[03:09] <micahg> DktrKranz: did you mean to subscribe sponsors for bug 835416?  it's in universe now, but also seeded in lubuntu
[07:27] <DktrKranz> micahg: indeed, I didn't notice it was demoted.
[07:27] <micahg> DktrKranz: well, from the look of the bug, requestsync didn't help you at all :)
[07:28]  * DktrKranz hasn't launchpadlib integration yet :P
[07:29] <hakermania> sladen, Good morning, why in armel it failed to build? It seems that it didn't use gcc, otherwise I cannot explain it. Also, notice it says: 'sh: gcc: not found'
[07:30] <hakermania> If it fails to build in some architectures, will it be available to the successful ones?
[07:31] <micahg> hakermania: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/78351164/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-armel.wallch_2.1-0ubuntu2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz, it seems to be a problem with an arm specific symbol in libav
[07:33] <hakermania> micahg, thanks, but how do ou know?
[07:33] <hakermania> you*
[07:33] <micahg> hakermania: I read the build log, you look right at the end before the packages start to be removed
[07:38] <hakermania> micahg, Which symbol? I can see an undefined reference inside the libhighgui (opencv) lib...
[07:38] <micahg> yep, that would be it
[07:39] <hakermania> micahg, but that's not problem of my code, it's architecture's or lib's dependend...
[07:41] <micahg> hakermania: it could be that opencv just needs a rebuild against the latest libav
[07:42] <hakermania> micahg, any action from my side?
[07:44] <micahg> hakermania: doesn't look like it
[07:45]  * micahg really needs to upgrade his armel machine to oneiric
[07:46] <micahg> unfortunately, I have to take care of something else before bed, maybe I can look later today
[07:47]  * hakermania is grateful
[08:11] <hakermania> blackout :P
[09:32] <hakermania> sladen, if there's no action required from me, why did you asigned me to the bug?
[11:07] <sladen> hakermania: you can mark it "Won't Fix"/deassign yourself---just thought as it's your package it was the easiest way to alert you to it
[11:08] <sladen> hakermania: (if you subscribe to  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wallch/+subscriptions  you should get bugmail automatically)
[12:13] <hakermania> sladen, I've already subscribed wallch team, in which i am a member
[13:30] <sladen> hakermania: okay
[14:15] <hakermania> sladen, will it be available for the architectures in which it successfully built, or?
[14:32] <sladen> hakermania: it is
[14:33] <sladen> hakermania: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wallch/2.1-0ubuntu2
[15:29] <hakermania> sladen, which will be Wallch's icon in USC? I don't want it to have this ugly 'box with tools' icon. Do I submitted somewhere or it will automatically take desktop file's icon for use?
[16:51] <sladen> hakermania: it's taken from the .desktop file + icon inside the binary, …when the database is rebuilt
[16:52] <sladen> hakermania: which is done sporadically IIRC
[17:00] <hakermania> sladen, what is IIRC :P ?
[17:19] <sladen> hakermania: "If I Recall Correctly", but I don't already recall/remember correctly
[17:19] <micahg> usually right before milestones
[17:36] <hakermania> micahg, milestones? Before betta release for example?
[17:42] <hakermania> wow, I had installed in a virtualbox aplha3 oneiric the 0ubuntu1 and it updated to 0ubuntu2 at once :O
[17:47] <hakermania> it's on the repos :D
[18:35] <hakermania> Ok, I would like to thank this channel very much for all the help I got, but especially tumbleweed, jtaylor, sladen, micahg and surely other ones that I've forgotten since winter... Also the AA and his instant reaction... Thanks you guys, really !
[18:36] <micahg> hakermania: thank you for contributing to Ubuntu!, do you intend to try to get the package in Debian now?
[18:41] <hakermania> micahg, Why NOT :D ? I know nothing about Debian BUT, I knew very few about Ubuntu and C++ when I started this project and now it's in! So, yes, I will.
[18:44] <micahg> hakermania: that's great!, then your program can get even more exposure :)
[19:05] <Laney> you'll get to have fun making the ubuntu specific features optional
[19:14] <hakermania> Laney, heh, I don't use to say good things for myself, and if I do i'm ironic, but I was quite clever to associate the Unity options with the start-up ones. If you mean to remove them from the .desktop file for Debian, then it's easy
[19:14] <hakermania> I mean that Unity options exist because of the start-up ones, also cli communication with the program through DBus is fun!
[19:26] <hakermania> Also, what's going on on revu? will it stay there?
[19:27] <Laney> it's the path of most resistance
[19:28] <jtaylor> wtf is this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/676740/
[19:28] <hakermania> !wtf jtaylor
[19:28] <hakermania> !wtf
[19:28] <hakermania> :(
[19:29] <micahg> jtaylor: something not cleaning up after itself?
[19:31] <jtaylor> that can only be gcc/ld then
[19:33] <jtaylor> to reproduce: http://paste.ubuntu.com/676746/
[19:40] <hakermania> micahg, should I port it somehow or upload it manually to http://expo.debian.net/ ?
[20:16] <jtaylor> anyone have an idea how to solve the ncurses issue?
[20:21] <tumbleweed> jtaylor: so, libncurses.so.5 is a symlink to libtermcap.so which is a linker script saying read libncurses.so.5 :)
[20:23] <jtaylor> hm
[20:23] <jtaylor> shouldn't that be a major problem for a lot more builds
[20:24] <tumbleweed> most likely
[20:24] <jtaylor> I oly found a single failure
[20:24] <tumbleweed> it was only uploaded 3 days ago
[20:25] <jtaylor> seems no bug reported
[20:25] <tumbleweed> aha, 5.9-1ubuntu1 was the culprit
[20:25] <tumbleweed> looks like a trivial fix
[20:28] <jtaylor> bug 836246
[20:35] <tumbleweed> jtaylor: got a patch?
[20:36] <jtaylor> have no experience with linker scripts
[20:45] <jtaylor> zZzZZz how large is this ncurses branch ._.
[20:46] <tumbleweed> jtaylor: I've realised I have no idea where /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 comes from
[20:47] <tumbleweed> it isn't there in a clean chroot
[20:49] <jtaylor> interesting
[20:50] <tumbleweed> right, ldconfig created it when 5.9-1 is installed
[20:50] <tumbleweed> but when it was transitioned to a linker script, it didn't know to clean it up
[20:51] <jtaylor> so its an upgrade problem?
[20:54] <tumbleweed> yeah, I think a bug in ldconfig
[20:55] <tumbleweed> although I don't know if ldconfig deletes symlinks, so maybe not