[02:26] <lfaraone> cjwatson: your irc nick @ubuntu.com? Just resent to @canonical.com.
[07:03] <dholbach> good morning
[08:18] <cjwatson> lfaraone: I'm afraid there's still no sign of it, not even in spam folders.  Maybe you could put it on a web page and give me a link?  Sorry ...
[16:23] <chilicuil> does anyone know what happened with http://hall-of-fame.ubuntu.com/ ?
[16:25] <Pici> chilicuil: The folks in #ubuntu-community-team probably have some idea.
[16:26] <paultag> chilicuil: it fell apart
[16:26] <paultag> chilicuil: people sort of stopped working on it due to other, more high-priority tasks
[16:26] <paultag> chilicuil: it's on the radar, last I checked, though
[16:26] <paultag> it's just most of the web guys are swamped
[16:29] <chilicuil> Pici, paultag thanks for ur comments, I'll check it out, I just wanted to point it out in some flyers I'm making
[16:30] <paultag> ah, shame
[17:54] <pdtpatr1ck> Question .. what's the preferred method for building a package.. there's dkpg-buildpackage -rfakeroot .. there's fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -F .. there's debuild -S -sa and then sudo pbuilder build <package_version.dsc>
[18:58] <Bachstelze> pdtpatr1ck: everyone has their own prefered method I guess, ultimately they are built on the build servers anyway
[18:59] <paultag> pdtpatr1ck: pbuilder allows you to catch errors that would only show up in a chroot - such as build-dep errors
[18:59] <paultag> but dpkg-buildpackage is a skitch faster
[18:59] <paultag> since you don't have to extract / configure / install packages every time for a test
[19:00] <paultag> it also won't match versions well - so if you're building for debian sid, ubuntu lucid won't cut it (outside of a pbuilder chroot)
[19:00] <Bachstelze> also pbuilder lets you build for different releases
[19:01] <paultag> when in doubt - pbuild
[19:05] <pdtpatr1ck> Thanks a bunch guys :)
[19:06] <paultag> :)
[20:11] <debfx> Laney: do you need any more information for bug #833561?
[20:12] <Laney> erm, i was away
[20:12] <Laney> jut got back this evening, let me look later
[20:12] <debfx> ah, ok
[20:18] <Laney> debfx: what is needed? just the two syncs?
[20:20] <debfx> Laney: syncing kbuild and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso and merging virtualbox
[20:21] <Laney> ok, how much testing have you done?
[20:25] <Laney> debfx: please explain the whole plan in the bug (or separate bugs if you prefer) & add some screenshots or other description of testing you've done
[20:25] <Laney> i'm minded to approve though if it's all in order
[20:25] <debfx> Laney: I've booted an oneiric guest and made sure that the guest additions features still work
[20:27] <debfx> in general virtualbox 4.1.2 is a bugfix-only release, it's just that it needs a new kbuild version
[20:29] <Laney> ah alright
[20:29] <Laney> debfx: there we go
[20:30] <ajmitch> now will it go into backports or the PPA for those earlier releases we still use? :)
[20:30] <debfx> thanks
[20:32] <debfx> ajmitch: definitely into the PPA since I've written a script to automate that :)
[20:32] <ajmitch> ah nice
[23:25] <lfaraone> cjwatson: http://paste.debian.net/128133/
[23:37] <pdtpatrick_> Which team would I ask this question to? .. why does the shell built-ins navigate better than for instance /usr/bin/less? ... here's an example.
[23:37] <pdtpatrick_> http://pastebin.com/BLXiiV4M
[23:38] <pdtpatrick_> notice how if u use cd it would add the /
[23:38] <pdtpatrick_> when u tab to autocomplete
[23:38] <pdtpatrick_> when u use less .. if u tab - it just creates a space instead of realizing you're navigating a directory