| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| al-maisan | hello there, how does one specify a dependency on package X >=1.5.0,<2.0.0 ? | 05:32 |
|---|---|---|
| Rhonda | Like you wrote. :) | 05:35 |
| mase_work | looks good to me | 05:35 |
| al-maisan | ah, I see, thanks :) | 05:36 |
| Rhonda | Depends X (>= 1.5.0Depends: wesnoth-1.9-core (>= 1:1.9.3-1), wesnoth-1.9-core (<< 1:1.9.3-1.~) | 05:36 |
| Rhonda | bleah :) | 05:37 |
| Rhonda | Depends: wesnoth-1.9-core (>= 1:1.9.3-1), wesnoth-1.9-core (<< 1:1.9.3-1.~) | 05:37 |
| al-maisan | ah, the package name needs to be repeated .. I see | 05:38 |
| Rhonda | Yes, that's pretty tight. But needed within Debian to allow binNMUs | 05:38 |
| Rhonda | al-maisan: the debian/rules magic for that is a fair bit weird | 05:38 |
| al-maisan | so, "Depends: python-dateutil (>= 1.5), python-dateutil (<< 2.0)" would be right? | 05:39 |
| Rhonda | Looks good, yes | 05:40 |
| al-maisan | great, thanks! | 05:40 |
| Rhonda | I'd even use 2.0~ | 05:40 |
| al-maisan | what is the effect of the '~'? | 05:40 |
| Rhonda | to nog get troubles with pre releases | 05:40 |
| Rhonda | Lower than anything, even the empty string | 05:41 |
| al-maisan | ok, will make use of it | 05:41 |
| Rhonda | so it is used eg for 2.0~rc1 to later be able to upgrade to 2.0 | 05:42 |
| al-maisan | ah, I see | 05:42 |
| * Rhonda . o O ( When you see me not shifting anything, not fixing typos and not responding soon, I am probably mobile and type singlehanded ;P ) | 05:44 | |
| al-maisan | ah :) | 05:48 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === StevenK is now known as W4|_|_YW0R|_D | ||
| === W4|_|_YW0R|_D is now known as StevenK | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:20 |
| hakermania | How did it go yesterday? I mean with the BetaFreeze and UIFreeze :) | 07:41 |
| pmjdebruijn | hi again | 08:13 |
| pmjdebruijn | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/78130735/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.libvirt_0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5unnet0~lucid_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 08:13 |
| pmjdebruijn | I have a pacakge build failing because it can't find any kernel stuff in /boot | 08:13 |
| pmjdebruijn | any advice on dealing with this? | 08:13 |
| pmjdebruijn | I guess I could hack out the test | 08:14 |
| pmjdebruijn | but then again I wonder how the package built on the original build farm? are they different from the ppa build farm? | 08:14 |
| geser | pmjdebruijn: it already skips those tests (Skipping /boot/initrd* tests. Could not find /boot/initrd*). The one that failed it before it: FAIL: daemon-conf | 08:19 |
| geser | pmjdebruijn: the official build skipped those initrd tests too but it also had a check for Ubuntu buildd for the failed one: Skipping valid config (Ubuntu buildd FTBFS) | 08:22 |
| geser | you might need to check why it doesn't trigger for PPA builds | 08:22 |
| pmjdebruijn | oh | 08:32 |
| pmjdebruijn | right | 08:32 |
| pmjdebruijn | ok | 08:32 |
| pmjdebruijn | thanks | 08:33 |
| pmjdebruijn | geser: crap it had a debian-changes-... patch affecting daemon-conf | 09:04 |
| pmjdebruijn | so I somehow broke it myself | 09:04 |
| pmjdebruijn | clear case of PEBKAC | 09:04 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| jtaylor | cnocerning this sru: https://code.launchpad.net/~jtaylor/ubuntu/natty/meld/meld-sru/+merge/72410 | 09:18 |
| jtaylor | it was approved but nothing uploaded, should I subscribe -release to the bugs now or will a sponsor have another look later? | 09:19 |
| geser | jtaylor: usually the SRU teams reviews from the upload queue, you need to find a sponsor for the upload | 09:23 |
| === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth | ||
| Laney | a sponsor needs to upload it as normal, yeah | 09:44 |
| jtaylor | k I'll wait then | 09:45 |
| jtaylor | hm as they review from the upload queue how will bug 811721 be handled which is waiting for an approval before anything is uploaded? | 09:46 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 811721 in tahoe-lafs (Ubuntu) "update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/811721 | 09:46 |
| Laney | get it uploaded | 09:49 |
| jtaylor | I am waiting for a decision if I should backport it or instead do some version number patching | 09:50 |
| geser | jtaylor: I'd suggest to try to reach them on IRC instead of waiting on a comment in the bug | 09:58 |
| jtaylor | geser: do they have an irc channel or do I just ask in -devel/privmsg? | 10:08 |
| geser | jtaylor: I'd try ping them in #ubuntu-devel | 10:16 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: did you see debbug 516689 | 12:20 |
| jtaylor | hm no, missed that affects 3.10, thx for checking | 12:26 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofle | ||
| === yofle is now known as yofel | ||
| === Nigel_ is now known as G | ||
| bpoole | jrib, thanks, so you would suggest something like this? http://pastebin.com/GamxrPNH | 14:30 |
| === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat | ||
| al-maisan | Hmm .. a package of mine failed to build with "Found files in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages (must be in dist-packages for python2.7)." | 14:55 |
| al-maisan | Any idea what that means and how it should be fixed? | 14:56 |
| al-maisan | This is the build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/78180839/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.python-dateutil_1.5-3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 14:56 |
| * al-maisan looks at the MANIFEST.in | 14:58 | |
| jtaylor | al-maisan: pass --install-layout=deb to setup.py install | 14:59 |
| al-maisan | do I need to override some target in rules to do that? | 14:59 |
| jtaylor | it appears it is already overriden | 15:01 |
| jtaylor | dh_auto_install usually does it right | 15:01 |
| jtaylor | you aren't using python packaging helpers? | 15:01 |
| al-maisan | I do not see "--install-layout=deb" being passed in the build log though | 15:01 |
| jtaylor | yes its missing | 15:02 |
| al-maisan | jtaylor: I did a dh_make and used the debian/rules it generated .. | 15:02 |
| jtaylor | add --with python2 to the dh $@ line | 15:02 |
| al-maisan | ah, ok, will try that, thanks! | 15:03 |
| tumbleweed | al-maisan: is there a Makefile in that source? it looks like you may want to pass dh --buildsystem=python_distutils | 15:04 |
| al-maisan | tumbleweed: actually there is one, http://paste.ubuntu.com/675313/ | 15:05 |
| tumbleweed | yeah, so tell dh not to use it :) | 15:06 |
| al-maisan | .. or remove it? | 15:06 |
| === dupondje_ is now known as dupondje | ||
| al-maisan | jtaylor, tumbleweed : thank you very much for your help ! | 15:08 |
| tumbleweed | al-maisan: yeah you could remove it, but you need to be sure you do that before dh tries to work out what buildsystem to use, which gets tricky | 15:08 |
| al-maisan | hmm .. I see .. I will give it a try and see how it goes .. thanks again! | 15:09 |
| jtaylor | passing --buildsystem works fine though | 15:10 |
| al-maisan | ok | 15:10 |
| jtaylor | I have a pacakge where I use distutils for most and a makefile for tests ^^ | 15:10 |
| al-maisan | ah, I see .. will use "--buildsystem=python_distutils" then | 15:10 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| keffie_jayx | Hello guys , i am currently working on a package that has changed significantly, Upstream has decided to split the core so it can be reused by other aplications, this core should be packaged as a share library package? | 15:37 |
| keffie_jayx | or should I just split the packages into two binary pacakges | 15:37 |
| === raju1 is now known as raju | ||
| === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero | ||
| Daviey | I'm not on crack am I? http://pb.daviey.com/ieni/ is 3 clause BSD, right? | 18:49 |
| broder | Daviey: it matches the 3-clause license on wikipedia :) | 18:52 |
| Daviey | $ licensecheck lcptools/readpol.c | 18:52 |
| Daviey | lcptools/readpol.c: BSD (2 clause) | 18:52 |
| Daviey | go figure :/ | 18:52 |
| Daviey | ISTR reading about someone else encountering that issue. | 18:52 |
| Rhonda | The issue is this: | 18:58 |
| Rhonda | elsif ($licensetext =~ /(The name of .*? may not|Neither the names? of .*? nor the names of (its|their) contributors may) be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software/i | 18:58 |
| broder | is it just not matching across the newline/asterisk? | 18:59 |
| Rhonda | no | 19:00 |
| Rhonda | The missing "of" infront of Intel Corporation is the issue | 19:00 |
| Rhonda | Add a "of" infront of intel in that file, run licensecheck on it again, and see | 19:00 |
| Rhonda | I would guess that the of should be left off in the match | 19:01 |
| Daviey | Yeah, that isn't a patch i'll be carrying. | 19:01 |
| Daviey | :) | 19:01 |
| broder | or /(The name (of )?.*? may not|Neither the names? (of )?.*? etc, etc | 19:01 |
| Rhonda | s/of // in that line isn't a patch you would like to submit to licensecheck? | 19:01 |
| Rhonda | broder: That makes no sense. | 19:01 |
| broder | change the regex to deal with the absence of the "of" | 19:02 |
| Rhonda | (of )? directly infront of .*? is … "irrelevant", as seven-of-nine would say. | 19:02 |
| broder | ha. good point | 19:02 |
| Rhonda | .*? itself would deal with that already. | 19:02 |
| Rhonda | So strip the of off (hah) | 19:03 |
| Rhonda | ah, adsb! | 19:03 |
| * Rhonda . o O ( debcheckout -a devscripts ) | 19:06 | |
| Rhonda | broder, Daviey: Patch will be submitted soonish. | 19:06 |
| Rhonda | broder, Daviey: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=devscripts/devscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=1c2016 | 19:17 |
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| hakermania | sladen, Hello again, what about my next move now :) ? | 21:50 |
| sladen | hakermania: you want your (now approved package) uploading | 21:50 |
| hakermania | sladen, by who? | 21:51 |
| sladen | well probably by me | 21:51 |
| micahg | sladen: yep, it's all you :) | 21:52 |
| hakermania | heh, thanks if you do so | 21:52 |
| sladen | micahg: remind me, are we allowed to sponsor new packages to Universe after FF / | 21:53 |
| micahg | sladen: if there's an FFe granter | 21:53 |
| micahg | *granted | 21:53 |
| * micahg doesn't know where the FFE bug is, hakermania? | 21:55 | |
| sladen | micahg: mmm, technically I'm not sure a wallpaper changer is essential, so probably doesn't deserve one :( | 21:55 |
| micahg | sladen: I think it was already granted | 21:56 |
| micahg | this was the second cycle hakermania has tried to get it in | 21:56 |
| sladen | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/824102 | 21:57 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 824102 in Ubuntu "FFE: Wallch 2.0" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 21:57 |
| hakermania | micahg: sladen, thanks | 21:58 |
| hakermania | Yes it is already granted :D | 21:58 |
| hakermania | Laney, ;) | 21:59 |
| hakermania | but the Kate Stewart who replied the request confused me a bit, (s)he was probably wrong | 21:59 |
| micahg | hakermania: she's the release manager ;) | 22:02 |
| micahg | sladen: ah, the FFe is conditional on finding an AA who's gulli^H^H^H^H^Hkind enough to review it | 22:03 |
| sladen | micahg: hakermania suckered me into that yesterday | 22:04 |
| sladen | micahg: so by my (optimistic reading), that means we're good to go, right :) | 22:04 |
| micahg | sladen: I think the uploader needs to find the AA that's willing to review it :) | 22:05 |
| micahg | hakermania: I think she was missing that it's a new package with no dependencies | 22:05 |
| hakermania | Nice, what's an AA? | 22:05 |
| micahg | hakermania: archive admin | 22:05 |
| hakermania | aha, are there multiple ones around :D ? | 22:06 |
| micahg | probably not on a Friday afternoon/evening | 22:06 |
| Daviey | hakermania: Wait, are you trying to get wallch installed by default? | 22:06 |
| hakermania | Daviey, no, absolutely not | 22:06 |
| Daviey | good stuff | 22:07 |
| ScottK | micahg: I don't think she was missing that. One of the main reasons not to continue to allow a steady stream of new packages into the archive late in the cycle is the archive-admins generally need to be busy with other stuff. | 22:10 |
| ScottK | So "If someone has time to review it" is a reasonable basis for an FFe approval. | 22:10 |
| hakermania | ScottK, I think that nobody disagrees with this | 22:12 |
| sladen | ScottK: so, happy to NEW it if I upload? | 22:13 |
| ScottK | sladen: No. Busy with other things. | 22:14 |
| hakermania | Is ScottK an AA? | 22:15 |
| Daviey | hakermania: wow, you've had a pretty drawn out process trying to get it in the archive. | 22:15 |
| hakermania | Daviey, I know :'( | 22:16 |
| hakermania | lol | 22:16 |
| hakermania | Daviey, there are also 1.0 tries in there... Being a complete newbie in pacaging and with a brief knowledge of english it isn't so easy :P | 22:17 |
| Daviey | hakermania: good effort on your perseverance, sorry it's been such a challenge. | 22:18 |
| hakermania | Daviey, sorry? I'm glad that the system is so strict | 22:18 |
| hakermania | sladen, thanks for the comment, can you please tell me some AA to kindly ask them for marking wallch as 'NEW' (if I got it right) | 22:22 |
| Daviey | hakermania: The issue is that archive admins need to review the package, and as we are in a beta freeze - they are mostly tied up with more pressing tasks. It's not just a case of them hitting approve. | 22:25 |
| hakermania | Daviey, I got it, what do you suggest | 22:26 |
| hakermania | ? | 22:26 |
| Daviey | hakermania: either get it in Debian or see if you have more success on Monday. | 22:35 |
| sladen | hakermania: I have passed a small anonymous brown paper bag to an archive admin on your behalf | 22:37 |
| hakermania | sladen, containing money :P ? | 22:39 |
| hakermania | Daviey, thanks for the suggestion by I don't think that it's applicable, with so many uploads to REVU each one separately containing hours of searching on the net, I think it deserves going through ubuntu now that's finally OK. It is designed to work on ubuntu better, after all | 22:40 |
| hakermania | sladen, thanks whatever you do(or did) :D Goodnight | 23:01 |
| micahg | ScottK: Laney made the conditional approval on AA time, did I say anything contrary to that? | 23:03 |
| ScottK | micahg: I should have directed that at hakermania. Sorry. | 23:04 |
| micahg | ScottK: no problem :) | 23:05 |
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!