=== yofel_ is now known as yofel [02:58] === ara_ is now known as ara [13:52] i know this is off topic, but does ubuntu use any software for managing test plans and hosting unit tests w/ scripts? [14:32] thebishop: checkbox and jenkins for managing/executing tests, test cases are stored in the wiki I believe [14:32] You might get better answers than I can provide on the Ubuntu QA mailing list :) [14:34] fader, that's already helpful [14:36] maybe i just need to use wiki for my project. what i have in mind is a wiki-like interface for documenting the whole test plan outline, with each section having links to the detailed test steps/objectives/results/etc, and a built-in repository for automation/scripts [14:37] wiki basically does what i want, but i was hoping a test-specific package maybe with a dashboard view graphing test results and stuff [14:37] Yeah, a wiki would probably work well for that, at least until you need to scale way up [14:38] thebishop: There's a jenkins dashboard here if you want to see how it looks: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/ === rickspencer3_ is now known as rickspencer3 [14:39] Though I can't tell you much more than the URL. No idea how to set one up :) [14:39] fader, yeah, this is a cool ui, but jenkins seems more geared as a continuous integration build server with some automated tests [14:39] Indeed [14:40] we already have a build server, and what i'm looking for is really just managing test cases [14:40] Yeah, no idea there, sorry :/ [14:40] don't even need issue tracking, since we already have Trac [14:40] fader, that's cool, i wasn't aware of jenkins or checkbox before [14:54] fader, have you seen the Sikuli project? [14:55] it's a pretty impressive gui-automation IDE that works through OCR on screenshots [14:55] cross-platform :) [14:56] thebishop: I have, actually :) When I was on the Ubuntu QA team we took a look at it and discussed using it, but decided not to [14:57] fader, yeah? what were the cons? [14:57] Mostly because we already had a project (written by ara) doing something similar but more Linux-centric called "mago" [14:57] yeah i just read about mago [14:57] IIRC the cons for us were that it required installation of the JRE, so it wasn't very useful for testing the default desktop or for install/ISO testing [14:58] Whereas mago and preseeding could do that testing with a much lower footprint and do it faster [14:58] Don't get me wrong, we though it was a really cool tool and one we wanted to keep an eye on. It just wasn't the right fit for our specific testing needs at that time [14:59] I think I still have a VM somewhere with my sikuli playground on it :) [14:59] i see [14:59] i can understand how it wouldn't be ideal for those cases [14:59] but man, it's ridiculously better than any gui-automation i've used in the past, including some pretty expensive solutions [15:01] Yeah, it's a really slick tool [18:02] question: I successfully found out how to get an All-in-one PC working (Lenovo C205) with Natty. Where should I share this? [23:49] hi [23:49] i'm testing oneiric beta 1 server and i found that if the server has a power-cut, when it's powered on it stucks on grub menu by default [23:50] i think it's a thing people do not want [23:50] on a server [23:58] anyone ? [23:58] should i file a bu ? [23:58] bug ?