[01:21] <LPCIBot> Project devel build #1,027: STILL FAILING in 4 hr 6 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/1027/
[01:32] <StevenK> wgrant: lpci has a new cert
[01:38] <wgrant> StevenK: Indeed, thanks!
[04:14] <nigelb> Morning!
[04:15] <nigelb> *yawn*
[04:15] <nigelb> are we still in testfix?
[04:19] <nigelb> hmm. QA.
[05:38] <LPCIBot> Project devel build #1,028: STILL FAILING in 4 hr 8 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/1028/
[05:54] <G> nigelb: kia ora
[06:03] <StevenK> G: O hai. You haz qa
[06:03] <StevenK> G: I can give you run-down if you need it.
[06:04] <G> StevenK: huh?
[06:05] <StevenK> G: Launchpad has a deployment report for which revisions are deployable to production. Before they can deployed they need to be QA'd and marked as such in the bug.
[06:05] <G> StevenK: oh so this is something that I have to / can do?
[06:05] <StevenK> Sadly, the deployment report is private, but I've started the process to open it up.
[06:06] <StevenK> G: We prefer people do their own QA if they can.
[06:06] <G> sure I can do it myself
[06:07] <StevenK> G: r13839 / bug 837290 and r13856 / bug 61428
[06:07] <_mup_> Bug #837290: When there is no "Other bug subscribers" incorrect descriptive text is displayed <qa-needstesting> <Launchpad itself:Fix Committed by dev-nigelj> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/837290 >
[06:07] <_mup_> Bug #61428: Want a "subscribed to teams" portlet... <feature> <lp-bugs> <qa-needstesting> <trivial> <ui> <Launchpad itself:Fix Committed by dev-nigelj> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/61428 >
[06:07] <G> StevenK: yep I was just loading up the bugs myself :)
[06:07] <StevenK> G: You can use qastaging.launchpad.net to see if your code fixes the problem
[06:07] <G> okay
[06:07] <StevenK> G: If it looks good, then remove the tag of 'qa-needstesting' and add one of 'qa-ok'
[06:08] <G> is qastaging clean data or what?
[06:08] <G> oh nevermind, I clicked login and openid logged me in
[06:08] <StevenK> qastaging is using the production database, which is probably a few months out of date
[06:09] <StevenK> qastaging and staging use their own databases, so it's fine to play with
[06:12] <G> StevenK: okay, 837290 is qa-ok now
[06:12] <StevenK> G: Excellent!
[06:14] <StevenK> We have 29 revisions in the queue, so I doubt we're fully deployable until AU Tuesday morning, with probably some deployable UK Monday morning
[06:14] <G> ditto for 61428
[06:14] <G> StevenK: done
[06:15]  * G hits the big read "That was Easy!" button
[06:15] <G> *red
[06:19] <G> StevenK: btw, if there are any other bugs that need a look over for verification just let me know
[06:25] <StevenK> G: Your 3 revisions are all qa-ok :-)
[06:26] <G> StevenK: yep :)
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
[09:47] <LPCIBot> Project devel build #1,029: STILL FAILING in 4 hr 8 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/1029/
[09:54] <nigelb> StevenK: are we still in testfix?
[09:54] <nigelb> One of my branches is unmerged I think.
[10:22] <StevenK> Sigh. Yes.
[10:23] <StevenK> I can force, but there is little point, since it will fail that test.
[10:27] <nigelb> Ah
[10:27] <nigelb> this is the bzr-related test which was talked about yesterday?
[10:40] <StevenK> Yeah, one of the lpserve tests
[10:41] <nigelb> *whee*
[10:42] <nigelb> I think I was on the blamelist of buildbot when it failed.
[10:42]  * nigelb remembers getting a failure email.
[11:38] <G> hmmm interesting
[11:40] <G> I was looking at the code behind https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/697157 (which I'm going to fix) and noticed something interesting that I hadn't really realized
[11:40] <_mup_> Bug #697157: Streamline "You have assigned this bug to yourself" message  <bugs> <trivial> <ui> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/697157 >
[11:41] <G> sometimes an action can generate two e-mails (i.e. comment on bug, and assign to $self) first been the generate comment bug, and then another e-mail implying that the bug is NEW sent 2 seconds later