[00:01] at-spi2-core looks good, accepted [00:01] that should deal with the upgrade problems [00:03] doko: heh [00:17] infinity, Daviey: the php5 build did succeed, wondering how ... please don't touch anything before squlite is demoted [00:17] doko: Yeah, I won't fix it properly until a bit later. No worries. [00:43] stgraber, highvoltage - edubuntu dvd 20110830 has been published (ubiquity fixes). [00:45] thanks [00:46] stgraber, are you going to need a respin to pick up the at-spi2-core upgrade fix? [00:47] I'm not aware of that one, what's it fixing? [01:07] skaet, can we get the respin of mythbuntu to verify the mythbuntu-*, ubiquity, and casper fixes? [01:08] superm1, mythbuntu is being built right now (almost done), one of the builders failed though, but not sure if its serious or not. Can you have a look at the logs? [01:08] Tue Aug 30 00:34:28 UTC 2011 [01:08] BUILDING: mythbuntu live cd [01:08] kapok.buildd starting at Tue Aug 30 00:34:28 UTC 2011 [01:08] cardamom.buildd starting at Tue Aug 30 00:34:28 UTC 2011 [01:08] kapok.buildd finished at Tue Aug 30 00:41:25 UTC 2011 (failed) [01:08] cardamom.buildd finished at Tue Aug 30 00:56:31 UTC 2011 (success) [01:09] skaet, you mean this failure? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/oneiric/mythbuntu/20110830/livecd-20110830-amd64.out [01:09] i think that's the php5 problem on amd64 that's been discussed above [01:10] superm1, yeah, I think you're right. [01:14] superm1 - Images just got published to cdimage. There is one there for amd64 (oversided though). i386 logs look ok. [01:14] Do you want me posting the amd64 and i386 one to the iso tracker? [01:14] superm1, ^^ [01:15] cool thanks. only post amd64 if it actually has the new stuff, old livefs isn't worth it [01:15] the oversized problem won't be fixed for b1, not really sure why it's happening still [01:15] both images have the new ubiquity [01:16] Mythbuntu 20110830 images posted [01:18] skaet, er checking http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/mythbuntu/daily-live/20110830/oneiric-desktop-amd64.manifest it still has the old ubiquity 2.7.17, probably because that livefs did fail [01:18] so you can pull that one off the tracker for now [01:18] superm1 - will do. [01:19] done [02:02] ScottK, kubuntu desktop images posted (20110830), several oversize. Some other issues with the powerpc one that need looking into. [03:50] gilir, lubuntu live cd 20110830 posted. [03:51] ScottK, kubuntu dvd images posted (20110830) [04:18] Good morning [04:19] hey skaet [04:22] ah, nice, all new images [04:22] heya pitti, yup, and a bunch on new ones still to be spun [04:23] just a sec and I'll paste the summary [04:23] nice, no red bugs on the desktops so far [04:30] pitti, First round of livecd/dvd rebuilds that worked have been posted. In progress: ubuntu server image build followed by rebuilds of ubuntu live cd; ubuntu live dvd; edubuntu live dvd to pick up at-spi2-core 2.1.5-0ubuntu3. Following that is a rebuild of mythbuntu to see if it will pick up php, and succeed for amd64. [04:32] skaet: hang on, why do we need a rebuild for at-spi2-core2? I thought that was only an upgrade fix? [04:32] pitti, in parallel have also started off the ARM images builds pick up ubiquity and other changes. OMAP3 images aren't working though it seems (network kernel issue). [04:37] pitti, seemed to be interfering with people using update-manager, and was marked critical, so went ahead and started the builds off for the pieces that had reference to it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-spi2-core/+bug/836798 [04:37] Launchpad bug 836798 in at-spi2-core (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "natty to oneiric upgrade failed: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'python-pyatspi2' (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Critical,Fix released] [04:38] skaet: ah, ok; it's not an issue for installation [04:47] ^ for bug 837048, in case we do another rebuild [04:47] Launchpad bug 837048 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-bug ubiquity causes a traceback due to an UnboundLocalError (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/837048 [04:47] I saw it in the iso tracker, if someone wants to review [04:53] hm, I see bug 689323 all over the place in the tracker, I guess I have a look at this [04:53] Launchpad bug 689323 in jockey (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 2 other projects) "ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.68:/DeviceDriver: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus) (affects: 411) (dups: 84) (heat: 1120)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689323 [04:53] already times out on LP, awesome [04:54] * pitti reviews the queue for unseeded packages [05:13] I'll accept packages slow enough for the buildds to keep up (and keep a free one) [05:15] pitti, sounds good. Thanks! and on that note, I'm heading to zzz land. [05:15] skaet: thanks, sleep well! [05:38] ugh, I'm afraid bug 689323 warrants a rebuild, as it breaks driver installation for everyone :( [05:38] I'm testing/uploading a fix now [05:38] Launchpad bug 689323 in jockey (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 2 other projects) "ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.68:/DeviceDriver: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus) (affects: 411) (dups: 84) (heat: 1124)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689323 [05:38] NCommander: AYT? [05:38] pitti: AYT? [05:38] Whats AYT? [05:38] hey NCommander [05:38] "are you there" [05:38] just wondered if there's anyone else around who can review/accept the jockey fix [05:39] well, that question was answered [05:39] heh, yes [05:39] looking [05:39] NCommander: not uploaded yet [05:39] LP timed out twice -_-; [05:39] yes, to look at that bug you need /+text [05:39] (I can't actually approve into archive) [05:39] I just added a bug pattern [05:39] so that we won't get even more dupes [05:40] pitti: What do you want me to review specifically? (i'm reading the text log) [05:40] (I assume there is a patch in here somewhere) [05:40] NCommander: I mean my upload [05:41] I'm not an archive admin :-/ [05:41] ah, ok [05:41] I guess I have to self-approve that then [05:41] pitti: I thought you were an admin [05:41] Oh [05:41] skaet went to bed, and it's still too early for the other Europeans [05:41] skaet isn't an archive admin either [05:41] NCommander: yes, but we usually do four-eyes principle during freezes [05:41] NCommander: she is [05:41] When did that change? [05:42] NCommander: so, to at least do that some justice: the problem is that I tested jockey with the new pygobject 2.90 only, but that was held back due to ubiquity [05:42] but it breaks with the old pygobject [05:42] Ow [05:42] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/jockey/ubuntu/revision/575 [05:42] this is the fix [05:42] new pygobject won't happen until after beta? [05:42] This sounds like a bloody headache [05:42] which I have uploaded just now [05:42] jbicha: right [05:43] I can revert that workaround once pygobject 2.90 is in [05:44] damn, I should have gotten to this earlier [05:44] anyway, once it's in, I'll trigger new desktops [05:45] otherwise we'll screw all the nvidia users [05:46] FTR, self-accepting jockey from the queue; I'll take the bullets [05:47] and with that I can just as well accept apport as well, to unbreak ubuntu-bug ubiquity [06:02] ok, I accepted all unseeded packages with good fixes, to make use of the buildds [06:41] NCommander: so omap is still officially broken, right? I'll just add the omap4 images to the tracker [06:41] pitti: just ethernet, and I'm not 100% clear on that, need to reconfirm with GrueMaster [06:42] ah, ok [07:19] good morning [07:19] bonjour jibel [07:19] morgen pitti [07:19] jibel: FYI, just started to rebuild all images to pick up latest fixes, in particular the jockey crash [07:19] sorry about that [07:22] pitti, no problem, this jockey crash 689323 ? [07:22] right [07:23] jibel: IMHO worth rebuilding, as it completely breasks jockey everywhere and thus prevents installation of broadcom/nvidia etc. [07:23] I also added a bug pattern for it to avoid getting even more dupes [07:23] ok. I'm verifying the at-spi2-core fix. [07:28] ubiquity bugs reported during the night are all known. looks good. [07:37] ubuntu alternate added [07:42] desktop/server preinstalled omap/omap4 added [07:54] kubuntu alternate added [07:56] ubuntu desktop added [08:16] Gah, who accepted openstack-dashboard? [08:18] Daviey: was that wrong? it'll land in binNEW anyway [08:19] just wanted to give the buildds some fodder [08:19] and as it's in universe/unseeded it seemed quite harmless [08:20] Daviey: I can reject the binaries if they are known-bad [08:20] (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+queue?queue_state=0) [08:21] kubuntu desktop posted [08:23] xubuntu alternate posted [08:24] pitti: nah, not really, really bad. [08:24] 00:46 < Daviey> Please can python-carrot be promoted (MIR ack'd), glance be accepted, cobbler be accepted and openstack-dashboard be rejected. Thanks. [08:24] 00:47 < Daviey> Oh, and kombu promoted. (MIR also ack'd) [08:24] 00:50 < Daviey> not quite sure why python-novaclient was allowed into unapproved it is no change (including version), from what is in the archive [08:24] 00:51 < Daviey> Suprised that wasn't rejected straight away [08:25] Daviey: so, openstack-dashboard shouldn't be in the archive at all? or a different version? [08:26] pitti: it's not that bad.. I just didn't want *that* one accepted without a fix [08:27] Daviey: ok, keeping in binNEW then [08:27] Daviey: so, do you want above in beta-1? [08:27] pitti: yes please. [08:27] Daviey: then I'll do the promotions/acceptance now [08:27] pitti: Great! Thanks [08:28] Daviey: hm, I just see that glance is in universe; should that be on the server image, i. e. seeded and in main? [08:29] funny you say that. [08:29] promoted/accepted [08:29] \o/ [08:29] or will they be for b2? [08:30] I'm a bit confused how a universe package can have a "Task: openstack" [08:30] or is that not part of the server CD? [08:31] pitti: sevrer doesn't have a server-supported, that got broken down a while ago [08:31] So there is a seperate seed just for openstack [08:33] although currently it is both server-ship and supported.. will probably fall off server-ship before release. [08:34] just saying that universe packages in seeds are just silently ignored for CD builds, unless the CD has universe enabled (which is only the case for ubuntustudio, mythbuntu, and xubuntu AFAIK, not for server) [08:34] Daviey: asked in a more direct way, do we actually need a server image rebuild after this? [08:34] pitti: Well ideally i would.. which was why i was trying to get it pushed through last night :( [08:35] it's not essential tho. [08:36] Daviey: what would change with a rebuild? [08:36] Daviey: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/20110830/oneiric-server-amd64.list doesn't have either cobbler nor glance (as they are in universe) [08:39] pitti: Hmm, well - i wanted to iso to be usable without net connection for b1. Currently openstack will not work without glance, at all. [08:39] So the only thing that changes is that people can use it without direct net connection.. but not that exciting really. [08:44] xubuntu desktop posted [08:44] morning folks. anything I can usefully do first? [08:44] hey cjwatson [08:44] morning cjwatson [08:44] cjwatson: I hope you got some sleep after that nightshift.. thanks for the ubiquity fixes! [08:45] cjwatson: nothign too serious right now, I'm rebuilding all images after the jockey fix, and testing current desktop i386 right now [08:45] it wasn't too late, and I have this afternoon off as a swap for yesterday [08:47] Daviey: seems that's going to require a bunch of more MIR reviews: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt [08:47] glance, ipy, nova, python-anyjson, python-dingus, python-novaclient, python-stompy, socat [08:52] ubuntustudio posted [08:52] pitti: Yeah. :( I did that trick btw: http://people.ubuntu.com/~davewalker/component-mismatches-mir-track.html [08:52] Makes it much easier for me to track that for my needs. [08:53] nice! [09:10] Out of interest, what fixed the powerpc oversize? [09:11] * pitti hides his really scary big hammer [09:11] eep. [09:12] Daviey: I dropped another langpack from there, and it shrank massively together with the other images due to the langpack -base refresh [09:12] the updates packages got quite large [09:15] pitti: Hmm, well it's well within size now :_) [09:15] oneiric-server-powerpc.iso 30-Aug-2011 04:36 0 [09:15] that looks a little ... overoptimized? [09:15] lol [09:16] I wonder why power was larger to start with? [09:16] it tends to be on all images, not sure why [09:16] do we still ship two kernels on those? (32/64 bit) [09:17] yes [09:17] build log isn't that useful [09:17] I think [09:18] Using HFS name: squashfs-modules-3.0.0-9-powe_1 for CD1/pool/main/l/linux/squashfs-modules-3.0.0-9-powerpc64-smp-di_3.0.0-9.14_powerpc.udeb [09:18] Aborted [09:18] make: *** [bin-images] Error 134 [09:18] ERROR WHILE BUILDING OFFICIAL IMAGES !! [09:21] Is it possible to do an inplace arch rebuild, without incrementing? [09:22] we can rebuild a single arch but it will increment [09:23] mythbuntu posted [09:23] Hmm.. exit 134 is often something like out of resource or seg fault.. So i'm wondering if it was just a bad day? [09:24] skaet indeed got an error when she was building the server images [09:24] I didn't see that yesterday [09:24] (in my builds) [09:31] lubuntu alternate posted (but has uninstallables in report) [09:33] Can a rebuild be done without posting to cdimage just to check if it can be reproduced? [09:34] meh, kubuntu preinstalled failed on libo; I thought we removed LibO for armel [09:34] Daviey: not really, but we don't need to post it to the tracker [09:34] Daviey: starting [09:35] thanks [09:35] The problem is that current symlink seems to be cared about more than the tracker :/.. ah well. [09:36] Daviey: I can reset the current symlink manually if it fails again [09:38] ah groovy [09:39] pitti: er, yes, it can actually :) but too late now [09:39] DEBUG=1 [09:41] hm, lubuntu desktop failed, only powerpc succeeded; the 0829 build worked, investigating [09:54] lamont: I don't suppose you could help me debug http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/oneiric/ubuntu-zh_CN/20110825/livecd-20110825-i386.out ? ubuntu-defaults-builder is supposed to be installed in the chroot by that point, and that delivers /usr/bin/ubuntu-defaults-image [10:11] *** glibc detected *** genisoimage: double free or corruption (out): 0x0000000002749800 *** [10:11] ^ again, when building server images :/ [10:12] genisoimage(v_destruct+0x15)[0x4403a5] [10:12] genisoimage(hfs_umount+0x101)[0x43d311] [10:12] genisoimage(make_mac_volume+0x2b5)[0x428985] [10:12] genisoimage[0x429fc7] [10:12] genisoimage(main+0x1401)[0x40f021] [10:12] go schily [10:12] seems it doesn't particularly like hfs today :( [10:12] this rings a bell actually [10:12] that didn't happen on any of the other images [10:12] must have hit the "right" combination of bits in the server image [10:15] bug 452212 [10:15] Launchpad bug 452212 in cdrkit (Ubuntu) "genisoimage: HFS generation crashes on certain tree sizes (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452212 [10:15] (you might wish to avoid reading past comment 1 if you have heart problems) [10:16] heh, I guess that's schily's autoresponder for cdrkit bugs [10:16] (I also suggest not following up to that bug to avoid wakening the beast) [10:17] changing the size a bit should work around the bug [10:19] hmm, seems skaet's preinstalled pipeline broke somewhere in between kubuntu and kubuntu-mobile [10:20] lubuntu desktop posted [10:21] ah, right, both due to LibO being pulled in [10:24] * pitti doesn't understand why it's being pulled in [10:26] NCommander, ogra_, GrueMaster: FYI, server/ubuntu desktop/core images are on the tracker; kubuntu{,-mobile} failing because it pulls in LibO for yet unknown reasons; should omap4 work now, with the recent bootloader changes? [10:30] i hope so, havent tested yet (will do so in a few) [10:37] bbl, lunch [10:55] DVDs added to the tracker. [10:55] (Ubuntu Dvds) === doko_ is now known as doko [11:15] re [11:15] jibel: thanks [11:32] kubuntu DVD posted [11:35] pitti: postgresql-debversion has an unavail b-d on debhelper [11:39] oh smeg, I missed a piece to make dual-stack IPv4/v6 support work in d-i [11:39] that's extremely annoying [11:39] cjwatson: what an informative build log [11:39] :( [11:40] cjwatson: please provide the exact commandline that is failing [11:40] BuildLiveCD command line or the one being run by BuildLiveCD? [11:41] if the former, I believe it to be 'BuildLiveCD -u zh_CN -d oneiric ubuntu' [11:47] actually, that busybox upload can wait until after b1 - it's correct, but it won't fix the problem I'm seeing [11:49] pitti, thumbs up, omap4 preinstalled desktop boots fine (not sure about other issues yet, but u-boot seems sorted now) [11:54] yay [12:01] EFI installation is very probably broken in b1. [12:02] * [Config] Set CONFIG_EFI_VARS=m on amd64 and i386 [12:02] but no efi-modules udeb [12:03] I don't think we have time to fix that [12:36] * cjwatson accidentally breaks the amd64 porter box's oneiric chroot slightly, and uploads a fix for that [12:36] would be good to have if it doesn't impede CD building (kexec-tools) [12:43] cjwatson, slangasek: ok to remove the wvdial binary on armel? wvstreams was already removed === njpatel is now known as njpatel|lunch [12:50] doko: yes, I thought I already did [12:50] lamont: any luck? [13:07] good morning [13:11] cjwatson: gah. got distracted by something else, and up against a breakfast commitment [13:13] edubuntu posted [13:13] hey stgraber [13:13] buildd@cardamom:~$ sudo chroot build-oneiric-live/chroot-oneiric/ dpkg -l > public_html/dpkg.list [13:13] see if that helps? [13:13] see also ~buildd/BuildLive.out [13:13] which is bash -x of the command [13:15] E: Unable to locate package ubuntu-defaults-builder [13:15] argh, we haven't put that in main yet [13:15] pitti: ^- I think we'll need to MIR this [13:15] we'll be supporting it anyway ... [13:16] lamont: thanks, that answers my question [13:16] ta [13:16] afk for ~90-120 min [13:18] pitti: what's different from yesterday's rebuild? is that the at-spi change? [13:29] pitti: what do you think of a kernel upload to fix broken EFI installation? [13:29] ogasawara says it's just a config revert ... [13:29] but I don't know how far through testing we are, and how much we'd be throwing away [13:31] stgraber: at-spi, jockey (was totally broken), and a few smaller fixes [13:31] pitti: ok, cool. Syncing it now. [13:31] cjwatson: hmm, that'd mean rebuilds across the board [13:32] yeah, I'm reluctant unless there's another reason to do it [13:32] i. e. it would take the remaining day today for upload/build, and rebuilds over night [13:32] but ogasawara offered [13:32] I think we should have the new kernel anyway, unless it changes a lot more than this [13:33] the alternative is to release-note that you can only do EFI installs with the desktop CD [13:33] (which to be fair I haven't tested yet) [13:33] oh, that just affects alternate? [13:33] d-i only [13:33] my test was with server [13:33] that seems fine to me; jibel, if we would have a new set of alternates tomorrow morning, can we get that through testing quick enough? [13:34] Daviey: ^ for server [13:34] for full disclosure I should say that I can't be certain that there aren't other EFI problems behind this [13:35] pitti: what is the need for a new image? [13:35] * Daviey reads scrollback [13:35] from my POV it'd be good to have the new kernel available anyway [13:35] Daviey: installation on EFI, is that something you are particularly interested in? [13:35] I have no interest in EFI at this point. :) [13:36] cjwatson, pitti: I can revert the just the config change and upload, but will wait to do so until I get the green light from you [13:36] I don't think there is even server class hardware for public consumption that uses EFI, i might be wrong. [13:37] pitti, sure, we need 2 hours or so to test alternate. [13:39] there is a *drive* for such server-class hardware (dropping a bunch of legacy stuff => in theory faster boot, though maybe don't hold your breath but that's the idea), but I concede I don't know if it actually exists yet [13:39] I thought the kernel team had some test boards that were on the track to being server-class [13:40] aha, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635897 is the real dual-stack fix for d-i [13:40] Debian bug 635897 in isc-dhcp-client-udeb "isc-dhcp-client-udeb: add IPv6 support to dhclient-script" [Wishlist,Open] [13:43] when desktop images are respun, could you also rebuild wubi disk images ? [13:44] are desktop images being respun? [13:44] jibel: do we have a reason to? [13:44] they are not being rebuilt right now, and right now I don't have a "breaker" bug on my radar [13:45] .tar.xz doesn't include latest fixes [13:45] e.g jockey crashes [13:47] tar.xz? I tried the current ubuntu desktop i386 on my netbook, jockey didn't crash, and installed the bcmwl driver [13:48] Pici, wubi downloads a disk image from here http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/wubi/current/ and latest version if from yesterday. It should be in sync with desktop images IMO [13:48] pitti, ^ [13:49] Yep. [13:49] Pici, sorry [13:49] jibel: np :) [13:51] jibel: oh, in wubi [13:51] hm, I don't actually know how to rebuild this [14:02] jibel: rebuilding now [14:02] pitti, thanks. [14:09] pitti, cjwatson: just want to confirm it's ok for me upload the kernel with the EFI config change. [14:10] ogasawara: please do, thanks [14:14] yes, ack from me too [14:14] I'll reroll d-i later [14:14] (probably won't bother waiting for armel since this config change doesn't affect it) [14:25] pitti: the unity-2d guys have a fix for bugs #834045 and bug #834001 which seems quite widespread, maybe worth to get that in the beta? [14:25] Launchpad bug 834045 in unity-2d (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 3 other projects) "unity-2d-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in QConfSchema::findKey() (affects: 70) (dups: 74) (heat: 610)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/834045 [14:25] Launchpad bug 834001 in unity-2d (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 2 other projects) "unity-2d-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in QConf::notify() (affects: 30) (dups: 29) (heat: 262)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/834001 [14:30] didrocks: is that something that is bad enough to break installation or live system severely? it doesn't seem to here [14:31] I need to run out for ~ 40 mins, bbl [14:31] good morning pitti [14:32] pitti: it's some kind of a race, which already get 100 dups [14:42] pitti: ok, so, the crash of the panel is systematic on startup, then gnome-session respawn it [14:43] pitti, didrocks: I am checking the exact conditions of the crash [14:44] cjwatson: could I get you to approve the kernel upload please. [14:48] OEM install on DVDs is broken. filing a bug [14:55] hey skaet [14:55] didrocks: so independent of this we should have a bug pattern for this [14:55] I'm syncing more ocaml packages which are not in oneiric, to get liquidsoap built [14:56] heya pitti, been working my way through the backscroll. Busy day. What's on the todos? [14:56] cjwatson, ogasawara: kernel accepted, thanks! [14:56] skaet: just accepted a new kernel, need to rebuild alternates with that for fixing EFI installation [14:56] skaet: desktop/DVD unaffected [14:56] skaet: I did a full rebuild today to pick up the jockey fix [14:57] jibel: wubi image shuold be updated now [14:57] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/wubi/20110830/amd64.manifest has current jockey, anyway [14:58] pitti, do we have a fix/workaround for the server build - I couldn't quite figure it out from the backscroll (interesting bug that ;p ) [14:58] skaet: ubuntu/server armel omap4 confirmed to work, kubuntu fail to build because it pulls in LibO somehow, which is currently broken on armel [14:58] skaet: the workaround would be to change the image size [14:59] Daviey: do you care much about server/powerpc? [14:59] * skaet starts feeling the world is a little more fragile than she likes.... [15:00] pitti, thanks, trying now. [15:00] pitti: Not for beta1, no [15:00] It won't even be QA'd [15:04] Kaleo: did you find anything? [15:09] didrocks: not yet [15:09] pitti, jibel, just noticed kubuntu mobile i386 hadn't been posted, done now. [15:13] pitti: bah, kernel fails to build on powerpc due to our config enforcer checking CONFIG_EFI_VARS=y but CONFIG_EFI_VARS doesn't exist on powerpc. [15:14] pitti: so we need to adjust the enforcer to check for CONFIG_EFI_VARS=y | !CONFIG_EFI_VARS, which means another upload [15:19] ogasawara: is EFI relevant on the old powerpc at all? I didn't think so? [15:19] skaet: ah, thanks; it should have been pretty much a no-change upload for them, but sure [15:20] pitti: I don't believe so, but arm is also going to fail for the same reason [15:20] ogasawara: could we just ignore the ppc FTBFS until after beta-1? [15:20] ogasawara: I suppose arm will build too long for beta-1 anyway [15:20] new powerpc, surely it is? [15:21] Having the old kernel bin for beta1 for non-mainstream arches doesn't sound too scary IMO. [15:21] the diff is just the EFI config change, so it wouldn't make much difference either way [15:23] pitti: yep, so I'm fine if you want to just ignore the FTBFS's for now, but just wanted you to be aware. [15:24] ogasawara: thanks [15:28] pitti, so once the kernel publishes: ubuntu alternate, kubuntu alternate, xubuntu alternate, lubuntu alternate? [15:29] skaet: yes; Daviey said he doesn't care much about powerpc [15:29] (for server) [15:29] skaet: fortunately the DVDs now don't have an alternate part any more :) [15:30] pitti: +1 :) [15:30] the DVD is actually quite nice now, 1.5 GB is not too much to download (for me, anyway), and nicely equipped [15:30] hmm, wendar's not on the channel, but she will appreciate hearing that ;) [15:31] pitti, so ubuntu server gets added to the alternates list? [15:31] s/alternates/alternates rebuild/ [15:31] skaet: it is like an alternate, but we don't want a rebuild for EFI [15:32] we'd need some more changes to it anyway to work around the image build crash anyway [15:32] erm, ignore me, these are unrelated issues [15:34] cjwatson: heh, does schily have an autoresponder on cdrkit bugs? Seems like something we should block if so... [15:34] skaet: where should I be pushing release notes? [15:35] slangasek, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneiricOcelot/TechnicalOverview [15:36] is ready for input and updates. :) [15:36] great, thanks :) [15:36] * slangasek prepares to document how he broke ia32-libs [15:37] "this is not the package you are looking for" [15:39] skaet: multiarch is both a "new feature" and a "known issue", but I'd prefer to put the information all in one place in the release notes - what do you recommend? [15:40] slangasek, put it in "new feature" for now. I'll take a pass tomorrow at the content, and see if references back need to be made from known issues. [15:40] ok [15:41] skaet: we'll add some new desktop features soon (music lens, and new lenses) [15:41] pitti, thanks. :) [15:43] cjwatson: ^ b1 important? alternate/desktop/both? [15:46] oh, nevermind, saw teh changelog now [15:46] fixes autologin [15:47] didrocks: do you have the unity-2d upload ready? [15:47] didrocks: would be nice to have in the archive in case we respin for autologin [15:48] skaet, jibel: I'm almost tempted to rebuild for that autologin fix, as we can't fix it with an upgrade [15:48] pitti: no, didn't get it tested here as Kaleo is still looking for the way to reproduce it. The fix is just supposed to fix it as far as I understand [15:48] pitti, bug number? [15:48] skaet: bug 837165 [15:48] Launchpad bug 837165 in user-setup (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 3 other projects) ""Log in automatically" option in Ubiquity not honored by LightDM (affects: 4) (dups: 1) (heat: 28)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/837165 [15:48] thanks! [15:48]