[08:18] <mrevell> Hi
[09:17] <bigjools> DNS777: ping
[11:06] <czajkowski> mrevell: so glad my bug on how to suscribe to a bug is confusing to other people also
[11:09] <mrevell> czajkowski: I'm gonna take a look at it this afternoon.
[11:10] <czajkowski> mrevell: :) yay
[11:10] <mrevell> :)
[12:04] <nigelb> mrevell: hehe, cute vid :)
[12:04] <nigelb> where do you find these gems? :P
[12:20] <mrevell> nigelb, It's lodged in my brain as a memory of 1990s Britain :)
[12:21] <nigelb> mrevell: heh :)
[12:25] <nyuszika7h> benji: o_O How did you change topic without being opped?
[12:25] <nyuszika7h> Oh, no +t.
[12:25] <benji> I'm just cool like that.
[12:25] <nyuszika7h> I first thought that you're an IRCop or something, but whois would have shown that,
[12:28] <zyga-siesta> I cannot seem to call launchpad.me.getPPAByName() as anonymous user, is this expected?
[12:29] <wgrant> zyga-siesta: launchpad.me doesn't make sense when anonymous.
[12:29] <wgrant> Since the anonymous user hopefully doesn't have PPAs.
[12:29] <zyga-siesta> wgrant, oh
[12:29] <zyga-siesta> wgrant, so how should I call this?
[12:29] <wgrant> launchpad.people['someperson'].getPPAByName(name='someppa')
[12:30] <zyga-siesta> I just want to avoid having to authenticate as anything, the ppa is public and I will only do read request
[12:30] <zyga-siesta> ?
[12:30] <zyga-siesta> wgrant, I need to know the owner of the PPA?
[12:30] <wgrant> zyga-siesta: Yes. PPA names are local to the owner.
[12:30] <wgrant> eg. the default name is 'ppa'.
[12:30] <zyga-siesta> wgrant, ah
[12:31] <zyga-siesta> wgrant, I know about that, I just misunderstood the ppa
[12:31] <zyga-siesta> wgrant, I used to call "launchpadlib.me.getPPAByName("someuser/ppa")
[12:31] <zyga-siesta> wgrant, the "name" is certainly confusing I'd say
[12:31] <zyga-siesta> ok
[12:31] <wgrant> zyga-siesta: Well, look at what object it is on :)
[12:31] <wgrant> getPPAByName is on person.
[12:33] <zyga-siesta> ah, right
[12:33] <zyga-siesta> I find the API confusing still but that works
[12:33] <zyga-siesta> thanjks
[15:14] <AlecTaylor> hi
[15:14] <AlecTaylor> I'm looking for a good (locally-hostable) Intranet frontend which integrates with Active Directory (including groups). Know of one?
[15:45] <dieck> AlecTaylor: I suppose #launchpad is not the right location to ask about this feature, but Plone interacts nicely with AD
[15:45] <dieck> once set up correctly, which can be a pita
[15:50] <AlecTaylor> Hmm
[15:50] <AlecTaylor> Thanks
[17:27] <cnd> who can I ask about lp:ubuntu/gvfs being out of date?
[17:41] <maxb> http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/ is the first place to check
[17:49] <cnd> maxb: looks like it's due to an error: http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/gvfs.html#2011-07-07 12:41:25.638781
[17:49] <cnd> what should I do with this information?
[17:50] <cnd> is it likely to be fixed any time soon, or should I fall back to creating debdiffs until it is resolved?
[17:50] <maxb> The error can mainly be summed up as the importer having a disagreement with a manually committed revision, and further interacting with what turned out to be an unwise call in setting append_revisions_only on package branches without fully analysing the kind of things the importer does to them
[17:52] <cnd> maxb: thanks for the explanation of the error :), do you know if it is something that will be fixed soon?
[17:53] <maxb> It could probably be fixed right now by backing out the append_revisions_only setting
[17:54] <maxb> Is it something you were hoping to work on right now?
[17:57] <cnd> maxb: I'm trying to help someone else by being a good patch pilot :)
[17:57] <cnd> and they are very responsive right now
[17:58] <cnd> so it would help to have a fix and get the branch updated asap
[17:58] <cnd> but it's not a huge deal in the grand scheme of things
[18:31] <cnd> maxb: thanks for fixing the gvfs branch issue!
[18:31] <maxb> ah, it completed
[18:31] <maxb> I wasn't certain it would :-)
[18:31] <cnd> heh
[20:49] <soren> If someone accidentally posted sensitive information in a bug comment, how can he get it deleted?
[20:49] <soren> File a question against launchpad?
[21:01] <doko> DNS777, may I ask, what you are testing in your PPA? these are mostly packages which do not change. why test them daily?
[21:32] <flacoste> soren: yes
[21:32] <flacoste> soren: specifying the bug and comment number # and an admin will hide the comment
[22:17] <soren> flacoste: Thanks.
[22:18] <mwhudson> not even an admin, any lp developer can do it