[01:34] <X-Man> hello
[01:34] <X-Man> evening everyone
[13:34] <OwaisL> Hey guys, I upgraded packages on oneiric and skype stopped working. It is complaining about missing .so files. ia32libs was among the upgraded packages, probably the problem lies there. did anyone else notice this?
[13:35] <stgraber> wouldn't surprise me if the current move to multiarch broke it
[13:35] <mdeslaur> hmm...I have the problem also.
[13:36] <stgraber> AFAIK skype isn't in the partner repository for oneiric yet, so we're currently stuck with the natty packaging
[13:37] <stgraber> oneiric's packaging will likely depend on the multi-arch libs rather than using ia32-libs
[13:37] <stgraber> you may be able to fix your problem by manually installing the missing libraries using their i386 version on oneiric (<package name>:i386)
[13:38] <mdeslaur> so, I think the best way to fix this is to uninstall the skype amd64 package that came from natty's partner repo, and install the i386 skype package from natty
[13:38] <mdeslaur> that way, all the i386 dependencies get automatically pulled in
[13:38] <OwaisL> stgraber, I did that with --force-architecture but it didn't work. then I tried to manually extract the libs to lib32. that worked but then it started crying about other libs.
[13:38] <mdeslaur> and the fake amd64 packages for i386 binaries need to disappear in oneiric
[13:39] <mdeslaur> OwaisL: did you convert your oneiric to be multiarch?
[13:39] <OwaisL> no, I've no idea how to do that.
[13:39] <mdeslaur> OwaisL: echo foreign-architecture i386 > /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch
[13:39] <mdeslaur> that should enable i386 packages and apt repos
[13:40] <mdeslaur> OwaisL: see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2011-August/000886.html
[13:40] <OwaisL> Thanks, I'll try it out.
[13:40] <mdeslaur> yep, that fixed it for me, I removed skype amd64 and installed skype i386 and it pulled in everything automatically
[13:41] <mdeslaur> multiarch ftw
[13:41] <stgraber> yeah, that's definitely the way to go
[13:41] <OwaisL> mdeslaur, that's great. why doesn't the multiarch deb automatically add this line?
[13:42] <mdeslaur> OwaisL: it's now by default in oneiric, but if you had updated to oneiric before it happened, your config file doesn't contain the line. Read slangasek's posting I pasted.
[13:43] <OwaisL> Ok, thanks a ton!
[13:43] <mdeslaur> np
[13:43] <stgraber> I guess most of the partner repository will have to be converted to that
[13:43] <mdeslaur> die.ia32-libs.die.die.die
[13:44] <mdeslaur> well, there's probably only one or two packages in the partner repo that actually has i386 binaries in a amd64 deb
[13:45] <OwaisL> haha
[14:38] <lucidfox> Huh, why are application titles in the Unity global menu now displayed in DejaVu Serif?
[14:39] <lucidfox> Is it a bug or a feature?
[18:03] <bigon> dupondje: about mutter it needs clutter from 1.7 branch
[18:03] <bigon> :/
[18:03] <ricotz> bigon, it is on its way
[18:04] <bigon> oh ok :)
[18:05] <ricotz> bigon, if you like you can review the debian branches, pochu wont have time before 29th
[22:34] <OwaisL> Hey, I'm facing a problem with Gtk. If I add a Gtk.Switch to a toolbar which has 'primary-toolbar' style property added, the Switch widgets becomes unclickable. It becomes draggable and whole app is dragged. It looks like if "primary-toolbar" property is set on toolbar, the drag signal of toolbar takes precedence over click signal of switch.
[22:57] <jbicha> OwaisL: well it works in gnome-control-center user-accounts
[22:59] <OwaisL> jbicha, I mean the Switch widget in on the toolbar as a ToolItem unlike control-center
[23:00] <OwaisL> jbicha, probably you are talking about the lock button.
[23:01] <jbicha> yeah I got them confused
[23:03] <jbicha> you could try asking in Gnome #gtk I'm not much of a developer
[23:03] <OwaisL> jbicha, Ah, they rarely reply. :( Anyways, thanks!
[23:05] <jbicha> you could try opening a bug about it
[23:08] <OwaisL> jbicha. already did :)