[00:23] ahhh rape me [00:23] also, thought mindrape was banned [00:44] Why is illunatic banned? [00:48] bazhang, he was but someone probably inadvertently let him back in [01:14] kwtm seems to be offering very suspect advice [01:15] elky, thanks [01:17] partitioning advice: buy a new HDD [03:24] gnome3 and jolicloud and wants support. === marienz_ is now known as marienz [12:19] PM me so I can help you install ARCH, basically === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth [14:43] Hello, ladies and gentlemen. [14:44] Perhaps one of you can refresh my memory as to why I'm banned in #ubuntu-offtopic. I'm sure I've asked before but I forgot. [14:46] Is this thing on? [14:46] it is. [14:46] give me a minute [14:46] Oh, hiya IdleOne! Wanna scrabble later? [14:46] maybe 5 [14:46] heh, let me look into this first [14:46] k. [14:48] looks like you used some inappropriate language [14:48] Again? [14:48] yup [14:48] Ugh. [14:49] you really should know better [14:49] :) [14:49] I know, I just get really bored sometimes. :( [14:50] yeah, boredom isn't an excuse for doing stupid stuff [14:50] I get really bored sometimes, though. :) [14:51] Anywho, if you want to scrabble later /msg me or contact me via The Reservation. I suppose there's no chance of getting that ban overturned anytime soon. [14:52] I can't remove the ban. might want to try coming back later when a -ot op is active [14:52] Oh, well notify me when that happens too then. [14:53] * IdleOne isn't a messenger service :P [14:53] :( [14:54] This communication thing is too complicated. [14:54] Okay, I'll leave now. Join us in ##c-u though! [14:54] ugh [15:19] EgyParadox called the ops in #ubuntu () [15:20] its jsut spam\ [15:20] I didnt know tht its only emergency siutaiton [15:21] just abuse [15:21] I apologize [15:22] EgyParadox: no worries [15:25] WindowsMojave: mgj http://hostingpad.tk [15:42] EgyParadox: if there is nothing else we can do for you, please leave this channel [15:43] no there is nothing [16:43] anastasius is not interested in being unbanned, wasting our time is more relevant to them [16:43] In #xubuntu-devel, charlie-tca said: !no, !themes is #xubuntu Find your themes at http://www.gnome-look.org - http://art.gnome.org - http://xfce-look.org- Also see !changethemes [16:44] Would like that for both #xubuntu and #xubuntu-devel, please [17:54] offtopic ops around? [17:54] oh wait [17:54] nvm [18:43] blissi called the ops in #ubuntu () [20:01] blissi called the ops in #ubuntu () [20:03] IdleOne called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic () [20:03] 13:02:43 [freenode] [~blissi(~blissi@87.114.100.41 )] fag [20:03] That was.. constructive. [20:03] blissi called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic () [20:40] Hi! [20:40] I'll behave, I promise. [20:40] Howdy Anastasius [20:41] Wait, I need another drink. brb. [20:42] Okay, I'm back. What were we talking about again? [20:43] Anastasius: So, I think you're well aware of why you were banned from #ubuntu-offtopic. [20:44] I'm not really sure. Can you elaborate a bit to refresh my memory? [20:45] Anastasius: I think you're well aware. Playing coy isn't going to get you anywhere either. [20:45] No, I'm seriously not sure. Let me review my logs here. [20:46] But if we must, you weren't behaving like a decent, normal person in #ubuntu-offtopic. [20:48] Well I never behave like a decent normal person, whatever that means. I'm still grepping, btw. It would be good to tackle the specifics. [20:49] Anastasius: I guess that does bring us to the next question, regardless of whether we'll revisit this one. What makes you think you'll behave differently this time around? [20:49] Or is unbanning you simply going to mean I have to ban you again in 24 hours? [20:49] Hi skmpy, how can we help you? [20:50] Flannel: I'm basically a good guy. You know that. [20:50] Anastasius: Regardless of what you are, it's how you behave in IRC that forces my hand. [20:50] So no, if unbanned I won't do anything to be banned again within 24 hours. Maybe a week or so. [20:51] Anastasius: No, the goal is not to see how long it takes to get you banned. If you feel that it's inevitable that you'll get yourself banned in such a small timeframe, there really is no point in going through these motions. [20:51] Flannel: I see. So this is all basically because I said "tits"? [20:52] skmpy: hi! [20:52] Myrtti: Hi, how you doin'? [20:53] Myrtti: hey mang [20:53] skmpy: how can we help you? [20:53] Myrtti: You should join us in ##club-ubuntu sometime, em has missed you. [20:53] Anastasius: that statement contributed. Look 34 minutes before that for another episode, and 21hours and 45 minutes ahead of that for yet another. [20:54] Anastasius: in this particular case, those three things (how many warnings do you really need?) played a part in your ban. [20:54] Flannel: Jeez, dude, I didn't know that humour was verboten. Excuse me. [20:54] Anastasius: If that's your definition of humor, then yes, it might help you to consider humor forbidden. [20:54] How droll. [20:55] Anastasius: IRC doesn't exist to entertain you, there may be some channels you find utterly boring. You may choose not to participate in them. [20:55] Well at this point I'm not really expecting to get unbanned, nor do I care anyway. But you people might take a long hard look at what you think is forbidden. Just a tip. [20:56] Anastasius: We'll take that under advisement. Thanks. [20:56] Anastasius: Is there anything else we can help you with? [20:56] Well, yes. [20:57] I was sort of wondering why you call ##club-ubuntu the voldemort channel. [20:57] Or is that just an elky thing? Because #voldemort now redirects to ##club-ubuntu. [20:57] Anastasius: I don't believe I have evers done so. So I can't really comment on that. [20:58] Anastasius: actually, ##voldemort, and that channel is owned by emma. [20:58] Flannel: No hard feelings between us, I hope. I realize you're just doing your "duty", whatever that means. [20:58] rww: Hi! [20:58] Anastasius: hihi [20:59] rww: Thanks for the correction. [20:59] So yes, unless I'm now living in a hilarious alternate universe where emma is secretly elky... :) [20:59] That would be both twisted and appropriate. [21:00] I think that rounds out that question. Anastasius, if there's nothing else, kindly part this channel to keep it open for others. Thanks. [21:01] Flannel: But there's nobody here. [21:01] Anastasius: skmpy seems to have something to discuss [21:01] Anastasius: Well, skmpy seems to need something, and I'm sure we'll get more as the day progresses. [21:01] skmpy: Would you like to talk? I'm here to help. [21:02] Anastasius: Please part. We try to keep it spectator free. You know that logs are available if you'd like to keep an ear to the wall. [21:04] Oh, sorry! [21:04] yeah that's right, i need some privacy for my extremely urgent and improtant issue [21:04] skmpy: How can we help you? [21:04] skmpy: ok, great, let's hear it! :-) [21:04] who is phone? [21:05] there doesn't seem to be anyone with that nick online at the moment...? [21:05] well then, I shall depart. [21:06] * Myrtti sweeps the popcorn from underneath the seats [21:57] next time anastasius comes in, we should remind them that it's not a good idea to get banned from this channel [21:58] (although they probably read logs and will notice this) [21:58] HI ANASTASIUS [21:58] HI SWEDISH POLICE [21:59] HI FINLAND [21:59] most of finland's connections are throught sweden, and their police is well known for eavesdropping [22:00] we can basically communicate securely with estonia and russia [22:00] (which probably have their own problems) [22:00] topyli doesn't use SSL, Sweden knows his nickserv password ;( [22:00] irc is not secure, i have accepted this from the start [22:01] it's by design :) [22:02] it's a bit like demanding freedom of speech on #ubuntu-offtopic [22:02] could mandate SSL for the whole network. It wouldn't be the first. [22:02] i'm thinking about a blog post about "freedom of speech on irc" [22:02] rww: yeah it's not so hard to use ssl, i probably should [22:14] topyli: tonyyarusso already wrote one [22:17] Flannel: i have read it, but i still have stuff to say :) [22:30] banned tiox, they made the effort to pm me. they said they'll just "wait for their ban to expire" [22:30] (in -ot) [22:31] i explained that the ban will be removed when they convince me or another op that they can behave in the future. we've been babysitting tiox for months, and they just won't learn [23:52] In #ubuntu, Hasham said: ubottu, why cononical is pushing so hard towards unity