[12:05] <tumbleweed> Quintasan: don't you want to look at dappermuis' request in #kubuntu-devel for me? :) (We're doing global jamming)
[12:17] <Quintasan> tumbleweed: I can't see anything in backlog here :S
[12:20] <tumbleweed> Quintasan: hrm, bug 749189
[12:20] <tumbleweed> dappermuis: hi, just pointed Quintasan at the bug
[12:20] <Quintasan> tumbleweed: I'll look at it today
[12:20] <Quintasan> like in an hour
[12:20]  * Quintasan has to buy book to school
[12:20] <tumbleweed> thanks :)
[12:21] <dappermuis> tumbleweed, Quintasan: thanks
[12:42] <ari-tczew> hello
[12:43] <ari-tczew> I check package by lintian pedantic and got this fail: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-upstream-changelog.html and my d/rules looks following: http://paste.debian.net/128278/ what is wrong with override? directory: http://paste.debian.net/128279/
[13:27] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: I really wouldn't worry about overriding pedantic lintian tags
[13:28] <tumbleweed> jtaylor: any idea if automake 1.4 causes trouble with ld as needed?
[13:29] <tumbleweed> looking at bug 771103, and it looks like automake is generating a crazy linking gcc command line
[13:29] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: so there is no way to fix it?
[13:31] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: oh, right you mean dh_ override
[13:31] <tumbleweed> yeah, it looks like you are doing the right thing
[13:32] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: I guess so, but still error exist :/
[13:35] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: I found that discussion http://old.nabble.com/Lintian-reports-P%3A-no-upstream-changelog-even-though-its-intended-in-Ubuntu-td30678225.html
[13:35] <tumbleweed> oh, right pkgbinarymangler :)
[13:35] <ari-tczew> lfaraone wrote that pkgbinarymangler removes Changelog file
[13:36] <ari-tczew> is it true?
[13:36] <tumbleweed> yes
[13:37] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: so there is nothing to do and ignore warning?
[13:38] <tumbleweed> correct
[13:41] <jtaylor> tumbleweed: I think automake was patched at some point to do it correctly, don't know which version though
[13:42] <jtaylor> autoreconf should fix the makefile for ratpoison
[13:42] <tumbleweed> I just noticed a LDFLAGS with LIBS in that I missed
[13:51] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: ok thanks, so clementine will be merged in Debian soon.
[13:51] <ari-tczew> :-)
[15:34] <Barzogh> Hello everybody :)
[15:35] <Quintasan> dappermuis, tumbleweed: This is kinda more tricky than I expected
[15:35] <Quintasan> I'll ask o #kubuntu-devel in some time since I have to go now
[19:09] <tumbleweed> bdrung: syncpackage-close-bugs pushed (and tested on bug 840385)
[20:57] <Barzogh> i uploaded my first package a hour ago but i had some warnings , i re-packaged it with correction , but how can  i delete the previous one frome EVU please?
[20:59] <bdrung> Barzogh: IIRC, just upload the new one
[20:59] <Laney> just upload it again
[20:59] <Laney> but you should really get it into Debian. REVU isn't very functional.
[21:07] <Barzogh> oh, well i'll do that for all the new packages i'll make ,  thanks
[21:09] <Laney> yeah :-)
[21:09] <Laney> have a look on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams for one which matches your packages
[21:09] <Laney> also come to #debian-ubuntu on OFTC if you need help getting them in there
[21:10] <Barzogh> i'm' there too :)
[21:10] <Laney> awesome
[21:47] <jmarsden> apt-get build-dep ubiquity   installs both python2.6-dev and python2.7-dev (under Oneiric Beta1) -- is this expected behaviour?
[21:48] <tumbleweed> jmarsden: that's normal behavior for python libraries, so that they can be built, and have their test suite run, with all supported python versions.
[21:49] <jmarsden> Oh, OK.  Thanks.
[21:49] <tumbleweed> as long as the binary packages don't depend on both python versions, it's good