[02:54] <DanaG> Say, if I can confirm an Expired bug, should I move it back to New, or Confirmed?
[02:54] <DanaG> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/677042
[02:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 677042 in rhythmbox (Ubuntu) "rhythmbox removes song from library when external visualization is closed (affects: 5) (dups: 1) (heat: 28)" [Low,Expired]
[02:56] <yofel> confirmed in this case
[02:57] <DanaG> Thanks.
[02:59] <DanaG> How about this one? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/329012
[02:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 329012 in linux (Ubuntu) "Add ipmisensors module to ubuntu kernel (affects: 7) (heat: 38)" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[02:59] <DanaG> Apport usually gives this: "You are not the reporter of this problem report."
[03:00] <yofel> DanaG: you don't apport-collect kernel bugs from other people. You file your own bug
[03:03] <DanaG> .....[sudo] password for dana: ......................
[03:03] <DanaG> Nice... printing dots over the sudo.
[03:09] <DanaG> Done.  Made my own bug, and added the link to dupe-of.
[03:09] <DanaG> Should I just mark duplicate myself?
[03:09] <DanaG> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/827775
[03:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 827775 in linux (Ubuntu) "Add ipmisensors to Ubuntu kernel (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[03:09] <DanaG> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/329012
[03:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 329012 in linux (Ubuntu) "Add ipmisensors module to ubuntu kernel (affects: 7) (heat: 38)" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[03:11] <yofel> if you think it's the exact same issue feel free to, I don't touch kernel bugs
[03:11] <DanaG> It's a wishlist, anyway.
[07:32] <bdmurray> yofel: no, I noticed that too
[07:32] <bdmurray> I'td be great if someone were to report a bug as I'm at a sprint this week
[08:02] <bdmurray> I reported it as bug 827854
[08:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 827854 in launchpad-gm-scripts "lp_stockreplies no longer working with new Launchpad forms (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827854
[08:14] <bdmurray> mvo: bug 827776 is a new one to me.  Is that type of error common?
[08:14] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 827776 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) "package isc-dhcp-common 4.1.1-P1-15ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827776
[08:22] <mvo> bdmurray: I doubt it, but let me look at the logs
[08:23] <mvo> bdmurray: so that appears to be a problem with the filesystem again
[08:23] <bdmurray> mvo: right
[08:23] <mvo> bdmurray: would be nice to ask him to attach the file, I will do that now
[08:23] <bdmurray> I just hadn't seen that particular message before
[08:23] <mvo> yeah, me neither
[08:31] <bdmurray> mvo: there are about 6 more like it
[13:02] <bdmurray> mvo: bug 827736 is due to the order the packages are installed in?
[13:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 827736 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Upgrade from 10.10 to 11.04 fails because of isc-dhcp-client (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827736
[13:07] <mvo> bdmurray: not in this case, the resolver does not manage to find a solution, let me check whats going on in the apt.log
[13:50] <CarlFK> what's the command line image bin poster?
[13:50] <CarlFK> which I think it tied into one of the bug reporting tools
[14:27] <jibel> bdmurray, bug 828037
[14:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 828037 in apport (Ubuntu) "package apport 1.21.3-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 101 (affects: 3) (dups: 2) (heat: 22)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/828037
[14:28] <jibel> and good afternoon
[14:29] <velle_frak> Hello, could somebody please check out Bug #827157 which I marked as duplicate of bug Bug #827159 .
[14:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 827157 in transgui (Ubuntu) "Support Application Indicators (dup-of: 827159)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827157
[14:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 827159 in vidalia (Ubuntu) "Support Application Indicators (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827159
[14:29] <bdmurray> jibel: great, thanks
[14:30] <velle_frak> The package isn't the same, but I think it is the same problem.
[14:32] <jibel> velle_frak, these bugs are not duplicates. both application must be added to the whitelist. different applications = different bugs or tasks
[14:33] <velle_frak> Oh ok, thx for the info. I thought the problem could be in upstream code and was not really application related. What do you mean by whitelist?
[14:33] <paultag> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitelist :)
[14:33] <velle_frak> :)
[14:37] <hggdh> jibel, bdmurray, pedro_ : good afternoon
[14:37] <pedro_> hggdh, good morning Sir Carlos, how are you today?
[14:37]  * hggdh misses charlie_tca
[14:38] <hggdh> pedro_: life could be better, but it would hurt
[14:38] <hggdh> :-)
[14:38] <jibel> velle_frak, gory technical details there https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopExperienceTeam/ApplicationIndicators
[14:39] <jibel> Good morning hggdh
[14:40] <pedro_> afternoon jibel :-)
[14:40] <jibel> good afertnoon pedro_
[14:41] <jibel> *afternoon
[14:41] <velle_frak> Hmmmm, ok, thx jibel, maybe that will shed some light on the issue for me.....
[14:42] <jibel> velle_frak, if you plan writing indicators sure that will do, if you don't, then don't bother reading the doc and unduplicate :)
[14:45] <velle_frak> lol, i want to learn some more about insides, but, just in case that i might give up reading after a few lines, the bugs are already unduplicated ;).
[15:00]  * jibel updates his main laptop and reboots. finger crossed
[15:00] <jibel> brb
[16:52] <hggdh> QA meeting in 8 minutes on #ubuntu-meeting
[19:45] <lfaraone> uh, does anybody else see a reason why bug 813134 should be private?
[19:45] <ubot4> lfaraone: Bug 813134 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/813134 is private
[19:46] <lfaraone> I don't even think its a security vulnerability
[19:46] <lfaraone> bdmurray: ^^
[19:49] <bdmurray> lfaraone: I don't see a specific reason
[19:49] <lfaraone> bdmurray: mk. looks to me just like a mistaken user on both counts... shall I remove the private and security bits?
[19:51] <bdmurray> lfaraone: sounds good to me
[19:53] <lfaraone> mk, thx
[20:25] <njin> hello, wich is the package for update-apt-xapi ? thanks Fabio
[23:44] <hggdh> micahg: ok, I found the place. It is not dh_install, but dh_python2