| valorin | <valorin> Anyone experiencing this problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/834248 - Where windows resting on the edge of a workspace move into the next one when clicked in the launcher or via ALT+TAB, making it impossible to switch to these windows without manually going to the workspace. | 01:26 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 834248 in unity "Oneiric: Non-maximized windows which sit on the border of a workspace move when called from another workspace (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 01:26 |
| htorque | valorin: confirmed your bug, but i'm not sure if that's not a compiz bug (don't worry, people will find out and re-assign if necessary) | 01:32 |
| valorin | Ah cool, thanks. It's present in Natty, and no one seams to have noticed or cared enough to fix it though :( Oneiric was all good until a week ago when it appeared agian... | 01:33 |
| valorin | htorque, I've updated the bug as jbicha identified a case where it wasn't working. It's actually being triggered when windows are against the LOWER edge of a bottom workspace, and called from an UPPER workspace. Make sense? Now, to wait for it to get some attention from the devs... Bug #834248 | 02:23 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 834248 in unity "Oneiric: Non-maximized windows which sit on the bottom edge of the lower workspaces shift downwards when called from an upper workspace. (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/834248 | 02:23 |
| cjae | Im am pretty sure there is an issue when writing files to fat32 | 05:45 |
| htorque | om26er_: hi! don't you think bug 835362 should rather get low priority? it's a. not really a bad bug and b. you'd need to hit a small time frame of maybe 100ms to trigger it. | 10:14 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 835362 in unity (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "DND: Fails to drag items on the desktop if launcher bar starts to fade on mouse button release (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/835362 | 10:14 |
| om26er_ | htorque, its a regression from previous version, it made me angry a few times as well ;-) | 10:15 |
| om26er_ | i would drop the icon and it would come back to its place :/ | 10:15 |
| htorque | ok, if it made you angry, then let's leave it at medium :P | 10:17 |
| om26er_ | htorque, ;) | 10:17 |
| === decoder_ is now known as decoder | ||
| === abhinav_ is now known as abhinav- | ||
| === brianchidester_ is now known as brianchidester | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| hggdh | OK. As of today bugzilla.gnome.org is not accessible from firefox (at least Oneiric): b.g.o certificate has expired, and bloody dumb Firefox does not provide a way to store an exception anymore. | 15:36 |
| * hggdh marvels on the blindness of programmers when faced with security issues | 15:37 | |
| jtaylor | storing an exception is a security risk, it should be hard to do | 15:37 |
| jtaylor | thats current security practice | 15:38 |
| hggdh | but not impossible. Security that prohibits access no matter what is just plain dumb. | 15:38 |
| jtaylor | yes | 15:38 |
| * jtaylor not using ff | 15:38 | |
| hggdh | even more on X.509, which is known to be a bag of potential problems | 15:39 |
| hggdh | of course, this is implementation-specific. Chromium allows access (via override) and visually marks the certificate as bad | 15:40 |
| bdmurray | pedro_: I'm writing a bug pattern for bug 657829 re jockey | 15:49 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 657829 in jockey (Ubuntu) "jockey-gtk crashed with DBusException in call_blocking() (affects: 188) (dups: 203) (heat: 1762)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/657829 | 15:49 |
| pedro_ | bdmurray, cool thanks! | 15:50 |
| jibel | is there some apport magic to report a bug about a release upgrade and attach the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade automatically ? | 15:50 |
| charlie-tca | jibel: I thought update-manager bugs do that? | 15:59 |
| jibel | charlie-tca, nope. not in manual mode. | 16:01 |
| jibel | charlie-tca, nm, I attached the logs one by one no big deal. | 16:02 |
| charlie-tca | yeah, but it would be easier to if apport did it | 16:03 |
| jibel | agreed. | 16:03 |
| === wigit is now known as Guest91659 | ||
| bdmurray | jibel, charlie-tca: an update-manager bug could be about just using update-manager or a dist-upgrade. However, I guess it could ask you ... "Is this about a distribution upgrade from one release to another?" and then include log files... | 16:30 |
| bdmurray | Okay I'll fix this now | 16:35 |
| bdmurray | jtaylor: to be clear your bug pattern could apply to any package that uses mono? | 18:43 |
| jtaylor | yes | 18:44 |
| bdmurray | jtaylor: did you search for other duplicates? | 18:44 |
| jtaylor | technically all mono packages that install into the gac | 18:44 |
| jtaylor | bdmurray: yes although its possible I may have missed some | 18:45 |
| bdmurray | jtaylor: okay, great thanks! | 18:46 |
| jtaylor | thx for merging | 18:48 |
| bdmurray | no problem, it seems like it might be better to just prevent these from being reported altogether though | 18:49 |
| jtaylor | that would require an apport hook? | 18:50 |
| jtaylor | also I do want them reported for now, as it is not yet clear why this file gets modified so often | 18:51 |
| bdmurray | well if it was just one source package then you could use an apport package hook | 18:51 |
| bdmurray | because it is a multi-package thing you'd need to modify general-hooks/ubuntu.py | 18:51 |
| bdmurray | okay that makes sense then | 18:51 |
| jtaylor | the few reports we got up to now where not very conclusive | 18:52 |
| bdmurray | However, the bug pattern would redirect people to 805717 so you might want to put a general comment in the description if there isn't one. "Hey how did you muck up this file?" | 18:52 |
| jtaylor | I put a general comment into it | 18:53 |
| jtaylor | "It is still unclear what causes the installation to get modified, please report if you remember what could have changed the installation (e.g. installing mono from source) and attach the modified /usr/lib/mono/2.0/mscorlib.dll to the bug." | 18:53 |
| bdmurray | okay awesome | 18:53 |
| bdmurray | pedro_: would you use a bzr hook if untagged a bug bugpattern-needed, tagged it bugpattern-written and unsubscribed ubuntu-bugcontrol? | 18:55 |
| bdmurray | er if it | 18:55 |
| pedro_ | bdmurray, oh yes i would , totally | 18:57 |
| * bdmurray todos it | 18:57 | |
| bil21al | i want to report a bug of ALT+TAb in which pakage it will be reported?? | 19:35 |
| pedro_ | what's the bug about? | 19:36 |
| bil21al | dextop is not shows | 19:36 |
| bil21al | destop | 19:36 |
| pedro_ | desktop not being shown when you alt+tab ? | 19:37 |
| pedro_ | that'd be perfect for me ;-) | 19:37 |
| bil21al | yes | 19:37 |
| bil21al | how?? | 19:37 |
| pedro_ | bil21al, if you're running unity, file it under unity | 19:37 |
| bil21al | ok | 19:37 |
| bil21al | pedro_ are u a ubuntu member i have seen ur comment on my bugs also??? | 19:38 |
| pedro_ | bil21al, i am , yes | 19:40 |
| charlie-tca | bil21al: pedro_ is one the busiest triagers | 19:40 |
| charlie-tca | He might even be Number 1 in the triagers | 19:41 |
| pedro_ | bil21al, paste the link to that unity bug you're filing, probably there's going to be another person interesting on it :-) | 19:41 |
| bil21al | ok | 19:41 |
| * pedro_ been 'commenting' a lot about the alt+tab | 19:41 | |
| * pedro_ hugs charlie-tca | 19:41 | |
| bil21al | i m not filing man i m just adding more information | 19:41 |
| pedro_ | charlie-tca, hello! :-) | 19:41 |
| charlie-tca | Hello, pedro_ | 19:41 |
| pedro_ | bil21al, find it? could you give us the link ? ;-) | 19:41 |
| pedro_ | i'm feeling really lost with the alt+tab of unity | 19:42 |
| yofel | what does it do? | 19:42 |
| pedro_ | and the focus of the apps, oh men | 19:42 |
| bil21al | great man nice to meet u u have also triaged my bug today in gnome setting | 19:43 |
| bil21al | pedro_ here is the bug bug/836315 | 19:43 |
| pedro_ | bug 836315 | 19:44 |
| yofel | lp 836315 | 19:44 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 836315 in unity "'Show Desktop' fails to hand focus to desktop (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/836315 | 19:44 |
| bil21al | yes yes this | 19:44 |
| yofel | bil21al: ubot won't trigger if you don't use 'bug<space>NUM' syntax | 19:45 |
| bil21al | mean?? yofel: | 19:46 |
| yofel | bug/386315 | 19:46 |
| yofel | -> nothing happens | 19:46 |
| yofel | bug 836315 | 19:46 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 836315 in unity "'Show Desktop' fails to hand focus to desktop (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/836315 | 19:46 |
| yofel | see? | 19:46 |
| bil21al | hmm | 19:47 |
| bil21al | yofel u are also a triager i have also seen ur name is it?? | 19:48 |
| yofel | yep, although I don't do that much triaging these days | 19:48 |
| bil21al | ok but u are also a good person and also a good triager i have seen there.nice to meet you. | 19:51 |
| bdmurray | charlie-tca: fyi I'm ahead of pedro at the moment http://people.canonical.com/~brian/reports/mailing-lists/most-active-commenters.txt | 19:52 |
| charlie-tca | I am probably on the bottom of the list these days | 19:53 |
| charlie-tca | whew! pedro_ has a ways to go to catch you, too | 19:53 |
| yofel | heh, I'm somewhere in the middle with 18. | 19:54 |
| bil21al | yofe : here is a problem help me | 21:13 |
| bil21al | yofel | 21:14 |
| yofel | if would help if you told me the problem... | 21:14 |
| bil21al | see this https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/836315 | 21:14 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 836315 in unity "'Show Desktop' fails to hand focus to desktop (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 21:15 |
| bil21al | what i do?? now | 21:15 |
| yofel | I don't know. I'm triaging ubuntu bugs. That bug isn't against ubuntu but against unity. | 21:16 |
| yofel | so not really our field of work | 21:16 |
| yofel | bil21al: it would probably help though if you told the exact version of unity you're using | 21:16 |
| bil21al | i m using latest updated oneirics | 21:17 |
| bil21al | 11.10 | 21:17 |
| yofel | the bug doesn't say so, and add the package version that's currently in oneiric | 21:17 |
| yofel | apt-cache policy unity will tell you what you have installed | 21:18 |
| bil21al | i run that any info came now what i do now? ubuntu member can remove the comments. | 21:21 |
| yofel | huh? nobody can remove comments except launchpad admins IIRC | 21:22 |
| yofel | just add the package version and release to the bugs description | 21:22 |
| bil21al | hmm ok if i say sory or change the status than? | 21:23 |
| yofel | ok wait, I was mixing something up here | 21:24 |
| yofel | bil21al: ask the reporter to add the version of unity he's using to the bug | 21:25 |
| yofel | don't ask me more though, I'm not a unity bug triager | 21:26 |
| bil21al | by apport collect?? | 21:26 |
| bil21al | ok | 21:26 |
| yofel | well no, apport would be for bugs against the unity package in ubuntu | 21:26 |
| yofel | that bug is filed against the unity project, not against the ubuntu package | 21:26 |
| yofel | find the bug supervisors for the unity project (probably in #ayatana) and ask them what they need so the bug is triaged | 21:27 |
| bil21al | ok | 21:27 |
| bil21al | thank you bro | 21:28 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!