| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| DanaG | Say, if I can confirm an Expired bug, should I move it back to New, or Confirmed? | 02:54 |
|---|---|---|
| DanaG | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/677042 | 02:54 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 677042 in rhythmbox (Ubuntu) "rhythmbox removes song from library when external visualization is closed (affects: 5) (dups: 1) (heat: 28)" [Low,Expired] | 02:54 |
| yofel | confirmed in this case | 02:56 |
| DanaG | Thanks. | 02:57 |
| DanaG | How about this one? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/329012 | 02:59 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 329012 in linux (Ubuntu) "Add ipmisensors module to ubuntu kernel (affects: 7) (heat: 38)" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 02:59 |
| DanaG | Apport usually gives this: "You are not the reporter of this problem report." | 02:59 |
| yofel | DanaG: you don't apport-collect kernel bugs from other people. You file your own bug | 03:00 |
| DanaG | .....[sudo] password for dana: ...................... | 03:03 |
| DanaG | Nice... printing dots over the sudo. | 03:03 |
| DanaG | Done. Made my own bug, and added the link to dupe-of. | 03:09 |
| DanaG | Should I just mark duplicate myself? | 03:09 |
| DanaG | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/827775 | 03:09 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 827775 in linux (Ubuntu) "Add ipmisensors to Ubuntu kernel (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 03:09 |
| DanaG | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/329012 | 03:09 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 329012 in linux (Ubuntu) "Add ipmisensors module to ubuntu kernel (affects: 7) (heat: 38)" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 03:09 |
| yofel | if you think it's the exact same issue feel free to, I don't touch kernel bugs | 03:11 |
| DanaG | It's a wishlist, anyway. | 03:11 |
| === otubo is now known as otubo[AFK] | ||
| bdmurray | yofel: no, I noticed that too | 07:32 |
| bdmurray | I'td be great if someone were to report a bug as I'm at a sprint this week | 07:32 |
| === deegee__ is now known as drussell | ||
| bdmurray | I reported it as bug 827854 | 08:02 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 827854 in launchpad-gm-scripts "lp_stockreplies no longer working with new Launchpad forms (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827854 | 08:02 |
| bdmurray | mvo: bug 827776 is a new one to me. Is that type of error common? | 08:14 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 827776 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) "package isc-dhcp-common 4.1.1-P1-15ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827776 | 08:14 |
| mvo | bdmurray: I doubt it, but let me look at the logs | 08:22 |
| mvo | bdmurray: so that appears to be a problem with the filesystem again | 08:23 |
| bdmurray | mvo: right | 08:23 |
| mvo | bdmurray: would be nice to ask him to attach the file, I will do that now | 08:23 |
| bdmurray | I just hadn't seen that particular message before | 08:23 |
| mvo | yeah, me neither | 08:23 |
| bdmurray | mvo: there are about 6 more like it | 08:31 |
| === pedro__ is now known as pedro_ | ||
| === 92AADY244 is now known as tiagolramos | ||
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| bdmurray | mvo: bug 827736 is due to the order the packages are installed in? | 13:02 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 827736 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Upgrade from 10.10 to 11.04 fails because of isc-dhcp-client (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827736 | 13:02 |
| mvo | bdmurray: not in this case, the resolver does not manage to find a solution, let me check whats going on in the apt.log | 13:07 |
| === otubo[AFK] is now known as otubo | ||
| CarlFK | what's the command line image bin poster? | 13:50 |
| CarlFK | which I think it tied into one of the bug reporting tools | 13:50 |
| jibel | bdmurray, bug 828037 | 14:27 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 828037 in apport (Ubuntu) "package apport 1.21.3-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 101 (affects: 3) (dups: 2) (heat: 22)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/828037 | 14:28 |
| jibel | and good afternoon | 14:28 |
| velle_frak | Hello, could somebody please check out Bug #827157 which I marked as duplicate of bug Bug #827159 . | 14:29 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 827157 in transgui (Ubuntu) "Support Application Indicators (dup-of: 827159)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827157 | 14:29 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 827159 in vidalia (Ubuntu) "Support Application Indicators (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827159 | 14:29 |
| bdmurray | jibel: great, thanks | 14:29 |
| velle_frak | The package isn't the same, but I think it is the same problem. | 14:30 |
| jibel | velle_frak, these bugs are not duplicates. both application must be added to the whitelist. different applications = different bugs or tasks | 14:32 |
| velle_frak | Oh ok, thx for the info. I thought the problem could be in upstream code and was not really application related. What do you mean by whitelist? | 14:33 |
| paultag | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitelist :) | 14:33 |
| velle_frak | :) | 14:33 |
| hggdh | jibel, bdmurray, pedro_ : good afternoon | 14:37 |
| pedro_ | hggdh, good morning Sir Carlos, how are you today? | 14:37 |
| * hggdh misses charlie_tca | 14:37 | |
| hggdh | pedro_: life could be better, but it would hurt | 14:38 |
| hggdh | :-) | 14:38 |
| jibel | velle_frak, gory technical details there https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopExperienceTeam/ApplicationIndicators | 14:38 |
| jibel | Good morning hggdh | 14:39 |
| pedro_ | afternoon jibel :-) | 14:40 |
| jibel | good afertnoon pedro_ | 14:40 |
| jibel | *afternoon | 14:41 |
| velle_frak | Hmmmm, ok, thx jibel, maybe that will shed some light on the issue for me..... | 14:41 |
| jibel | velle_frak, if you plan writing indicators sure that will do, if you don't, then don't bother reading the doc and unduplicate :) | 14:42 |
| velle_frak | lol, i want to learn some more about insides, but, just in case that i might give up reading after a few lines, the bugs are already unduplicated ;). | 14:45 |
| * jibel updates his main laptop and reboots. finger crossed | 15:00 | |
| jibel | brb | 15:00 |
| === pedro__ is now known as pedro_ | ||
| hggdh | QA meeting in 8 minutes on #ubuntu-meeting | 16:52 |
| === otubo is now known as otubo[AFK] | ||
| === otubo[AFK] is now known as otubo | ||
| lfaraone | uh, does anybody else see a reason why bug 813134 should be private? | 19:45 |
| ubot4 | lfaraone: Bug 813134 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/813134 is private | 19:45 |
| lfaraone | I don't even think its a security vulnerability | 19:46 |
| lfaraone | bdmurray: ^^ | 19:46 |
| bdmurray | lfaraone: I don't see a specific reason | 19:49 |
| lfaraone | bdmurray: mk. looks to me just like a mistaken user on both counts... shall I remove the private and security bits? | 19:49 |
| bdmurray | lfaraone: sounds good to me | 19:51 |
| lfaraone | mk, thx | 19:53 |
| njin | hello, wich is the package for update-apt-xapi ? thanks Fabio | 20:25 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === plars_ is now known as plars | ||
| === otubo is now known as otubo[AFK] | ||
| hggdh | micahg: ok, I found the place. It is not dh_install, but dh_python2 | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!