask that question. | 15:07 | |
bigjools | achadwick: no, it won't | 15:08 |
Laney | lamont: so if you can give it back to zirconium, that might be a useful test | 15:09 |
Laney | don't know if you can do that | 15:09 |
achadwick | Was guessing that was too much to ask. In my case I guess I do a -sa build targetted at Lucid as ~lucid1 and a -sd build following it for each of the other series I want to support in turn. | 15:16 |
bigjools | achadwick: you can't recompile the same source in different series anyway | 15:18 |
=== deryck changed the topic of #launchpad to: PPA uploads are working, it just looks bad: https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: deryck | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
achadwick | That's annoying. I assumed the .orig.tar.bz2 was series-independent. Mostly it's a pain because my source is absurdly huge. | 15:23 |
* achadwick sighs. Really need to organise more bandwidth. | 15:24 | |
nigelb | achadwick: work off a VPS maybe? | 15:24 |
=== beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
=== Mkaysi|ZNC is now known as Mkaysi | ||
deryck | Hi, abentley. Pitching to you. (I *think* this is the normal time, though I'm usually late.) :) | 17:00 |
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
=== beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
=== deryck changed the topic of #launchpad to: PPA uploads are working, it just looks bad: https://launchpad.net/bugs/798957 | https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: abentley | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
deryck | abentley, I pinged earlier, but I've formally handed off IRC to you now. :) | 19:30 |
abentley | deryck: gotcha. | 19:30 |
=== michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
meme | i need help useing bzr to push source to a project | 19:48 |
meme | anyone? | 19:50 |
abentley | meme: What's the problem you're having? | 19:57 |
meme | well i think i figured it out mostly i dont know how bzr workes and how it pushes stuff to a launchpad project but i think i am figureing it out | 20:07 |
achiang | hello, i've a question around the way that bzr and launchpad interact. let's say i have two branches: ~team/project/branch, and ~team/project/test. i submit a merge proposal from test => branch, it gets merged, and everyone is happy | 20:46 |
achiang | but i don't like ~team/project/test cluttering up launchpad code page. is it safe to delete that branch? | 20:46 |
achiang | i know that trunk will have all the commits from test, so bzr will do the right thing, but iirc, launchpad will also display a link to ~team/project/test and say that code was merged from there... so if that branch gets deleted from LP, does that break that feature? | 20:48 |
tumbleweed | achiang: the branch will get its status set to Merged, and thus not clutter up the code page any more | 20:59 |
achiang | tumbleweed: ah, that is interesting. so a merged branch isn't supposed to show up on code.lp.net/~team/project/ ? | 21:00 |
tumbleweed | the default is to show branches with an "active" status | 21:01 |
tumbleweed | there are two inactive statuses: merged and abandoned | 21:02 |
tumbleweed | you can still find them if you want to | 21:02 |
achiang | tumbleweed: ok, thanks. now i see what you're talking about -- there is a drop down that says, "branches with status" | 21:02 |
achiang | tumbleweed: so, i must be looking at a project that has many unmerged branches | 21:02 |
achiang | tumbleweed: thanks for the explanation | 21:03 |
tumbleweed | np | 21:03 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!