[18:40] <ricotz> hello, are there packages for the cuda sdk available?
[18:40] <ricotz> bjsnider, ^
[19:15] <bjsnider> no, i don't think so. i think you have to build that manually
[19:17] <bjsnider> only the cuda header is included with the blob packages
[20:15] <ricotz> bjsnider, ok, i was hoping there are some already since this is a pretty big thing ;)
[20:23] <bjsnider> ricotz, did you check debian?
[20:23] <ricotz> http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nvidia-cuda-toolkit.html
[20:23] <bjsnider> i don't remember if i did
[20:23] <ricotz> bjsnider, just did
[20:24] <bjsnider> i guess there just isn't enough interest yet to get it fully tested and into ubuntu and whatnot
[20:25] <ricotz> probably, but it looks like it could be just synced
[20:26] <bjsnider> i don't know what the rules are
[20:26] <bjsnider> is it ok to sync something in experimental?
[20:27] <ricotz> yes, this isnt a problem
[20:28] <ricotz> but as you said there wasnt an interest to add it to ubuntu yet
[20:28] <ricotz> the packaging is also multiarch compatible
[20:28] <bjsnider> cool
[20:30] <ricotz> but it is probably too late for oneiric and it isnt important enough for a FFe
[20:30] <bjsnider> i don't know what it hurts
[20:31] <bjsnider> it's not there now at all, so i don't see how it's going to break anything just to have it available
[20:33] <ricotz> right, it shouldnt do no harm, but this isnt a reason for a FeatureFreezeException ;)
[20:33] <bjsnider> is khronos-opencl-headers in ubuntu? it's a dependency
[20:34] <ricotz> no
[20:35] <bjsnider> well, you can put it in a ppa anyway
[20:35] <ricotz> exactly