=== mendel__ is now known as mendel_ [05:35] Does ubuntu use insserv yet? [05:37] twb: /sbin/insserv exists in Lucid, if that helps answer the question. [05:37] Not really; I mean, upstart exists in Debian but it isn't really used [05:38] I suspect insserv will actively do the wrong thing because enough of the init jobs are in upstart now [05:38] OK. You could apt-get pruge insserv and then reboot and find out :) [05:39] jmarsden: it's provided by sysvinit [05:39] Oh, apparently not. [05:39] Not on my machine :) [05:39] I guess because insserv only triggers when a new sysvinit job is installed, rather than during boot (cf. startpar). === twb` is now known as twb [07:38] I am trying to setup nginx with php-fpm but can't find the package, even tried couple of ppa. The best one was nginx/php but that has php package, not fpm one. Do i need to install php5-cgi and use custom init script? [07:42] New bug: #842400 in nagios3 (main) "package nagios3-common 3.2.0-4ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842400 [07:50] found it === himcesjf1 is now known as himcesjf [08:34] rbasak: Fancy setting up a new upstream version of python-novaclient? [08:34] Daviey: sounds familiar :) [08:35] hello, i want to creat intranet, so what's the best solution to do it? [08:36] Daviey: any reason in particular I should be mentioning in the changelog? [08:36] rbasak: That you or zul failed to see if it built locally before uploading it? [08:37] :-( [08:37] Or, that upstream project doesn't use a gated trunk - and someone checked in broken code? [08:37] either way :) [08:38] looks like it's broken upstream to me [08:39] Oh yeah, about 3 commits after the one uploaded the fix is there. [08:41] rbasak: btw, mentioned "LP: #838298" in the bug, and the issue you resolved will be closed automagically. [08:44] Daviey: the latest snapshot they have is ~bzr110, dated 2/9 2141. Will that do? [08:45] rbasak: looks like it was fixed in 108, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jk0/python-novaclient/master/revision/108 [08:45] so bzr110 looks super [08:46] For interest, you can see the build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-novaclient/2.6.4~bzr106-0ubuntu1/+build/2761697 [08:46] yep seen it [08:46] Is there an FTBFS bug to close? [08:47] nah, you can open one if you want. [08:47] i'd be tempted not to bother. :) [08:47] I was gonna say that, seems a bit pointless :) [08:48] rbasak: Yeah, some people do that so they can increase their "bug closed" count. [08:48] :-/ [08:48] This split out debian/ thing is a bit annoying. Is there an automated way to test the build locally without doing it all manually? [08:49] rbasak: as in debian/ is a separate VCS repo? [08:49] normally. :) [08:49] * Daviey looks [08:49] twb: yes [08:50] I do that at http://darcs.debian.org/collab-maint/mg -- look at get-orig-source for the minimal workaround I have [08:50] That's get-orig-source in debian/rules [08:51] thanks [08:51] I was ust checking if we had that :) [08:51] that looks slightly mg-specific [08:51] Yes, well [08:51] I'm sure you can mangle it to your own use case [08:51] * rbasak doesn't yet understand the purpose of splitting it out like that [08:51] the tar part is portable enough [08:52] rbasak: splitting them out and using quilt to merge is simpler than learning to use a tool like git-buildpackage or svn-buildpackage [08:52] rbasak: and since 3.0 (quilt) format guarantees that debian/ contains the entire debianization, it's safe to do [08:53] It doesn't feel simpler to me right now! I guess I need to learn quilt [08:53] Are you coming from gbp, or what? [08:53] I am [08:53] Obviousl once you've made that learning hurdle, it looks easy :P [08:54] I accept that git is hard to learn [08:54] I can manage basic git, but I wanted to do packaging, not learn how to deal with branching and merging and shit [08:54] but I think that it is only hard because it reflects the true structure of any DVCS [08:55] instead of doing it in one tool we do the same thing out of band manually and with lots of messing around [08:55] I was especially disappointed because gbp and friends' documentation want the upstream branch to only have the tarball releases in it [08:55] just without realising what what we're doing is exactly all the same branching and merging and shit [08:55] If it was obvious and easy to just maintain the debian version as a branch of upstream's dev repo, it would be more attractive [08:56] rbasak: well, it's "out of band" in the sense that quilt does it. [08:56] That's what I always did [08:56] Not sure what you mean by only having tarball releases in it [08:56] rbasak: the *bp docs I've read all say "get upstream's tarball, and commit it" [08:56] rbasak: they don't say "git clone upstream, then make a new branch for debian" [08:56] Ah [08:56] AIUI, the two are identical [08:56] They're very definitely not [08:57] e.g. git log will not show you any of the upstream patches [08:57] For the purposes of gbp they are identical [08:57] I realise that it's different for git [08:57] but gbp will work just find if upstream is a remote tracking branch [08:57] (AFAIK) [08:57] s/find/fine [08:57] Maybe, but remember that when I was looking at this I also wasn't really familiar with git [08:58] I presume the reason the docs are written that way is that most upstreams aren't git repos [08:58] I felt like I was going against the grain of gbp/sbp and I knew a separate debian/ repo would Just Work [08:58] with quilt, surely we're stuck using tarball releases anyway? [08:58] rbasak: http://pb.daviey.com/XvE0/ [08:58] rbasak: yes, but it doesn't try to be clever, it just works, and there's very clear separation between upstream, debian/ and debian/patches [08:59] sure [08:59] it's that clear separation that I'm finding a right pain [08:59] rbasak: that is /one/ way of doing this [08:59] I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that this is how I did it, and why [08:59] OK :) [08:59] rbasak: actually, i didn't need to pull-lp-source [08:59] Daviey: that's very different from what zul showed me! [09:00] rbasak: it's /another/ way :) [09:01] rbasak: ask twb says, there is a pretty standard convention of having a get-orig-source target in debian/rules... which allows you to do, "debian/rules get-orig-source" , but that hasn't been done for this package. [09:01] Well, there's a convention that get-orig-source does *something*, and that debian/README.source documents *something* [09:01] I would be wary of running get-orig-source of a new package without reading it first ;-) [09:01] python-novaclient: remote site does not even have current version [09:01] what's what about? [09:02] debian/changelog says 2.6.4~bzr106-0ubuntu1 [09:02] rbasak: that would be saying that upstream hasn't released the version corresponding to your debian/changelog yet. [09:02] http://nova.openstack.org/tarballs/python-novaclient-2.6.4~bzr106.tar.gz exists [09:02] rbasak: i.e. it's trying to download 2.6.4~bzr106.tar.gz [09:02] Dunno, then, run uscan --debug or so [09:02] uscan --verbose? Whatever [09:03] might be a bug in the debian/watch file [09:03] shrug [09:03] Yea [09:04] should the watch file refer to pypi? [09:05] Fuck I know, is your debian source package visible somewhere I can dget? [09:06] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/python-novaclient/2.6.4~bzr106-0ubuntu1/+files/python-novaclient_2.6.4~bzr106-0ubuntu1.dsc [09:07] Upstream snapshot source is http://nova.openstack.org/tarballs/ AIUI [09:08] uscan wfm there [09:08] it worked for me aswell, but did give a false warning [09:09] I get http://paste.ubuntu.com/683282/ - is that the same? [09:09] Probably because there's two URLs there [09:09] ttx: I see you are Marked as maintainer for this package.. Do you want that to be kept? [09:09] So it can't find it on the first site, and tries the second [09:09] Argh [09:10] it's not piping the entire output when not connected to a terminal [09:10] Yay reading :P [09:10] rbasak: ew [09:10] rbasak: report that as a bug [09:10] Oh [09:11] No, uscan just doens't do what I thought it would do [09:11] Which part of name uscan suggests that it should have side effects? [09:13] (I assumed that running uscan multiple times would have the same result) [09:13] Even the manpage synopsis suggests that [09:13] hi all [09:14] rbasak: Really, the debian/control should also have - http://pb.daviey.com/qQ2c/ - so drive by developers know where they should propose fixes to the packaging [09:15] Daviey: ah yes, I was asking zul the other day how I was supposed to know where to get the bzr branch from [09:16] gah [09:16] http://pb.daviey.com/vJ3f/, rather [09:24] OK it builds this time [09:25] \o/ [09:26] rbasak: do you want to post a debdiff somewhere? [09:26] I'll push to my bzr branch if that's OK, that's what I did last time with zul [09:26] Daviey: no [09:27] twb: fancy tackling a bug? :) [09:27] rbasak: that is fine. [09:27] I'm going home in a minute, so you have, like, twenty seconds to sell me on it [09:28] ttx: python-novaclient isn't gated, it's had test suite failed commits pushed to it. This is why gated trunk is good. :) [09:28] is it a 'core' project? [09:28] twb: ah! Maybe next time.. :) [09:28] Whatever dude [09:29] Daviey: should I keep pypi in debian/watch? [09:30] Daviey: it seems out of date? [09:30] My install gets ceased if DHCP fails to assign IP and i have to retry after pressing/selecting the appeared option during cobbler provisioning for Oneiric. Am i the only one getting this issue ? [09:30] rbasak: it's not hurting [09:31] *selecting the DHCP assign option. [09:31] rbasak: it probably will be updated at some point, so it does work [09:31] koolhead11: funny you say that! [09:31] koolhead11: what hardware is this? [09:33] Daviey: it's not core -- but in some way it should be [09:33] Daviey, lemme pastebin it. [09:33] Daviey: pushed to https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~racb/%2Bjunk/python-nova-client/ [09:33] Daviey, am wrongly explaining i think :D [09:34] its like if DHCP fails via provisioning and then i again ask him for assigning the IP once it assigns the IP whole process ceases [09:37] Daviey, http://paste.ubuntu.com/683311/ The card [09:37] koolhead11: process ceases?! [09:37] or it works on attempt #2? [09:38] hi all [09:38] Daviey, it gets the ip and then ceases :D [09:39] koolhead11: I've come across a class of hardware that takes too long to get an IP addresses and the on board pxe fails.. but you have got into the installer ok. [09:39] anybody know how to disable putting daemon scripts to autostart on install step (configure apt or dpkg) [09:39] & [09:39] koolhead11: This certainly sounds like it could be a bug.. [09:39] ? [09:39] Daviey, the PXE has not failed in my case but took hell lot of time. [09:39] koolhead11: Could you raise one against debian-installer, and try and add as much info/logs from the installer as possible? [09:40] anybody know how to disable putting daemon scripts to autostart on install step (configure apt or dpkg)? [09:40] Daviey, i can do that. log will not be possible because the system ceases in middle and i have to reboot the system. [09:42] koolhead11: local or remote? [09:43] ello folks, I've just installed virtualmin and I want to have multiple versions of php installed. Is it possible to have multiple versions installed? If so, could you point me in the right direction? [09:43] Daviey, the local system [09:44] koolhead11: Someone from the foundations team might be better at helping to debug this.. Open a bug report with waht you can :0 [09:45] Daviey, ok. [09:48] Daviey, and am really stuck with the custom partition using preseed [09:48] :( [09:48] Didn't this come up yesterday? [09:49] hmm [09:49] what do you mean by custom? [09:53] nopes [09:54] hey guys is there a ppa with an updated version of make [09:54] for lucid [09:54] http://paste.ubuntu.com/683346/ [09:55] Daviey, i put paste of what came as output and what i assigned in preseed [09:56] i just need a root a swap and rest a free extended partition :D [09:57] just-a-visitor, hey [10:05] Hello koolhead11 [10:05] just-a-visitor, still struggling there :( [10:09] Well, I have searched for that info on Google. :| [10:10] just-a-visitor, :D [10:10] Read somewhere, that if you put everything on one line it might work, but I am still looking for the article. [10:11] k [10:18] am leaving that section and manually run it unless i figure the issue. i have allready wasted 2 days :( [10:21] anybody know how to disable putting daemon scripts to autostart on install step (configure apt or dpkg)? [10:22] <_ruben> rnz: you'd probably have to edit the package (get source package, apply change, re-package) [10:23] How would one install php 5.2.8 on ubuntu server 11.04? [10:24] _ruben - I think this bad idea [10:24] How about if i need disable for all installing daemons? [10:24] koolhead11 I am sorry, that I cannot help you more. You know, just a visitor. [10:25] <_ruben> rnz: then i'd say you're an unlucky person ... or just be less lazy and disable said daemons after installing 'em [10:25] just-a-visitor, dont be only that. :D [10:26] Well, I'm trying... ;-) [10:30] _ruben - i think you don't understand - apt-get install app - app add to starup and start - but server don't need to auto start them. and nothing to do with laziness [10:31] and server not need to start app now [10:33] <_ruben> rnz: that's part of the app's post-install script, if you don't want that behaviour: patch it out .. if you don't want to patch it out: stop and disable after installing [10:33] <_ruben> neither are 100% ideal .. tho afaik, those are your only options [10:33] _ruben: OS should not be doing what it does not ask [10:34] <_ruben> then go use an OS that does what you want? [10:34] <_ruben> auto starting is rather common thing for a daemon .. why else would one be installing it [10:35] <_ruben> but sure, there's also apps that pose a question whether or not to do so .. those are kinda rare tho [10:35] rnz, so you don`t want few apps to start during bootup right? [10:38] koolhead11: no.. I think apt or dpgk have setting to disable add app after install to autostart [10:38] and this behavior don't hardcoded in packages [10:38] rnz, apt-get install rcconf [10:38] :D [10:39] sorry for my bad english... [10:42] behavior in ubuntu: apt-get install daemon, if post-install phase daemon add to autostart and start immediately [10:42] heed behavior in ubuntu: apt-get install daemon, if post-install phase daemon don't add to autostart and don't start [10:43] if post-install/IN post-install [10:49] <_ruben> rnz: i expect most users to prefer the current behaviour tho [10:49] <_ruben> (me included) [10:54] I'm happy for them and for you, but I'm not interested. I am interested in changing behavior when installed in the right me. And asked a question about this. [10:56] <_ruben> like i said, if you want to change current behaviour, roll your own patched versions of those packages .. a change in dkpg/apt to override this at install time is not something i'd see implemented soon .. then again, i'm far from authoritative on that matter :) [11:04] _ruben: IMHO this (patched version of package) is not good way... This functionality should be in the package manager, but not rigidly fixed in the package... [11:06] <_ruben> rnz: i suggest you file a bug in the bugtracker === Brumle_ is now known as Brumle [11:13] How would one install php 5.2.8 on ubuntu server 11.04? Should I just compile from source? [11:20] I take it its not in any official repo, is it? [11:33] kennt sich jemand von euch a weng mit mason aus ? [11:33] <_ruben> try again in english [11:34] someone who has some experience with mason? [11:52] morning [12:02] New bug: #842585 in tftp-hpa (main) "Please merge tftp-hpa 5.1-2 from debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842585 === lenios__ is now known as lenios_ [12:40] Hi, is there a good/easy way upgrading to samba 3.6.0? [12:43] fatbrain_: not if you compile from source [12:43] zul: ok, thanks. [12:46] libapache2-mod-fastcgi or libapache2-mod-fcgid? [13:11] Daviey: hey, what are you opinions on syncing rails from Debian (fixes 3 CVEs) [13:12] Daviey: it is a new upstream version: 2.3.11-0.1 -> 2.3.14.1 [13:12] Daviey: (and in universe) [13:13] jdstrand: I'd rather stay as close to Debian as we can with Rails. [13:13] Daviey: so, that's a 'yes'? [13:13] It's probably had minimal testing in Oneiric so far anyway.. [13:14] jdstrand: make it so! [13:14] (yes) [13:14] Daviey: thanks. I'll mention it in ubuntu-release [13:15] ta [13:50] lynxman: around? === himcesjf1 is now known as himcesjf [14:10] RoAkSoAx: Hey, good day off? [14:16] adam_g: hey - around? wanted to discuss openstack testing approachs for single and multinode deployments [14:17] jamespage: i am here, but can we defer till tomorrow? im at a minisprint in texas today [14:17] adam_g: hey no problem whatsoever - will have to wait until thursday tho as out tommorrow PM [14:18] jamespage: ok, or if you wanna take it to email that works too [14:24] jamespage, page [14:24] hey koolhead11 [14:24] :-) [14:27] wassup [14:27] Daviey, am adding more info i wrote the log and adding in the same bug report [14:29] koolhead11: hmm, what is the bug number? [14:30] Daviey, hold on [14:30] :D [14:31] Daviey, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/842509 [14:31] Launchpad bug 842509 in debian-installer "debian-installer fails to proceed/ceases if preseed fails to assign IP automatically." [Undecided,New] [14:31] TeTeT hello [14:32] koolhead11: What is your cobbler server ubuntu version? [14:33] koolhead11: do you get this if you install from cd? [14:33] hi koolhead11 [14:34] jdstrand: ping socat...can you guys do a review of it please its kind of blocking the MIR for nova [14:35] zul: and python-stompy [14:36] Daviey: true but that doesnt need the security team [14:36] Daviey, My cobbler server : -- [14:36] DISTRIB_RELEASE=11.04 [14:36] Cobbler Version=2.1.0-0ubuntu7 [14:37] TeTeT, how have you been? long time. :D [14:37] koolhead11: really need a log from the failed client [14:38] Daviey: isn't there limitations when preseeding network values on PXE booting? [14:39] Daviey: with regards to python-novaclient ftbfs whatever was failing in bzr109 is fixed in bzr110 [14:40] zul: running LXC containers with openstack - what difference does instance type make? think I'm missing something [14:40] jamespage: uh? it shouldnt [14:40] * jamespage thinks this is his lack of understanding of LXC [14:41] zul: ack [14:41] jdstrand: thanks [14:41] RoAkSoAx: i don't think so? [14:43] koolhead11: doing fine, how about yourself? [14:44] zul: right - so instance type is ignored [14:44] jamespage: right [14:44] zul: though I was missing something obvious but evidently not [14:47] Daviey: I thought I read something similar somewhere though I'm not so sure anymore [14:47] hmm [14:47] maybe [14:47] it could have been one of my nightmares whiloe trying to figure something out [14:47] lol [14:49] smoser: howdy!! what was the bug # that caused cloud-init to fail on real hw? [14:53] jamespage: was on a day off, what can I do for you sir? :) [14:54] lynxman: if you are on a day off it can definately wait [14:54] :-) [14:55] jamespage: you sure? :) [14:55] lynxman: yep - its definately non-urgent [14:55] jamespage: alrighty, I'll ping you tomorrow morning then [15:12] adam_g: ping...knowing swift release schedule would be good [15:13] zul: good call. ill be sure to find out === Kevin___ is now known as Karboncode [15:22] RoAkSoAx, hey [15:38] RoAkSoAx: chairing? [15:39] Daviey: am I? [15:39] RoAkSoAx: seems you ar enext in the FIFO. [15:40] Daviey: ah! you just updated the wikipage [15:40] how convient ;) [15:41] zul: Was that you offering to volunter? [15:41] no just commenting [15:41] Its nice that it takes 2 months to rotate around these days. :) [15:42] RoAkSoAx: BTW - myself and rbasak will be in a call which clashes with the meeting.. So i might be able to 'check in' but not be a crticial part of the meeting. [15:42] New bug: #842845 in nova (universe) "problems starting multiple lxc instances concurrently" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842845 [15:43] Daviey: no worries [15:43] RoAkSoAx: The blueprints need to be updated to reflect the current status. [15:44] * zul shakes his fist at jamespage [15:44] zul: :-) one more to come as well [15:44] Daviey: ok i'll mention that [15:44] zul: I now have a borked nova install - is they any way I can clear out all my broken lxc instances? without re-installing? [15:45] euca-terminate? [15:45] nope - nova delete not working either [15:46] falls over with bug 842856 [15:46] Launchpad bug 842856 in nova "problems terminating lxc instances" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842856 [15:46] son...of... [15:46] New bug: #842856 in nova (universe) "problems terminating lxc instances" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842856 [15:46] hello.... [15:47] looks like i have some stuff to do [15:48] jamespage: So wait, it's not starting OR stopping them properly? [15:48] well if I spin them up individually they are OK [15:50] Daviey: I was trying out https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Oneiric/OpenStackTestPlan with nova-compute-lxc rather than kvm [15:50] I'm going to blast the system and see if I get the same issues again [15:51] Daviey: did you see my ping re lack of daily iso images for server? [15:55] jamespage: i did not! [15:55] jamespage: thanks for raising it [15:56] np - its was the cause of my network install woes - netbooting off one kernel version and then network installing with stuff for another [15:57] jamespage: Ah, that has hit me a few times :/ [15:57] I wonder if that was what koolhead11 saw. [15:57] I switched to the mini.iso and it fixed my problem [15:57] (didn't sound like it, tho) [15:57] maybe - my installs failed to find any disks! [15:59] jamespage: do you get the same problem when creating more than one kvm instance [15:59] zul: I would need to check [15:59] I did not actually try that TBH [15:59] jamespage: k thanks [15:59] but I will [15:59] hi [15:59] zul: I did get some of the instances I requested - just not all of them! [16:00] how can I disable apt-get autoremove? [16:00] jamespage: par for the course for cloud ;) [16:00] or clear autoremove list [16:00] :-) [16:01] EriksLV: It sounds like you have some depends that were instaled because of something else. [16:01] you removed the something else [16:01] yea, I know [16:01] :) [16:02] I removed virtualmin [16:02] so apt-get install "something else", and it won't be marked for removal [16:02] now it wants to remove mysql/apache [16:07] thanks Daviey, that works [16:45] Daviey: jenkins builds just fine in PPA BTW - not sure what is up with your pbuilder === WinstonSmith is now known as Propdep === Propdep is now known as WinstonSmith [17:05] i have a problem. i lost my user password [17:05] and so i cant login to the vps. the grub menu does not show, is there any way to enter the vps? [17:08] mount your vps filesystem on other system [17:09] I am running ngrep. Does this capture packets before or after iptables? Can I control which side of iptables the sniffing is done on for the sake of testing my rules ? [17:11] zul, likewise-open ping [17:12] doko: pong whats up? [17:19] smoser: ping? [17:19] RoAkSoAx, here [17:19] zul, why were the armel patches dropped? [17:19] doko: i have no idea we get the package from upstream [17:20] smoser: what was the bug # for the issue we had when depoying with ensemble [17:20] Have a Dell GX260 with latest BIOS A09. Can't get installation of LTS going with USB keyboard/mouse [17:20] smoser: that cloud-init run stuff because the network was supposed to be up but it wasn't? [17:21] zul, then pretty please educate upstream not to drop changes. didn't get any feedback on bug 823717 either. imnsho this is the task of the sponsor [17:21] Launchpad bug 823717 in likewise-open "likewise-open version 6.1.0.406-0ubuntu2 failed to build on armel" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/823717 [17:21] bug 838968 [17:21] Launchpad bug 838968 in ifupdown "static-network-up event does not wait for interfaces to have an address" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/838968 [17:21] smoser: thanks [17:21] so you should be good now... [17:21] smoser: cool [17:21] gonna test [17:21] doko: crap...sorry about that [17:21] Daviey, hey [17:22] Daviey: ok so bug ^^ is fixed, so I should be able to deploy without any issues now [17:24] RoAkSoAx, [17:24] smoser: yes? [17:24] grab the cloud-init log ensemble patch if you can [17:24] and apply to ensemble [17:24] hold on [17:24] bug 842488 [17:24] Launchpad bug 842488 in ensemble "Enable cloud-init debug output to better support problem analysis" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842488 [17:24] branch is linked there, patch is pretty trivial [17:25] smoser: you want that in trunk or just in our test branch? [17:26] well, it is proposed for merging, and i think hazmat is aware. and SpamapS said he'd pull to ubuntu ensemble package [17:26] but for your testing, pull it [17:26] smoser: alrighty [17:26] it just redirects output of cloud-init and all its subprocesses to a file so you can see it (other than to the console) [17:26] RoAkSoAx, you mean the bug i reported is fixed :D [17:26] koolhead11: which one? [17:27] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/842509 [17:27] Launchpad bug 842509 in debian-installer "debian-installer fails to proceed/ceases if preseed fails to assign IP automatically." [Undecided,New] [17:28] koolhead11: nope, i mean bug [17:28] oops. k [17:28] koolhead11: nope, i mean bug #842488 [17:28] Launchpad bug 842488 in ensemble "Enable cloud-init debug output to better support problem analysis" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842488 [17:28] ooh nice. well i was not able to get it working on AWS [17:36] Anyone worked with ipv6 on an ubuntu server running as a kvm server before? === baggar11_ is now known as baggar11 [17:37] I can get the public route to show up witih "ip -6 route", but the interface never seems to get attached. [17:38] I check ifconfing, and all I see is the local ipv6 address [17:42] no [17:45] Daviey: FYI, bug 837991 [17:45] Launchpad bug 837991 in apache2 "Please merge apache2 2.2.20-1 to fix CVE-2011-3192+regressions" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/837991 [17:47] sbeattie: you sir, are a rock star! === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-nom [18:31] sbeattie: Thanks for that, it was more than perfect. [18:33] Daviey: awesome. Of course, my first attempt at it managed to drop the hardening-wrapper build dependency, which would have made me a sad panda had I not caught it. [18:33] sbeattie: Yeah, we keep trying to drop the PIE stuff, but it keeps getting noticed. :) [18:34] sbeattie: I'm suprised you can't upload this stuff directly.. you should. [18:42] okay folks....gotta fire in some nearby woods...railroad tracks are a good barrier between the woods and my neighborhood, but I need to go afk for a bit until I know it's safe [18:50] hi! I've just installed oneiric (server) and noticed that I had some troubles with locales. http://pastebin.com/dtvCj89K - just wondered if this is a known problem, or if I should report it, or if I have some gremlins on my system. [19:12] hi, how can i set multiple sites under the same ip/domain using apache2? [19:13]